EN 17020-3:2022
(Main)Extended application of test results on durability of self-closing for fire resistance and/or smoke control doorsets and openable windows - Part 3: Durability of self-closing of steel sliding doorsets
Extended application of test results on durability of self-closing for fire resistance and/or smoke control doorsets and openable windows - Part 3: Durability of self-closing of steel sliding doorsets
This document is applicable to the following types of steel based doorsets: horizontally sliding single and double leaf doorsets, horizontally sliding single and double leaf telescopic doorsets, vertically sliding single leaf doorsets and vertically sliding single leaf telescopic doorsets as covered by EN 15269-7 or EN 15269-20.
This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from durability of self-closing test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 12605:2000 and/or EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate durability of self-closing test or tests, the extended application can cover all or some of the following non-exhaustive list:
- door leaf (of the sliding doorset and its pass door);
- integrated pass doors;
- wall or ceiling fixed parts or items of the doorset, e.g. frame or suspension systems;
- ventilation grilles and/or louvres;
- glazing for door leaf;
- items of building hardware;
- decorative finishes;
- intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
- alternative supporting construction(s).
Erweiterte Anwendung von Prüfergebnissen zur Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung für Feuerschutz und/oder Rauchschutztüren, -tore und zu öffnende Fenster - Teil 3: Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung von Schiebetoren aus Stahl
Dieses Dokument ist für die folgenden Arten von Stahltoren anwendbar: horizontal öffnende ein oder zweiflügelige Schiebetore/ türen, horizontal öffnende ein oder zweiflügelige Teleskoptore/ türen, vertikal öffnende einflügelige Schiebetore/ türen und vertikal öffnende einflügelige Teleskoptore/ türen, wie in EN 15269 7 oder EN 15269 20 beschrieben.
Dieses Dokument schreibt die Methodik zur Erweiterung der Anwendung von Prüfergebnissen zur Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung vor, die nach EN 12605:2000 bzw. nach EN 1191 durchgeführt wurden.
In Abhängigkeit von der Durchführung der entsprechenden Prüfung(en) zur Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung kann die erweiterte Anwendung die nachfolgende nicht-abschließende Auflistung ganz oder auch nur teilweise abdecken:
— Tür /Torblatt (der Schiebetür/des Schiebetores und deren/dessen Schlupftür);
— integrierte Schlupftüren;
— an der Wand oder Decke befestigte Teile oder Elemente der Tür/des Tores, z. B. Rahmen oder Aufhängungssysteme;
— Lüftungsgitter und/oder lamellen;
— Tor /Türblatt-Verglasung;
— Baubeschläge;
— dekorative Oberflächenbeschichtungen;
— dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen sowie Dichtungen zur Behinderung von Rauchdurchtritt (Rauchschutzdichtungen), Durchzug oder Schallübertragung (Schallschutzdichtungen);
— alternative Tragkonstruktion(en).
Application étendue des résultats d’essais de durabilité de la fermeture automatique des blocs-portes et fenêtres ouvrantes résistants au feu et/ou étanches à la fumée - Partie 3 : Durabilité de la fermeture automatique des blocs-portes coulissants en acier
Le présent document s’applique aux types suivants de blocs-portes à base d’acier : blocs-portes à simple ou à double vantail coulissant horizontalement, blocs-portes télescopiques à simple ou à double vantail coulissant horizontalement, blocs-portes à simple vantail coulissant verticalement et blocs-portes télescopiques à simple vantail coulissant verticalement visés par l’EN 15269-7 ou l’EN 15269-20.
Le présent document établit la méthodologie d’extension de l’application des résultats d’essai obtenus à la suite de l’essai ou des essais de durabilité de la fermeture automatique réalisés conformément à l’EN 12605:2000 et/ou l’EN 1191.
