ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Speech and multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ); Reference benchmarking, background traffic profiles and KPIs; Part 2: Reference benchmarking and KPIs for High speed internet
Speech and multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ); Reference benchmarking, background traffic profiles and KPIs; Part 2: Reference benchmarking and KPIs for High speed internet
RTS/STQ-280-2
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
Speech and multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ);
Reference benchmarking,
background traffic profiles and KPIs;
Part 2: Reference benchmarking
and KPIs for High speed internet
2 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Reference
RTS/STQ-280-2
Keywords
KPI, QoS
ETSI
650 Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C
Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la
Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88
Important notice
The present document can be downloaded from:
http://www.etsi.org/standards-search
The present document may be made available in electronic versions and/or in print. The content of any electronic and/or
print versions of the present document shall not be modified without the prior written authorization of ETSI. In case of any
existing or perceived difference in contents between such versions and/or in print, the prevailing version of an ETSI
deliverable is the one made publicly available in PDF format at www.etsi.org/deliver.
Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status.
Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at
https://portal.etsi.org/TB/ETSIDeliverableStatus.aspx
If you find errors in the present document, please send your comment to one of the following services:
https://portal.etsi.org/People/CommiteeSupportStaff.aspx
Copyright Notification
No part may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying
and microfilm except as authorized by written permission of ETSI.
The content of the PDF version shall not be modified without the written authorization of ETSI.
The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© ETSI 2019.
All rights reserved.
DECT™, PLUGTESTS™, UMTS™ and the ETSI logo are trademarks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members.
3GPP™ and LTE™ are trademarks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and
of the 3GPP Organizational Partners.
oneM2M™ logo is a trademark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and
of the oneM2M Partners. ®
GSM and the GSM logo are trademarks registered and owned by the GSM Association.
ETSI
3 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Contents
Intellectual Property Rights . 5
Foreword . 5
Modal verbs terminology . 5
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 6
2 References . 6
2.1 Normative references . 6
2.2 Informative references . 6
3 Definition of terms, symbols and abbreviations . 7
3.1 Terms . 7
3.2 Symbols . 7
3.3 Abbreviations . 7
4 Quality of service parameter values for High-speed internet . 8
4.0 KPIs overview . 8
4.1 PING . 12
4.1.1 PING Packets Missing [%] . 12
4.1.2 PING Packet Errors [%] . 13
4.1.3 PING Failure Ratio [%] . 13
4.2 HTTP . 13
4.2.1 HTTP Response Time . 13
4.2.2 HTTP Download Throughput . 13
4.2.3 HTTP Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth . 14
4.2.4 HTTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth [%] . 14
4.2.5 HTTP Upload Response Time . 14
4.2.6 HTTP Upload Throughput . 14
4.2.7 HTTP Upload Throughput [%] of Bandwidth . 15
4.2.8 Number of HTTP Sessions . 15
4.2.9 HTTP Dropped Sessions [%] . 15
4.2.10 HTTP Download Failure Ratio [%] . 15
4.2.11 HTTP peak download throughput . 15
4.3 FTP . 15
4.3.1 FTP Upload/Download Throughput . 15
4.3.2 FTP Upload/Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth . 15
4.3.3 FTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth [%] . 16
4.3.4 FTP Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth . 16
4.3.5 File Download/Upload Data Transfer Cut-off [%] . 16
4.3.6 FTP {Download|Upload} Service non-accessibility [%] . 16
4.3.7 FTP {Download|Upload} Retransmission Ratio . 16
4.3.8 FTP {Download|Upload} packet loss rate [%] . 16
4.3.9 FTP Retransmission Ratio [%] . 17
4.4 TCP . 17
4.4.1 TCP Round Trip Time (Server side) . 17
4.4.2 TCP Round Trip Time (Client side) . 17
4.4.3 TCP Retransmission Ratio . 17
4.4.4 TCP Data Call Access Failure Ratio . 18
