Standard Test Method for <i>in vitro</i> Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical Implants

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is intended to help assess the degradation rates (that is, the mass loss rate) and changes in material or structural properties, or both, of HDP materials used in surgical implants. Polymers that are known to degrade primarily by hydrolysis include but are not limited to homopolymers and copolymers of l-lactide, d-lactide, d,l-lactide glycolide, caprolactone, and p-dioxanone.  
This test method may not be appropriate for all types of implant applications or for all known absorbable polymers. The user is cautioned to consider the appropriateness of the test method in view of the materials being tested and their potential application (see X1.1.1).
Since it is well known that mechanical loading can increase the degradation rate of absorbable polymers, the presence and extent of such loading needs to be considered when comparing in vitro behavior with that expected or observed in vivo.  
Mechanically Unloaded Hydrolytic Evaluation—Conditioning of a hydrolysable device under mechanically unchallenged hydrolytic conditions at 37°C in buffered saline is a common means to obtain a first approximation of the degradation profile of an absorbable material or device. It does not necessarily represent actual in vivo service conditions, which can include mechanical loading in a variety of forms (for example. static tensile, cyclic tensile, shear, bending, and so forth). If the performance of a device under its indicated use includes loading, hydrolytic aging alone is NOT sufficient to fully characterize the device.
5.3.2 Mechanically Loaded Hydrolytic Evaluation—The objective of loading is to approximate (at 37°C in buffered saline) the actual expected device service conditions so as to better understand potential physicochemical changes that may occur. Such testing can be considered as necessary if loading can be reasonably expected under in vivo service conditions. When feasible, test specimens should be loaded in a manner that simulates in vivo condition...
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers in vitro degradation of hydrolytically degradable polymers (HDP) intended for use in surgical implants.
1.2 The requirements of this test method apply to HDPs in various forms:
1.2.1 Virgin polymer resins, or
1.2.2 Any form fabricated from virgin polymer such as a semi-finished component of a finished product, a finished product, which may include packaged and sterilized implants, or a specially fabricated test specimen.
1.3 This test method provides guidance for mechanical loading or fluid flow, or both, when relevant to the device being evaluated. The specifics of loading type, magnitude, and frequency for a given application are beyond the scope of this test method.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
28-Feb-2011
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F1635-11 - Standard Test Method for <i>in vitro</i> Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical Implants
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM F1635-11 - Standard Test Method for <i>in vitro</i> Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical Implants
English language
7 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F1635 − 11
Standard Test Method for
in vitro Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable
Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical
1
Implants
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1635; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
3
1. Scope Constant-Amplitude-of-Force (Withdrawn 2002)
D695 Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid
1.1 This test method covers in vitro degradation of hydro-
Plastics
lytically degradable polymers (HDP) intended for use in
D747 Test Method for Apparent Bending Modulus of Plas-
surgical implants.
tics by Means of a Cantilever Beam
1.2 The requirements of this test method apply to HDPs in
D790 Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced
various forms:
and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materi-
1.2.1 Virgin polymer resins, or
als
1.2.2 Any form fabricated from virgin polymer such as a
D882 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic
semi-finished component of a finished product, a finished
Sheeting
product, which may include packaged and sterilized implants,
D1708 Test Method forTensile Properties of Plastics by Use
or a specially fabricated test specimen.
of Microtensile Specimens
D1822 Test Method for Tensile-Impact Energy to Break
1.3 This test method provides guidance for mechanical
Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials
loadingorfluidflow,orboth,whenrelevanttothedevicebeing
D2857 Practice for Dilute Solution Viscosity of Polymers
evaluated. The specifics of loading type, magnitude, and
F748 PracticeforSelectingGenericBiologicalTestMethods
frequency for a given application are beyond the scope of this
for Materials and Devices
test method.
2.2 Other Referenced Standard:
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as
ISO 31–8 Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics - Part
standard. No other units of measurement are included in this
8: Quantities and Units
standard.
