49.020 - Aircraft and space vehicles in general
ICS 49.020 Details
Aircraft and space vehicles in general
Luft- und Raumfahrzeuge im allgemeinen
Aéronautique et espace en général
Letala in vesoljska vozila na splošno
General Information
e-Library Subscription
Create subscription and get permanent access to documents within 49.020 - Aircraft and space vehicles in general
Currently subscription includes documents marked with .We are working on making all documents available within the subscription.
This document provides a report on tests that were performed to ensure the "safety and quality" requirements of detection and avoidance (DAA) systems used between UASs and other objects, including aircraft. This document describes test methods and the results of related experiments, which successfully meet the requirements of a DAA system architecture with radar and optical sensors.
- Technical report15 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
1.1 This document establishes the requirements for performing and documenting FAI. It is emphasized that the requirements specified in this document are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
In this document, the following verbal forms are used:
- "shall" indicates a requirement;
- "should" indicates a recommendation;
- "may" indicates a permission;
- "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
Information marked as "NOTE" is for guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement.
1.2 Purpose
The primary purpose of FAI is to verify and validate product realization processes capable of producing characteristics that meet engineering and design requirements. A FAI is not a product acceptance document. A well-planned and executed FAI by a multi-disciplinary team (e.g., members from responsible functions) provides objective evidence the manufacturer’s processes can produce compliant product, having effectively understood and incorporated the associated requirements.
NOTE While interrelated, FAI and product acceptance are separate activities. FAI focus is verification of production processes via assessment of product. FAI and supporting documentation do not provide assurance regarding conformance for product acceptance purposes; neither does the lack of a FAI necessarily imply that the product is nonconforming to engineering and design requirements.
FAI will:
- provide confidence that the product realization processes are capable of producing conforming product;
- demonstrate that the manufacturers and processors of the product have an understanding of the associated requirements;
- provide objective evidence of process capability;
- mitigate risk associated with production startup and/or process changes;
- provide assurance of product conformance at the start of production and after changes, as outlined in this document.
A FAI is intended to:
- reduce future escapes, risks, and total costs;
- help ensure product safety;
- improve quality, delivery, and customer satisfaction;
- reduce costs and production delays associated with product nonconformances;
- identify product realization processes not capable of producing conforming product, and initiate and/or validate associated corrective actions.
1.3 Application
This document applies to organizations and sub-tiers responsible for product realization processes that produce the design characteristics of the product. The organization shall flow down the requirements of this document to suppliers who produce design characteristics.
This document applies to external suppliers performing special processes. A Certificate of Conformity (CoC) provided by processors attests to satisfying the specification requirements of the applicable design authority. External suppliers providing special processes can satisfy this document’s requirements by either:
- documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a FAI;
- documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a customer-defined detailed CoC.
This document applies to assemblies, sub-assemblies, and detail parts including castings, forgings, and modifications to document catalogue or Commercial-Off-the-Shelf (COTS) items. Each of these items requires a stand-alone FAI.
Unless contractually required, this document does not apply to:
- development and prototype parts that are not considered as part of the first production run;
- procured standard catalogue items, COTS, or deliverable software. These items shall be documented in the index of part numbers in an assembly First Article Inspection Report (FAIR).
- Standard28 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 General
This document establishes the requirements for performing and documenting FAI. It is emphasized the requirements specified in this document are complementary (not alternative) to customer and applicable statutory and regulatory requirements.
1.2 Purpose
The primary purpose of FAI is to verify and validate product realization processes are capable of producing characteristics that meet engineering and design requirements. A well-planned and executed FAI by a multi-disciplinary team (e.g. members from responsible functions) provides objective evidence the manufacturer’s processes can produce compliant product; having effectively understood and incorporated the associated requirements.
NOTE A FAI is not a product acceptance document. While interrelated, FAI and product acceptance are separate activities. The focus of FAI is verification of production processes via assessment of product. FAI and supporting documentation do not provide assurance regarding conformance for product acceptance purposes; neither does the lack of a FAI necessarily imply product is nonconforming to engineering and design requirements.