4.4.5 TCP Data Call Access Time . 18
4.4.6 TCP Server Response Time . 18
4.5 IP/UDP Capacity . 18
4.5.1 Conventions and Definitions for IP/UDP Metrics . 18
4.5.2 IP packet sending bit rate . 18
4.5.3 Maximum IP-layer Capacity . 18
4.5.4 Method of Measurement for Maximum IP-layer Capacity . 19
5 Cloud Services . 19
ETSI
4 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
5.0 Introduction . 19
5.1 DNS Lookup Time . 19
5.2 Web browsing indicators . 19
5.2.1 Introduction. 19
5.2.2 HTTP Concepts . 20
5.2.3 Website Response Time . 21
5.2.4 Website Load Duration Time. 22
5.2.5 Website Session Duration Time. 22
5.2.6 Website Download Failure Ratio . 23
6 Streaming . 24
6.0 QoE Streaming Indicators . 24
6.1 Streaming indicators . 24
6.2 Streaming Reproduction Cut-Off Ratio . 25
6.3 Time to Stream Start. 25
6.4 Streaming Reproduction Start Failure Ratio [%] . 26
6.5 Total Number of Videos . 26
6.6 Total Reproduction Time . 26
6.7 Effective Reproduction Time . 26
6.8 Rebuffering Time Percentage . 26
6.9 Streaming Mean Data Rate . 27
6.10 Streaming Peak Data Rate . 27
6.11 Effective Reproduction Time . 27
6.12 Number Streaming Sessions . 27
7 Gaming . 27
7.0 Introduction . 27
7.1 Number of Gaming Sessions . 28
7.2 Gaming Session Duration . 28
7.3 Gaming Average Throughput Uplink . 28
7.4 Gaming Average Throughput Downlink . 28
7.5 Gaming Packet Loss Ratio (Uplink/Downlink) . 28
7.6 Gaming TCP Retransmission Ratio (Uplink/Downlink) . 29
7.7 Gaming End-to-end Latency . 29
7.8 Gaming Traffic Volume (Uplink/Downlink) . 30
7.9 Daily Number of Unique Users . 30
History . 31
ETSI
5 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Intellectual Property Rights
Essential patents
IPRs essential or potentially essential to normative deliverables may have been declared to ETSI. The information
pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found
in ETSI SR 000 314: "Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in
respect of ETSI standards", which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web
server (https://ipr.etsi.org/).
Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee
can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web
server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to the present document.
Trademarks
The present document may include trademarks and/or tradenames which are asserted and/or registered by their owners.
ETSI claims no ownership of these except for any which are indicated as being the property of ETSI, and conveys no
right to use or reproduce any trademark and/or tradename. Mention of those trademarks in the present document does
not constitute an endorsement by ETSI of products, services or organizations associated with those trademarks.
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI Technical Committee Speech and multimedia
Transmission Quality (STQ).
The present document is part 2 of a multi-part deliverable covering Reference benchmarking, background traffic
profiles and KPIs as identified below:
Part 1: "Reference benchmarking, background traffic profiles and KPIs for VoIP and FoIP in fixed networks";
Part 2: "Reference benchmarking and KPIs for High speed internet";
Part 3: "Reference benchmarking, background traffic profiles and KPIs for UMTS and VoLTE";
Part 4: "Reference benchmarking for IPTV, Web TV and RCS-e Video Share".
Modal verbs terminology
In the present document "shall", "shall not", "should", "should not", "may", "need not", "will", "will not", "can" and
"cannot" are to be interpreted as described in clause 3.2 of the ETSI Drafting Rules (Verbal forms for the expression of
provisions).
"must" and "must not" are NOT allowed in ETSI deliverables except when used in direct citation.
Introduction
The present document describes the reference benchmarking, background traffic profiles and key performance
indicators for high-speed internet.
ETSI
6 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
1 Scope
The offer of new NGN services requires new KPIs, QoS measurement and benchmarking methods which are needed to
ensure the quality of new services. To ensure the comparability of test results, reference benchmarking methods and
background traffic load profiles are needed. The present document describes key performance indicators and
benchmarking methods for the spectrum of potential applications. All access technologies offered by the operator under
test are considered.
