Prevention of crime - Urban planning and design - Part 2: Urban planning

This European Prestandard specifies the classification of open areas with respect to location and access to the areas. The Prestandard gives means of crime prevention in accordance to the classification.

Vorbeugende Kriminalitätsbekämpfung - Stadt- und Gebäudeplanung - Teil 2: Stadtplannung

Diese Europäische Vornorm enthält Richtlinien zu Verfahren ) für die Bewertung der Kriminalitätsgefahr und/oder der Angst vor Verbrechen und Maßnahmen, Verfahren und Prozesse, die auf die Verringerung dieser Gefahren abzielen.
Konstruktionsrichtlinien werden für bestimmten Typen von Umfeldern gegeben, um verschiedenen Kriminalitäts-problemen ) vorzubeugen oder entgegenzuwirken. Darüber hinaus werden Richtlinien für einen Schritt-für-Schritt-Prozess vorgelegt, um alle Beteiligten, die in der Stadtplanung ) und in der Verringerung der Umfeldkriminalität )  mitwirken und genauso wie alle weiteren Beteiligten - vor allem örtliche und regionale Behörden und Bewohner - in der erforderlichen breit gefächerten Wirkung einzubeziehen, um die Gefahren der Kriminalität und die Angst vor Verbrechen zu verringern.
Diese Europäische Vornorm gilt für den Planungsprozess von neuen wie auch von bestehenden Stadtgebieten. Ein Gebiet kann das Umfeld oder die Umgebung, angefangen mit nur wenigen Häusern oder Straßen bis hin zu einem Stadtzentrum, Industriegebiet oder einer großen Freifläche für die öffentliche Nutzung sein.

Prévention de la malveillance - Urbanisme et conception des bâtiments - Partie 2: Urbanisme

La présente Prénorme européenne donne des lignes directrices sur les méthodes d'évaluation ) du risque de malveillance et/ou de sentiment d'insécurité et des mesures, procédures et processus visant à réduire ces risques.
Des directives architecturales sont données pour des types d'environnements particuliers dans l'optique de prévenir différents problèmes de malveillance ) ou d'y remédier. Des directives sont également données pour la mise au point d'un processus par étapes à l'intention de toutes les parties concernées par l'urbanisme ) et par la réduction de la malveillance liée à l'environnement ), ainsi que toutes les autres parties intéressées - principalement les autorités locales et régionales et les résidents -
ce processus visant à impliquer chacun dans les démarches nécessaires aux différents échelons pour minimiser les risques de malveillance et le sentiment d'insécurité.
La présente Prénorme européenne s'intéresse au processus d'urbanisation, qu'il s'agisse de zones nouvelles ou déjà construites. Le terme "zone" peut désigner un quartier ou un environnement de taille très variable - depuis le petit groupe de maisons ou de rues jusqu'au centre-ville, en passant par la zone industrielle ou l'espace ouvert au public.

Preprečevanje kriminala – Urbanistično planiranje in projektiranje – 2. del: Urbanistično planiranje

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
16-Dec-2003
Withdrawal Date
23-Oct-2007
Current Stage
9960 - Withdrawal effective - Withdrawal
Start Date
24-Oct-2007
Completion Date
24-Oct-2007

Relations

Buy Standard

Standardization document
ENV 14383-2:2004
English language
47 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)


SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-april-2004
3UHSUHþHYDQMHNULPLQDOD±8UEDQLVWLþQRSODQLUDQMHLQSURMHNWLUDQMH±GHO
8UEDQLVWLþQRSODQLUDQMH
Prevention of crime - Urban planning and design - Part 2: Urban planning
Vorbeugende Kriminalitätsbekämpfung - Stadt- und Gebäudeplanung - Teil 2:
Stadtplannung
Prévention de la malveillance - Urbanisme et conception des bâtiments - Partie 2:
Urbanisme
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ENV 14383-2:2003
ICS:
13.310
91.020
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