FAI will:
- provide confidence, through objective evidence, the product realization processes are capable of producing conforming product;
- demonstrate the manufacturers and processors of the product have an understanding of the associated requirements;
- provide assurance of product conformance at the start of production and after changes, as outlined in this document.
A FAI is intended to:
- mitigate risks associated with production startup and process changes;
- reduce future escapes;
- help ensure product safety;
- improve quality, delivery, and customer satisfaction;
- reduce costs and production delays associated with product nonconformances;
- identify product realization processes not capable of producing conforming characteristics and initiate and/or validate associated corrective actions.
-
1.3 Application
This document applies to organizations and their suppliers responsible for product realization processes that produce the design characteristics of the product. The organization shall flow down the requirements of this document to suppliers who produce design characteristics.
This document also applies to suppliers performing special process(es). A certificate of conformance (CoC) provided by processors attests to satisfying the requirements. External suppliers providing special process(es) can satisfy this document's requirements by either:
- documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a first article inspection report (FAIR); or
- documenting the design characteristics and associated results on a detailed CoC.
This document applies to assemblies, sub-assemblies, and detail parts including castings, forgings, and modifications to standard catalogue or commercial-off-the-shelf (COTS) items. Each of these items have a separate FAI.
Unless contractually required, this document does not apply to:
- development and prototype parts that are not considered as part of the first production run;
- procured standard catalogue item, COTS, or deliverable software. When these items are included in an assembly, they shall be documented in the index of part numbers in an assembly FAIR.
1.4 Informative
If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
In this document, the following verbal forms are used:
- "shall" indicates a requirement;
- "should" indicates a recommendation;
- "may" indicates a permission;
- "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
Information marked as "NOTE" is for guidance in understanding or clarifying the associated requirement .
- Standard28 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies requirements for the qualification of welders and welding operators for fusion
welding of metallic materials for aerospace applications.
NOTE Success in the test is an essential precondition for the qualification of welders and welding operators
in new production and repair work in aerospace. However, welding equipment operators do not need to be
qualified according to this document.
- Standard40 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Draft35 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This document specifies methods for recording the time history of instantaneous sound pressure in several positions around rotor powered unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) with a maximum take-off mass (MTOM) of less than 150 kg in accordance with ISO 21895[9]. The UAS can be either electrically powered or fuel-powered. It is not applicable to the tilt-rotor or tilt-wing UAS. It does not account for the UAS noise certification or regulation This document can also be applied to measure the sound pressure from a UAS with either multiple rotors or a single rotor. This document specifies: a) recommendations and requirements for three different test facilities for the noise measurements of various categories of multirotor-powered UAS: — requirements and recommendations of UAS noise tests in anechoic chambers (Clause 7); — requirements and recommendations of UAS noise tests in anechoic wind tunnels (Clause 8); — requirements and recommendations of UAS noise tests in outdoor environments (Clause 9); b) requirements and recommendations for the configuration of noise measurement for multirotor-powered UAS in hover, vertical take-off and landing, and horizontal cruise; c) recommendations for the test configuration and procedures to minimize the influence of meteorological effects.
- Standard49 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document defines the minimum requirements for auditors, CBs, Auditor Authentication Bodies (AABs), Training Provider Approval Bodies (TPABs), and Training Providers (TPs) who participate in the IAQG Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme. The requirements in this standard supplement those defined within the EN 9104-1, EN 9104-2, ISO/IEC 17021-1, and ISO/IEC 17021-3 standards.
Data protection for the parties subject to this document and other relevant requirements of the ICOP scheme are managed via bi-lateral contracts between the joint controllers of the data.
- Standard28 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document defines the industry-accepted requirements for the ICOP scheme, which provides confidence to ASD customers, that organizations with certification of their QMS, issued by accredited CBs, meet applicable AQMS standard requirements. The requirements in this document are applicable to all participants in the ICOP scheme. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
- Standard50 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document provides a harmonized process and documentation requirements for the establishment of Certificates of Conformance (CoCs) used to attest the conformity of aviation, space, and defence products (e.g. assemblies, sub-assemblies, equipment and systems, parts, material) or services). It includes a CoC template and supporting instructions on how to complete it.
When quoted by the customer in a contractual requirement, application of this document is mandatory. In other cases, its use is recommended, but if there is a conflict between the requirements of this document and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter take precedence.
