EN 15269-7:2009
(Main)Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 7: Fire resistance for steel sliding doorsets
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 7: Fire resistance for steel sliding doorsets
This European Standard, which should be read in conjunction with prEN 15269-1, covers the following types of steel based doorsets: horizontally sliding doorsets (single and double), telescopic doorsets (single and double) and single vertically sliding doorsets.
This document prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests selected from those identified in Clause 4 the extended application may cover all or some of the following non-exhaustive list:
- integrity only (E), radiation (EW) or insulated (EI1 or EI2) classifications;
- door leaf;
- wall/ceiling fixed elements (frame/suspension system);
- glazing for door leaf;
- items of building hardware;
- decorative finishes;
- intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
- alternative supporting construction(s).
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 7: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Schiebetoren aus Stahl
Diese Europäische Norm gilt in Verbindung mit prEN 15269 1 und deckt die folgenden Arten von Stahltoren ab: horizontal öffnende Schiebetore (ein- oder zweiflügelig), Teleskoptore (ein- oder zweiflügelig) und von einer Seite aus vertikal öffnende Schiebetore.
Dieses Dokument legt die Methodologie zur Erweiterung der Anwendung von Ergebnissen aus Prüfungen nach EN 1634 1 fest.
In Abhängigkeit von der Durchführung der entsprechenden Prüfung oder Prüfungen, die aus den in Abschnitt 4 aufgeführten auszuwählen sind, kann der erweiterte Anwendungsbereich einige oder alle der nachstehend aufgeführten Bereiche abdecken, wobei diese Liste nicht vollständig ist:
- Klassifizierung von nicht wärmegedämmten Abschlüssen (E), sowie solchen mit Anforderungen an die Strahlung (EW) oder wärmegedämmten Abschlüssen (EI1 oder EI2);
- Türflügel;
- an der Wand/Decke befestigte Elemente (Zarge/Aufhängungssysteme);
- verglaste Teilbereiche;
- Baubeschläge;
- dekorative Beschichtungen;
- dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen, sowie Dichtungen zur Behinderung von Rauchdurchtritt (Rauchschutz-dichtungen), Durchzug oder der Schallübertragung (Schallschutzdichtungen);
- alternative Tragkonstruktionen.
Application élargie des résultats d'essai en matières de résistance au feu et d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtres, y compris les éléments intégrés de quincaillerie de bâtiment - Partie 7: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes coulissants en acier
La présente Norme européenne, qu'il convient de lire conjointement avec le prEN 15269-1, couvre les types
suivants de blocs-portes en acier : blocs-portes coulissant horizontalement (à simple vantail ou double
vantail), blocs-portes télescopiques (à simple vantail ou double vantail) et blocs-portes coulissant
verticalement à simple vantail.
Le présent document prescrit la méthodologie d'extension de l'application des résultats d'essai obtenus suite
aux essais réalisés conformément à l'EN 1634-1.
Sous réserve de la réalisation de l'essai ou des essais appropriés sélectionnés parmi ceux identifiés à
l'Article 4, l'application élargie peut couvrir tout ou partie de la liste suivante non exhaustive :
- classement d'étanchéité au feu uniquement (E), de rayonnement (EW) ou d'isolation thermique (EI1 ou
EI2) ;
- vantail ;
- éléments fixés au mur/plafond (ossature/système de suspension) ;
- vitrage de vantail ;
- éléments de quincaillerie de bâtiment ;
- finitions décoratives ;
- joints intumescents, d'étanchéité à la fumée, d'étanchéité à l'air ou acoustique ;
- autre(s) construction(s) support.
Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in nadzora dima za vrata, zaporne elemente ter okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z vgrajenimi elementi gradbenega okovja - 7. del: Požarna odpornost za jeklena drsna vrata
Ta evropski standard, ki se mora obravnavati v povezavi s prEN 15269-1, vključuje naslednje vrste vrat na osnovi jekla: vodoravna drsna vrata (enojna in dvojna), teleskopska vrata (enojna in dvojna) in enojna navpična drsna vrata. Ta dokument predpisuje metodologijo za razširitev uporabe rezultatov preskusa, pridobljenih s preskusi, opravljenimi v skladu z EN 1634-1. Razširjena uporaba lahko v skladu z opravljenim ustreznim preskusom ali preskusi, izbranimi med tistimi, opredeljenimi v Klavzuli 4, vključuje vse ali del navedenega v naslednjem neizčrpnem seznamu: razvrstitev le glede na integriteto (E), sevanje (EW) ali izolirana razvrstitev (EI1 ali EI2); vratno krilo; fiksni elementi na steni/stropu (ogrodje/sistem za obešanje); zasteklitev vratnih kril; izdelki gradbene strojne opreme; okrasni zaključki; intumescenčna, dimna, vetrovna ali akustična tesnila; alternativne podporne konstrukcije.
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.DWDErweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Feuerschutzabschlüssen und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 7: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Schiebetoren aus StahlApplication élargie des résultats d'essai en matière de résistance au feu et d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtres, y compris les éléments intégrés de quincaillerie de bâtiment - Partie 7: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes coulissants en acierExtended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 7: Fire resistance for steel sliding doorsets91.060.50Vrata in oknaDoors and windows13.220.50Požarna odpornost gradbenih materialov in elementovFire-resistance of building materials and elementsICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 15269-7:2009SIST EN 15269-7:2010en,de01-februar-2010SIST EN 15269-7:2010SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 15269-7
November 2009 ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50 English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 7: Fire resistance for steel sliding doorsets
Application élargie des résultats d'essai en matière de résistance au feu et d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtres, y compris les éléments intégrés de quincaillerie de bâtiment - Partie 7: Résistance au feu des blocs-portes coulissants en acier Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 7: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Schiebetoren aus Stahl This European Standard was approved by CEN on 22 September 2009.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN Management Centre or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre:
Avenue Marnix 17,
B-1000 Brussels © 2009 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 15269-7:2009: ESIST EN 15269-7:2010
EN 15269, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware Part 7: Fire resistance for steel sliding doorsets Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metal framed glazed doorsets
Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset should have been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 to achieve a test result which could generate a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification subsequently required from extended application considerations. A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations should be made on the basis of retaining the fire resistance classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However, this should never lead to an increased classification for any specific fire or smoke performance parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables within this series of standards. The effect on the durability of self closing of the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed in this series of standards. SIST EN 15269-7:2010
EN 13501-2:2007, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification using data from fire resistance tests, excluding ventilation services
EN 15254-4:2008, Extended application of results from fire resistance tests — Non-loadbearing walls — Part 4: Glazed constructions prEN 15269-1:2007, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware — Part 1: General requirements SIST EN 15269-7:2010
EN ISO 13943:2000, EN 1634-1:2008, EN 1634-2:2008 and prEN 15269-1:2007 together with the following apply. 3.1 full scale test test of a full size doorset in accordance with EN 1634-1 3.2 leaf/element/panel different parts of a doorset as indicated in Figures 1 and 2 below
123 Key 1
panel 2
leaf 3
element Figure 1 — Double leaf telescopic door SIST EN 15269-7:2010
Key 1
panel 2
leaf Figure 2 — Double leaf sliding door 4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General 4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application the doorset shall have been tested and classified in accordance with EN 1634-1 and EN 13501-2 respectively in order to establish a classification for the doorset. 4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables. 4.1.3 All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classification obtained from testing to EN 1634-1. 4.1.4 If, by following the ensuing procedure, any part of the classification cannot be achieved by extended application rules that part of classification shall be omitted from the subsequent extended application report and classification report. 4.2 Procedure for evaluation 4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an extended application report. 4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of Table A.1. 4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) of Table A.1 and establish from the contents of column (4) of Table A.1 whether any extended application is available without the need for further testing. 4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible this can be recorded in the extended application report together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) in Table A.1. 4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing according to column (5) in Table A.1, the additional test can be made on a similar specimen type to the original test SIST EN 15269-7:2010