Sous réserve de la réalisation de l’essai ou des essais appropriés de durabilité de la fermeture automatique, l’application étendue peut couvrir tout ou partie des éléments de la liste non exhaustive suivante :
- vantail (du bloc-porte coulissant et de son portillon) ;
- portillons intégrés ;
- éléments ou parties du bloc-porte fixés au mur ou au plafond, par exemple structure ou systèmes de suspension ;
- grilles de ventilation et/ou jalousies ;
- vitrage de vantail ;
- tout élément de quincaillerie intégré ;
- finitions décoratives ;
- joints intumescents, joints d’étanchéité aux fumées, joints d’étanchéité à l’air ou joints acoustiques ;
- autres supports.
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov trajnosti samozapiranja za požarno odporna in/ali dimotesna vrata in okna, ki se odpirajo - 3. del: Trajnost samozapiranja jeklenih drsnih vrat
Ta dokument se uporablja za naslednje vrste jeklenih vrat: vodoravno drsna vrata (enojna in dvojna), teleskopska vrata (enojna in dvojna) in enojna navpično drsna vrata, zajeta v standardu EN 15269 7 ali EN 15269 20.
Ta dokument predpisuje metodologijo za razširitev uporabe rezultatov, pridobljenih iz preskusov trajnosti samozapiranja, izvedenih v skladu s standardom EN 12605:2017+A1:2020 ali EN 1191.
Razširjena uporaba lahko (glede na opravljene ustrezne preskuse samozapiranja) zajema vse ali nekatere primere iz naslednjega neizčrpnega seznama:
– vratno krilo;
– prehodna vrata;
– stensko/stropno okovje (okvir/sistem vzmetenja);
– prezračevalne rešetke in/ali žaluzijske lopute;
– steklo za vratno krilo;
– elementi stavbnega okovja;
– okrasni zaključki;
– intumescentna, dimna, akustična tesnila in tesnila za preprečevanje prepiha;
– alternativne podporne konstrukcije.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-april-2023
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov trajnosti samozapiranja za požarno
odporna in/ali dimotesna vrata in okna, ki se odpirajo - 3. del: Trajnost
samozapiranja jeklenih drsnih vrat
Extended application of test results on durability of self-closing for fire resistance and/or
smoke control doorsets and openable windows - Part 3: Durability of self-closing of steel
sliding doorsets
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Dauerhaftigkeit der
Selbstschließung für Feuerschutz- und/oder Rauchschutztüren und zu öffnende Fenster
- Teil 3: Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung von Schiebetoren aus Stahl
Application étendue des résultats d’essais de durabilité de la fermeture automatique des
blocs-portes et fenêtres ouvrantes résistants au feu et/ou étanches à la fumée - Partie 3
: Durabilité de la fermeture automatique des blocs-portes coulissants en acier
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 17020-3:2022
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
EN 17020-3
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
December 2022
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50
English Version
Extended application of test results on durability of self-
closing for fire resistance and/or smoke control doorsets
and openable windows - Part 3: Durability of self-closing
of steel sliding doorsets
Application étendue des résultats d'essais de durabilité Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen
de la fermeture automatique des blocs-portes et zur Dauerhaftigkeit der Selbstschließung für
fenêtres ouvrantes résistants au feu et/ou étanches à la Feuerschutz- und/oder Rauchschutztüren und zu
fumée - Partie 3 : Durabilité de la fermeture öffnende Fenster - Teil 3: Dauerhaftigkeit der
automatique des blocs-portes coulissants en acier Selbstschließung von Schiebetoren aus Stahl
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 24 July 2022.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2022 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 17020-3:2022 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 7
4 Determination of the field of extended application . 8
4.1 General . 8
4.2 Procedure for evaluation . 8
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application . 9
4.4 Interpretation of test results . 9
5 Extended application report . 10
6 Classification report . 10
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations . 11
Annex B (normative) Construction parameter variation simulation by applying additional
weights . 59
Bibliography . 60
European foreword
This document (EN 17020-3:2022) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety
in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by June 2023, and conflicting national standards shall be
withdrawn at the latest by June 2023.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document has been prepared under a Standardization Request given to CEN by the European
Commission and the European Free Trade Association.