Requirements for the establishment of Authorized Release Certificates (ARCs) [e.g. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 8130-3 tag] by an external provider holding a production approval (for new aviation products; production or spares) or maintenance approval (i.e. for in service repairs, modifications, after sales maintenance, overhaul activities, inspections) are not covered by this document, as applicable rules are defined by the aviation authorities having granted these approvals.
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies lessons learned principles and guidelines that are applicable in all space project activities (management, technical, quality, cost and schedule). The application of this document is intended to be included in the supplier quality management system, but can be tailored in individual contracts as agreed by the customer and supplier, depending on: — the content of each project (size, technological level and novelty, particular organization, participants, etc.); — the interest and usefulness of the related information. The lessons learned information can result from any situation which can be encountered in similar contexts for future projects, i.e.: — undesirable experiences to be avoided; — strategies, rules, principles of design, validation, tests and operations proved to be successful or necessary. This document neither endorses nor recommends the transmission of company proprietary information to external entities as part of a lessons learned process. Implementing a formal lessons learned process as outlined in this document makes it possible to capture and benefit from this information. The lessons learned activity is an important contribution to the processing of the preventive and corrective actions specified in ISO 9001, ISO 17666, ISO 14620-1 and ISO 23460. This document also provides lessons learned processes and suggested lessons learned forms.
- Standard13 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document provides a harmonized process and documentation requirements for the establishment of CoCs used to attest the conformity of aviation, space, and defence products (e.g. assemblies, sub-assemblies, equipment and systems, parts, material, software) or services. It includes a CoC template and supporting instructions on how to complete it.
When quoted by the customer in a contractual requirement, application of this document is mandatory. In other cases, its use is recommended, but if there is a conflict between the requirements of this document and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter take precedence.
This document can be used by other industries that require the use/application of a CoC.
Requirements for the establishment of Authorized Release Certificates (ARCs) [e.g. European Union Aviation Safety Agency (EASA) Form 1, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) 8130-3 tag, Civil Aviation Administration of China (CAAC) Form 038] by an external provider holding a production approval (for new aviation products, production, or spares) or maintenance approval (i.e. for in service repairs, modifications, after sales maintenance, overhaul activities, inspections) are not covered by this document, as applicable rules are defined by the aviation authorities having granted these approvals.
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
IEC 62282-4-202:2023 covers performance test methods of fuel cell power systems intended to be used to power unmanned aircrafts, including general requirements, start-up, shutdown, power output, continuous running time, electric efficiency, data transmission, warning and monitoring, environmental compatibility, etc.
The scope of this document is limited to electrically powered unmanned aircrafts with a maximum take-off mass not exceeding 150 kg (i.e. level 5 or lower unmanned aircrafts (UAs)).
This document applies to fuel cell power systems with a rated output voltage not exceeding 220 V DC for outdoor use.
This document applies only to compressed gaseous hydrogen-fuelled fuel cell power systems.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document defines the industry-accepted requirements for the ICOP scheme, which provides confidence to ASD customers, that organizations with certification of their QMS, issued by accredited CBs, meet applicable AQMS standard requirements. The requirements in this document are applicable to all participants in the ICOP scheme. If there is a conflict between the requirements of this document, and customer or applicable statutory/regulatory requirements, the latter takes precedence.
- Standard50 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document establishes the terms and definitions of the basic concepts applied in science, engineering and manufacturing in the field of flight control systems of aircraft (airplane and helicopter).
- Standard11 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document mainly specifies elements of information exchange between unmanned aircraft system (UAS) traffic management (UTM) service providers (USP) and different users to support relevant UTM services between them, while the protocol requirements and the transmission requirements at the operational level are not included. This document excludes the interface between USP and USP and the interface between USP and providers of operation support services.
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies the test conditions and methods to be used for the vibration testing of unmanned aircraft system (UAS, including unmanned aircraft and ground station) which applies to level II through V according to ISO 21895.
- Standard13 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
1.1 General
This document defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the 9100-series standards, the organization’s QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements.
The requirements in this document are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e. ISO/IEC 17000, ISO/IEC 17021 1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of 9101 standard take precedence.