The present document is the second part of the multi-part deliverable which consists of four parts. The present
document contains the Reference benchmarking and KPIs for High speed internet.
2 References
2.1 Normative references
References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or
non-specific. For specific references, only the cited version applies. For non-specific references, the latest version of the
referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
Referenced documents which are not found to be publicly available in the expected location might be found at
https://docbox.etsi.org/Reference.
NOTE: While any hyperlinks included in this clause were valid at the time of publication, ETSI cannot guarantee
their long term validity.
The following referenced documents are necessary for the application of the present document.
[1] Recommendation ITU-T E.800 (2008): "Definitions of terms related to quality of service".
[2] ETSI TS 102 250-2: "Speech and multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ); QoS aspects for
popular services in mobile networks; Part 2: Definition of Quality of Service parameters and their
computation".
[3] Recommendation ITU-T Y.1540: "Internet protocol data communication service - IP packet
transfer and availability performance parameters".
2.2 Informative references
References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or
non-specific. For specific references, only the cited version applies. For non-specific references, the latest version of the
referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
NOTE: While any hyperlinks included in this clause were valid at the time of publication, ETSI cannot guarantee
their long term validity.
The following referenced documents are not necessary for the application of the present document but they assist the
user with regard to a particular subject area.
[i.1] ETSI TR 101 578: "Speech and multimedia Transmission Quality (STQ); QoS aspects of TCP-
based video services like YouTubeTM".
ETSI
7 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
3 Definition of terms, symbols and abbreviations
3.1 Terms
For the purposes of the present document, the following terms apply:
benchmark: evaluation of performance value/s of a parameter or set of parameters for the purpose of establishing
value/s as the norm against which future performance achievements may be compared or assessed
NOTE: The definition is taken from Recommendation ITU-T E.800 [1].
3.2 Symbols
Void.
3.3 Abbreviations
For the purposes of the present document, the following abbreviations apply:
ACK Acknowledgement message
DL DownLoad
DNS Domain Name System
E2E End-to-End
FFS For Further Study
FIN FIN message
FTP File Transfer Protocol
GET HTTP method GET
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
IAD Integrated Access Device
ICMP Internet Control Message Protocol
IP Internet Protocol
IPDV IP Delay Variation
IPER IP Packet Error Ratio
IPLR IP Packet Loss Ratio
IPSBR IP Packet Sending Bit Rate
IPTD IP Packet Transfer Delay
IPTV Internet Protocol Television
KPI Key Performance Indicator
NGN Next Generation Networks
PING Packet INternet Groper (Send a packet to a computer and wait for its return)
POST HTTP method POST
QoE Quality of Experience
QoS Quality of Service
RTP Real-Time Transport Protocol
RTT Round-Trip Time
SYN SYNchronize Message
TCP Transmission Control Protocol
UDP User Datagram Protocol
UE User Equipment
UL UpLoad
UMTS Universal Mobile Telecommunications System
URI Uniform Resource Identifier
VoIP Voice over IP
ETSI
8 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
4 Quality of service parameter values for High-speed
internet
4.0 KPIs overview
To determine the quality of high-speed internet connections, the following measurement and KPI values are determined.