4.3.1 It is possible to provide a limited field of extended application from the results of a single test. However, where a manufacturer intends to produce a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double doors, with or without glazing, with alternative elements of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options in order to minimise the testing required before testing commences. 4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be part of the product range. 4.3.3 Select specimen(s) for the first test(s) in the series to ensure that the most important parameter variations for the manufactured products are covered. 4.3.4 Complete the first test or a series of tests and prepare a field of direct application and possibly a classification report from the results of the test(s). 4.3.5 Establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the direct application and classification report. 4.3.6 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible without further testing. 4.3.7 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in column (5) in Table A.1. 4.3.8 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of direct application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.7 above. 4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Table A.1 and observe from column (5) of Table A.1 which are the most appropriate weakest specimen options for further testing. 4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests completed in accordance with 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated with the additional product variations incorporated. 4.4 Interpretation of test results 4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall record details of any integrity and/or insulation failures throughout the test duration. 4.4.2 Where a series of tests have been conducted, the field of extended application shall be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variation. 4.4.3 Where it has been possible, to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the premature failure(s).
5 Extended application report Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of
prEN 15269-1:2007, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above. SIST EN 15269-7:2010
Construction parameter variations Table A.1 is designed to provide rules for the creation of extended application reports by experts in the field of fire resistance testing of the following sliding steel doorsets: horizontally sliding doors (single and double), horizontally operating telescopic doors (single and double) and single vertically sliding doors. Table A.1 shall only be used to evaluate a field of extended application when at least one positive fire resistance test to EN 1634-1 has resulted in a classification according to EN 13501-2.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.
The type of classification achieved from the test can be identified from the ‘Performance characteristic’ section of Table A.1 column (3) as insulation, radiation control or integrity only.
The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in column (3) under E for effects on integrity, I for effects on insulation (whether an I1 or I2) and W for the effects on radiation control for EW doors.
Where symbols are used these relate to the following definitions: a) < - forecast is a worse performance; b) > - forecast is a better performance; c) = - forecast is no significant difference; d) ≤ - forecast is a worse or equal performance; e) ≥ - forecast is a better or equal performance; f) >=< - forecast unknown These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application the results of which are given in column (4). In certain cases, in column (4), it is a requirement to achieve Category B, the details for which are given in EN 1634-1.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary the type of specimen approved for incorporation of the changed parameter is defined in column (5).
Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation, e.g. single panel sliding doorsets to telescopic doorsets
The rules given for size increase (width, height, area) of the door leaf are applicable for doors tested in size equal or bigger than the maximum size which can be tested in a standard size furnace (normally 3 m x 3 m). These rules are not applicable to doors tested only with horizontal joints. All size variations based on the results of more than one test with specimens of different sizes can be combined. Column (5) defines the side of the door leaf which has to be tested. Inwards means a test with the loadbearing components such as the runners/hanging mechanism, etc. on the fire side. Outwards means the opposite side. If a special type (e.g. single, double and telescopic) is not specified, the additional test can be carried out with all types of sliding doors therefore, if more than one additional test is not specified, only one test is required. If after consideration of a specific variation, additional changes are required to be made to the specimen, these may be made providing the implications on other variations are also taken into account.