NOTE 1 In this document, the term "9100-series standards" comprises the 9100, 9110, and 9120 standards; developed by the IAQG and published by various national standards bodies.
NOTE 2 In addition to this document, the IAQG publishes deployment support material on the IAQG website (see http://www.sae.org/iaqg/) that can be used by audit teams, when executing the audit process.
1.2 Application
This document is intended to be used for audits of 9100-series standards by Certification Bodies (CBs) for certification of organizations, under the auspices of the ASD industry certification scheme [also known as the Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme]. The ICOP scheme requirements are defined in the 9104-series standards (i.e. EN 9104 001, EN 9104 002, EN 9104 003).
NOTE Relevant parts of this document can also be used by an organization in support of internal audits (1st party) and external audits at suppliers (2nd party).
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 General
This document is primarily intended to apply to new parts and products intended to be produced in an on-going production phase but can also be applied to parts currently in production (e.g., manufacturing, maintenance). This document is applicable to all production processes that influence the variation of KCs, as well as maintenance and service processes in which KCs are identified. It applies to organizations for assemblies and all levels of parts within an assembly, down to the basic materials including castings and forgings, and to organizations that are responsible for producing the design characteristics of the product.
The variation control process begins with product definition, typically stated in the design documentation (e.g., digital model, engineering drawing, specification) which identifies KCs, and leads to a variation management process for those KCs. This process may also be used for producer-identified KCs (e.g., process KCs, additional/substitute product KCs).
Producers and their subcontractors are responsible for flow down of the standard requirements to those external providers, who produce design characteristics and provide production and service provisions, to ensure that KCs conform to the customer’s requirements.
1.2 Purpose
This document is designed to drive the improvement of manufacturing and maintenance processes through adequate planning and effective management of KC variation. This focus is intended to improve uniformity (less variation or minimum variation of product KCs) and acceptance probability of the end-product.
NOTE Control of a product or process KC per this document does not constitute, nor imply acceptance of the resulting product. If variation management, under this document, is to be part of an acceptance decision, the requirements need to be specified in the applicable product acceptance plan or contract.
1.3 Convention
The following conventions are used in this document:
- "shall" indicates a requirement;
- "should" indicates a recommendation;
- "may" indicates a permission;
- "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
IEC 62282-4-202:2023 covers performance test methods of fuel cell power systems intended to be used to power unmanned aircrafts, including general requirements, start-up, shutdown, power output, continuous running time, electric efficiency, data transmission, warning and monitoring, environmental compatibility, etc. The scope of this document is limited to electrically powered unmanned aircrafts with a maximum take-off mass not exceeding 150 kg (i.e. level 5 or lower unmanned aircrafts (UAs)). This document applies to fuel cell power systems with a rated output voltage not exceeding 220 V DC for outdoor use. This document applies only to compressed gaseous hydrogen-fuelled fuel cell power systems.
- Standard23 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document defines the minimum requirements for auditors, CBs, auditor authentication bodies (AABs), training provider approval bodies (TPABs), and training providers (TPs) who participate in the IAQG industry controlled other party (ICOP) scheme. The requirements in this document supplement those defined within the EN 9104-001, EN 9104-002, EN ISO/IEC 17021-1, and EN ISO/IEC 17021-3 standards.
Data protection for the parties subject to this document and other relevant requirements of the ICOP scheme are managed via bi-lateral contracts between the joint controllers of the data.
- Standard28 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document defines the concepts and terms used in flight dynamics studies to specify aircraft flight conditions and envelopes. This document applies to the analysis of operational, experimental or simulated flights for the purposes of safety analyses and qualification, taking into account potential failures and likely environmental conditions.
- Standard9 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the Semantic Representation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 concerning the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this Part.
The term “semantic representation” is defined in Clause 3 “Terms, definitions and abbreviations”.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of EN 9300 121:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Semantic Representation” (Refer to clause 3 for definition);
- the association of the above with 3D geometric shapes;
- the possible association of the above with Presentation of 3D Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI), and 3D annotations as defined in EN 9300 120.
In EN 9300 121, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on semantic representation. The main use cases are Certification, Product Liability and Design re-use.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting” for the purpose of human readability.
