Railway applications - Gauges - Part 5: Background, explanation and worked examples

This document presents the background of gauging methods, gives calculation examples for both rolling stock and infrastructure based on gauging methods from prEN 15273-2 and prEN 15273-3, and also demonstrates some relevant formulae.

Bahnanwendungen - Begrenzungslinien - Hintergrund, Erläuterung und praktizierte Beispiele

Applications ferroviaires - Gabarits - Partie 5 : Contexte, explication et exemples

Železniške naprave - Profili - 5. del: Ozadje, razlaga in praktični primeri

General Information

Status
Not Published
Current Stage
5098 - Decision to abandon - Formal Approval
Completion Date
27-Mar-2020

Buy Standard

Draft
kTP FprCEN/TR 15273-5:2019 - BARVE
English language
214 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-februar-2019
äHOH]QLãNHQDSUDYH3URILOLGHO2]DGMHUD]ODJDLQSUDNWLþQLSULPHUL
Railway applications - Gauges - Part 5: Background, explanation and worked examples
Bahnanwendungen - Begrenzungslinien - Hintergrund, Erläuterung und praktizierte
Beispiele
Applications ferroviaires - Gabarits - Partie 5 : Contexte, explication et exemples
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: FprCEN/TR 15273-5
ICS:
45.060.01 Železniška vozila na splošno Railway rolling stock in
general
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

FINAL DRAFT
TECHNICAL REPORT
RAPPORT TECHNIQUE
TECHNISCHER BERICHT
November 2018
ICS 45.020; 45.060.01
English Version
Railway applications - Gauges - Part 5: Background,
explanation and worked examples
Applications ferroviaires - Gabarits - Partie 5 : Bahnanwendungen - Begrenzungslinien - Hintergrund,
Contexte, explication et exemples Erläuterung und praktizierte Beispiele

This draft Technical Report is submitted to CEN members for Vote. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC
256.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and United Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are
aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a Technical Report. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without
notice and shall not be referred to as a Technical Report.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2018 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. FprCEN/TR 15273-5:2018 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 6
2 Normative references . 6
3 Terms and definitions . 6
4 Symbols and abbreviations . 6
5 General . 6
6 Historical background . 7
6.1 Why gauging? . 7
6.2 Defined gauges . 8
6.3 Absolute and comparative process . 9
7 Technical background . 11
7.1 Defined gauges . 11
Rolling stock . 11
Infrastructure . 56
Creating a defined gauge . 67
7.2 Absolute and comparative process . 71
Main steps to performing an absolute gauging assessment . 71
Main steps to performing a comparative gauging assessment . 71
Clearances and control measures . 72
Effective position of the track . 73
Platform stepping distances . 73
Generation of track data for use in absolute and comparative process . 77
Background to statistical evaluation and clearance categories in prEN 15273-1 . 84
Information on vehicle “datum” used in calculation of swept envelopes . 85
Guidance on choosing between two or three datum points for calculation of maximum
suspension displacement . 86
Determining survey and measurement accuracy . 86
8 Examples: defined kinematic gauges . 87
8.1 General . 87
8.2 Rolling stock . 87
Passenger coach with 2 trailer bogies without rotation bump stops with gauges G1 + GI2
............................................................................................................................................................................. 87
Passenger coach with 2 trailer bogies with rotation stops with G1 + GI2 . 93
Multiple unit with 1 trailer bogie + 1 motor bogie with GB + GI2 . 96
Application for particular articulated trainset . 102
Checking the pantograph in collecting position . 106
Analysis of an open door and steps for FR 3.3 and GI2 . 108
Calculation of bogie gauge for G1+GI2 . 112
Tilting trains with an active system . 116
Passive tilting passenger vehicles with single axles. 123
Wagon and marshalling hump . 131
Defined new formulae in special cases . 134
8.3 Infrastructure . 137
General . 137
Gauge GB + GI2 on straight track . 137
Gauge GB + GI2 in curve track . 146
Pantograph. 155
Platform calculation . 158
Distance between the track centres . 160
Transition curve . 164
9 Examples: defined dynamic gauges . 169
9.1 Rolling stock . 169
Multiple unit . 169
Pantograph. 176
9.2 Infrastructure . 178
General . 178
Gauge SEa on straight track . 178
Gauge SEa in curved track . 184
Pantograph for SEa . 192
Platform calculation for Sea . 193
Distance between track centres for Sea . 194
10 Examples: absolute and comparative gauging process . 197
10.1 Absolute example . 197
Introduction . 197
Input . 197
Methodology . 199
Calculating the swept envelope . 202
Building the swept envelope . 203
Including the effective track position . 204
Calculating the clearance . 205
10.2 Comparative example . 206
Input data . 206
Methodology . 207
Results . 208
10.3 Hybrid example – combination of comparative and absolute method . 209
10.4 Absolute gauging example for pantographs . 210
Introduction . 210
Method 1 – static pantograph gauge example . 210
Method 2 – Benchmark sway values example . 212
Bibliography . 214

European foreword
This docum
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.