Table 4.0-1: Overview of quality benchmarks for DNS
1. DNS Lookup Time [ms]; see clause 5.1
2. DNS Lookup Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 5.10 of [2]
3. DNS Host Name Resolution Time; see clause 5.11 of [2]
Table 4.0-2: Overview of quality benchmarks for PING
1. PING Average Time [ms]; is defined in clause 6.3.1 of [2]
2. PING packets missing [%]; see clause 4.1.1
3. PING Packets Errors [%]; see clause 4.1.2
4. PING Failure Ratio; see clause 4.1.3
Table 4.0-3: Overview of quality benchmarks for HTTP
1. HTTP Service Non-Accessibility [%]; see clause 6.8.1 of [2]
2. HTTP Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.2 of [2]
3. HTTP IP Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.3 of [2]
4. HTTP IP Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.4 of [2]
5. HTTP Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.5 of [2]
6. HTTP Session Time [s]; see clause 6.8.6 of [2]
7. HTTP Mean Data Rate [kbit/s]; see clause 6.8.7 of [2]
8. HTTP Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.8 of [2]
9. HTTP Content Compression Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.9 of [2]
10. HTTP peak download throughput [kbit/s]; see clause 4.2.11
11. HTTP Response Time; see clause 4.2.1
12. HTTP Download Throughput; see clause 4.2.2
13. HTTP Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; see clause 4.2.3
14. HTTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth; see clause 4.2.4
15. HTTP Upload Response Time; see clause 4.5
16. HTTP Upload Throughput; see clause 4.2.6
17. HTTP Upload Throughput; see clause 4.2.7
18. HTTP; Number of HTTP Sessions; see clause 4.2.8
19. HTTP Dropped Sessions; see clause 4.2.9
22. Number of HTTP Sessions (Daily number of HTTP sessions); see clause 4.2.9
23. Traffic Volume DL (Daily total volume in Downlink)
24. Traffic Volume UL (Daily total volume in Uplink)
25. Number of active users
26. Average duration of HTTP sessions [min]
ETSI
9 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Table 4.0-4: Overview of quality of service parameters for FTP
1. FTP {Download|Upload} Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.1.2 of [2]
2. FTP {Download|Upload} IP-Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.1.3 of [2]
3. FTP {Download|Upload} IP-Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.1.4 of [2]
4. FTP {Download|Upload} Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.1.5 of [2]
5. FTP {Download|Upload} Session Time [s]; see clause 6.1.6 of [2]
6. FTP {Download|Upload} Mean Data Rate [kbit/s] ]; see clause 6.1.7 of [2]
7. FTP {Download|Upload} Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.7
8. FTP {Download|Upload} Service non - Accessibility [%]; see clause 4.3.8
9. FTP {Download|Upload} throughput [kbit/s]; defined in clause 4.3.1
10. FTP Upload/Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.2
11. FTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.3
12. FTP Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.4
13. File Download/Upload Data Transfer Cut-off; defined in clause 4.3.5
14. FTP {Download|Upload} Service non - Accessibility [%]; defined in clause 4.3.6
15. FTP Retransmission Ratio; defined in clause 4.3.9
16. FTP {Download|Upload} packet loss rate [%]; defined in clause 4.3.8
17. FTP {Download|Upload} Traffic Volume (Daily total volume in Downlink)
18. Active Users (Daily number of unique users)
19. FTP upload with parallel HTTP Download
20. FTP upload Number of FTP Sessions with parallel HTTP Download
21. FTP upload Service non - Accessibility with parallel HTTP Download [%]
22. FTP upload Setup Time with parallel HTTP Download
23. FTP upload IP service Access Failure Ratio with parallel HTTP Download [%]
24. FTP upload IP-Service Access Setup Time with parallel HTTP Download [%]
25. FTP upload Session Time [s] with parallel HTTP Download
26. FTP upload Mean Data Rate with parallel HTTP Download [kbit/s]
27. FTP upload Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio with parallel HTTP Download [%]
Table 4.0-5: Overview of TCP quality benchmarks
1. TCP Round Trip Time (Server side); see clause 4.4.1
2. TCP Round Trip Time (Client side); see clause 4.4.2
3. TCP Retransmission Ratio; see clause 4.4.3
4. TCP Data Call Access Failure Ratio; see clause 4.4.4
5. TCP Data Call Access Time; see clause 4.4.5
