Standard Practice for Setup, Calibration, and Quality Control of Instruments Used for Radioactivity Measurements

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This practice is consistent with a performance-based approach wherein the frequency of recalibration and instrument testing is linked to the results from continuing instrument quality control. Under the premise of this practice, a laboratory demonstrates that its instrument performance is acceptable for analyzing sample test sources.  
5.2 When a laboratory demonstrates acceptable performance based on continuing instrument quality control data (that is, control charts and tolerance charts), batch QC samples (that is, blanks, laboratory control samples, replicates, matrix spikes, and other batch QC samples as may be applicable) and independent reference materials, traditional schedule-driven instrument recalibration is permissible but unnecessary.  
5.3 When continuing instrument QC, batch QC, or independent reference material sample results indicate that instrument response has exceeded established control or tolerance limits, instrument calibration is required. Other actions related to sample analyses on the affected instruments may be required by the laboratory QM.  
5.4 The data obtained while following this practice will likely be stored electronically. The data remain in electronic storage, where they are readily available to produce plots, graphs, spreadsheets, and other types of displays and reports. The laboratory QM should specify the frequency and performance of data storage backup.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers consensus criteria for the setup, calibration, and quality control of nuclear instruments. Setup establishes the operating parameters of the instrument—for example, voltage or discriminator settings. Calibrations determine the instrument’s response characteristics—for example, its counting efficiency or gain. Quality control ensures that the performance of the instrument remains acceptable for its intended use and consistent with the performance at the time of calibration.  
1.2 This practice addresses four of the most commonly used types of nuclear counting instruments: alpha-particle spectrometer, gamma-ray spectrometer, gas proportional counter, and liquid scintillation counter.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
14-May-2021
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D7282-21e1 - Standard Practice for Setup, Calibration, and Quality Control of Instruments Used for Radioactivity Measurements
English language
27 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
´1
Designation: D7282 − 21
Standard Practice for
Setup, Calibration, and Quality Control of Instruments Used
1
for Radioactivity Measurements
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7282; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1
ε NOTE—Editorially corrected Fig. X1.1, Fig. X3.1, and Fig. X4.1 in December 2022.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2
1.1 This practice covers consensus criteria for the setup, 2.1 ASTM Standards:
calibration, and quality control of nuclear instruments. Setup D1129Terminology Relating to Water
establishes the operating parameters of the instrument—for D3648Practices for the Measurement of Radioactivity
example, voltage or discriminator settings. Calibrations deter- D7283TestMethodforAlphaandBetaActivityinWaterBy
mine the instrument’s response characteristics—for example, Liquid Scintillation Counting
its counting efficiency or gain. Quality control ensures that the D7902Terminology for Radiochemical Analyses
performance of the instrument remains acceptable for its E2586Practice for Calculating and Using Basic Statistics
intendeduseandconsistentwiththeperformanceatthetimeof
2.2 Other Standards:
calibration.
ANSI N42.22Traceability of Radioactive Sources to the
National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)
1.2 Thispracticeaddressesfourofthemostcommonlyused
3
and Associated Instrument Quality Control
types of nuclear counting instruments: alpha-particle
ANSI N42.23Measurement andAssociated Instrumentation
spectrometer, gamma-ray spectrometer, gas proportional
3
Quality Assurance for Radioassay Laboratories
counter, and liquid scintillation counter.
3
ANSI/HPS N13.30Performance Criteria for Radiobioassay
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
ISO/IEC 17025General Requirements for the Competence
standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
4
of Testing and Calibration Laboratories
conversions that are provided for information only and are not
JCGM 100:2008Evaluation of Measurement Data – Guide
considered standard.
5
to the Expression of Uncertainty in Measurement
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3. Terminology
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
3.1 Definitions:
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
3.1.1 For definitions of terms used in this standard, refer to
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Terminologies D1129 and D7902 and Practice E2586.
1.5 This international standard was developed in accor-
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee. Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
3
Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D19 on Water and 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
4
is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D19.04 on Methods of Radiochemical Available from International Organization for Standardization (ISO), 1 rue de
Analysis. Varembé, Case postale 56, CH-1211, Geneva 20, Switzerland, http://www.iso.ch.
5
Current edition approved May 15, 2021. Published December 2021. Originally Available from Bureau International des Poids et Mesures (BIPM), Pavillon de
approved in 2006. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as D7282–14. DOI: Breteuil F-92312 Sèvres Cedex France, http://www.bipm.org/en/publications/
10.1520/D7282-21E01. guides/gum.html.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
´1
D7282 − 21
3.2.1 acceptable verification ratio (AVR), n—ratio of the 3.2.14 measurement quality objective (MQO),
absolute difference between the measured value of the verifi- n—quantitative or qualitative statement of a performance
cation sample and the known value added to the verification objective or
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.