ASTM E1820-18ae1
(Test Method)Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fracture Toughness
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Assuming the presence of a preexisting, sharp, fatigue crack, the material fracture toughness values identified by this test method characterize its resistance to: (1) fracture of a stationary crack, (2) fracture after some stable tearing, (3) stable tearing onset, and (4) sustained stable tearing. This test method is particularly useful when the material response cannot be anticipated before the test. Application of procedures in Test Method E1921 is recommended for testing ferritic steels that undergo cleavage fracture in the ductile-to-brittle transition.
5.1.1 These fracture toughness values may serve as a basis for material comparison, selection, and quality assurance. Fracture toughness can be used to rank materials within a similar yield strength range.
5.1.2 These fracture toughness values may serve as a basis for structural flaw tolerance assessment. Awareness of differences that may exist between laboratory test and field conditions is required to make proper flaw tolerance assessment.
5.2 The following cautionary statements are based on some observations.
5.2.1 Particular care must be exercised in applying to structural flaw tolerance assessment the fracture toughness value associated with fracture after some stable tearing has occurred. This response is characteristic of ferritic steel in the transition regime. This response is especially sensitive to material inhomogeneity and to constraint variations that may be induced by planar geometry, thickness differences, mode of loading, and structural details.
5.2.2 The J-R curve from bend-type specimens recommended by this test method (SE(B), C(T), and DC(T)) has been observed to be conservative with respect to results from tensile loading configurations.
5.2.3 The values of δc, δu, Jc, and Ju may be affected by specimen dimensions.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers procedures and guidelines for the determination of fracture toughness of metallic materials using the following parameters: K, J, and CTOD (δ). Toughness can be measured in the R-curve format or as a point value. The fracture toughness determined in accordance with this test method is for the opening mode (Mode I) of loading.
Note 1: Until this version, KIc could be evaluated using this test method as well as by using Test Method E399. To avoid duplication, the evaluation of KIc has been removed from this test method and the user is referred to Test Method E399.
1.2 The recommended specimens are single-edge bend, [SE(B)], compact, [C(T)], and disk-shaped compact, [DC(T)]. All specimens contain notches that are sharpened with fatigue cracks.
1.2.1 Specimen dimensional (size) requirements vary according to the fracture toughness analysis applied. The guidelines are established through consideration of material toughness, material flow strength, and the individual qualification requirements of the toughness value per values sought.
Note 2: Other standard methods for the determination of fracture toughness using the parameters K, J, and CTOD are contained in Test Methods E399, E1290, and E1921. This test method was developed to provide a common method for determining all applicable toughness parameters from a single test.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barri...
General Information
Relations
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
´1
Designation: E1820 − 18a
Standard Test Method for
1
Measurement of Fracture Toughness
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1820; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
ε NOTE—8.5.4 was editorially corrected in March 2019.
1. Scope 1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
1.1 This test method covers procedures and guidelines for
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
the determination of fracture toughness of metallic materials
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
using the following parameters: K, J, and CTOD (δ). Tough-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
nesscanbemeasuredintheR-curveformatorasapointvalue.
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
The fracture toughness determined in accordance with this test
method is for the opening mode (Mode I) of loading.
2. Referenced Documents
2
NOTE 1—Until this version, K could be evaluated using this test
Ic
2.1 ASTM Standards:
method as well as by using Test Method E399. To avoid duplication, the
E4Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
evaluation of K has been removed from this test method and the user is
Ic
E8/E8MTest Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Ma-
referred to Test Method E399.
terials
1.2 The recommended specimens are single-edge bend,
E21TestMethodsforElevatedTemperatureTensionTestsof
[SE(B)], compact, [C(T)], and disk-shaped compact, [DC(T)].
Metallic Materials
All specimens contain notches that are sharpened with fatigue
E23Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Me-
cracks.
tallic Materials
1.2.1 Specimen dimensional (size) requirements vary ac-
E399Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture
cording to the fracture toughness analysis applied. The guide-
Toughness K of Metallic Materials
Ic
lines are established through consideration of material
E1290Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement
toughness, material flow strength, and the individual qualifi-
(CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement (Withdrawn
cation requirements of the toughness value per values sought.
