Standard Test Method for Relative Cure of Energy-Cured Inks and Coatings

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method is used as a manufacturing or laboratory process control tool by providing a visual comparison of the ability to resist solvent break-through against an established control. The test method is designed to indicate a potential problem caused by an undercured condition but does not identify what caused the condition.  
5.2 This test method does not duplicate the conditions on a printing press but does provide a means to determine whether the test sample meets specifications as agreed upon between supplier and customer.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method describes the procedure for evaluating the relative cure of printed energy-cured (ultraviolet or electron beam) ink or coating by a mechanical solvent rub test using a motorized Crockmeter.  
1.2 This test method is applicable to laboratory and production prints on any flat substrate that is no thicker than 3 mm (0.125 in.), durable enough to withstand the test conditions, and for which a control (reference) sample is available.  
1.3 This test method applies to comparisons between energy-cured inks and coatings of the same chemistry and film weight and should not be used to compare different ink or coating chemistries or various applied film weights without first establishing process performance.  
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-May-2020
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D7244-20 - Standard Test Method for Relative Cure of Energy-Cured Inks and Coatings
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
Designation: D7244 − 20
Standard Test Method for
1
Relative Cure of Energy-Cured Inks and Coatings
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D7244; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This test method describes the procedure for evaluating 2.1 Other Standards:
AATCC Test Method 8 Colorfastness to Crocking: AATCC
therelativecureofprintedenergy-cured(ultravioletorelectron
2
Crockmeter Method
beam) ink or coating by a mechanical solvent rub test using a
motorized Crockmeter.
3. Terminology
1.2 This test method is applicable to laboratory and produc-
3.1 Definitions:
tion prints on any flat substrate that is no thicker than 3 mm
3.1.1 break-through, n—the point where the ink or coatings
(0.125 in.), durable enough to withstand the test conditions,
film is penetrated by the solvent rub, causing a loss of density.
and for which a control (reference) sample is available.
3.1.2 cure, n—the condition of a test sample after conver-
1.3 This test method applies to comparisons between
sion to a dried film as measured by tests generally related to
energy-cured inks and coatings of the same chemistry and film end-use performance and mutually agreeable to supplier and
weight and should not be used to compare different ink or purchaser.
coating chemistries or various applied film weights without
3.1.3 electron beam (EB) curing, n—conversion of an ink or
first establishing process performance.
coating to its final polymerized state by means of a mechanism
initiated by electron beam radiation.
1.4 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
3.1.4 ultraviolet (UV) curing, n—conversion of an ink or
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
coating to its final polymerized state by means of a mechanism
only.
initiated by ultraviolet radiation.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
4. Summary of Test Method
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
4.1 The Crockmeter is set to a predetermined number of rub
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
cycles. The test specimen is attached to the bed of the
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
instrument. The linen covered rubbing finger is laid on the test
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor-
print. Solvent is applied and the rub cycle started.
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
4.2 The test specimen is removed, examined for break-
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
through and rated as less, equal, or more than the control.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
5. Significance and Use
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
5.1 This test method is used as a manufacturing or labora-
tory process control tool by providing a visual comparison of
theabilitytoresistsolventbreak-throughagainstanestablished
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint
control. The test method is designed to indicate a potential
and Related Coatings, Materials, andApplications and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee D01.56 on Printing Inks.
Current edition approved June 1, 2020. Published June 2020. Originally
2
approved in 2006. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as D7244 – 06a (2011) Available from American Association of Textile Chemists and Colorists
which was withdrawn January 2020 and reinstated in June 2020. DOI: 10.1520/ (AATCC), P.O. Box 12215, Research Triangle Park, NC 27709, http://
D7244-20. www.aatcc.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D7244 − 20
FIG. 1 AATCC Motorized Crockmeter Model CM-5
2 2
problem caused by an undercured condition but does not 7.2 Test cloth, white linen 50 mm (2 in. ) as specified in
identify what caused the condition. AATCC Method 8.
5.2 This test method does not duplicate the conditions on a 7.3 Solvents:
printing press but does provide a means to determine whether 7.3.1 Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK).
the test sample meets specifications as agreed upon between 7.3.2 Isopropyl alcohol 99 % (IPA).
supplier and customer.
8. Hazards
6. Apparatus
8.1 Provide adequate
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.