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- PMI presentation (defined in EN 9300 120);
- User defined attributes that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level. The archiving of the UDA is defined in EN 9300 120.
- How to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- - form features;
- - CAD Assemblies.
- The semantics of special Notes outside the scope of PMI: ITAR/EAR, proprietary, and title block information, etc.
- Standard18 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of single CAD parts. The goal is to preserve this 3D information with respect to the geometry and related PMI produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
The requirements of EN 9300 110 “CAD mechanical 3D explicit geometry information” about the preservation of the 3D explicit shape shall apply within this document.
The meaning of terms "Presentation" and "Representation", defined in the EN 9300 100 “Common concepts for Long term archiving and retrieval of CAD 3D mechanical information” is required to understand this EN 9300 document.
1.2 In scope
The following outlines the total scope of this document:
- the Presentation of 3D geometrical dimension and tolerance, and 3D annotation attributes;
- their possible semantic links with 3D Geometric shape;
- User Defined Attributes: that are assigned to 3D geometric entities or at the part level.
For the purpose of this document, the semantic definition is at the level that supports associative “Cross-highlighting”, to illustrate the portion of the geometry to which a PMI element applies.
In this version, the technology used to preserve this 3D information is based on polyline and tessellated presentation. Polyline presentation is a conversion to lines and curves of all 3D annotations by the STEP interfaces of the CAD system, including validation properties. Tessellated presentation is a conversion to tessellated curves and tessellated faces. The main use cases are the Certification and Product Liability of static information, however, re-use is also possible after the deletion of previous PMI and creation of new PMI (refer to clause 3 for definition).
1.3 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- machine-interpretable PMI “Representation”;
- how to preserve additional information:
- - property rights;
- -form features;
- -machining features;
- CAD Assemblies.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 Introduction
This document defines the requirements for the long-term digital preservation of the presentation of Product and Manufacturing Information (PMI) with their possible links to the 3D explicit shape and geometry of CAD assembly structure. The goal is to preserve this 3D information, without loss, with respect to the geometry produced by the original CAD system, following the principles laid down in EN 9300 003 “Fundamentals and Concepts”.
This will allow the retrieval of the assembly structure including the placement information.
This standard extends EN 9300-115 “Explicit CAD Assembly Structure” by including assembly level PMI.
PMI for the assembly structure can be recorded in the same file as the geometry, can be in a nested assembly structure or the PMI will be contained in its own separate file (Side-Car).
The PMI elements shall be presented on the graphic level only (i.e. polyline, tessellated).
1.2 Out of scope
The following is outside the scope:
- The archiving of assembly Form Features.
- Semantic PMI representation is out of scope for this document.
- The geometry defined at assembly level is out of scope for this document.
(This document covers PMI at the assembly level only.)
- Standard24 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 General
This document is primarily intended to apply to new parts and products intended to be produced in an on-going production phase but can also be applied to parts currently in production (e.g., manufacturing, maintenance). This document is applicable to all production processes that influence the variation of KCs, as well as maintenance and service processes in which KCs are identified. It applies to organizations for assemblies and all levels of parts within an assembly, down to the basic materials including castings and forgings, and to organizations that are responsible for producing the design characteristics of the product.
The variation control process begins with product definition, typically stated in the design documentation (e.g., digital model, engineering drawing, specification) which identifies KCs, and leads to a variation management process for those KCs. This process may also be used for producer-identified KCs (e.g., process KCs, additional/substitute product KCs).
Producers and their subcontractors are responsible for flow down of the standard requirements to those external providers, who produce design characteristics and provide production and service provisions, to ensure that KCs conform to the customer’s requirements.
1.2 Purpose
This document is designed to drive the improvement of manufacturing and maintenance processes through adequate planning and effective management of KC variation. This focus is intended to improve uniformity (less variation or minimum variation of product KCs) and acceptance probability of the end-product.
NOTE Control of a product or process KC per this document does not constitute, nor imply acceptance of the resulting product. If variation management, under this document, is to be part of an acceptance decision, the requirements need to be specified in the applicable product acceptance plan or contract.
1.3 Convention
The following conventions are used in this document:
- "shall" indicates a requirement;
- "should" indicates a recommendation;
- "may" indicates a permission; and
- "can" indicates a possibility or a capability.
