Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets

This Part of prEN 15269, which should be read in conjunction with prEN 15269-1, covers single and double leaf, hinged and pivoted, steel based doorsets.
This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 4 the extended application may cover all or some of the following non-exhaustive list:
- Integrity only (E), radiation (EW) or insulated (EI1 or EI2) classifications;
- door leaf;
- wall/ceiling fixed elements (frame/suspension system;
- glazing for door leaf;
- items of building hardware;
- decorative finishes;
- intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
- alternative supporting construction(s).
- decorative finishes;
- intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
alternative supporting construction(s).

Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchtigkeit von Feuerschutzabschlüssen und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 2: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Drehflügeltüreinheiten aus Stahl

Application élargie des résultats d'essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, fermetures et fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie - Partie 2: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en acier

La présente partie du prEN 15269, qu’il convient de lire conjointement avec le prEN 15269-1, couvre les blocs-portes en acier à un vantail ou deux vantaux, pivotants ou battants.
Le présent document prescrit la méthode d’extension de l’application des résultats d’essai obtenus suite aux essais menés conformément à l’EN 1634-1.
Soumise à la réalisation des essais appropriés sélectionnés parmi ceux identifiés dans l’article 4, l’application étendue peut couvrir tout ou partie de la liste non exhaustive ci-dessous :
-   classifications d’étanchéité au feu uniquement (E), de rayonnement (EW) ou d’isolation (EI1 ou EI2) ;
-   ouvrant ;
-   éléments fixes des murs/du plafond (châssis/système de suspension) ;
-   vitrage pour ouvrant ;
-   éléments de quincaillerie ;
-   finis décoratifs ;
-   joints intumescent, joints étanches à la fumée, joints étanches à l’air ou joints acoustiques ;
-   autre(s) construction(s) support(s).

Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti za vrata, zapore in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 2. del: Požarna odpornost jeklenih vrat s tečaji

General Information

Status
Not Published
Current Stage
4098 - Decision to abandon - Enquiry
Due Date
13-Dec-2010
Completion Date
13-Dec-2010

Buy Standard

Draft
prEN 15269-2:2009
English language
94 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview

e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (sample)

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Feuerschutzabschlüssen - Teil 2: Drehflügeltüreinheiten aus StahlApplication élargie des résultats d'essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, fermetures et fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie - Partie 2: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en acierExtended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets91.060.50Vrata in oknaDoors and windows13.220.50Požarna odpornost gradbenih materialov in elementovFire-resistance of building materials and elementsICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:prEN 15269-2oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009en,fr,de01-julij-2009oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009SLOVENSKI

STANDARD
oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

EUROPEAN STANDARDNORME EUROPÉENNEEUROPÄISCHE NORMDRAFTprEN 15269-2April 2009ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50 English VersionExtended application of test results for fire resistance and/orsmoke control for door, shutter and openable windowassemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsetsApplication élargie des résultats d'essais en matière derésistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, fermetures et fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments dequincaillerie - Partie 2: Résistance au feu des blocs-portesbattants et pivotants en acierThis draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 127.If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations whichstipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other languagemade by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN Management Centre has thesame status as the official versions.CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and toprovide supporting documentation.Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without notice andshall not be referred to as a European Standard.EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATIONCOMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATIONEUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNGManagement Centre:

Avenue Marnix 17,

B-1000 Brussels© 2009 CENAll rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reservedworldwide for CEN national Members.Ref. No. prEN 15269-2:2009: EoSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

2 Contents Page Foreword ............................................................................................................................................................. 3Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................ 31 Scope...................................................................................................................................................... 42 Normative references ........................................................................................................................... 43 Definitions .............................................................................................................................................. 54 Determination of the field of extended application ........................................................................... 54.1 General ................................................................................................................................................... 54.2 Procedure for evaluation ...................................................................................................................... 54.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application ..................................................................... 64.4 Interpretation of test results ................................................................................................................ 75 Extended application report ................................................................................................................ 76 Classification report ............................................................................................................................. 7Annex A (normative)

Construction Parameter Variations .............................................................................. 8Annex B (normative) Test Protocols for Doorsets Incorporating Side, Transom and Flush Over Panels. Tables and figures in Annex B relate to Section E of Annex A ............................... 50Annex C (informative)