6. TCP Server Response Time; see clause 4.4.6
Table 4.0-6: Overview of IP/UDP quality benchmarks
1. IP Sending Rate (Sender side); see clause 4.5.2
2. Maximum IP Capacity (Receiver side); see clause 4.5.3
Table 4.0-7: Overview of quality benchmarks E-mail
1. E-Mail {Download|Upload} Service Non-Accessibility [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
2. E-Mail {Download|Upload} Setup Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
3. E-Mail {Download|Upload} IP-Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
4. E-Mail {Download|Upload} IP-Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
5. E-mail {Upload|Download} Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
6. E-mail {Upload|Header Download|Download} Session Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
7. E-mail {Upload|Header Download|Download} Mean Data Rate [kbit/s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
8. E-mail {Upload|Header Download|Download} Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%];
see clause 7.2 of [2]
9. E-mail {Upload|Header Download|Download} Data Transfer Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
10. E-mail Login Non-Accessibility [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
11. E-mail Login Access Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
12. E-mail Notification Push Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
13. E-mail Notification Push Transfer Time [s]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
14. E-mail End-to-End Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 7.2 of [2]
ETSI
10 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Table 4.0-8: Network Diagnostic parameters
1. Number of open parallel UDP ports (Default value 11)
2. Number of open parallel TCP ports (Default value 16)
3. Reachability of DNS entries (Default value 45)
4. Reachability of Transparent connections (Default value 2) - for further study
5. Reachability of Reference Webpage (Default value 1) - for further study
6. Unchanged content transport (Default value 2) - for further study
7. Radio level - for further study
8. Stability of Radio level - for further study
Table 4.0-9: Overview of quality benchmarks for Network performance objectives
for IP-based services
1. Maximal IPDV
2. Maximal IPTD
3. Maximal IPLR
4. Maximal IPER
Table 4.0-10: Overview of quality benchmarks for voice Media RTP
1. RTP DL Throughput
2. RTP UL Throughput
3. RTP Latency
4. RTP Jitter
5. RTP Out of sequence
6. RTP Dropped sequence
7. RTP duplicate packets
Table 4.0-11: Overview of quality benchmarks for real-time video
1. DL Throughput
2. UL Throughput
3. Latency
4. Jitter
5. Out of sequence
6. Dropped sequence
7. Duplicate packets
Table 4.0-12: Web Browsing QoS Parameters
1. Website Response Time; see clause 5.2.3
2. Website Load Duration Time; see clause 5.2.4
3. Website Session Duration Time; see clause 5.2.5
4. Website Download Failure Ratio; see clause 5.2.6
5. HTTP Service Non-Accessibility; defined in clause 6.8.1 of [2]
6. Number HTTP Sessions; defined in clause 4.2.8
7. TCP Round Trip Time (Client side); defined in clause 4.4.1
8. TCP Round Trip Time (Server side); defined in clause 4.4.2
9. TCP Retransmission Ratio; defined in clause 4.4.3
10. HTTP Service Setup Time; defined in clause 6.8.4 of [2]
11. HTTP IP-Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.4 of [2]
12. HTTP Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.2 of [2]
ETSI
11 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Table 4.0-13: Streaming QoS Parameters
1. Streaming Service Non-Accessibility [%]; see clause 6.5.4 of [2]
2. Streaming Service Access Time [s]; see clause 6.5.5 of [2]
3. Streaming Reproduction Cut-off Ratio [%];see clause 6.5.6 of [2]
4. Streaming Audio Quality; see clause 6.5.7 of [2]
5. Streaming Video Quality; see clause 6.5.8 of [2]
6. Streaming Audio/Video De-Synchronization; see clause 6.5.9 of [2]
7. Streaming Reproduction Start Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.5.10 of [2]
8. Streaming Reproduction Start Delay [s]; see clause 6.5.11 of [2]
9. Streaming Teardown Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.5.12 of [2]
10. Streaming Teardown Time [s]; see clause 6.5.13 of [2]
11. Streaming Rebuffering Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.5.14 of [2]