- Standard34 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This recommendation is mainly aimed at all the trades which are actively involved in managing the health of a system.
Although it relies on examples of aeronautical systems, the expert group considers that these general recommendations are of interest for systems from other areas.
- Standard67 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document provides means of compliance with the “Direct Remote Identification” requirements set
in Regulation (EU) 2019/945 on Unmanned Aircraft Systems.
“Direct remote identification” means a system that ensures the local broadcast of information about a
UA in operation.
More specifically, this document addresses drone’s capability to be identified during the whole duration
of the flight, in real time and with no specific connectivity or ground infrastructure link, by existing
mobile devices when within the broadcasting range. Such functionality, based on an open and
documented transmission protocol (described in this document) contributes to address security threats
and to support drones’ operators’ obligations with respect to citizens’ fundamental rights to privacy
and protection of personal data. It can be used by law enforcement people, critical infrastructure
managers, and public to get an instantaneous information on the drone flying around, providing various
information such as UA serial number, UA navigation data and operational status, UAS Operator
registration number and position as defined in the Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945.
Since Regulation (EU) 2019/945 requires DRI information to be broadcasted using an “open and
documented protocol”, this document does not define technological measures to protect the
confidentiality and integrity of the data broadcasted.
- Standard64 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
1.1 General
This document defines requirements for the preparation and execution of the audit process. In addition, it defines the content and composition for the audit reporting of conformity and process effectiveness to the EN 9100-series standards, the organization’s QMS documentation, and customer and statutory/regulatory requirements.
The requirements in this document are additions or represent changes to the requirements and guidelines in the standards for conformity assessment, auditing, and certification as published by ISO/IEC (i.e. ISO/IEC 17000:2020, ISO/IEC 17021 1). When there is conflict with these standards, the requirements of this document take precedence.
NOTE 1 In this document, the term “EN 9100-series standards” comprises the EN 9100, EN 9110, and EN 9120 standards; developed by the IAQG and published by various national standards bodies.
NOTE 2 In addition to this document, the IAQG publishes deployment support material on the IAQG website (see http://www.iaqg.org) that can be used by audit teams, when executing the audit process.
1.2 Application
This document is intended to be used for audits of EN 9100-series standards by Certification Bodies (CBs) for certification of organizations, under the auspices of the ASD industry certification scheme [also known as the Industry Controlled Other Party (ICOP) scheme]. The ICOP scheme requirements are defined in the EN 9104-series standards (i.e. FprEN 9104-1, prEN 9104-2, EN 9104 3).
NOTE Relevant parts of this document can also be used by an organization in support of internal audits (1st party) and external audits at suppliers (2nd party).
- Standard30 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document is mainly aimed at all the trades which are actively involved in managing the health of a system.
Although it relies on examples of aeronautical systems, the expert group considers that this document is applicable for systems from other areas.
This document specifies the centralization of the health data for a fleet of systems, such as an aircraft fleet for example, to ensure consistency between stakeholders (operators, repair facilities, designers, etc.) and the management of its health card.
- Standard67 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the test requirements and methods for verifying the specified flight performance items of civil fixed-wing unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This document is applicable to the category of civil small and light fixed-wing UAS, which applies to maximum take-off mass (MTOM) level I through V according to ISO 21895.
- Standard8 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies the evaluation and test method for sharp injury to human body caused by rotor blades of civil small and light unmanned aircraft (UA), including injury scale, requirements, content, tests, results, etc. This document is applicable to evaluating and testing the sharp injury to human body caused by rotor blades of civil small and light UA (with maximum take-off mass between 0,25 kg to 4 kg, which are between the levels II and III as categorized by ISO 21895), including multicopter UA, unmanned helicopters and other rotor UA.
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies test method to determine the operation ability of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) at low-air-pressure conditions. This document is applicable to the category of civil small and light UAS, which applies to maximum take-off mass (MTOM) level II through V according to ISO 21895.
- Standard8 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
IEC 62282-4-202:2023 covers performance test methods of fuel cell power systems intended to be used to power unmanned aircrafts, including general requirements, start-up, shutdown, power output, continuous running time, electric efficiency, data transmission, warning and monitoring, environmental compatibility, etc.
