Standard Test Methods for Polariscopic Examination of Glass Containers

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 These two test methods are provided for evaluating the quality of annealing. These test methods can be used in the quality control of glass containers or other products made of similar glass compositions, where the degree of annealing must be verified to ensure quality products. These test methods apply to glass containers manufactured from commercial soda-lime-silica glass compositions.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods describe the determination of relative optical retardation associated with the state of anneal of glass containers. Two alternative test methods are covered as follows:    
Sections  
Test Method A—Comparison with Reference Standards
Using a Polariscope  
6 – 9  
Test Method B—Determination with Polarimeter  
10 – 12  
1.2 Test Method A is useful in determining retardations less than 150 nm, while Test Method B is useful in determining retardations less than 565 nm.  
Note 1: The apparent temper number as determined by these test methods depends primarily on (1) the magnitude and distribution of the residual stress in the glass, (2) the thickness of the glass (optical path length at the point of grading), and (3) the composition of the glass. For all usual soda-lime silica bottle glass compositions, the effect of the composition is negligible. In an examination of the bottom of a container, the thickness of glass may be taken into account by use of the following formula, which defines a real temper number, TR, in terms of the apparent temper number, TA, and the bottom thickness, t:
This thickness should be measured at the location of the maximum apparent retardation. Interpretation of either real or apparent temper number requires practical experience with the particular ware being evaluated.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
30-Jun-2022
Technical Committee
C14 - Glass and Glass Products
Drafting Committee
C14.07 - Glass Containers

Relations

Effective Date
01-Oct-2023
Effective Date
01-Aug-2020
Effective Date
01-Aug-2020
Effective Date
01-Nov-2015
Effective Date
01-Oct-2014
Effective Date
01-May-2014
Effective Date
01-Nov-2009
Effective Date
01-May-2009
Effective Date
01-Oct-2005
Effective Date
01-Oct-2005
Effective Date
01-Oct-2004
Effective Date
01-Jun-2004
Effective Date
01-Apr-2004
Effective Date
10-Jul-2003
Effective Date
10-May-1999

Overview

ASTM C148-17(2022): Standard Test Methods for Polariscopic Examination of Glass Containers is an internationally recognized standard developed by ASTM for evaluating the annealing quality of glass containers. The standard outlines two reliable test methods for determining the degree of annealing by measuring the relative optical retardation in soda-lime-silica glass containers. Ensuring proper annealing is critical for product safety, durability, and quality control in glass manufacturing and related industries.

Key Topics

  • Annealing Verification: The document provides two independent methods for assessing the state of anneal in glass containers, which is vital for preventing residual stresses that could lead to container failure.
  • Test Method A (Polariscope): Used for optical retardation measurements below 150 nm, this method involves comparing sample containers to reference standards using a polariscope.
  • Test Method B (Polarimeter): Suitable for measurements up to 565 nm, this polarimeter-based method measures the analyzer's rotation to determine optical retardation and thus evaluate annealing quality.
  • Measurement Considerations: Both test methods take into account factors such as residual stress, glass thickness, and composition. For typical soda-lime-silica glass, composition has negligible effect, while accurate measurement of glass thickness at the point of maximum retardation is essential.
  • Quality Assurance: The results help production facilities maintain high standards in the manufacture of glass products by identifying and addressing annealing irregularities.

Applications

ASTM C148-17(2022) plays a central role in quality control processes for manufacturers and suppliers of glass containers and similar products. Key practical applications include:

  • Glass Container Manufacturing: Frequent testing ensures bottles and jars are properly annealed, minimizing internal stress and risk of cracking or breakage during filling, transport, or consumer use.
  • Research and Development: Supports R&D and process optimization in glass production by providing standardized assessment tools.
  • Safety Compliance: Meeting industry and regulatory safety requirements. Proper annealing is directly linked to product reliability in critical sectors such as food and beverage, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, and chemical packaging.
  • Supplier Evaluation: Offers a reference method for qualifying and auditing glassware suppliers for consistent product quality.

Related Standards

Several related ASTM standards enhance the effective implementation of ASTM C148-17(2022):

  • ASTM C162: Terminology of Glass and Glass Products - Provides standardized definitions relevant to glass testing.
  • ASTM C224: Practice for Sampling Glass Containers - Details best practices for collecting representative samples for testing.
  • ASTM C1426: Practices for Verification and Calibration of Polarimeters - Ensures that polariscopes and polarimeters used in testing are properly calibrated for accurate results.

Summary

Adhering to ASTM C148-17(2022) ensures that glass containers meet international standards for annealing and structural quality. Its test methods are widely recognized for their accuracy, reliability, and practical application across industries, making it an essential resource for glass manufacturers, quality assurance professionals, and suppliers seeking to uphold high standards in glass container production.

Keywords: ASTM C148-17, polariscopic examination, glass containers, annealing verification, quality control, soda-lime-silica glass, polariscope, polarimeter, optical retardation, residual stress, glass manufacturing standards.

