Standard Test Method for Dimensional Stability of Fabrics to Changes in Humidity and Temperature

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The measured dimensional stability of a fabric determines whether a fabric has the potential to retain its original shape and remain stable, indicating it will not bubble or sag over time, when applied over a substrate, and its suitability for a specified use.  
5.2 This test method is recommended for acceptance testing of commercial shipments however, caution is advised since information about between laboratory precision is incomplete. Comparative tests as directed in 5.2.1 are advisable.  
5.2.1 If there are differences of practical significance between reported test results for two laboratories (or more), comparative test should be performed to determine if there is a statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assistance. At a minimum, use the samples for such a comparative test that are as homogeneous as possible, drawn from the same lot of material as the samples that resulted in disparate results during initial testing and randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory. The test results from the laboratories involved should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, a probability level chosen prior to the testing series. If bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results for that material must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias.  
5.3 This test method is used in industry to determine if a fabric grows, grows and then shrinks, shrinks and then grows, or remains the same when subjected to a specified range of humidity and temperature conditions.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the dimensional stability of fabrics that are intended for use on panel and screen systems to cycled changes in humidity and temperature.  
1.1.1 Panel and screen systems include acoustic panels, free standing screens, office partitions, and furniture systems.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values in parentheses are approximate inch-pound unit equivalents and are for information only.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Jun-2015
Technical Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D6207-03(2015) - Standard Test Method for Dimensional Stability of Fabrics to Changes in Humidity and Temperature
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM D6207-03(2015) - Standard Test Method for Dimensional Stability of Fabrics to Changes in Humidity and Temperature
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D6207 − 03 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Test Method for
Dimensional Stability of Fabrics to Changes in Humidity and
Temperature
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6207; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.1.2 For definitions of all other textile terms see Terminol-
ogy D123.
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the dimen-
sional stability of fabrics that are intended for use on panel and
4. Summary of Test Method
screen systems to cycled changes in humidity and temperature.
1.1.1 Panel and screen systems include acoustic panels, free 4.1 Dimensional change (growth and shrinkage) data is
standing screens, office partitions, and furniture systems.
collectedforaspecimenoffabricthatissubjectedtocontrolled
cycles of specified relative humidity and temperature condi-
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
tions.
standard. The values in parentheses are approximate inch-
pound unit equivalents and are for information only.
5. Significance and Use
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
5.1 The measured dimensional stability of a fabric deter-
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
mines whether a fabric has the potential to retain its original
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
shape and remain stable, indicating it will not bubble or sag
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
over time, when applied over a substrate, and its suitability for
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
a specified use.
2. Referenced Documents
5.2 This test method is recommended for acceptance testing
of commercial shipments however, caution is advised since
2.1 ASTM Standards:
information about between laboratory precision is incomplete.
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
Comparative tests as directed in 5.2.1 are advisable.
D4850 Terminology Relating to Fabrics and Fabric Test
5.2.1 If there are differences of practical significance be-
Methods
tween reported test results for two laboratories (or more),
D5034 TestMethodforBreakingStrengthandElongationof
comparative test should be performed to determine if there is a
Textile Fabrics (Grab Test)
statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assis-
D5035 Test Method for Breaking Force and Elongation of
tance. At a minimum, use the samples for such a comparative
Textile Fabrics (Strip Method)
test that are as homogeneous as possible, drawn from the same
lot of material as the samples that resulted in disparate results
3. Terminology
during initial testing and randomly assigned in equal numbers
3.1 Definitions:
to each laboratory. The test results from the laboratories
3.1.1 For all terminology related to D13.59 on Fabric Test
involved should be compared using a statistical test for
Methods, General, see Terminology D4850.
unpaired data, a probability level chosen prior to the testing
3.1.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard:
series. If bias is found, either its cause must be found and
bench mark; dimensional change; dimensional stability.
corrected, or future test results for that material must be
adjusted in consideration of the known bias.
5.3 This test method is used in industry to determine if a
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee D13 on Textiles
fabric grows, grows and then shrinks, shrinks and then grows,
and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.59 on Fabric Test Methods,
General.
or remains the same when subjected to a specified range of
Current edition approved July 1, 2015. Published September 2015. Originally
humidity and temperature conditions.
approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2011 as D6207 – 03(2011).
DOI: 10.1520/D6207-03R15.
For referencedASTM standards, visist theASTM Web Site, www.astm.org, or 6. Apparatus
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
6.1 Environmental Test Chamber, meeting the following
Standardsvolume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM web site. criteria:
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D6207 − 03 (2015)
6.1.1 Capable of testing two specimens at one time, each 8. Preparation of Apparatus
150 by 1000, 6 6 mm (6.0 by 39.0, 6 0.25 in.) mounted
8.1 Check all elements of the environmental test chamber to
vertically in a single frame.
ensure that they are functioning properly. These elements
6.1.2 Capable of a relative humidity range of 15 to 95%,
include, but are not limited to, the humidifier, dehumidifier,
controllable to 6 5%.
heater, fan, gages, and recording device.
6.1.3 Capable of a temperature range of 15 to 35 °C (59 to
8.2 Calibrate the test chamber instrumentation as recom-
95 °F) with a tolerance of 62°C(6 4 °F).
mended by the manufacturer, to maintain relative humidity and
6.1.4 Provision for automatic cycling of humidity and
temperature accuracy.
temperature conditions.
