iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM F1111-02

(Test Method)

Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals

Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
The data generated by this test method shall be used to determine whether low embrittling cadmium plated parts are liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test material during routine maintenance operations.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended as a means of determining the corrosive effects of aircraft maintenance chemicals on low-embrittling cadmium plating used on aircraft high-strength steel, under conditions of total immersion by quantitative measurements of weight change.
1.2 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements see Section 6, 4.1, and X1.3.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-May-2002
ICS
49.025.99 - Other materials
Technical Committee
F07 - Aerospace and Aircraft
Drafting Committee
F07.07 - Qualification Testing of Aircraft Cleaning Materials
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Replaces
ASTM F1111-88(1998) - Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals
Effective Date
10-May-2002
Replaced By
ASTM F1111-08 - Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals
Effective Date
01-May-2008
Referred By
ASTM D6361/D6361M-98(2020) - Standard Guide for Selecting Cleaning Agents and Processes
Effective Date
10-May-2002

Buy Standard

ASTM F1111-02 - Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance ChemicalsASTM F1111-02 - Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM F1111-02 - Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:F 1111 – 02
Standard Test Method for
Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft
1
Maintenance Chemicals
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1111; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the Department of Defense.
1. Scope liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test
material during routine maintenance operations.
1.1 This test method is intended as a means of determining
the corrosive effects of aircraft maintenance chemicals on
4. Apparatus
low-embrittlingcadmiumplatingusedonaircrafthigh-strength
4.1 Wide Mouth Sealable Glass Jar or Stoppered Flask,
steel, under conditions of total immersion by quantitative
having a capacity so chosen that specimens will remain fully
measurements of weight change.
immersed in a vertical position and not in contact with other
1.2 This standard may involve hazardous materials, opera-
specimens during the test and the ratio of area of immersed
tions, and equipment. This standard does not purport to
metal to the volume of solution will be as prescribed in 9.1.
address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its
(Warning—Some aircraft maintenance chemicals when
use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to
heated have high vapor pressures or may produce gases during
establish appropriate safety and health practices and deter-
testing. Suitable precautions should be taken to prevent the
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
containing vessel from exploding or the vessel should be so
For specific hazard statements see Section 6, 4.1, and X1.3.
chosen as to withstand the resulting pressures.)
2. Referenced Documents 4.2 Constant Temperature Device—Any suitable regulated
heating device may be employed for maintaining the solution
2.1 ASTM Standards:
2
at the required temperature.
D 329 Specification for Acetone
2
4.3 Sandblaster.
D 740 Specification for Methyl Ethyl Ketone
3
4.4 Ampere Meter, capable of measuring 60 65A.
D 1193 Specification for Reagent Water
4.5 Oven, capable of maintaining temperature of 110 6 2°C
D 4080 Specification for Trichloroethylene, Technical and
4
(230 6 4°F).
Vapor Degreasing Grade
4.6 Plating Bath, containing the solution specified in X1.2.
2.2 Industry Standards:
SAE-AMS-6345 Steel Sheet, Strip and Plate (SAE 4130)
5. Reagents
5
Normalized or Otherwise Heat Treated
5.1 PurityofWater—Unless otherwise indicated, references
3. Significance and Use to water shall be understood to mean reagent water as defined
by Type III of Specification D 1193.
3.1 The data generated by this test method shall be used to
5.2 Trichloroethylene, in accordance with Specification
determine whether low embrittling cadmium plated parts are
D 4080.
5.3 Methyl Ethyl Ketone, in accordance with Specification
D 740.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F07 on
5.4 Acetone, in accordance with Specification D 329.
Aerospace and Aircraft and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F07.07 on
5.5 Aluminum Oxide, 180 grit.
Qualification Testing of Aircraft Cleaning Materials.
Current edition approved May 10, 2002. Published June 2002. Originally
6. Safety Precautions
published as F 1111 – 88. Last previous edition F 1111 – 88 (1998).
2
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 06.04.
6.1 The solvents used in cleaning test specimens are flam-
3
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 11.01.
mable or harmful if inhaled, or both. Keep away from sparks
4
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 15.05.
5 and open flames. Avoid breathing vapors and prolonged or
Available from Society of Automotive Engineers (SAE), 400 Commonwealth
Dr., Warrendale, PA 15096-0001. repeated contact with skin. Use adequate ventilation.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1111–02
6.2 Cyanides and cadmium oxide are very toxic and corro- 9.3 Temperature—Unless otherwise specified, the test tem-
sive to skin. Take suitable precautions in the handling of them perature shall be 35 6 1°C (95 6 2°F).
to avoid personal injury. Use adequate ventilation and keep 9.4 Test Duration—Unless otherwise specified, the test
away from acids. period shall be 24 h.
6.3 Some materials used for aircraft maintenance may
10. Procedure
contain flammable solvents, acids or alkalis, or other toxic
compounds. Take suitable precautions to prevent personal 10.1 Dry the precleaned specimens at 110°C (230°F) for 1
h, allow to cool to ro
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM F1110-09(2020)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Sandwich Corrosion Test