Figures Relating to Annex A ..................................................................................... 58Bibliography ..................................................................................................................................................... 94 oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 3 Foreword This document (prEN 15269-2:2009) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI. This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry. This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association, and supports essential requirements of 89/106/EEC. Introduction This document is one of a series of standards listed below and intended to be used for the purpose of producing an extended application report based on the evaluation of one or more fire resistance and/or smoke control tests. These standards may also be used to identify the best selection of test specimens required to cover a wide range of product variations. The prEN 15269 series of standards currently consists of: prEN 15269, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware Part 1: General requirements Part 2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets

Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted, metal framed, glazed doorsets and openable windows Part 6: Fire resistance of sliding timber doorsets Part 7: Fire resistance of sliding steel doorsets

Part 8: Fire resistance of horizontally folding timber doorsets Part 9: Fire resistance of horizontally folding steel doorsets Part 10: Fire resistance of steel rolling shutters Part 11: Fire resistance of fabric curtains Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted timber and steel doorsets

Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset should have been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 to achieve a test result which could generate a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification subsequently required from extended application considerations.

oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009
prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

4 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations should be made on the basis of retaining the fire resistance classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However, this should never lead to an increased classification for any specific fire performance parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables within this series of standards. The effect on the durability of self closing of the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed in this series of standards. 1 Scope This Part of prEN 15269, which should be read in conjunction with prEN 15269-1, covers single and double leaf, hinged and pivoted, steel based doorsets. This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1. Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 4 the extended application may cover all or some of the following non-exhaustive list:  Integrity only (E), radiation (EW) or insulated (EI1 or EI2) classifications;  door leaf;  wall/ceiling fixed elements (frame/suspension system;  glazing for door leaf;  items of building hardware;  decorative finishes;  intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;  alternative supporting construction(s). 2 Normative references This European Standard incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications. These normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications apply to this European Standard only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the latest edition of the publication referred to applies. EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware - Part 1:

Fire resistance tests for doors, shutters and openable windows oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 5 EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building hardware

EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification using data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services

3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this Part or EN 15269, the terms and definitions given in EN1363-1, EN ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, prEN 1634-2 and prEN 15269-1 together with the following apply: 3.1 full scale test test of a full size doorset in accordance with EN 1634-1 3.2 small scale test test on elements of building hardware in accordance with prEN 1634-2 and where the decision process, given in prEN 1634-2, permits its use. This is abbreviated as SS in annex C 3.3 effective rebate depth dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame, transom or side panel or flush overpanel. At the meeting edges and for rebated leaves the dimension shall be the depth of the largest rebate or the rebate where the intumescent seal is fitted 3.4 panel component of a door leaf separated from other elements by joints which break through the total door thickness. A door leaf can consist of one or more panels. 4 Determination of the field of extended application

4.1 General 4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, the doorset must have been tested and classified in accordance with EN1634-1 and EN 13501-2 respectively in order to establish a classification for the doorset. 4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables. 4.1.3 All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classification obtained from testing to EN1634-1. 4.1.4 If, by following the ensuing procedure, any part of the classification cannot be achieved by extended application rules, that part of classification shall be omitted from the subsequent extended application report and classification report. 4.2 Procedure for evaluation 4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an extended application report. oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

6 4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of Annex A. 4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) and establish from the contents of column (4) whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application rules in EN 1634-1 without the need for further testing. 4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4). 4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing according to column (5), the additional test can be made on a similar specimen type to the original test against which the extended application is sought. Alternatively, column (5) identifies an option for alternative testing and relevant test parameters. 4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application

4.3.1 It is possible to provide a limited field extended of application from the results of a single test. However, where a manufacturer intends to produce a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double doors, with or without glazing, with alternative elements of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options in order to minimise the testing required before testing commences. 4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be part of the product range. 4.3.3 Select specimen(s) for the first test(s) in the series to ensure that those required for the manufactured products are covered. 4.3.4 Complete the first test or a series of tests and prepare a field of direct application and possibly a classification report from the results of the test(s). 4.3.5 Establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the direct application classification report. 4.3.6 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible without further testing. 4.3.7 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in column (5). 4.3.8 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of direct application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.7. above. 4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A and observe from column (5) which are the most appropriate weakest specimen options for further testing. 4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations have not been covered by the tests completed in accordance with 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated with the additional product variations incorporated. oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 7 4.4 Interpretation of test results 4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall record details of any integrity and/or insulation failures throughout the test duration. 4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variations. 4.4.3 Where it has been possible, to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the premature failure(s).