The scope of this document is limited to electrically powered unmanned aircrafts with a maximum take-off mass not exceeding 150 kg (i.e. level 5 or lower unmanned aircrafts (UAs)).
This document applies to fuel cell power systems with a rated output voltage not exceeding 220 V DC for outdoor use.
This document applies only to compressed gaseous hydrogen-fuelled fuel cell power systems.
- Standard41 pagesEnglish and French languagesale 15% off
This document specifies the requirements for safe commercial unmanned aircraft system (UAS) operations, including the external safety-critical service providing command and control (C2) link.
- Standard39 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document describes the procedures for training personnel who will be involved in the operation of unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This document defines: a) knowledge, skill, attitude and qualification criteria that are needed for UAS pilots and training organizations that provide training to UAS remote pilots and other personnel involved in UAS operations; b) training curriculum and contents for specific learning courses; c) qualification and confirmation criteria for the training organizations; d) general procedures for providing training of UAS personnel; the requirements for a specific course as described in Annex A can be more restrictive in some cases.
- Standard42 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies the procedures for testing flight stability of a multi-copter unmanned aircraft system (UAS) and is applicable to multi-copter type UAS that can take-off and land vertically. A commercial multi-copter UAS weighing over 250 g to less than 150 kg is discussed in this document. Further, this document is applicable to military and civilian multi-copter UAS. However, quantitatively specific stability criteria for the test are not specified in this document.
- Standard20 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document sets forth the general rules applying to the justification of the definition of a product (tangible or intangible) and specifies the content of the Definition Justification Plan (DJP) and the Definition Justification Dossier (DJD).
It is applicable to all products designed and developed to fulfil the requirements of a customer expressed in a (Need) Technical Specification. Industrials are advised to apply the following principles to their own needs for justification in their internal customer/supplier relations.
Clause 5 presents the concepts and the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes.
Clause 6 summarizes the role and the contractual nature of the qualification of the definition.
Clause 7 gives details of the qualification of the definition process, while Clause 8 positions this process in the programme development logic.
The document also describes the differences between the justification and the qualification of the definition and other notions, such as verification, validation or acceptance (Clause 9).
Clause 10 is a guide to the establishment and maintenance of the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes. Information related to the certification process, even if it is out of the scope of the present document, is also presented in Clause 10, because this process has certain similarities with the justification of the definition and qualification process.
This document belongs to the documents supporting the EN 9200 relating to Project Management Specification.
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in ISO 20785-3:2015 and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC Guide 98‑1, Uncertainty of measurement ? Part 1: Introduction to the expression of uncertainty in measurement
ISO/IEC Guide 98‑3, Uncertainty of measurement ? Part 3: Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM:1995)
ISO 20785‑1, Dosimetry for exposures to cosmic radiation in civilian aircraft ? Part 1: Conceptual basis for measurements
ISO 20785‑2, Dosimetry for exposures to cosmic radiation in civilian aircraft ? Part 2: Characterization of instrument response
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the composition, functional and performance requirements for a payload interface of civil unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), with the maximum take-off mass of 0,25 kg to 25 kg which relates to level II through IV according to ISO 21895. This document is applicable to the design and manufacture of physically independent payload interfaces which connect an external payload to an unmanned aircraft (UA).
- Standard8 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document provides a method for evaluating the resonance vibration frequency of the multi-copter unmanned aircraft (UA). This document specifies a method of designing the UA so as to avoid the resonance generated by the coincidence of the natural frequency of the UA body and the rotational frequency of the rotor. This document is applicable to multi-copter UA weighing less than 150 kg.
- Standard9 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document sets forth the general rules applying to the justification of the definition of a product (tangible or intangible) and specifies the content of the Definition Justification Plan (DJP) and the Definition Justification Dossier (DJD).
It is applicable to all products designed and developed to fulfil the requirements of a customer expressed in a (Need) Technical Specification. Industrials are advised to apply the following principles to their own needs for justification in their internal customer/supplier relations.
Clause 5 presents the concepts and the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes.
Clause 6 summarizes the role and the contractual nature of the qualification of the definition.
Clause 7 gives details of the qualification of the definition process, while Clause 8 positions this process in the programme development logic.