A list of all parts in the EN 17020 series and the EN 15269 series can be found on the CEN website.
Any feedback and questions on this document should be directed to the users’ national standards body.
A complete listing of these bodies can be found on the CEN website.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Türkiye and the United
Kingdom.
Introduction
The EN 15269 series of standards covering extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or
smoke control for doorsets, shutter assemblies and openable window, including their items of building
hardware, does not yet include the durability of self-closing following an extended application process.
This document is one of the EN 17020 series of standards intended to be used for the purpose of
producing an extended application report based on the evaluation of one or more durability of self-
closing tests. These European Standards may also be used to identify the best selection of test specimens
required to cover a wide range of product variations.
1 Scope
This document is applicable to the following types of steel based doorsets: horizontally sliding single and
double leaf doorsets, horizontally sliding single and double leaf telescopic doorsets, vertically sliding
single leaf doorsets and vertically sliding single leaf telescopic doorsets as covered by EN 15269-7 or
EN 15269-20.
This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from
durability of self-closing test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 12605:2000 and/or EN 1191.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate durability of self-closing test or tests, the extended
application can cover all or some of the following non-exhaustive list:
— door leaf (of the sliding doorset and its pass door);
— integrated pass doors;
— wall or ceiling fixed parts or items of the doorset, e.g. frame or suspension systems;
— ventilation grilles and/or louvres;
— glazing for door leaf;
— items of building hardware;
— decorative finishes;
— intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
— alternative supporting construction(s).
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 179, Building hardware - Emergency exit devices operated by a lever handle or push pad, for use on
escape routes - Requirements and test methods
EN 1125, Building hardware - Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal bar, for use on escape routes -
Requirements and test methods
EN 1154, Building hardware - Controlled door closing devices - Requirements and test methods
EN 1155, Building hardware - Electrically powered hold-open devices for swing doors - Requirements and
test methods
EN 1191, Windows and doors - Resistance to repeated opening and closing - Test method
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests - Part 1: General requirements
EN 1363-2, Fire resistance tests - Part 2: Alternative and additional procedures
EN 14637, Building hardware - Electrically controlled hold-open systems for fire/smoke door assemblies -
Requirements, test methods, application and maintenance
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware - Part 1: Fire resistance test for door and shutter assemblies and openable
windows
EN 1634-3, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door and shutter assemblies, openable windows and
elements of building hardware - Part 3: Smoke control test for door and shutter assemblies
EN 1906, Building hardware - Lever handles and knob furniture - Requirements and test methods
EN 1935:2002 , Building hardware - Single-axis hinges - Requirements and test methods
EN 12209, Building hardware - Mechanically operated locks and locking plates - Requirements and test
methods
EN 12433-1, Industrial, commercial and garage doors and gates - Terminology - Part 1: Types of doors
EN 12433-2, Industrial, commercial and garage doors and gates - Terminology - Part 2: Parts of doors
EN 12605:2000, Industrial, commercial and garage doors and gates - Mechanical aspects - Test methods
EN 13501-1, Fire classification of construction products and building elements - Part 1: Classification using
data from reaction to fire tests
EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements - Part 2: Classification using
data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 14846, Building hardware - Locks and latches - Electromechanically operated locks and striking plates -
Requirements and test methods
EN 15269-1, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 1: General
requirements
EN 15269-7, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 7: Fire resistance for
steel sliding doorsets
EN 15269-20, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter
and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 20: Smoke control
for doors, shutters, operable fabric curtains and openable windows
, Building hardware - Requirements and test methods - Multipoint locks, latches and locking
EN 15685
plates - Characteristics and test methods
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety - Vocabulary (ISO 13943)
As impacted by EN 1935:2002/AC:2003.