EUROPEAN PRESTANDARD
ENV 14383-2
PRÉNORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE VORNORM
December 2003
ICS 13.310; 91.020
English version
Prevention of crime - Urban planning and design - Part 2: Urban
planning
Prévention de la malveillance - Urbanisme et conception Vorbeugende Kriminalitätsbekämpfung - Stadt- und
des bâtiments - Partie 2: Urbanisme Gebäudeplanung - Teil 2: Stadtplannung
This European Prestandard (ENV) was approved by CEN on 21 November 2002 as a prospective standard for provisional application.
The period of validity of this ENV is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to submit their
comments, particularly on the question whether the ENV can be converted into a European Standard.
CEN members are required to announce the existence of this ENV in the same way as for an EN and to make the ENV available promptly
at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in parallel to the ENV) until the final
decision about the possible conversion of the ENV into an EN is reached.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Greece,
Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United
Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre: rue de Stassart, 36  B-1050 Brussels
© 2003 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. ENV 14383-2:2003 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents
Foreword.3
Introduction .4
1 Scope.7
2 Normative references.7
3 Terms and definitions .7
4 Preliminary questions: the area, its crime problems and the stakeholders .7
4.1 General.7
4.2 Where: Identification of the area .8
4.2.1 Focus on urban environments .8
4.2.2 Level at which action can be taken.9
4.2.3 Type of area.11
4.3 What: Problem identification .12
4.3.1 Crime .12
4.3.2 Fear of crime.13
4.4 Who: Stakeholders.13
4.5 In sum: identification of 'where', 'what' and 'who' .14
5 Urban Planning and Design Guidelines .14
5.1 Introduction.14
5.2 Three categories, 15 strategies, more than 100 measures .15
5.2.1 General .15
5.2.2 Urban planning strategies.15
5.2.3 Urban design strategies.16
5.2.4 Management strategies .16
5.3 How to choose the strategies.16
6 Process to prevent and reduce crime problems by urban planning and management.17
6.1 General.17
6.2 Responsible body, mission Statement, working group .18
6.2.1 General .18
6.2.2 Mission statement.18
6.2.3 Working group.18
6.2.4 The planning document of the working group .19
6.2.5 Consultation mechanisms.19
6.3 Steps to be taken .19
6.3.1 Step 1: Crime review or crime assessment.19
6.3.2 Step 2: Objectives/requirements.20
6.3.3 Step 3: Plan .20
6.3.4 Step 4: Decision by responsible body.21
6.3.5 Step 5: Action and implementation.21
6.3.6 Step 6: Monitor, audit and corrective action .21
6.4 Flow chart.21
Annex A (informative) Assessment of crime preventive and fear reducing features of a plan
for a new area.23
Annex B (informative) Crime review: problem identification in an existing area .27
Annex C (informative) Fear of crime.29
Annex D (informative) Problem x strategy/measure matrices for 8 types of environment .31
Foreword
This document (ENV 14383-2:2003) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 325 'Prevention of
crime by urban planning and building design'. The secretariat of which is held by DS until October 2002 and
since then held by SNV.
The status of European Prestandard (ENV) was proposed to give all countries the opportunity to compare
experiences and to harmonise procedures.
This European Prestandard is one of a series for the “Prevention of crime by urban planning and building
design”, that consists of the following Parts:
 Part 1: Terminology.
 Part 2: Urban planning.
 Part 3: Dwellings.
 Part 4: Offices and Shops.
In the European Prestandard the Annexes A to D are informative.
According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the following
countries are bound to announce this European Prestandard: Austria, Belgium, Czech Republic, Denmark,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Portugal, Slovakia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and the United Kingdom.
Introduction
Crime and fear of crime as major problems
The European Urban Charter asserts the basic right for citizens of European towns to "a secure and safe town
free, as far as possible, from crime, delinquency and aggression". This basic right to a safe community has
been enshrined into many national and local crime reduction programs all over Europe.
1)
The final declaration of an International Conference organised by the Council of Europe's Congress of Local
and Regional Authorities of Europe (CLRAE; Erfurt 26.-28. February 1997) stated:
"that crime, fear of crime and urban insecurity in Europe are major problems affecting the public (…) and that
finding satisfactory solutions for them is one of the main keys to civic peace and stability."
The first recommendation from this conference was that local and regional authorities in Europe develop
integrated crime reduction action plans, with continuing public involvement, in which crime reduction is
included as a policy in all aspects of the responsibilities of local authorities. Such a plan should define the
nature and type of crime to be tackled, objectives, timetable, proposals for action and be based on a wide
ranging up-to-date survey of statistics and diagnosis of crime.
In this respect the CLRAE conference in Erfurt also stressed the importance to promote collaboration between
the police and professional designers and ensure that police officers are specially trained to advise on the
relationship between crime and the built environment".
Crime prevention and fear reduction by urban planning and building design
The Justice and Home Affairs council of the European Union (meeting 15-03-2001) agreed politically on the
conclusion of the EU experts' Conference 'Towards a knowledge-based strategy to prevent crime' (Sundsvall,
Sweden, 21.-23. February 2001). This conference concluded that "Crime Prevention through Environmental
Design, or Designing out Crime (CPTED/DOC), has proven to be a useful, effective, very concrete and
feasible strategy to prevent crime and feelings of insecurity, integrated in a multidisciplinary approach. Best
practices regarding CPTED/DOC should be collected, evaluated and made accessible for stakeholders. This
process should utilise a common framework of concepts and processes, and transferable principles should be
identified".
This conference also underlined "as regards prevention of the fear of crime, that the fear of crime should be
viewed and treated as a social problem in its own right".
Statements and recommendations about the collaboration between environmental design/planning specialists
and crime experts are becoming more and more common nowadays in European countries. These statements
and recommendations are based on assumptions regarding the inter-relationships between the physical
environment and human behaviour. It is obvious that the results of urban planning and architecture do
influence the choice of conduct and choice of routes of all people (young/old, woman/man, potential
offender/potential victim).
Hence urban planning also has an impact on crime and fear of crime by influencing the conduct and attitudes
of e.g.
— offenders;
— formal guardians such as police;
— informal guardians such as residents surveying an environment;

) Crime and Urban insecurity: the role and responsibilities of local and regional authorities.
— potential victims (and/or targets) of crime or victims of fear of crime.
A great number of experiments have shown that particular types of crime can be reduced by modifying the
opportunity for crime in the built environment. Moving the night-time tavern crowd away from vacant
storefronts after closing time will inevitably reduce the number of burglaries and vandalism incidents to the
stores. Controlling the access into, and natural sightlines through, underground parking areas will increase the
opportunity for offenders to be seen and caught. This in turn will reduce the number of assaults and car crimes
in those parking areas. The list of successful opportunity reduction examples goes on. In Canada and the
USA this has come to be known as crime prevention through environmental design – CPTED (pronounced
)
sep-ted
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.