12. Streaming Rebuffering Time [s]; see clause 6.5.15 of [2]
13. Number Streaming Sessions; see clause 6.12
14. Streaming Mean Data Rate; see clause 6.9
15. Streaming Peak Data Rate; see clause 6.10
16. Effective Reproduction Time; see clause 6.11
Table 4.0-14: File Download/Upload QoS Parameter
1. TCP Round Trip Time (Server side); see clause 4.4.1
2. TCP Round Trip Time (Client side); see clause 4.4.2
3. TCP Retransmission Ratio; see clause 4.4.3
4. TCP Data Call Access Failure Ratio; see clause 4.4.4
5. TCP Data Call Access Time; see clause 4.4.5
6. TCP Server Response Time; see clause 4.4.6
7. FTP {Download|Upload} Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.1.2 of [2]
8. FTP {Download|Upload} IP-Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.1.3 of [2]
9. FTP {Download|Upload} IP-Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.1.4 of [2]
10. FTP {Download|Upload} Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.1.5 of [2]
11. FTP {Download|Upload} Session Time [s]; see clause 6.1.6 of [2]
12. FTP {Download|Upload} Mean Data Rate [kbit/s] ]; see clause 6.1.7 of [2]
13. FTP {Download|Upload} Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.7
14. FTP {Download|Upload} Service non - Accessibility [%]; see clause 4.3.8
15. FTP {Download|Upload} throughput [kbit/s]; defined in clause 4.3.1
16. FTP Upload/Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.2
17. FTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.3
18. FTP Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; defined in clause 4.3.4
19. File Download/Upload Data Transfer Cut-off; defined in clause 4.3.5
20. FTP {Download|Upload} Service non - Accessibility [%]; defined in clause 4.3.6
21. FTP {Download|Upload} Retransmission Ratio; defined in clause 4.3.7
22. FTP {Download|Upload} packet loss rate [%]; defined in clause 4.3.8
23. FTP {Download|Upload} number of FTP Sessions
24. FTP {Download|Upload} Traffic Volume (Daily total volume in Downlink)
25. Active Users (Daily number of unique users)
26. HTTP Service Non-Accessibility [%]; see clause 6.8.1 of [2]
27. HTTP Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.2 of [2]
28. HTTP IP-Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.3 of [2]
29. HTTP IP-Service Setup Time [s]; see clause 6.8.4 of [2]
30. HTTP Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.5 of [2]
31. HTTP Session Time [s], see clause 6.8.6 of [2]
32. HTTP Mean Data Rate [kbit/s]; see clause 6.8.7 of [2]
33. HTTP Data Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.8 of [2]
34. HTTP Content Compression Ratio [%]; see clause 6.8.9 of [2]
35. HTTP peak download throughput [kbit/s]; see clause 4.2.11
36. HTTP Response Time; see clause 4.2.1
37. HTTP Download Throughput; see clause 4.2.2
38. HTTP Download Throughput < x % of Bandwidth; see clause 4.2.3
39. HTTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth; see clause 4.2.4
40. HTTP Upload Response Time; see clause 4.5
41. HTTP Upload Throughput; see clause 4.2.6
42. HTTP Upload Throughput; see clause 4.2.7
43. HTTP; Number of HTTP Sessions; see clause 4.2.8
ETSI
12 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
44. HTTP Dropped Sessions; see clause 4.2.9
45. Number of HTTP Sessions (Daily number of HTTP sessions); see clause 4.2.9
46. Traffic Volume DL (Daily total volume in Downlink)
47. Traffic Volume UL (Daily total volume in Uplink)
48. HTTP Dropped Connections [%]
49. HTTP IP-Service Access Failure Ratio [%]
50. HTTP Confirmation Time [ms]; see clause 6.1 (optional Website Benchmarking)
51. Number of HTTP Sessions (Daily number of HTTP sessions); see clause 4.2.9
52. Traffic Volume DL (Daily total volume in Downlink)
53. Traffic Volume UL (Daily total volume in Uplink)
54. Average duration of HTTP sessions [min]
Table 4.0-15: QoS aspects of TCP-based video services like YouTube™
1. Player IP Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.1 of [i.1]
2. Player IP Service Access Time [s]; see clause 4.3.2 of [i.1]
3. Player Download Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.3 of [i.1]
4. Player Download Time [s]; see clause 4.3.4 of [i.1]
5. Player Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.5 of [i.1]
6. Player Session Time [s]; [%]; see clause 4.3.6 of [i.1]
7. Player Session Time [s]; see clause 4.3.7 of [i.1]