Under preparation. Stage at the time of publication: prEN 15685:2022.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1191, EN 1363-1, EN 1363-2,
EN 1634-1, EN 1634-3, EN 15269-1, EN 15269-7, EN 15269-20, EN 12433-1, EN 12433-2 and
EN ISO 13943 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
full scale test
test of a full size doorset in accordance with EN 12605:2000 and/or EN 1191
3.2
panel
part of a leaf or element of a doorset as indicated as 1 in Figures 1 and 2
Key
1 panel
2 leaf
3 element
Figure 1 — Double leaf telescopic sliding doorset
Key
1 panel
2 leaf
Figure 2 — Double leaf sliding doorset
3.3
leaf
movable part of a doorset indicated as 2 in Figures 1 and 2
3.4
element
part of a leaf indicated as 3 in Figure 1
3.5
add
put an additional component to the doorset which has not been tested as a part of the original doorset
3.6
remove
take a component away which has been tested as a part of the original doorset
3.7
alternative
variation intended by the application of EXAP rules where the original construction parameter tested
shall be substituted by another one either by change, interchange or exchange
Note 1 to entry: Finally, the alternatives are those variations that are permitted by the EXAP report.
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, the doorset shall have been tested
in accordance with EN 12605:2000 and/or EN 1191, as appropriate, to achieve a test result which could
generate a classification for the durability of self-closing in accordance with EN 13501-2 for the required
number of test cycles.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate, that one or more characteristics
can be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of
retaining the classifications for the durability of self-closing obtainable from testing to EN 12605:2000
and/or EN 1191, as appropriate, including those with a lower number of opening and closing cycles.
However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that
achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter
Variation tables.
4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any part of the classified product cannot
be achieved by extended application rules, that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report.
4.2 Procedure for evaluation
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an
extended application report. Ensure that the variation(s) do(es) not prevent the doorset and/or
integrated hinged pass doors from self-closing.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2)
of Annex A, Table A.1.
4.2.3 Establish from the contents of column (3) of Annex A, Table A.1 whether any extended application
is available without the need for further testing.
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible, this can be recorded in the extended application report
together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (3) in Annex A, Table A.1.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing according to
column (4), the additional test can be made on a test specimen similar to the original test specimen
against which the extended application is sought. Alternatively, column (4) in Table A.1 identifies an
option for alternative testing and relevant test parameters.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide a limited field of extended application from the results of a single test.
However, where a manufacturer intends to produce a range of sliding doorsets incorporating single leaf
doorsets and also double leaf doorsets, with or without pass doors, with or without glazing, with
alternative items of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the
complete range of doorset designs and options in order to minimize the testing required before testing
commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations, which are required to be part of the product range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many as
possible into the test specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first durability of self-closing test or a series of tests and then establish, which of the
original desired parameter variations have not been covered by this test(s).
4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A, Table A.1 and establish if any extended
application is possible without further testing.
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in
column (3) in Annex A, Table A.1.
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the initial
field of extended application derived from 4.3.6 above.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also
include double leaf configurations. Where only single leaf doorsets are to be part of the product range,
the outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the
single leaf doorsets. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range,
the outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets
may be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or, in the weakest option, as defined in
column (4) of the table in Annex A, Table A.1, double leaf doorset configurations.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A,
Table A.1 and observe from column (4) of Annex A, Table A.1 which are the most appropriate weakest
test specimen options for further testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests
completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be carried out
with the additional product variations incorporated.
4.4 Interpretation of test results
4.4.1 In order to maximize the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall
record details of any failures occurred throughout the test duration.
4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based on
the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has been
attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variations(s).
4.4.3 Where it has been possible, to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for
all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the
premature failure(s). The failed parameter shall be omitted from the extended application report and the
subsequent classification report.
5 Extended application report
Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of EN 15269-1 based on the
results of evaluations in accordance with the above.
6 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and shall
be presented in accordance with EN 13501-2.
Annex A
(normative)
Construction parameter variations
Table A.1 below is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance, smoke control
and durability of self-closing testing of sliding doorsets and/or integrated hinged pass doors, as
appropriate.