Buy Documents

Standard

ASTM C148-17(2022) - Standard Test Methods for Polariscopic Examination of Glass Containers

English language (4 pages)
sale 15% off
sale 15% off

Frequently Asked Questions

ASTM C148-17(2022) is a standard published by ASTM International. Its full title is "Standard Test Methods for Polariscopic Examination of Glass Containers". This standard covers: SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 These two test methods are provided for evaluating the quality of annealing. These test methods can be used in the quality control of glass containers or other products made of similar glass compositions, where the degree of annealing must be verified to ensure quality products. These test methods apply to glass containers manufactured from commercial soda-lime-silica glass compositions. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods describe the determination of relative optical retardation associated with the state of anneal of glass containers. Two alternative test methods are covered as follows: Sections Test Method A—Comparison with Reference Standards Using a Polariscope 6 – 9 Test Method B—Determination with Polarimeter 10 – 12 1.2 Test Method A is useful in determining retardations less than 150 nm, while Test Method B is useful in determining retardations less than 565 nm. Note 1: The apparent temper number as determined by these test methods depends primarily on (1) the magnitude and distribution of the residual stress in the glass, (2) the thickness of the glass (optical path length at the point of grading), and (3) the composition of the glass. For all usual soda-lime silica bottle glass compositions, the effect of the composition is negligible. In an examination of the bottom of a container, the thickness of glass may be taken into account by use of the following formula, which defines a real temper number, TR, in terms of the apparent temper number, TA, and the bottom thickness, t: This thickness should be measured at the location of the maximum apparent retardation. Interpretation of either real or apparent temper number requires practical experience with the particular ware being evaluated. 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE 4.1 These two test methods are provided for evaluating the quality of annealing. These test methods can be used in the quality control of glass containers or other products made of similar glass compositions, where the degree of annealing must be verified to ensure quality products. These test methods apply to glass containers manufactured from commercial soda-lime-silica glass compositions. SCOPE 1.1 These test methods describe the determination of relative optical retardation associated with the state of anneal of glass containers. Two alternative test methods are covered as follows: Sections Test Method A—Comparison with Reference Standards Using a Polariscope 6 – 9 Test Method B—Determination with Polarimeter 10 – 12 1.2 Test Method A is useful in determining retardations less than 150 nm, while Test Method B is useful in determining retardations less than 565 nm. Note 1: The apparent temper number as determined by these test methods depends primarily on (1) the magnitude and distribution of the residual stress in the glass, (2) the thickness of the glass (optical path length at the point of grading), and (3) the composition of the glass. For all usual soda-lime silica bottle glass compositions, the effect of the composition is negligible. In an examination of the bottom of a container, the thickness of glass may be taken into account by use of the following formula, which defines a real temper number, TR, in terms of the apparent temper number, TA, and the bottom thickness, t: This thickness should be measured at the location of the maximum apparent retardation. Interpretation of either real or apparent temper number requires practical experience with the particular ware being evaluated. 1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only. 1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

ASTM C148-17(2022) is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 81.040.30 - Glass products. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

ASTM C148-17(2022) has the following relationships with other standards: It is inter standard links to ASTM C162-23, ASTM C224-78(2020), ASTM C1426-14(2020), ASTM C162-05(2015), ASTM C224-78(2014), ASTM C1426-14, ASTM C1426-09, ASTM C224-78(2009), ASTM C162-05, ASTM C162-05(2010), ASTM C1426-99(2004), ASTM C162-04, ASTM C224-78(2004)e1, ASTM C162-03, ASTM C162-99. Understanding these relationships helps ensure you are using the most current and applicable version of the standard.