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The data generated by this test method shall be used to determine whether aircraft structural aluminum alloys are liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test material during routine maintenance operations.  
5.2 Interpretation of the sandwich corrosion test results is based on a comparison of the appearance of faying surfaces of three sets of coupons. One set of test coupons is exposed with reagent water only in the faying surfaces, to establish the baseline (controls) against which the panels exposed to the test material are compared. Disregard corrosion at cut edges of the test coupons.  
5.3 The relative corrosion severity rating system is provided in order to allow a numerical classification of the test results and to eliminate the necessity for elaborate weight loss measurements. Pitting corrosion, which is rated 4—extensive (severe) corrosion, may involve only a negligible weight loss.  
5.4 Relative corrosion severity rating system:    
Appearance/Corrosion:  
0—No visible corrosion and no discoloration present  
1—Very slight corrosion or very slight discoloration, and/or up to 5 % of areaA corroded    
2—Discoloration and/or up to 10 % of areaA corroded  
3—Discoloration and/or up to 25 % of areaA corroded  
4—Discoloration and/or more than 25 % of areaA corroded, and/or pitting
present (A) ”Area” refers to area under the filter paper, or if no filter paper is used, the area where the test material was applied.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method defines the procedure for evaluating the corrosivity of aircraft maintenance chemicals, when present between faying surfaces (sandwich) of aluminum alloys commonly used for aircraft structures. This test method is intended to be used in the qualification and approval of compounds employed in aircraft maintenance operations.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information.  
1.3 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements appear in Section 9.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1111-08b(2019)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The data generated by this test method shall be used to determine whether low embrittling cadmium plated parts are liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test material during routine maintenance operations.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended as a means of determining the corrosive effects of aircraft maintenance chemicals on low-embrittling cadmium plating used on aircraft high-strength steel, under conditions of total immersion by quantitative measurements of weight change.  
1.2 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements see Section 6, 4.1.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D5972-23(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Freezing Point of Aviation Fuels (Automatic Phase Transition Method)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The freezing point of an aviation fuel is the lowest temperature at which the fuel remains free of solid hydrocarbon crystals. These crystals can restrict the flow of fuel through the fuel system of the aircraft. The temperature of the fuel in the aircraft tank normally decreases during flight depending on aircraft speed, altitude, and flight duration. The freezing point of the fuel must always be lower than the minimum operational fuel temperature.  
5.2 Petroleum blending operations require precise measurement of the freezing point.  
5.3 This test method produces results which have been found to be equivalent to Test Method D2386 and expresses results to the nearest 0.1 °C, with improved precision over Test Method D2386. This test method also eliminates most of the operator time and judgment required by Test Method D2386.  
5.4 When specification requires Test Method D2386, do not substitute this test method or any other test method.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the temperature below which solid hydrocarbon crystals form in aviation turbine fuels.  
1.2 This test method is designed to cover the temperature range of −80 °C to 20 °C; however, 2003 Joint ASTM/IP Interlaboratory Cooperative Test Program mentioned in 12.4 has only demonstrated the test method with fuels having freezing points in the range of −42 °C to −60 °C.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific warning statements, see 7.1, 7.3, and 7.5.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D2532-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Viscosity and Viscosity Change After Standing at Low Temperature of Aircraft Turbine Lubricants