The table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive durability
of self-closing test to EN 12605:2000 and/or EN 1191, as appropriate, has generated a classification
according to EN 13501-2 for the required number of test cycles.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested. It is
presupposed that the variations do not restrain the doorset and/or its pass door from closing.
Column (3) leads to the judgement of the possibility of extending the field of application.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, the type of test specimen approved for incorporation
of the changed parameter is defined in column (4). Where it is possible to use information from tests
performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made
in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single leaf
doorsets to double leaf doorsets.
Where an additional test is required in column (4), the test is a full scale test unless otherwise specified.
In order to maximize the possible field of application from a minimum number of tests, the parameter
changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. Where more than a single parameter variation
is required, the influence on other variations shall also be taken into account.
All parameter variations in Table A.1 presuppose that the total mass of doorset and/or its pass door does
not exceed the maximum mass having been tested. For simulation of a higher mass of the varied doorset
the test specimen for durability of self-closing test can be loaded with additional weight(s) attached to
the leaf according to the rules in Annex B.
Table A.1 — Construction parameter variations
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A Door leaf
A.1 General
Possible providing the overlap of the single leaf
doorset (door leaf to frame) is similar to the
overlap of the double doorset (meeting edge) and
A.1.1 Number of door leaves (not
all the constructional details have been tested (in
Single leaf doorset from double leaf Additional test single leaf
applicable for vertically sliding
the double doorset), otherwise not possible
doorset test doorset
doorsets)
without an additional test.
Any size variations of door leaf shall be in line
with A.2.1 to A.2.4 incl.
A.1.2 Number of door leaves (not
Double leaf doorset from single leaf Additional test double leaf
applicable for vertically sliding Not possible without an additional test
doorset test doorset or double leaf telescopic
doors)
Possible providing all constructional details have
A.1.3 Number of elements of single leaf Additional test single or double
Decrease been tested, otherwise not possible without an
telescopic doorsets, leaf telescopic doorset
additional test
A.1.4 Number of elements of single leaf Additional test single or double
Increase Not possible without an additional test
telescopic doorsets, leaf telescopic doorset
Possible providing all constructional details have
A.1.5 Number of elements of double leaf been tested and the reduction of elements is the Additional test double leaf
Decrease
telescopic doorsets – See Figure A.1 same for both door leaves, otherwise not possible telescopic doorset
without an additional test
A.1.6 Number of elements of double leaf
Additional test double leaf
telescopic doors, (not applicable for Increase Not possible without an additional test
telescopic doorset
vertically sliding doorsets)
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Possible if tested at least one leaf (single, primary
or secondary) with the minimum of two panels
A.1.7 Number of panels per door leaf or Additional test single or double
and the intended jointing technique centrally
Increase
element – See Figure A.2 leaf doorset
located in the door leaf.
Otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.1.8 Number of panels per door leaf or
Decrease Possible -
element – See Figure A.3
A.1.9 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door Possible providing the requirements of Annex B
Additional test single or double
leaf tested without ventilation grille Add are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an
leaf doorset
(louvers) additional test
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B
A.1.10 Ventilation grilles (louvres) in door Additional test single or double
Remove are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an
leaf leaf doorset
additional test
A.1.11 Location of Ventilation grilles
(louvres) in door leaf tested with Alternative Possible -
ventilation grille (louvres)
A.1.12 Size of ventilation grilles (louvres) in Increase/decrease Possible providing the requirements of Annex B
Additional test single or double
door leaf tested with ventilation are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an
leaf doorset
grille (louvres) additional test
A.2 Size variations/single or multiple panel construction
A.2.1 Size (area, width, height) of door leaf Decrease Possible -
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.2 Width of door leaf – See Figure A.4 Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.3 Height of door leaf – See Figure A.5 Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.4 Area of door leaf Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
A.2.5 Width of vertical door leaf panel for
a sliding doorset with more than one Decrease Possible -
panel
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.6 Height of vertical door leaf panel Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
A.2.7 Height of vertical door leaf panel Decrease Possible -
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.8 Width of vertical door leaf panel Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.2.9 Area of vertical door leaf panel Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
A.2.10 Number of horizontal joints between
Increase Possible -
panels
Possible
A.2.11 Number of horizontal joints between
Decrease -
panels
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B
Additional test double for single
are fulfilled and by a maximum of 25 %,
A.2.12 Thickness of the door leaf Increase and double leaf doorsets or
single for single leaf doorsets
otherwise not possible without an additional test
Additional test double for single
Possible by a maximum of 25 %,
A.2.13 Thickness of the door leaf Decrease and double leaf doorsets or
otherwise not possible without an additional test
single for single leaf doorsets
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.3 Materials and constructions
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.3.1 Density of core material Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
A.3.2 Density of core material Decrease Possible -
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.3.3 Thickness of core material Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Additional test double for single
Possible in line with A.2.13, otherwise not possible
A.3.4 Thickness of core material Decrease and double leaf doorsets or
without an additional test
single for single leaf doorsets
A.3.5 Pattern of core material, – number
Increase Possible -
of pieces – See Figure A.6
A.3.6 Pattern of core material – number
Decrease Possible -
of pieces – See Figure A.7
A.3.7 Number of layers of identical core
Increase Possible -
material – See Figure A.8
A.3.8 Number of layers of identical core
Decrease Possible -
material – See Figure A.9
A.3.9 Number of layers of different
Increase Possible -
materials – See Figure A.10
A.3.10 Number of layers of different
Decrease Possible -
materials – See Figure A.11
A.3.11 Supplier/manufacturer of core Possible providing the material with composition
Additional test single or double
material (single thickness or in Alternative and properties are identical, otherwise not
leaf doorset
combination of different layers) possible without an additional test
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.3.12 Composition of core material (single
thickness or in combination of Alternative Possible -
different layers)
A.3.13 Amount of adhesives/m –
Increase Possible -
a
Products < Euroclass A1
Possible by a maximum of 50 %
A.3.14 Amount of adhesives/m – Additional test single or double
Decrease
a
leaf doorset
Products < Euroclass A1
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.3.15 Amount of adhesives/m – Products
Increase Possible -
a
of Euroclass A1
Possible by a maximum of 50 %
A.3.16 Amount of adhesives/m – Products Additional test single or double
Decrease
a
leaf doorset
of Euroclass A1 otherwise not possible without an additional test
Possible providing the material with composition
A.3.17 Change of supplier/manufacturer /
Additional test single or double
Alternative and properties are identical, otherwise not
type of adhesives leaf doorset
possible without an additional test