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A Door leaf
A.1
General A.1.1 number of leaves (not applicable
for vertically sliding doors) single leaf from double leaf door test ≥ ≥ ≥ possible providing the overlap of the single leaf door is similar to the overlap of the double door (meeting edge) and all the constructional details have been tested (in the double door), otherwise not possible without an additional test. Any size variations of door leaf shall be in line with A.2.1 to A.2.4 incl. additional test single leaf doorset tested with
suspension system on the fire side
A.1.2 number of leaves (not applicable for vertically sliding doors) double leaf from single leaf door test ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test double leaf doorset or double side telescopic, tested with suspension system on the fire side A.1.3 number of elements of telescopic
doors, single leaf decrease ≥ ≥ ≥ possible
providing all constructional details have been tested, otherwise not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side (single or double side telescopic) A.1.4 number of elements of telescopic
doors, single leaf increase
≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side (single or double side telescopic) A.1.5 number of elements of telescopic doors, double leaf - See Figure A.1 decrease ≥ ≥ ≥ possible
providing all constructional details have been tested and the reduction of elements is the same for both leaves, otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side (double side telescopic) SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.1.6 number of elements of telescopic doors, double leaf (not applicable for vertically sliding doors) increase
≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side (double side telescopic) A.1.7 number of panels per leaf / element- See Figure A.2
add = >/=/< >/=/< possible by maximum 100 % of the number of panels of the tested specimen and providing the intended jointing technique has been incorporated in the tested door specimen and only with regard to the rules given in section A.2 additional test according to section A.2 A.1.8 number of panels per leaf / element- See Figure A.3 reduce = >/=/< >/=/< possible with regard to the rules given in section A.2
A.2
Size variations / single or multiple panel construction A.2.1 size (area, width, height) of door leaf
decrease ≥ >/=/<> E, EW possible in line with direct application EI possible in line with direct application. For category A doors beyond the field of direct application possible down to size of a smaller test specimen
additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.2.2
width of door leaf - See Figure A.4 a) and A.4 b)
increase ≤ >/=/<< possible in line with direct application, if tested at least to the maximum possible size in the standard furnace (3 m x 3 m), or if tested in a bigger additional test(s) with suspension system on the fire side to be performed on a single leaf doorset which includes the required details from column 4 SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
size. possible up to 100 % for category B doors if for EI doors both sides have been tested and for E doors the suspension system has been tested exposed to fire. For E and EI doors the increase is possible, providing that the following conditions A-E are fulfilled. A) for doors made of modular panels the basic test shall be performed with at least three panels per leaf, with the widest panel in intermediate position when testing with the suspension system not exposed to fire and the widest panel furthest away from the centre when testing with the suspension system exposed to fire. B) the distance between supporting elements (e.g. rollers) and the door leaf edges and the distance between each supporting element shall not increased, and number of panel joints between the supporting elements shall not increased, (i.e. additional supporting element (stiffening finger or roller) is required). C) the distance between fixings of the track and any horizontal interlock profiles to the supporting construction is decreased at least by 25 %. D) the distance between fixings of the supporting elements (e.g. rollers) and
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
the fixings of the track to the supporting construction is not increased in a closed position of the door. E) the condition stated in the last sentence of EN 1634-1:2008, 13.3.3.3 shall be fulfilled and the width of any intumescent seals in the vertical interlock system shall be increased at least in line with any increase of the interlock. Otherwise an additional test is required. Sliding doors with horizontal modular panels and telescopic doors only in line with direct application.
Additionally, for EW doors, a radiation calculation within the 15 KW/m2 limit shall be perfomed.