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Aircraft turbine lubricants, upon standing at low temperatures for prolonged periods of time, may show an increase in kinematic viscosity. This increase may cause lubrication problems in aircraft engines. Thus, this test method is used to ensure that the kinematic viscosity does not exceed the maximum kinematic viscosity in certain specifications for aircraft turbine lubricants.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the kinematic viscosity of aircraft turbine lubricants at low temperature, and the percent change of viscosity after a 3 h and a 72 h standing period at low temperature.  
1.1.1 The range of kinematic viscosities covered by this test method is from 7700 mm2/s to 14 000 mm2/s at –40 °C and from 7000 mm2/s to 17 500 mm2/s at –51 °C. The precision has only been determined for those materials, kinematic viscosity ranges, and temperatures as shown in the precision section. Kinematic viscosities and percent change of viscosity may be measured and reported at other temperatures and other thermal soak period intervals as agreed by the contracting parties.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.2.1 The SI unit used in this test method for Kinematic Viscosity is mm2/s. For user reference, 1 mm2/s = 10-6 m2/s = 1 cSt.  
1.3 Warning—Mercury has been designated by many regulatory agencies as a hazardous substance that can cause serious medical issues. Mercury, or its vapor, has been demonstrated to be hazardous to health and corrosive to materials. Use caution when handling mercury and mercury-containing products. See the applicable product Safety Data Sheet (SDS) for additional information. The potential exists that selling mercury or mercury-containing products, or both, is prohibited by local or national law. Users must determine legality of sales in their location.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements, see Section 7.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D6790/D6790M-22(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Determining Poisson's Ratio of Honeycomb Cores

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Certain sandwich panel analyses require the Poisson's ratio of the honeycomb core. It is not possible to measure the honeycomb's Poisson's ratio by conventional methods.  
5.2 This test method provides a standard method of determining the Poisson’s ratio of honeycomb core materials for design properties, material specifications, research and development applications, and quality assurance.  
5.3 Factors that influence the Poisson’s ratio of honeycomb core materials and shall therefore be reported include the following: core material, methods of material fabrication, core geometry, core thickness, core thickness uniformity, cell wall thickness, specimen geometry, specimen preparation, and specimen conditioning.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of the sandwich honeycomb core Poisson's ratio from the anticlastic curvature radii; see Fig. 1.
FIG. 1 Anticlastic Curvature  
1.2 Units—The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system are not necessarily exact equivalents; therefore, to ensure conformance with the standard, each system shall be used independently of the other, and values from the two systems shall not be combined.  
1.2.1 Within the text, the inch-pound units are shown in brackets.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    4 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1110-09(2020)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Sandwich Corrosion Test

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The data generated by this test method shall be used to determine whether aircraft structural aluminum alloys are liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test material during routine maintenance operations.  
5.2 Interpretation of the sandwich corrosion test results is based on a comparison of the appearance of faying surfaces of three sets of coupons. One set of test coupons is exposed with reagent water only in the faying surfaces, to establish the baseline (controls) against which the panels exposed to the test material are compared. Disregard corrosion at cut edges of the test coupons.  
5.3 The relative corrosion severity rating system is provided in order to allow a numerical classification of the test results and to eliminate the necessity for elaborate weight loss measurements. Pitting corrosion, which is rated 4—extensive (severe) corrosion, may involve only a negligible weight loss.  
5.4 Relative corrosion severity rating system:    
Appearance/Corrosion:  
0—No visible corrosion and no discoloration present  
1—Very slight corrosion or very slight discoloration, and/or up to 5 % of areaA corroded    
2—Discoloration and/or up to 10 % of areaA corroded  
3—Discoloration and/or up to 25 % of areaA corroded  
4—Discoloration and/or more than 25 % of areaA corroded, and/or pitting
present (A) ”Area” refers to area under the filter paper, or if no filter paper is used, the area where the test material was applied.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method defines the procedure for evaluating the corrosivity of aircraft maintenance chemicals, when present between faying surfaces (sandwich) of aluminum alloys commonly used for aircraft structures. This test method is intended to be used in the qualification and approval of compounds employed in aircraft maintenance operations.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information.  
1.3 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. Specific hazard statements appear in Section 9.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E285-08(2020)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Oxyacetylene Ablation Testing of Thermal Insulation Materials