A.3.18 Composition of adhesives Alternative Possible -
A.3.19 Metal armour sheet (internally or Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
externally mounted) – See Add are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
Figure A.12 additional test single for single leaf doorsets
A.3.20 Metal armour sheet (internally or
externally mounted) – See Remove Possible -
Figure A.13
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.3.21 Thickness of steel sheet,
Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
(if not part of the interlock system)
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Additional test double for single
A.3.22 Thickness of steel sheet, Possible by a maximum of 25 %, more than 25 %
Decrease and double leaf door sets or
(if not part of the interlock system) needs an additional test
single for single leaf door sets
A.3.23 Type of steel sheet Mild to stainless steel Possible -
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.3.24 Type of steel sheet Stainless to mild steel Possible -
A.3.25 Type of steel for stiffeners and
Mild to stainless steel Possible -
profiles
A.3.26 Type of steel for stiffeners and
Stainless to mild steel Possible -
profiles
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.3.27 Cross-section dimension of
Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
stiffening elements
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Additional test double for single
A.3.28 Cross-section dimension of Possible by a maximum of 25 %, more than 25 %
Decrease and double leaf doorsets or
stiffening elements needs an additional test
single for single leaf doorsets
Possible providing the requirements of Annex B Additional test double for single
A.3.29 Number of intermediate stiffening
Increase are fulfilled, otherwise not possible without an and double leaf doorsets or
elements per panel
additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Possible proportional to the decrease of height or Additional test double for single
A.3.30 Number of intermediate stiffening
Decrease width of the panel, as appropriate, otherwise not and double leaf doorsets or
elements per panel
possible without an additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Possible proportional to the increase of height or Additional test double for single
A.3.31 Spacing of intermediate stiffening
Increase width of the panel, as appropriate, otherwise not and double leaf doorsets or
elements per panel
possible without an additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Possible proportional to the decrease of height or Additional test double for single
A.3.32 Spacing of intermediate stiffening
Decrease width of the panel, as appropriate, otherwise not and double leaf doorsets or
elements per panel
possible without an additional test single for single leaf doorsets
Additional test double for single
A.3.33 Distance between stiffening element
Increase Not possible without an additional test and double leaf doorsets or
fixing points – See Figure A.14
single for single leaf doorsets
A.3.34 Distance between stiffening element
Decrease Possible -
fixing points – See Figure A.15
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Possible to change only between riveting and
screwing, providing that the centre distances do
not increase, fixings are made from the same
Additional test double for single
material(s) and cross section dimension of the
A.3.35 Jointing technique (door leaf edges, Alternative (welding/riveting/
and double leaf doorsets or
alternative (rivets/screws) is not smaller.
stiffening elements, etc.) screwing)
single for single leaf doorsets
Possible to change from welding to screws or steel
rivets
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.3.36 Overlap of door leaf edge Increase Possible -
A.3.37 Overlap of door leaf edge Decrease Possible -
A.3.38 Location of Intumescent seals Alternative Possible -
A.3.39 Dimension of intumescent seals Decrease Possible -
A.3.40 Dimension of intumescent seals Increase Possible -
A.3.41 Intumescent seals Remove Possible -
A.3.42 Intumescent seals Add Possible -
A.3.43 Manufacturer/supplier of
Alternative Possible -
intumescent seals
A.3.44 Material of intumescent seals Alternative Possible -
Possible providing the deformation / load of the
seal will not be more than tested during the
A.3.45 Location of non intumescent seals
Additional test double for single
movement of the door leaf/leaves
(draught/smoke/acoustic, etc.) – Alternative
and double leaf doorsets or
a
otherwise single for single leaf doorsets
Products of Euroclass A1
not possible without an additional test
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Possible providing the deformation / load of the
seal will not be more than tested during the
A.3.46 Location of non intumescent seals Additional test double for single
movement of the door leaf/leaves
(draught /smoke/acoustic, etc.) –
Alternative and double leaf doorsets or
a
Products < Euroclass A1 otherwise single for single leaf doorsets
not possible without an additional test