ASTM C148-17(2022) is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: C148 − 17 (Reapproved 2022)
Standard Test Methods for
Polariscopic Examination of Glass Containers
This standard is issued under the fixed designation C148; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope 1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
1.1 These test methods describe the determination of rela-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
tive optical retardation associated with the state of anneal of
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
glass containers. Two alternative test methods are covered as
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
follows:
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Sections
Test Method A—Comparison with Reference Standards 6–9
2. Referenced Documents
Using a Polariscope
Test Method B—Determination with Polarimeter 10–12
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.2 Test MethodAis useful in determining retardations less
C162 Terminology of Glass and Glass Products
than 150 nm, while Test Method B is useful in determining
C224 Practice for Sampling Glass Containers
retardations less than 565 nm.
C1426 Practices for Verification and Calibration of Polarim-
eters
NOTE 1—The apparent temper number as determined by these test
methods depends primarily on (1) the magnitude and distribution of the
residual stress in the glass, (2) the thickness of the glass (optical path
3. Terminology
length at the point of grading), and (3) the composition of the glass. For
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms used in these test
all usual soda-lime silica bottle glass compositions, the effect of the
methods see Terminology C162.
composition is negligible. In an examination of the bottom of a container,
the thickness of glass may be taken into account by use of the following
formula, which defines a real temper number, T , in terms of the apparent
4. Significance and Use
R
temper number, T , and the bottom thickness, t:
A
4.1 These two test methods are provided for evaluating the
T 5 T 0.160 ⁄ t , where t is in inches, or
~ !
R A quality of annealing. These test methods can be used in the
quality control of glass containers or other products made of
T 5 T 4.06 ⁄ t , where t is in millimetres.
~ !
R A
similarglasscompositions,wherethedegreeofannealingmust
This thickness should be measured at the location of the maximum ap-
be verified to ensure quality products. These test methods
parent retardation. Interpretation of either real or apparent temper num-
apply to glass containers manufactured from commercial
ber requires practical experience with the particular ware being evalu-
soda-lime-silica glass compositions.
ated.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
5. Sampling
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
5.1 Methods of sampling a minimum lot from a group of
only.
containers of a given type are given in Practice C224 for the
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
various situations to which that method may apply.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
TEST METHOD A—COMPARISON WITH
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
REFERENCE STANDARDS USING A POLARISCOPE
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Polariscope, conforming to the following requirements:
These test methods are under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee C14 on
Glass and Glass Products and are the direct responsibility of Subcommittee C14.07
on Glass Containers. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved July 1, 2022. Published July 2022. Originally approved contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
in 1939. Last previous edition approved in 2017 as C148 – 17. DOI: 10.1520/ Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
C0148-17R22. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
C148 − 17 (2022)
6.1.1 The degree of polarization of the field at all points greater than that of N disks but less than N + 1 disks, the
shall not be less than 99 %. apparent temper grade is judged to be that of N + 1 disks. The
6.1.2 The field shall be a minimum of 51 mm (2 in.) in apparent temper number is always determined to be the next
diameter greater than the diameter of the container to be integral temper number greater in value than the actual
measured. The distance between the polarizing and analyzing observed value as seen in the following table:
elements shall be sufficient to allow the inside bottle bottom
Apparent Temper Number Observed Temper
surface to be viewed through the open container finish.
1 less than 1 disk
6.1.3 A sensitive tint plate, having a nominal optical retar-
2 less than 2, greater than 1 disk
dation of 565 nm, with a variation across the field of view of
3 less than 3, greater than 2 disks
4 less than 4, greater than 3 disks
less than 5 nm and with its slow axis at 45° to the plane of
5 less than 5, greater than 4 disks
polarization, shall be used. Such an orientation will produce a
6 less than 6, greater than 5 disks
A
magenta background in the field of view. The brightness of the
polarized field illuminating the sample shall be a minimum of
A
Evaluation by polarimeter (Test Method B) should be used for apparent temper
300 cd/m .
numbers greater than six.
NOTE 2—Color discrimination remains satisfactory with retardations
8.2 Examination of Square, Oval, and Irregular Shapes—
between 510 nm and 580 nm, but optimum conditions are attained at
Make the polariscopic examination of that container curve or
565 nm.
corner that shows the maximum order of retardation color and
6.1.4 Samples must be allowed to equilibrate until the entire
record the temper number in accordance with the procedure
thickness of glass is at room temperature.
outlined in 8.1.
7. Calibration and Standardization 8.3 Examination of the Container Sidewalls—Match the
maximum retardation color observed in the container sidewall
7.1 A set of not less than five standardized glass disks of
with the maximum retardation color at the calibration point of
known retardation stress shall be used to cover the range of
the standard reference disks, and record the apparent temper
commercial container annealing. Such disks shall be circular
number in accordance with the procedure outlined in 8.1.1.
plates of glass not less than 76 mm (3 in.) nor more than
102 mm (4 in.) in diameter. Each disk shall have a nominal 8.4 Examination of Colored Ware—Using the polariscope
retardation at the calibration point, 6.4 mm (0.25 in.) from the
with the tint plate in the field of view, rotate the container to
outer circumference of the disk, corresponding to not less than determine the location of the highest order retardation color at
21.8 nm nor more than 23.8 nm of optical retardation. Each
the inside knuckle position. View the bottom of the container
disk shall have a nominal retardation at the calibration point, through the open container finish and select as a reference area
6.4 mm (0.25 in.) from the PHYSICAL EDGE of the GLASS the darkest appearing area of the container bottom having
disk, corresponding to not less than 21.8 nm nor more than minimum retardation, usually found at the center of the
23.8nmofopticalretardation.Ifthediskismountedinaframe container bottom. Then, with the tint plate in position, hold a
that covers the glass edge, refer to the instructions provided by standard reference disk under the reference area in the bottom
the supplier of the strain disk set with regard to the distance to of the container such that the calibration point on the disk is
the calibration point from the frame ID. If unknown, the disks directly under the reference area in the center bottom of the
may be removed from the frame, the calibration point marked container. Compare the retardation color of the reference area
accordingly, and the disks placed back into their frames. in the container center bottom as modified by the standard
reference disk with the maximum retardation color as normally
8. Procedure
observed at the inside knuckle of the container bottom. If this
color is greater than the modified color of the reference area,
8.1 Examination of the Bottom of Cylindrical Flint
use two or more disks and grade the
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...