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.2.3 height of door leaf - See Figure A.5
increase ≤ >/=/<< possible in line with direct application, if tested at least to the maximum possible size in the standard furnace (3 m x 3 m), or if tested in a bigger size possible up to a maximum increase of 75 % for category B doors, and providing that the following conditions A-B are fulfilled. A) the distance between fixings of the track and any horizontal interlock profiles to the supporting construction is decreased at least by 25 % B) the condition stated in the last sentence of EN 1634-1:2008, 13.3.3.3 shall be fulfilled and the width of any intumescent seals in the horizontal interlock system shall be increased at least in line with any increase of the interlock otherwise not possible without an additional test sliding doors with horizontal panels and telescopic doors only in line with direct application. Additionally, for EW doors, a radiation calculation within the 15 KW/m2 limit shall be perfomed. additional test with suspension system on the fire side
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.2.4 area of door leaf increase ≤ >/=/<< additionally to the rules given for increasing width and height, which can be combined, the maximum area is limited to 50 m2. sliding doors with horizontal panels and telescopic doors only in line with direct application. additionally, for EW doors, a thermal radiation calculation within the 15 KW/m2 limit shall be performed. additional test according to A.2.2 and A.2.3
A.2.5 width of vertical door leaf panel for a sliding door with more than one panel decrease ≥ >/=/<>/=/< possible providing the width of the panel is between the tested minimum and maximum width of the panels, otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.2.6 height of vertical door leaf panel increase ≤ >/=/<≤ possible in line with rules for the increasing of height of door leaves
A.2.7 height of vertical door leaf panel decrease ≤ >/=/<≤ possible in line with rules for the decreasing of height of door leaves
A.2.8 width of vertical door leaf panel increase ≤ >/=/<≤ possible up to the widest tested panel in accordance to its position (intermediate or at the edges), otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.2.9 area of vertical door leaf panel increase ≤ >/=/<≤ possible in line with rules for increase of the width and height of door panels which may be combined
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.2.10 number of horizontal joints between panels increase ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side
A.2.11 number of horizontal joints between panels decrease ≥ ≥ ≥ possible to remove only one horizontal joint,
otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side
A.2.12 thickness of the door leaf
increase >/=/< ≥ ≥ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side
A.2.13 thickness of the door leaf decrease >/=/< ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side
A.3
Materials and constructions A.3.1 density of core material increase >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< possible by a maximum of 15 % (nominal value) of each core material of the door leaf
above 15 % not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.2 density of core material decrease ≥ ≤ ≤ possible for E doors with core material of Euroclass A1, otherwise not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.3 thickness of core material
increase >/=/< ≥ ≥ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.4 thickness of core material
decrease >/=/< ≤ ≤ not possible without new tests according to EN 1634-1
A.3.5 pattern of core material - See Figure A.6
increase number of pieces = >/=/< = E doors, possible. EI and EW doors, possible up to 100 % for sizes up to the tested sizes and then proportional to any size increase, providing the original test specimen includes horizontal and/or vertical joint(s) between the core material pieces, as appropriate. The joints (can be horizontal or vertical) have to be tested in the upper 1/3 of a panel, otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.6 pattern of core material - See Figure A.7
decrease number of pieces ≥ ≥ ≥ possible
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.7 number of layers of identical core material
- See Figure A.8
increase >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.8 number of layers of identical core material
- See Figure A.9
decrease >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.9 number of layers of different materials - See Figure A.10
increase >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.10 number of layers of different materials - See Figure A.11 decrease >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.11 core material (single thickness or in combination of different layers) change of supplier / manufacturer of identical material with identical composition and properties = = = possible
A.3.12 type of core material (single thickness or in combination of different layers) alternative composition >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without new basic tests according to EN 1634-1
A.3.13 amount of adhesives / m2 – Products < Euroclass A1
increase ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.14 amount of adhesives / m2 – Products < Euroclass A1 decrease >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.15 amount of adhesives / m2 – Products of Euroclass A1 increase = = = possible
A.3.16 amount of adhesives / m2 – Products of Euroclass A1 decrease >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.17 type of adhesives change of supplier / manufacturer of identical material with identical composition and properties = = = possible
A.3.18 type of adhesives alternative composition >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.19 metal armour sheet (internally or externally mounted) - See Figure A.12 a)
add >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< Possible for one piece per panel face up to 800 mm from the base of the leaf providing no thicker than 1,5 mm or limited to maximum two pieces per panel face at 250 mm in width or height (in all cases the elements shall be Euroclass A1). For acceptable fixing methods see A.4.16. Otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.20 metal armour sheet (internally or externally mounted) - See Figure A.12 b)
