Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is based upon the stereological principle that a grid with a number of regularly arrayed points, when systematically placed over an image of a two-dimensional section through the microstructure, can provide, after a representative number of placements on different fields, an unbiased statistical estimation of the volume fraction of an identifiable constituent or phase (1, 2, 3).  
This test method has been described  (4) as being superior to other manual methods with regard to effort, bias, and simplicity.
Any number of clearly distinguishable constituents or phases within a microstructure (or macrostructure) can be counted using the method. Thus, the method can be applied to any type of solid material from which adequate two-dimensional sections can be prepared and observed.  
A condensed step-by-step guide for using the method is given in Annex A1.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes a systematic manual point counting procedure for statistically estimating the volume fraction of an identifiable constituent or phase from sections through the microstructure by means of a point grid.
1.2 The use of automatic image analysis to determine the volume fraction of constituents is described in Practice E 1245.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Sep-2008
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E562-08 - Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM E562-08 - Standard Test Method for Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point Count
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E562 – 08
Standard Test Method for
Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point
1
Count
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E562; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
This test method may be used to determine the volume fraction of constituents in an opaque
specimen using a polished, planar cross section by the manual point count procedure. The same
measurements can be achieved using image analysis per Practice E1245.
1. Scope Phase Constituent Content of Metals by Automatic Image
Analysis
1.1 This test method describes a systematic manual point
counting procedure for statistically estimating the volume
3. Terminology
fraction of an identifiable constituent or phase from sections
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this prac-
through the microstructure by means of a point grid.
tice, see Terminology E7.
1.2 The use of automatic image analysis to determine the
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
volume fraction of constituents is described in Practice E1245.
3.2.1 point count—the total number of points in a test grid
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
that fall within the microstructural feature of interest, or on the
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
feature boundary; for the latter, each test point on the boundary
standard.
is one half a point.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
3.2.2 point fraction—the ratio, usually expressed as a per-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
centage, of the point count of the phase or constituent of
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
interest on the two-dimensional image of an opaque specimen
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
to the number of grid points, which is averaged over n fields to
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
produce an unbiased estimate of the volume fraction of the
2. Referenced Documents phase or constituent.
2
3.2.3 stereology—themethodsdevelopedtoobtaininforma-
2.1 ASTM Standards:
tion about the three-dimensional characteristics of microstruc-
E3 Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens
tures based upon measurements made on two-dimensional
E7 Terminology Relating to Metallography
sections through a solid material or their projection on a
E407 Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys
surface.
E691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to
3.2.4 test grid—a transparent sheet or eyepiece reticle with
Determine the Precision of a Test Method
a regular pattern of lines or crosses that is superimposed over
E1245 Practice for Determining the Inclusion or Second-
the microstructural image for counting microstructural features
of interest.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E04 on
3.2.5 volume fraction—the total volume of a phase or
Metallography and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E04.14 on Quanti-
constituent per unit volume of specimen, generally expressed
tative Metallography.
as a percentage.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2008. Published November 2008. Originally
´1
3.3 Symbols:
approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E562 – 05 . DOI:
10.1520/E0562-08.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
P = total number of points in the test grid.
T
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on th
P = point count on the i field.
i
the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E562 – 08
TABLE 1 95 % Confidence Interval Multipliers
P
P (i) =
i
P
3 100 = percentage of grid points, in the
No. of Fields n t No. of Fields n t
P
T
th
constituent observed on the i field.
5 2.776 19 2.101
6 2.571 20 2.093
n = number of fields counted.
n
7 2.447 21 2.086
¯
P = 1
p
8 2.365 22 2.080
P ~i! = arithmetic average of P (i).
( p
p
n
i 5 1 9 2.306 23 2.074
s = estimate of the standard deviation (s) (see (Eq
10 2.262 24 2.069
3) in Section 10).
11 2.228 25 2.064
95 % CI = 95 % confidence interval 12 2.201 26 2.060
13 2.179 27 2.056
= 6ts/ n (see Note 1).
=
14 2.160 28 2.052
t = a multiplier related to the number of fields
15 2.145 29 2.048
examined and used in conjunction with the 16 2.131 30 2.045
17 2.120 40 2.020
standard deviation of the measurements to de-
18 2.110 60
...

This document is not anASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of anASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation:E562–05 Designation: E 562 – 08
Standard Test Method for
Determining Volume Fraction by Systematic Manual Point
1
Count
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 562; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
´ NOTE—Equation 3 and A1.11 were editorially revised in February 2008.
INTRODUCTION
This test method may be used to determine the volume fraction of constituents in an opaque
specimen using a polished, planar cross section by the manual point count procedure. The same
measurements can be achieved using image analysis per Practice E 1245.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method describes a systematic manual point counting procedure for statistically estimating the volume fraction of
an identifiable constituent or phase from sections through the microstructure by means of a point grid.
1.2 The use of automatic image analysis to determine the volume fraction of constituents is described in Practice E 1245.
1.3
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E 3 Guide for Preparation of Metallographic Specimens
E 7 Terminology Relating to Metallography
E 407 Practice for Microetching Metals and Alloys
E 691 Practice for Conducting an Interlaboratory Study to Determine the Precision of a Test Method
E 1245 Practice for Determining the Inclusion or Second-Phase Constituent Content of Metals by Automatic Image Analysis
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in this practice, see Terminology E 7.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 point count—the total number of points in a test grid that fall within the microstructural feature of interest, or on the
feature boundary; for the latter, each test point on the boundary is one half a point.
3.2.2 point fraction—the ratio, usually expressed as a percentage, of the point count of the phase or constituent of interest on
the two-dimensional image of an opaque specimen to the number of grid points, which is averaged over n fields to produce an
unbiased estimate of the volume fraction of the phase or constituent.
3.2.3 stereology—the methods developed to obtain information about the three-dimensional characteristics of microstructures
based upon measurements made on two-dimensional sections through a solid material or their projection on a surface.
3.2.4 test grid—a transparent sheet or eyepiece reticle with a regular pattern of lines or crosses that is superimposed over the
microstructural image for counting microstructural features of interest.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E04 on Metallography and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E04.14 on Quantitative
Metallography.
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2005. Published December 2005. Originally approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2002 as E562–02.
´1
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2008. Published November 2008. Originally approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E 562 – 05 .
2
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E562–08
3.2.5 volume fraction—the total volume of a phase or constituent per unit volume of specimen, generally expressed as a
percentage.
3.3 Symbols:
P = total number of points in the test grid.
T
th
P = point count on the i field.
i
P
P (i) =
i
P th
3 100 = percentage of grid points, in the constituent observed on the i field.
P
T
n = number of fields counted.
n
¯
P = 1
p
P ~i! = arithmetic average of P (i).
( p p
n
i 5 1
s = estimate of the standard deviation (s) (see (Eq 3) in Section 10).
95 % CI = 95 % confiden
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.