5 Extended application report Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of prEN 15269-1, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above. 6 Classification report The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and shall be presented in accordance with Annex A of EN 13501-2.

oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009
prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)
8 Annex A (normative)

Construction Parameter Variations Table A.1 is designed to provide rules for the creation of extended application reports by experts in the field of fire resistance testing of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets. Table A.1 shall only be used to evaluate a field of extended application when at least one positive fire resistance test to EN 1634-1 has resulted in a classification according to EN 13501-2.

The first two columns of Table A.1 identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.

The type of classification achieved from the test can be identified from the ‘Performance characteristic’ section of Table A.1 column 3 as insulation, radiation control or integrity only. For some parameters, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the case the following levels shall be used to provide high, medium and low distortion doorsets:  low < 40 % of effective rebate depth,  medium > 40 % and < 85 %

of effective rebate depth,  high > 85 % of effective rebate depth. The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in column 3 under E for effects on integrity, I for effects on insulation (whether an I1 or I2) and W for the effects on radiation. Where symbols are used these relate to the following definitions: a) < - forecast is a worse performance; b) > - forecast is a better performance; c) = - forecast is no significant difference d) ≤ - forecast is a worse or equal performance; e) ≥ - forecast is a better or equal performance; f) >=< - forecast unknown These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of extending the field of application, the results of which are given in column 4 of Table A.1. In certain cases in Column 4 it is a requirement to achieve Category B, the requirements for which are given in EN 1634-1. Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary the type of specimen approved for incorporation of the changed parameter is defined in column 5. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single action doorsets to double action doorsets. oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 9 In order to maximise the possible field of application from a minimum number of tests, the parameter changes can be spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended test for each parameter is dependant upon the classification required and the preferred direction of testing as indicated in Column 5. If after consideration of a specific variation, additional changes are required to be made to the specimen, these may be made providing the implications on other variations are also taken into account.

oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009
prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

10 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A Door leaf In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side, transom

and overpanels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction. A.1 General A.1.1 Number of leaves

- See Figure C.1 Single leaf from double leaf test ≤ ≥ ≥ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single leaf doorset (open outwards) A.1.2 Number of leaves Double leaf from single leaf test ≥ ≤ ≥ ≥ Not possible without an additional test Additional test (s) double leaf doorset (open outwards and inwards for EI doors, open outwards for E or W doors) A.1.3 Number of panels per leaf (primary or secondary)- See Figure C.2 Add (one panel per leaf – on any leaf) = = = Possible if tested at least one leaf (single, primary or secondary) with the minimum of two panels, panel size not increased and the intended jointing technique centrally located in the door leaf otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset (open outwards) A.1.4 Number of panels per leaf - See Figure C.3 Reduce (one panel) = = = Possible providing the tested width of the panel is not increased otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset (open outwards) A.1.5

Intumescent seals between frame and door leaf / leaves- See Figure C.4 Location towards the frame rebate >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< Not possible without an additional test Additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset (open outwards) A.1.6

Intumescent seals between frame and door leaf / leaves – See Figure C.5 Location away from the frame rebate >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< Not possible without an additional test Additional test single leaf or double leaf doorset (open outwards) oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 11 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.7 Intumescent seals between meeting edges of the door leaves Location >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< Not possible without additional test (s) Additional test (s) double leaf doorset (open outwards and inwards for EI doors, open outwards for E or W doors) A.1.8 Nnon intumescent seals between frame and door leaf / leaves (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - (Euroclass A1) e.g. ceramic products(fitted in leaf or frame).– See Figure C.6 Location = = = Any movement possible providing no modifications of the construction are required

A.1.9 Non intumescent seals between meeting edges of the door leaves (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - (Euroclass A1) Location >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< No movement possible without an additional test Additional test double leaf doorset