remove >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.21 thickness of steel sheet, (if not part of the interlock system) increase ≤ ≤ ≤ possible in line with direct application, otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side with a door including the biggest number of leaves where the modification is applied for A.3.22 thickness of steel sheet, (if not part of the interlock system)
decrease ≥ ≥ ≥ possible by a maximum of 25 %, more than 25 % needs an additional test
additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.23 type of steel sheet mild to stainless = = = possible providing that the material thickness is not increased but may be decreased by a maximum of 20 % and providing the door has an interlock system at least at the top edge and the two vertical edges of the door leaf,
otherwise not possible without an additional test
additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.24 type of steel sheet stainless to mild = = = possible providing that the material thickness is not decreased but may be increased by a maximum of 25 %
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.25 type of steel for stiffeners and profiles mild to stainless = = = possible providing the door has an interlock system at least at the top edge and the two vertical edges of the door leaf,
otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.26 type of steel for stiffeners and profiles stainless to mild = = = possible
A.3.27 cross-section dimension of stiffening elements
increase >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< for E doors, possible up to a maximum increase of 50 %. For EI, EW doors, not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side A.3.28 cross-section dimension of stiffening elements
decrease >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side with a door including the biggest number of leaves where the modification is applied for A.3.29 number of intermediate stiffening elements per panel
increase = = = possible proportional to the increase of height or width, of the panel, as appropriate, rounded to the nearest whole number of stiffeners
A.3.30 number of intermediate stiffening elements
per panel
decrease = = = possible proportional to the decrease of height or width of the panel, as appropriate, rounded to the nearest whole number of stiffeners
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.31 spacing of intermediate stiffening elements per panel
increase = = = possible proportional to the increase of height or width of the panel, as appropriate
A.3.32 spacing of intermediate stiffening elements per panel decrease = = = possible proportional to the decrease of height or width of the panel, as appropriate
A.3.33 distance between stiffening element fixing points - See Figure
A.13a) increase ≤ = = not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side or the opposite side A.3.34 distance between stiffening element fixing points - See Figure
A.13b) decrease ≥ = = possible
A.3.35 jointing technique (leaf edges, stiffening elements, etc.) alternative (welding / riveting / screwing) >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< possible to interchange only between riveting and screwing, providing that the centre distances are not increases, fixings are made from the same materials and cross section dimension of the alternative (rivets / screws) is not smaller. Possible to change from welding to screws or steel rivets. Change to screws are allowed only for steel sheet where the sheet nearest to the screw head is at least 1 mm thick otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side with a door including the lowest number of leaves where the modification is applied for SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.36 overlap of door leaf edge
increase ≥ ≥ ≥ possible
A.3.37 overlap of door leaf edge decrease ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.38 intumescent seals
change of location
>/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.39 dimension of intumescent seals decrease ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.40 dimension of intumescent seals increase ≥ ≥ ≥ possible only for intumescent seals at the interlock system at least in line with a pro-rata increase in the dimension of the interlock, otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.41 intumescent seals remove ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.42 intumescent seals add >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.43 intumescent seals change of manufacturer / supplier >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< possible only for identical product (identical chemical composition and identical manufacturing process), otherwise not possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.44 intumescent seals alternative material >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.45 non intumescent
seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc.) - Products of Euroclass A1 location >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< no movement possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.46 non intumescent seals (draught /smoke / acoustic, etc.) – Products < Euroclass A1
location >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< no movement possible without an additional test additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.47 non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc.) - Products of Euroclass A1
add ≥ ≥ ≥ possible without altering the construction and without decreasing the dimension of the interlock additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.48 non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc.) - Products of Euroclass A1
remove ≤ ≤ ≤ not possible without an additional testadditional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for SIST EN 15269-7:2010
performance Possibility of extension
Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4)(5) EIW
A.3.49 non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc.) – Products < Euroclass A1
add >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without additional test
additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.50 non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc. – Products < Euroclass A1
remove >/=/< >/=/< >/=/< not possible without additional tests
additional test with suspension system on the fire side for each type of sliding door (e.g. single, double, telescopic door), where the modification is applied for A.3.51 dimension of non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic, etc.) - Products of Euroclass A1 increase ≥ ≥ ≥
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...