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This test method is intended to screen the most obvious poor materials from further consideration. Since the combustion gases more closely resemble the environment generated in rocket motors, this test method is more applicable to screening materials for nozzles and motor liners than for aerodynamic heating.  
4.2 The environment for any specific high-temperature thermal protection problem is peculiar to that particular application. The conditions generated by the oxyacetylene heat source in this test method represent only one set of conditions; they do not simulate any specific application. Thus, the test results cannot be used to predict directly the behavior of materials for specific environments, nor can they be used for design purposes. However, over a number of years, the test has been useful in determining the relative merit of materials, particularly in weeding out obviously poor materials from more advanced data-generation programs. It has also been considered for use as a production quality-control test for rocket insulation materials.  
4.3 The tester is cautioned to use prudence in extending the usefulness of the test method beyond its original intent, namely, screening. For situations having environments widely different from those of the test, the user is urged to modify the oxyacetylene burner conditions to suit his requirements or perhaps change to a different heat-generating device that provides better simulation.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the screening of ablative materials to determine the relative thermal insulation effectiveness when tested as a flat panel in an environment of a steady flow of hot gas provided by an oxyacetylene burner.  
1.2 This test method should be used to measure and describe the properties of materials, products, or assemblies in response to heat and flame under controlled laboratory conditions and should not be used to describe or appraise the fire hazard of materials, products, or assemblies under actual fire conditions. However, results of this test method may be used as elements of a fire risk assessment which takes into account all of the factors which are pertinent to an assessment of the fire hazard of a particular end use.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    6 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1111-08b(2019)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Corrosion of Low-Embrittling Cadmium Plate by Aircraft Maintenance Chemicals

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 The data generated by this test method shall be used to determine whether low embrittling cadmium plated parts are liable to be corroded or damaged by application of the test material during routine maintenance operations.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended as a means of determining the corrosive effects of aircraft maintenance chemicals on low-embrittling cadmium plating used on aircraft high-strength steel, under conditions of total immersion by quantitative measurements of weight change.  
1.2 This standard may involve hazardous materials, operations, and equipment. This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific hazard statements see Section 6, 4.1.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1731-11(2018)(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Gravimetric Determination of Nonvolatile Residue from Cleanroom Gloves

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The NVR obtained by this test method is that amount which is available for release by the gloves onto handled surfaces.  
5.2 Evaporation of solvent at the stated temperature is to quantify the NVR that can be expected to exist at room temperature, since the slight difference between room temperature and the test temperature is not likely to result in significant variances.  
5.3 This method may be more aggressive than necessary to determine the suitability of cleanroom gloves that are restricted to dry operations only.  
5.4 Various other methods exist for determining NVR, for example Practice G120 and IEST-RP-CC005. This test is not intended to replace test methods used for other purposes.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of solvent extractable nonvolatile residue (NVR) from gloves used in cleanrooms where spacecraft are assembled, cleaned, or tested.  
1.2 The NVR of interest is that which can be extracted from gloves using a specified solvent that has been selected for its extracting qualities, or because it is representative of solvents used in the particular facility. Alternative solvents may be used, but since their use may result in different values being generated, they must be identified in the procedure data sheet.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM E1560-18(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Gravimetric Determination of Nonvolatile Residue From Cleanroom Wipers

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The NVR obtained by this test method is that amount which is available for release by wipers in normal use.  
5.2 Evaporation of the solvent at the stated temperature is to quantify the NVR that can be expected to exist at room temperature, since the slight difference between room temperature and test temperature has not been shown to result in significant variances.  
5.3 This test method may be more aggressive than necessary for the evaluation of wipers that will be restricted to dry use only.  
5.4 Numerous other methods are being used to determine NVR. This test method is not intended to replace test methods used for other applications.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the determination of solvent extractable nonvolatile residue (NVR) from wipers used in assembly, cleaning, or testing of spacecraft, but not from those used for analytical surface sampling of hardware.  
1.2 The NVR of interest is that which can be extracted from cleanroom wipers using a specified solvent that has been selected for its extractive qualities. Alternative solvents may be selected, but since their use may result in different values being generated, they must be identified in the procedure data sheet.  
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.  
1.3.1 Exception—The inch-pound units are included for information only.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off