A.1.10 Non intumescent seals between door leaves and / or frames (draught /smoke / acoustic etc.) – < Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame).- See Figure C.7 Location >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< No movement possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset if the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the additional test has to be a double leaf doorset A.1.11 Non intumescent seals between door leaves and / or frames (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - (Euroclass A1), e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or frame). - See Figure C.8 Add = = = Possible for doors without intumescent seals otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset, if the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the additional test has to be a double leaf doorset A.1.11 Non intumescent seals between door leaves and / or framwes (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - (Euroclass A1), e.g. ceramic products (fitted in leaf or frame)- See Figure C.9 Remove ≤ ≤ ≤ Notpossible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset, if the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the additional test has to be a double leaf doorset oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

12 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.12 Non intumescent seals between door leaves and / or frames (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) – < Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame)- See Figure C.10 Add ≤ ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset, if the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the additional test has to be a double leaf doorset A.1.13 Non intumescent seals between door leaves and / or frames (draught / smoke / acoustic etc. – < Euroclass A1 (fitted in leaf or frame) - See Figure C.11 Remove >/=/< >/=/< = Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset, if the seal is positioned between the meeting edges of the door leaves the additional test has to be a double leaf doorset A.1.14 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf tested without ventilation grille - See Figure C.12a Add ≤ ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset A.1.15 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf - See Figure C.12b

Remove >/=/< ≥ ≥ Possible providing the cut out is less than 25 % of the door leaf area otherwise not possible without an additional test

Additional test single or double leaf doorset A.1.16 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf tested with ventilation grille Location in vertical direction ≤ ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset A.1.17 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf tested with ventilation grille - See Figure C.13 Location in horizontal direction = = = Possible providing the distance between the edge of the louvre and the perimeter of the door leaf is not decreased and providing any internal stiffening elements are not affected otherwise not possible without an additional test

Additional test single or double leaf doorset oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 13 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.18 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door leaf tested with ventilation grille - See Figure C.14a Smaller size ≥ ≥ ≥ Possible for one or more louvres smaller than that tested specimen providing the location is inside the perimeter of the tested louvre and minimum spacing between cut outs is not less than 100 mm otherwise not possible without an additional test

Additional test single or double leaf doorset - See Figure C.14b Larger size ≤ ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset A.1.19 Rebate (door leaves to frames) - See Figure C.15a Add ≥ ≤ ≥ EI Not possible without an additional test unless the original test had additional thermocouples positioned 100mm and / or 25mm from the edge of the notional rebate (i.e. 100-x) where x means the width of the added rebate and dimension y shall not be reduced

Additional test single or double leaf doorset (open outwards) E, EW Possible providing no reduction of frame rebate or leaf edge thickness otherwise not possible without an additional test

Additional test single or double leaf doorset (open outwards) A.1.20 Rebate
(meeting edges)

- See Figure C.15b Add (one rebate) ≥ ≥ ≥ Possible if the doorset included one rebate and the added rebate is of the same design / material as that tested otherwise not possible without an additional test Additional test double leaf doorset (added rebate away from the fire) A.1.21 Rebate

(door leaves to frames)

- See Figure C.16 Remove ≤ ≤ ≤ Not possible without an additional test Additional test single or double leaf doorset (open inwards) oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E)

14 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.1.22 Latching / locking - See Figure C.17 Remove from door leaf tested with latching / locking ≤ ≥ ≥ Not possible without an additional test For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf doorset (open inwards for EI doors, open outwards for E or W doors) for double leaf doorsets additional test double leaf doorset (open inwards for EI doors, open outwards for E or W doors) A.1.23 Latched condition for single and double leaf doorsets - See Figure C.18. Change in latching condition. >=< = = Possible in line with the following relationship: Additional test to include the required latching condition.

tested without a latch/lock tested with a latch/lock but unlatched tested with a latch/lock latched

extension to: without a lock/latch - possible not possible

extension to: with lock/latch but unlocked / unlatched not possible for EI doors. possible for E or EW doors if latch/lock is all metal contruction - not possible

extension to: with a lock/latch, latched not possible possible -
oSIST prEN 15269-2:2009

prEN 15269-2:2009 (E) 15 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension

Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W

A.2 Size variations / single or multiple panel construction A.2.1 Size (area, width, height) all distortions Decrease ≥ ≤ ≥ E, EW Possible

EI Possible from the size tested down to size of a second test specimen in the same design

For single leaf doorsets additional test single leaf or double leaf doors
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.