6.1.5 Having visible humidity and temperature indicators
9. Preparation of Test Specimens
and a continuous recording device (digital readout or plotter).
9.1 Position and clamp length and width test specimens in
6.2 Specimen Frame, meeting the following criteria:
the specimen frame. (See Fig. 2).
6.2.1 Of a size that will fit in the test chamber and hold two
9.2 Attach a weighted spring clamp to the lower end of each
specimens, see Fig. 1.
specimen (see 6.4). Do not remove the weighted springs
6.2.2 With a means for measuring specimen length of at
clamps until the test has been completed.
least 1000 mm (36 in.) in increments of 1 mm (0.05 or ⁄16 in.).
9.3 Precondition the specimens (see 9.2)for24hat15+/-
6.2.3 With a means for holding and suspending the speci-
5 % relative humidity (RH) and 32 +/- 2° C (90 +/- 4 °F).
men vertically.
9.3.1 The specimens may be preconditioned in a sep
...


This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: D6207 − 03 (Reapproved 2011) D6207 − 03 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Test Method for
Dimensional Stability of Fabrics to Changes in Humidity and
Temperature
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D6207; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the dimensional stability of fabrics that are intended for use on panel and screen
systems to cycled changes in humidity and temperature.
1.1.1 Panel and screen systems include acoustic panels, free standing screens, office partitions, and furniture systems.
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values in parentheses are approximate inch-pound unit
equivalents and are for information only.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
D4850 Terminology Relating to Fabrics and Fabric Test Methods
D5034 Test Method for Breaking Strength and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Grab Test)
D5035 Test Method for Breaking Force and Elongation of Textile Fabrics (Strip Method)
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 For all terminology related to D13.59 on Fabric Test Methods, General, see Terminology D4850.
3.1.1.1 The following terms are relevant to this standard: bench mark; dimensional change; dimensional stability.
3.1.2 For definitions of all other textile terms see Terminology D123.
4. Summary of Test Method
4.1 Dimensional change (growth and shrinkage) data is collected for a specimen of fabric that is subjected to controlled cycles
of specified relative humidity and temperature conditions.
5. Significance and Use
5.1 The measured dimensional stability of a fabric determines whether a fabric has the potential to retain its original shape and
remain stable, indicating it will not bubble or sag over time, when applied over a substrate, and its suitability for a specified use.
5.2 This test method is recommended for acceptance testing of commercial shipments however, caution is advised since
information about between laboratory precision is incomplete. Comparative tests as directed in 5.2.1 are advisable.
5.2.1 If there are differences of practical significance between reported test results for two laboratories (or more), comparative
test should be performed to determine if there is a statistical bias between them, using competent statistical assistance. At a
minimum, use the samples for such a comparative test that are as homogeneous as possible, drawn from the same lot of material
as the samples that resulted in disparate results during initial testing and randomly assigned in equal numbers to each laboratory.
The test results from the laboratories involved should be compared using a statistical test for unpaired data, a probability level
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D13 on Textiles and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee D13.59 on Fabric Test Methods, General.
Current edition approved May 1, 2011July 1, 2015. Published July 2011September 2015. Originally approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 20072011 as
D6207 – 03(2007).(2011). DOI: 10.1520/D6207-03R11.10.1520/D6207-03R15.
For referenced ASTM standards, visist the ASTM Web Site, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standardsvolume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM web site.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D6207 − 03 (2015)
chosen prior to the testing series. If bias is found, either its cause must be found and corrected, or future test results for that material
must be adjusted in consideration of the known bias.
5.3 This test method is used in industry to determine if a fabric grows, grows and then shrinks, shrinks and then grows, or
remains the same when subjected to a specified range of humidity and temperature conditions.
6. Apparatus
6.1 Environmental Test Chamber, meeting the following criteria:
6.1.1 Capable of testing two specimens at one time, each 150 by 1000, 6 6 mm (6.0 by 39.0, 6 0.25 in.) mounted vertically
in a single frame.
6.1.2 Capable of a relative humidity range of 15 to 95%, controllable to 6 5%.
6.1.3 Capable of a temperature range of 15 to 35 °C (59 to 95 °F) with a tolerance of 6 2 °C (6 4 °F).
6.1.4 Provision for automatic cycling of humidity and temperature conditions.
6.1.5 Having visible humidity and temperature indicators and a continuous recording device (digital readout or plotter).
6.2 Specimen Frame, meeting the following criteria:
6.2.1 Of a size that will fit in the test chamber and hold two specimens, see Fig. 1.
6.2.2 With a means for measuring specimen length of at least 1000 mm (36 in.) in increments of 1 mm (0.05 or ⁄16 in.).
6.2.3 With a means for holding and suspending the specimen vertically.
6.3 Pointers, T-shaped or common straight pins, one per specimen, for reference marks.
6.4 A weight spring clamp, with a mass of 100 6 5 g, one per specimen, to create a uniformly distributed force across the
specimen width dimension of 1.00 n 6 0.05 N (0.22 lbf).
6.4.1 Examples of weighted spring clamps are the paper holders used on the top of clip boards and potato chip bag clamps.
7. Sampling
7.1 Lot Sample—Take a lot sample as directed in the applicable material specification. In the absence of such a specification,
randomly select the rolls or pieces that constitute the lot sample using the following schedule:
Number of Rolls, Pieces in Number of Rolls, or Pieces in
Lot, Inclusi
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.