Standard Practice for Selection of Wire and Cable Size in AWG or Metric Units

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The selection criteria is to be applied for uses of (1) new cable and (2) replacement cable.  
3.2 For the selection of new cable or the selection of replacement cable, this practice defines the choice criteria for conductor selection for cables in AWG (ASTM) or metric (IEC) sizes.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice is intended as a guide to shipbuilders, shipowners, and design agents for use in the selection of conductor size for single conductor or multiple conductor cable sizes either in American Wire Gauge (AWG) or metric designations for commercial ship design and construction.  
1.2 The comparison chart of electrical conductor sizes shown in Table 1 presents a combined listing of international standard sizes of Class 2 stranded copper conductors in accordance with AWG (Specification B8) English units or IEC (IEC 60228) metric units.TABLE 1 Conversion Table—AWG/Metric Preferred Sizes of Conductors    
Size
Metric,
mm 2  
Size
AWG/MCM  
Area in
Circ Mils
(Nominal)  
AmpacityA  
dc Resistances at 20°CB  
Ohms
per 1000 ft  
Ohms
per km  
2000*C  
2 000 000  
1155  
0.0053  
0.0177  
1000*  
1 970 000  
1145  
0.0054  
0.0176  
1750*  
1 750 000  
1070  
0.0063  
0.0199  
800*  
1 580 000  
1009  
0.0067  
0.0224  
1500*  
1 500 000  
980  
0.0071  
0.0232  
1250*  
1 250 000  
890  
0.0085  
0.0278  
630*  
1 240 000  
886  
0.0096  
0.0286  
1000*  
1 000 000  
780  
0.0106  
0.0347  
500*  
987 000  
772  
0.0105  
0.0369  
400*  
789 000  
675  
0.0133  
0.0475  
750*  
750 000  
655  
0.0141  
0.0463  
600*  
600 000  
575  
0.0176  
0.0578  
300*  
592 000  
570  
0.0211  
0.0607  
500*  
500 000  
515  
0.0211  
0.0694  
240*  
474 000  
499  
0.0219  
0.0762  
400*  
400 000  
455  
0.0264  
0.0867  
185*  
365 000  
431  
0.0286  
0.1000  
350*  
350 000  
420  
0.0302  
0.0990  
300*  
300 000  
375  
0.0353  
0.1157  
150*  
296 000  
372  
0.0353  
0.1260  
250*  
250 000  
340  
0.0423  
0.1388  
120*  
237 000  
327  
0.0436  
0.1540  
4/0*  
211 600  
300  
0.0500  
0.1639  
95*  
187 000  
265  
0.0551  
0.1950  
3/0*  
167 000  
260  
0.0631  
0.2065  
70*  
138 000  
230  
0.0752  
0.2700  
2/0*  
133 100  
225  
0.0794  
0.2605  
1/0*  
105 600  
195  
0.1002  
0.3288  
50*  
98 700  
185  
0.1044  
0.3910  
1  
83 690  
165  
0.1261  
0.4139  
35*  
69 100  
144  
0.1495  
0.5290  
2*  
66 360  
140  
0.1588  
0.5211  
3  
52 620  
120  
0.2005  
0.6577  
25*  
49 300  
115  
0.2057  
0.7340  
4*  
41 740  
105  
0.2528  
0.8295  
16*  
31 600  
89  
0.3259  
1.160  
6*  
26 240  
80  
0.4023  
1.320  
10*  
19 700  
63  
0.5167  
1.840  
8*  
16 510  
55  
0.6380  
2.093  
6.0*  
11 800  
43  
0.8543  
3.110  
10*  
10 380  
40  
1.017  
3.335  
4.0*  
7 890  
30  
1.304  
4.700  
12*  
6 530  
25  
1.620  
5.315  
2.5*  
4 930  
22  
2.067  
7.560  
14*  
4 110  
20  
2.573  
8.442  
1.5*  
2 960  
. . .  
3.417  
12.20  
16*  
2 580  
. . .  
4.020  
13.19  
1.0*  
1 970  
. . .  
5.213  
18.20  
0.90  
1 773  
. . .  
6.45  
21.10  
18*  
1 620  
. . .  