3
2013)
NOTE 2—Other standard methods for the determination of fracture
E1823TerminologyRelatingtoFatigueandFractureTesting
toughness using the parameters K, J, and CTOD are contained in Test
E1921 Test Method for Determination of Reference
Methods E399, E1290, and E1921. This test method was developed to
Temperature, T , for Ferritic Steels in the Transition
o
provide a common method for determining all applicable toughness
Range
parameters from a single test.
E1942Guide for Evaluating DataAcquisition Systems Used
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
in Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics Testing
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
E2298Test Method for Instrumented Impact Testing of
only.
Metallic Materials
4
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
2.2 ASTM Data Set:
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
E1820/1–DS1(2015)Standard data set to evaluate computer
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
algorithmsforevaluationofJ using,AnnexA9ofE1820
Ic
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
and Fracture and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E08.07 on Fracture the ASTM website.
3
Mechanics. The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2018. Published February 2019. Originally www.astm.org.
4
approved in 1996. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as E1820–18. DOI: This data set is available for download from ASTM at https://www.astm.org/
10.1520/E1820-18AE01 COMMITTEE/E08.htm, under the heading, Additional Information.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ϵ1
E1820 − 18a
3. Terminology corresponds to the force P and clip-gage displacement v (see
c c
Fig. 1). It may be size-dependent and a function of test
3.1 Terminology E1823 is applicable to this test method.
specimen geometry.
Only items
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
´1
Designation: E1820 − 18a E1820 − 18a
Standard Test Method for
1
Measurement of Fracture Toughness
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1820; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
ε NOTE—8.5.4 was editorially corrected in March 2019.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers procedures and guidelines for the determination of fracture toughness of metallic materials using
the following parameters: K, J, and CTOD (δ). Toughness can be measured in the R-curve format or as a point value. The fracture
toughness determined in accordance with this test method is for the opening mode (Mode I) of loading.
NOTE 1—Until this version, K could be evaluated using this test method as well as by using Test Method E399. To avoid duplication, the evaluation
Ic
of K has been removed from this test method and the user is referred to Test Method E399.
Ic
1.2 The recommended specimens are single-edge bend, [SE(B)], compact, [C(T)], and disk-shaped compact, [DC(T)]. All
specimens contain notches that are sharpened with fatigue cracks.
1.2.1 Specimen dimensional (size) requirements vary according to the fracture toughness analysis applied. The guidelines are
established through consideration of material toughness, material flow strength, and the individual qualification requirements of
the toughness value per values sought.
NOTE 2—Other standard methods for the determination of fracture toughness using the parameters K, J, and CTOD are contained in Test Methods E399,
E1290, and E1921. This test method was developed to provide a common method for determining all applicable toughness parameters from a single test.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of
regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization
established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued
by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E4 Practices for Force Verification of Testing Machines
E8/E8M Test Methods for Tension Testing of Metallic Materials
E21 Test Methods for Elevated Temperature Tension Tests of Metallic Materials
E23 Test Methods for Notched Bar Impact Testing of Metallic Materials
E399 Test Method for Linear-Elastic Plane-Strain Fracture Toughness K of Metallic Materials
Ic
3
E1290 Test Method for Crack-Tip Opening Displacement (CTOD) Fracture Toughness Measurement (Withdrawn 2013)
E1823 Terminology Relating to Fatigue and Fracture Testing
E1921 Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, T , for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range
o
E1942 Guide for Evaluating Data Acquisition Systems Used in Cyclic Fatigue and Fracture Mechanics Testing
E2298 Test Method for Instrumented Impact Testing of Metallic Materials
4
2.2 ASTM Data Set:
E1820/1–DS1(2015) Standard data set to evaluate computer algorithms for evaluation of J using, Annex A9 of E1820
Ic
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E08 on Fatigue and Fracture and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E08.07 on Fracture
Mechanics.
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2018. Published February 2019. Originally approved in 1996. Last previous edition approved in 2018 as E1820 – 18. DOI:
10.1520/E1820-18A10.1520/E1820-18AE01
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on www.astm.org.
4
This data set is available for download from ASTM at https://www.astm.org/COMMITTEE/E08.htm, under the heading, Additional Information.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Consho
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.