The document also describes the differences between the justification and the qualification of the definition and other notions, such as verification, validation or acceptance (Clause 9).
Clause 10 is a guide to the establishment and maintenance of the documents associated with the justification of the definition and qualification processes. Information related to the certification process, even if it is out of the scope of the present document, is also presented in Clause 10, because this process has certain similarities with the justification of the definition and qualification process.
This document belongs to the documents supporting the EN 9200 relating to Project Management Specification.
- Standard31 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document gives the basis for the measurement of ambient dose equivalent at flight altitudes for the evaluation of the exposures to cosmic radiation in civilian aircraft.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document gives the basis for the measurement of ambient dose equivalent at flight altitudes for the evaluation of the exposures to cosmic radiation in civilian aircraft.
- Standard17 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard19 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This document defines the requirements for constructing a vertiport. This document applies to vertiports of type A (micro) as defined in ISO 5015-2.
- Standard11 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document, when used together with ISO 16119-1, specifies the requirements and the means for verification of the design and performance of unmanned aerial spraying systems (UASS) mounted on unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) for application of plant protection products (PPPs) in agriculture, forestry, turf and amenity areas, with regard to minimising the potential risk of environmental contamination during use, including misuse foreseeable by the UASS manufacturer. The requirements of this document take precedence over those of ISO 16119-1. The ISO 23117 series does not cover human safety aspects of UASS’s or safety aspects concerning UAS’s, remote pilots or bystanders. This document is not applicable to UASS mounted on UASs with a maximum take-off mass greater than 150 kg. This document is not applicable to UASSs manufactured before the date of its publication.
- Standard12 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
- Standard13 pagesFrench languagesale 15% off
This technical document specifies requirements for immersion suits for use by helicopter crew members and passengers in the event of a ditching or water impact, to ensure minimum levels of performance. It applies to immersion suits for use by adults only.
- Standard57 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies requirements for constant wear lifejackets for use by helicopter crew members and passengers in the event of a ditching or water impact, to ensure minimum levels of performance. It only applies to constant wear lifejackets for use by adults and that are intended to be manually inflated after leaving the helicopter.
Helicopter constant wear lifejackets are designed to be worn with or without a helicopter immersion suit and/or emergency breathing system.
- Standard58 pagesEnglish languagesale 10% offe-Library read for1 day
This document specifies the composition, functional and performance requirements of flight controls for civil multicopter unmanned aircrafts (UAs) with the maximum take-off mass (MTOM) less than or equal to 25 kg corresponding to unmanned aircraft systems (UAS) at levels I, II, III and IV as graded in ISO 21895 which does not include fully autonomous flights. The flight control system in this document consists of flight control unit, navigation unit, fault diagnosis and management unit, flight planning, flight recorder, etc. This document is applicable to the design and manufacture of other UA flight control systems or subsystems.
- Standard10 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document specifies test methods for civil electric multi-copter unmanned aircraft systems (UAS). This document is intended to be a general standard for testing the overall UAS functionality with the support of subsystems. It is applicable to the category of civil electric multi-copter UAS with maximum take-off mass (MTOM) level I to level V according to ISO 21895. The configuration control and subsystem (e.g. energy system and flight control system tests) test methods are out of the scope of this document. In addition, test methods for operations in snow and icing conditions are not included either, manufacturers have procedures identified to cope with flight in those conditions.
- Standard26 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document provides technical requirements and test methods for small unmanned aircraft electric energy systems (EESs). This document applies to the EES of small unmanned aircrafts (UAs) with the maximum take-off mass (MTOM) less than 25 kg corresponding to unmanned aircraft systems (UASs) at level I, II, III and IV as graded in ISO 21895:2020, and with secondary lithium batteries. This document can apply to new type of batteries to be used in the UA electric energy system in the future.
- Standard19 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off
This document is dedicated to establishing a common understanding of UTM core functions and functional structure. It provides a detailed description of the UTM system layer given in the UTM Framework. This document excludes: — role-sharing among entities constituting UTM, which is left to implementations; — technical methodology of communication or data transaction among core functions; — business model of players engaging in a function of UTM.
- Standard14 pagesEnglish languagesale 15% off