8. Video IP Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.8 of [i.1]
9. Video IP Service Access Time [s]; see clause 4.3.9 of [i.1]
10. Video Reproduction Start Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.10 of [i.1]
11. Video Reproduction Start Delay [s]; see clause 4.3.11 of [i.1]
12. Video Play Start Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.12 of [i.1]
13. Video Play Start Time [s]; see clause 4.3.13 of [i.1]
14. Video Play Start Time [s]; see clause 4.3.14 of [i.1]
15. IP Service Access Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.15 of [i.1]
16. IP Service Access Time [s]; see clause 4.3.16 of [i.1]
17. Video Session Cut-off Ratio [%];see clause 4.3.17 of [i.1]
18. Video Session Time [s]; see clause 4.3.18 of [i.1]
19. Impairment Free Video Session Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.19 of [i.1]
20. Video Expected Size [kbit]; see clause 4.3.20 of [i.1]
21. Video Downloaded Size [kbit]; see clause 4.3.21 of [i.1]
22. Video Compression Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.22 of [i.1]
23. Video Transfer Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.23 of [i.1]
24. Video Transfer Time [s]; see clause 4.3.24 of [i.1]
25. Video Mean User Data Rate [kbit/s]; see clause 4.3.25 of [i.1]
26. Video Playout Cut-off Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.26 of [i.1]
27. Video Playout Cut-off Time [s]; see clause 4.3.27 of [i.1]
28. Video Expected Duration [s]; see clause 4.3.28 of [i.1]
29. Video Freeze Occurrences; see clause 4.3.29 of [i.1]
30. Accumulated Video Freezing Duration [s]; see clause 4.3.30 of [i.1]
31. Video Skip Occurrences; see clause 4.3.31 of [i.1]
32. Accumulated Video Skips Duration [s]; see clause 4.3.32 of [i.1]
33. Video Maximum Freezing Duration [s]; see clause 4.3.33 of [i.1]
34. Video Freezing Impairment Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.34 of [i.1]
35. Video Freezing Time Proportion; see clause 4.3.35 of [i.1]
36. End-to-End Session Failure Ratio [%]; see clause 4.3.36 of [i.1]
4.1 PING
4.1.1 PING Packets Missing [%]
The parameter value "PING Packets Missing" indicates the ratio in percentage of ICMP echo replies not received to the
total number of initiated ICMP echo requests. An ICMP echo reply is deemed not received if it does not arrive within
the timeout of 10 seconds from an ICMP echo request.
ETSI
13 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
number of ICMP echo replies not received
PING Packets misssing % = ×100
total number of ICMP echo replies received
4.1.2 PING Packet Errors [%]
The parameter value PING Packet Errors indicates the percentage ratio of ICMP echo replies with errors to the total
number of ICMP echo replies received.
number of ICMP echo errors received
PING Packets Errors % = ×100
total number of ICMP echo replies received
4.1.3 PING Failure Ratio [%]
The parameter value PING Failure Ration represents the PING Failure Ratio as a percentage.
A PING measurement is considered unsuccessful if ICMP echo replies are missing, have errors (e.g. the target does not
respond with the same value in the "Sequence Number"), or the mean response time (PING Average Time) exceeds
1 second.
unsuccessfull IMCP requests
PING Failure Ratio % = ×100
successfull IMCP requests
4.2 HTTP
4.2.1 HTTP Response Time
The HTTP Response Time is defined as the time elapsed between the sending of the initial Sending of First TCP SYN
and the receipt of the first HTTP GET command. To determine the various HTTP download parameters of the products,
a standardized HTTP download to data reference systems is performed. In addition, four HTTP streams are set up in
parallel. These HTTP downloads access sufficiently large files, the download of which is simultaneously interrupted
after a defined period of time.
In this way, four HTTP Response Times are recorded per standardized HTTP download. The minimum value of the
HTTP Response Times recorded is deemed the HTTP Response Time of the standardized HTTP download.
4.2.2 HTTP Download Throughput
NOTE: Following the testing specified and results presented in Recommendation ITU-T Y.1540 [3], this metric
should not be used to measure access performance (using TCP transport). TCP throughput measurements
tend to under-estimate the network operator's access performance.