6.82  
20.95  
0.80  
1 576  
. . .  
6.52  
21.40  
0.75*  
1 480  
. . .  
6.82  
24.80  
0.60*  
1 182  
. . .  
9.5  
31.16  
20*  
1 020  
. . .  
10.5  
34.45  
0.50*  
987  
. . .  
11.4  
36.70  
22*  
640  
. . .  
16.9  
55.44  
0.20*  
24*  
404  
. . .  
26.7  ...

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2013
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F1883-03(2013) - Standard Practice for Selection of Wire and Cable Size in AWG or Metric Units
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F1883 − 03 (Reapproved 2013) An American National Standard
Standard Practice for
Selection of Wire and Cable Size in AWG or Metric Units
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1883; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2.3 IEEE Standard:
IEEE STD 45 Recommended Practice for Electric Installa-
1.1 This practice is intended as a guide to shipbuilders,
tions on Shipboard
shipowners, and design agents for use in the selection of
conductorsizeforsingleconductorormultipleconductorcable
3. Significance and Use
sizes either in American Wire Gauge (AWG) or metric desig-
3.1 The selection criteria is to be applied for uses of (1) new
nations for commercial ship design and construction.
cable and (2) replacement cable.
1.2 The comparison chart of electrical conductor sizes
3.2 For the selection of new cable or the selection of
shown in Table 1 presents a combined listing of international
replacement cable, this practice defines the choice criteria for
standard sizes of Class 2 stranded copper conductors in
conductor selection for cables in AWG (ASTM) or metric
accordance withAWG (Specification B8) English units or IEC
(IEC) sizes.
(IEC 60228) metric units.
1.3 As a precautionary caveat, some conductor sizes listed
4. Selection Criteria
in Table 1 may exceed minimal size requirements of the U.S.
4.1 When selecting cable for any application, AWG or
CoastGuard,theAmericanBureauofShipping,andIEEESTD
metric sizing should be selected according to preferred sizes.
45 for specific applications.
The sizes of conductors that have been marked with an asterisk
1.4 The values stated for ampacity and dc resistance are
in Table 1 designate preferred sizes per Specification B8 and
presentedasmaximumvaluesandareprovidedforinformation
IEC 60228. Those sizes not marked are given for reference,
only.
and it is recommended that their use be discouraged.
4.2 When selecting cable for any application, AWG or
2. Referenced Documents
metric sizing should be selected with full consideration of the
2.1 ASTM Standards:
relationshipoftypeofinsulationandampacity.Directselection
B8 Specification for Concentric-Lay-Stranded Copper
between AWG and metric sizes can be made only after a
Conductors, Hard, Medium-Hard, or Soft
determination of the equivalence of insulation is made.
B193 Test Method for Resistivity of Electrical Conductor
4.3 When selecting cable, the conductor size will be deter-
Materials
mined from analysis of required ampacity, voltage drop
2.2 IEC Standards:
considerations, type of cable insulation, and planned installa-
IEC 60092-350 Electrical Installations in Ships—Part 350:
tion. Recommended practices for selection and installation of
Shipboard Power: Cables—General Construction andTest
cable systems are detailed in IEEE STD 45 and IEC 60092-
Requirements
350.
IEC 60228 Conductors of Insulated Cables
4.4 For the selection of cable sizes for new applications,
conductor size that satisfies ampacity requirements, voltage
drop factors, and the adequacy for application in the available
This specification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F25 on Ships
cable space must also be considered.
and Marine Technologyand is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F25.10 on
Electrical.
4.5 For the selection of cable sizes for replacement
Current edition approved May 1, 2013. Published May 2013. Originally
applications, cable size should be selected in excess of or equal
approved in 1998. Last previous edition approved in 2008 as F1883 – 03 (2008).
DOI: 10.1520/F1883-03R13.
to the replaced cable size. Existing cable space limitations
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
should then be determined to ensure that space for installation
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
of the replacement cable is adequate.
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
Available from International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC), 3 rue de
Varembé, Case postale 131, CH-1211, Geneva 20, Switzerland, http://www.iec.ch. Available from Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE),
445 Hoes Ln., P.O. Box 1331, Piscataway, NJ
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.