ISO 10993–1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the 4
Part 1 Evaluation and Testing
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
ISO 10993–9 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Part 9 Framework for Identification and Quantification of
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- 4
Potential Degradation Products
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
NIST Special Publication SP811 Guide for the Use of the
5
International System of Units (SI)
2. Referenced Documents
2
3. Terminology
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
3.1 Definitions:
D671 Test Method for Flexural Fatigue of Plastics by
3.1.1 absorbable, adj—in the body—an initially distinct
foreign material or substance that either directly or through
intended degradation can pass through or be assimilated by
cells and/or tissue.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee F04 on Medical
and Surgical Materials and Devicesand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
F04.15 on Material Test Methods.
3
Current edition approved March 1, 2011. Published March 2011. Originally The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as F1635 – 04a. DOI: www.astm.org.
4
10.1520/F1635-11. Available fromAmerican National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
5
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Available from National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), 100
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on Bureau Dr., Stop 1070, Gaithersburg, MD 20899-1070, at http://physics.nist.gov/
the ASTM website. cuu/Units/bibliography.html.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1635 − 11
NOTE 1—See Appendix X2 for a discussion regarding the usage of
unchallenged hydrolytic conditions at 37°C in buffered saline
absorbable and other related terms.
is a common means to obtain a first approximation of the
3.1.2 hydrolytically degradable polymer (HDP)—any poly-
degradation profile of an absorbable material or device. It does
meric material in which the primary mechanism of chemical
not necessarily represent actual in vivo service conditions,
degradation in the bo
...

This document is not anASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of anASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation:F1635–04a Designation:F1635–11
Standard Test Method for
in vitro Degradation Testing of Hydrolytically Degradable
Polymer Resins and Fabricated Forms for Surgical
1
Implants
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1635; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers in vitro degradation of hydrolytically degradable polymers (HDP) intended for use in surgical
implants.
1.2 The requirements of this test method apply to HDPs in various forms:
1.2.1 Virgin polymer resins, or
1.2.2 Any form fabricated from virgin polymer such as a semi-finished component of a finished product, a finished product,
which may include packaged and sterilized implants, or a specially fabricated test specimen.
1.3This test method has no provisions for mechanical loading, fluid flow, or other dynamic challenges.
1.4
1.3 This test method provides guidance for mechanical loading or fluid flow, or both, when relevant to the device being
evaluated.Thespecificsofloadingtype,magnitude,andfrequencyforagivenapplicationarebeyondthescopeofthistestmethod.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D638 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics
3
D671 Test Method for Flexural Fatigue of Plastics by Constant-Amplitude-of-Force
D695 Test Method for Compressive Properties of Rigid Plastics
D747 Test Method for Apparent Bending Modulus of Plastics by Means of a Cantilever Beam
D790 Test Methods for Flexural Properties of Unreinforced and Reinforced Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials
D882 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Thin Plastic Sheeting
D1708 Test Method for Tensile Properties of Plastics by Use of Microtensile Specimens
D1822 Test Method for Tensile-Impact Energy to Break Plastics and Electrical Insulating Materials
D2857 Practice for Dilute Solution Viscosity of Polymers
F748 Practice for Selecting Generic Biological Test Methods for Materials and Devices
2.2 Other Referenced Standard:
ISO 31–8 Physical Chemistry and Molecular Physics - Part 8: Quantities and Units
4
ISO 10993–1 Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 1 Evaluation and Testing
ISO 10993-9:1999Biological Evaluation of Medical Devices—Part 9 Framework for Identification and Quantification of
PotentialDegradationProductsISO10993–9 BiologicalEvaluationofMedicalDevices—Part9FrameworkforIdentification
4
and Quantification of Potential Degradation Products
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F04 on Medical and Surgical Materials and Devices and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
F04.15 on Material Test Methods.
Current edition approved Oct.March 1, 2004.2011. Published October 2004.March 2011. Originally approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2004 as
F1635 – 04a. DOI: 10.1520/F1635-04A.10.1520/F1635-11.
2
For referencedASTM standards, visit theASTM website, www.astm.org, or contactASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
3
Withdrawn.
4
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1635–11
5
NIST Special Publication SP811 Guide for the Use of the International System of Units (SI)
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 resin—any polymer that is a basic material for plastics. absorbable, adj— in the body—an initially distinct foreign
material or substance that either directly or through intended degradation can pass through or be assimilated by cells and/or tissue.
NOTE 1—See Appendix X2 for a discussion regarding the usage of absorbable and other related terms.
3.1.2 hydrolytically degradable polyme
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.