A standardized HTTP download is conducted to determine the available downstream bandwidth. The average
throughput is measured from opening the data connection to the end of the successful transfer of the content.
ETSI
14 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
Figure 4.2.2-1: Measurement of the HTTP Download Throughput
Table 4.2.2-1: Description of the HTTP Download Throughput measurement
Trigger point from user's
Event from abstract equation Technical description/protocol part
point of view
t : Time of Start: Web page download starts. Start Method A: Reception of the first data
data transfer start
packet containing content.
successfully started data transfer
Start Method B: Sending of the first GET
command.
T : Time when Stop: Web page download Stop: Reception of the last data packet
data transfer complete
successfully is completed. containing content.
data transfer is complete
NOTE: There are web pages that do not have a well-defined last data packet, e.g. due to dynamic content. If such
pages are used for measurement, then suitable end of page indications, e.g. provided by the browser, may
be used as an alternative.
4.2.3 HTTP Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth
The value HTTP Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth is the percentage ratio of the reduced HTTP downloads to
the HTTP downloads undertaken in total.
ratio of the reduced HTTP downloads
HTTP Download Throughput % = ×100
HTTP downloads undertaken in total
4.2.4 HTTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth [%]
The HTTP Percentage of invoiced Bandwidth indicates the ratio in percent of the actual measured HTTP download
throughput against the nominally invoiced bandwidth.
actual measured HTTP download
HTTP invoiced bandwith % = ×100
nominal invoiced bandwith
4.2.5 HTTP Upload Response Time
The HTTP Upload Response Time is defined as the time elapsed between the sending of an initial HTTP request (GET
HTTP) to the receipt of the first HTTP Response Packet (TCP Packet).
4.2.6 HTTP Upload Throughput
The HTTP upload throughput is defined as the available upstream bandwidth in kbit/s.
NOTE: Following the testing specified and results presented in Recommendation ITU-T Y.1540 [3], this metric
should not be used to measure access performance (using TCP transport). TCP throughput measurements
tend to under-estimate the network operator's access performance.
ETSI
15 ETSI TS 103 222-2 V1.2.1 (2019-08)
4.2.7 HTTP Upload Throughput [%] of Bandwidth
The value HTTP Upload Throughput [%] of Bandwidth is the percentage ratio of the reduced HTTP uploads to the
Nominal invoiced bandwidth.
reduced HTTP upload
HTTP Upload Throughput % = × 100
HTTP nominal invoiced bandwith
4.2.8 Number of HTTP Sessions
Number HTTP Sessions is defined as a number of HTTP flows grouped together as per the heuristics below in order to
comprise the view of a unique web page.
4.2.9 HTTP Dropped Sessions [%]
The number percentage of HTTP Dropped Sessions indicates the ratio between the dropped file DL/UL connections and
the total file DL/UL Sessions
HTTP dropped sessions
HTTP dropped sessions Upload Throughput %= ×100
total HTTP numberof sessions
4.2.10 HTTP Download Failure Ratio [%]
The HTTP Download Failure Ratio is defined as the ratio of failed HTTP downloads to the total number of initiated
HTTP downloads as a percentage.
failed HTTP ddownloads
HTTP download Faillure Ratio = ×100
total number of initiated HTTP downloads
4.2.11 HTTP peak download throughput
The definition of HTTP peak download throughput is for FFS.
4.3 FTP
4.3.1 FTP Upload/Download Throughput
The FTP Upload/Download Throughput determines the available upstream/downstream bandwidth.
NOTE: Following the testing specified and results presented in Recommendation ITU-T Y.1540 [3], this metric
should not be used to measure access performance (using TCP transport). TCP throughput measurements
tend to under-estimate the network operator's access performance.
4.3.2 FTP Upload/Download Throughput [%] of Bandwidth
The value FTP Upload Throughput [%] of Bandwidth is the percentage ratio of the reduced FTP Uploads/Download to
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...