A.3.47 Non intumescent seals Additional test double for single
(draught/smoke/acoustic, etc.) – Add Not possible without an additional test and double leaf doorsets or
a
Products of Euroclass A1 single for single leaf doorsets
A.3.48 Non intumescent seals
(draught/smoke/acoustic, etc.) – Remove Possible -
a
Products of Euroclass A1
A.3.49 Non intumescent seals Additional test double for single
(draught/smoke/acoustic, etc.) – Add Not possible without additional test and double leaf doorsets or
a
single for single leaf doorsets
Products < Euroclass A1
A.3.50 Non intumescent seals
(draught/smoke/
Remove Possible -
acoustic, etc.) –
a
Products < Euroclass A1
Possible by a maximum of 15 % in any cross
A.3.51 Dimension of non intumescent seals
Additional test double for single
sectional dimension and by a maximum of 10 %
(draught/smoke/
Increase and double leaf doorsets or
mass,
acoustic, etc.) – Products of
single for single leaf doorsets
a
Euroclass A1
otherwise not possible without an additional test
A.3.52 Dimension of non intumescent seals
(draught/smoke/
Decrease Possible -
acoustic, etc.) – Products of
a
Euroclass A1
A.3.53 Dimension of non intumescent seals
Possible by a maximum of 15 % in any cross
Additional test double for single
(draught/smoke/ sectional dimension and by a maximum of 10 %
Increase and double leaf doorsets or
acoustic, etc.) – mass, otherwise not possible without an
single for single leaf doorsets
a
Products < Euroclass A1 additional test
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.3.54 Dimension of non intumescent seals
(draught/smoke/
Decrease Possible -
acoustic, etc.) –
a
Products < Euroclass A1
A.3.55 Manufacturer/supplier of
Alternative Possible -
draught/smoke/acoustic seals
Alternative material (Euroclass A1 to
A.3.56 Material of draught/smoke/
Euroclass A1, < Euroclass A1 to
Possible -
acoustic seals
a
Euroclass A1)
Alternative material (Euroclass A1
A.3.57 Material of
to < Euroclass A1, < Euroclass A1
Possible -
draught/smoke/acoustic seals
a
to < Euroclass A1)
A.4 Decorative and/or protective finishes
A.4.1 Paints without contribution to fire
Add Possible -
resistance
A.4.2 Paints without contribution to fire
Alternative Possible -
resistance
A.4.3 Thickness of paints with positive
Increase Possible -
contribution to fire resistance
A.4.4 Thickness of paints with positive
Decrease Possible -
contribution to fire resistance
A.4.5 Manufacturer/supplier of paints
with positive contribution to fire Alternative Possible -
resistance
A.4.6 Material of paints with positive
Alternative Possible -
contribution to fire resistance
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
A.4.7 Decorative laminates and timber
veneers on the faces – See Add Possible -
Figure A.16
A.4.8 Decorative laminates and timber
veneers on the faces – See Remove Possible -
Figure A.17
A.4.9 Decorative laminates and timber
veneers on the edges – See Figure Add Possible -
A.18
A.4.10 Decorative laminates and timber
veneers on the edges – See Figure Remove Possible -
A.19
A.4.11.1 Material of decorative laminates
Alternative Possible -
and timber veneers on the faces
A.4.11.2 Thickness of decorative laminates
Increase Possible -
and timber veneers on the faces
A.4.11.3 Thickness of decorative laminates
Decrease Possible -
and timber veneers on the faces
A.4.12.1 Material of decorative laminates
Alternative Possible -
and timber veneers on the edges
A.4.12.2 Thickness of decorative laminates
Increase Possible -
and timber veneers on the edges
A.4.12.3 Thickness of decorative laminates
Decrease Possible -
and timber veneers on the edges
Possible to change between adhesives / rivets /
A.4.13 Attachment technique of laminates Additional test single or double
Alternative screws, otherwise not possible without an
on the faces leaf doorset
additional test
Construction Parameter Variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required
(1) (2) (3) (4)
Possible to change between adhesives / rivets /
A.4.14 Attachment technique of laminates Additional test single or double
Alternative screws, otherwise not possible without an
on the edges leaf doorset
additional test
A.4.15 Signs with and without adhesive –
Add Possible -
face fixed
Possible to change between adhesives / rivets /
A.4.16 Attachment technique for signs Additional test single or double
Alternative screws, otherwise not possible without an
added to doorsets leaf doorset
additional test
B. Wall/Ceiling/Floor fixed items (Frame/Suspension System)
B.1 General
For intumescent/draught/smoke/acoustic seals refer to section A.3
B.1.1 Wall fixed items (frame) at the Possible providing the interlock construction has Additional test double for single
bottom of the doorset – See Add been tested at top or lateral sides of the door leaf, and double leaf doorsets or
Figure A.20 a) otherwise not possible without an additional test single for single leaf doorsets
B.1.2 Wall fixed items (frame) at the
Remove Possible -
bottom of the doorset
B.1.3 Height of door set above floor – See
Variation Possible -
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...