ETSI ETS 300 347-1/A1 ed.1 (1997-05)
V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.2 interface for the support of Access Network (AN); Part 1: V5.2 interface specification
V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.2 interface for the support of Access Network (AN); Part 1: V5.2 interface specification
RE/SPS-03035-1
Signalizacijski protokoli in komutacija (SPS) - Vmesniki "V" pri digitalnih krajevnih telefonskih centralah (LE) - Vmesnik V5.2 za podporo dostopovnega omrežja (AN) - 1. del: Specifikacija vmesnika V5.2
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
01-oktober-1998
Signalizacijski protokoli in komutacija (SPS) - Vmesniki "V" pri digitalnih krajevnih
telefonskih centralah (LE) - Vmesnik V5.2 za podporo dostopovnega omrežja (AN) -
1. del: Specifikacija vmesnika V5.2
V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.2 interface for the support of Access
Network (AN); Part 1: V5.2 interface specification
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ETS 300 347-1/A1 Edition 1
ICS:
33.040.30 Komutacijski in signalizacijski Switching and signalling
sistem systems
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
ETS 300 347-1
AMENDMENT A1
May 1997
Source: ETSI TC-SPS Reference: RE/SPS-03035-1
ICS: 33.020
Key words: V interface, V5 interface, LE, AN
This amendment A1 modifies
the European Telecommunication Standard ETS 300 347-1 (1994)
Signalling Protocols and Switching (SPS);
V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE);
V5.2 interface for support of Access Network (AN);
Part 1: V5.2 interface specification
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
X.400: c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - Internet: secretariat@etsi.fr
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1997. All rights reserved.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 2
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 3
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Foreword
This amendment to ETS 300 347-1 (1994) has been produced by the Signalling Protocols and Switching
(SPS) Technical Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
This amendment contains changes of clauses, subclauses and annexes of ETS 300 347-1 (1994) as
detailed below.
Transfer of V5.1 amendments (ETS 300 324-1/A1)
Annex C, item 5): According to annex C, item 5), the receiving entity of an unblock request
message is allowed to send no response back because it does not agree with
the unblock request. But then it is not possible for the sender of the unblock
request to distinguish between such a disagreement and a mismatch of the port
FSMs which has to be resolved by a block-unblock sequence.
Amendment: To avoid a situation where the FSMs stay undetected misaligned,
the receiver of a MPH-UBR shall respond to an unblock request within a certain
time limit.
Annex C, item 12): The text concerning re-provisioning verification is clarified.
Annex C, item 13): Initial state of the ISDN user port FSM, PSTN user port FSM and PSTN protocol
after system start up is not defined clearly.
Amendment: The system startup procedure is clarified. The SDL diagrams in
annex L are adapted accordingly.
It is stated that the interface and the variant ID shall be checked during system
startup. No procedure exists for the case of an unsuccessful check.
Amendment: The treatment of a unsuccessful system startup is be the same as
in the case of an unsuccessful restart (refer to annex C, item 14 b), last
paragraph).
Annex C, item 14): This item defines an asymmetrical PSTN restart procedure (master-slave
relationship). This leads to a lock-up situation if the restart is required from both
sides at the same point in time.
Amendment: The restart procedure is defined in a symmetrical way. The SDL
diagrams in annex L are adapted accordingly.
Annex C, item 17): If TC3 expires only on one side of the V5.1 interface, a mismatch of the PSTN
protocol FSMs after a re-establishment of the PSTN_DL can persist.
Amendment: The PSTN restart procedure is added in case of a re-
establishment of the PSTN_DL.
Annex C, table C.1: "Cause for start" of Timer TC2 is wrong.
Amendment: The cause for start is corrected.
Annex L, figure L.15.2: Figure L.15.2 is contradictory to annex C, item 13), which requires that the
variant and interface ID shall be checked during system start-up. Figure L.15.2
shows only a check of the interface ID.
Amendment: Update the figure by adding a decision for the correct variant.
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 4
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Editorial
General: To be in line with existing definitions in the V5 standards, the "local manager"
and "system manager" are changed to "system management" in several places.
Clause 2: Update the normative reference to ETS 300 324-1 to include the amendment.
Subclause 13.5: Incorrect reference given where the code sets are defined. Change to the same
reference given by ETS 300 324-1.
Subclause 15.3.3.3.4: Correction of the state "Access Operational" that should be changed to
Operational to be in line with V5.1.
Subclause 15.3.3.3.4: In third paragraph, change the action to go from one state to another as "return
to" instead of "reset".
Clause 16, figure 11: The invisible text is reconstituted from an earlier version.
Subclause 16.2.4.5: A note is added about the sending of a notification to system management.
Subclause 16.3.1.1: Reconstitute the missing part of the table.
Subclause 16.3.2: The Link Control Function IE is defined differently in two separate places. The
value given in table M.2 (00110000) is correct.
Subclause 17.4.2.5: In table 42, the cause "V5 link unavailable (blocked)" missing. The cause with
diagnostic and length is added.
Subclause 17.4.2.6: An incorrect reference to subclause 17.5.8 is corrected.
Subclause 17.4.2.7: There are inconsistencies in the specification of the BCC protocol specification
element "Connection incomplete". The value in table 40 is correct and figure 24
is incorrect.
Subclause 17.5.5.2: Delete the duplicated word "entity".
Subclause 17.5.8: Subclause 17.5.8, third paragraph, states that a message with more than two
optional information elements shall be considered as too long, but in
subclause 17.3.8, up to three optional information elements are possible in the
AUDIT COMPLETE message in order to indicate an extent complete
connection.
Subclause 17.5.8.4: Split the subclause in two subclauses, one for mandatory and another (new) for
optional repeated information elements.
Subclause 17.6: There are inconsistencies between table 46 and table 47 in the BCC protocol.
Table 46 is changed to be consistent with table 47.
Subclause 17.7: In table 47 an unnecessary state is included for event MDU-BCC (Allocation
request) and state Bcc null (LEBcc0). Remove the "no state change" notation.
Subclause 18.3.2: In table 49, MDU "reset SN req" is not used in AN. It is mentioned in the ETS
only at this place and should therefore be deleted.
Subclause 18.3.2: PROTOCOL_ERROR PDU is missing in table 49.
Subclause 18.4.5: Table 56 contains a wrong reference for the IE Rejection Cause.
Subclause 18.4.6: Table 57 contains wrong references for the IE Logical C-channel identification,
Sequence number and Rejection Cause.
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 5
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Subclause 18.6.2.3.1: An incorrect reference to subclause 18.6.2.2 is given.
Subclause 18.6.6.3: Change the subclause title by adding "mandatory" to be consistent with the text.
Subclause 18.8.2: Undefined protection protocol messages: (Wrong message name)
The message OS SWITCH-OVER REQ is defined in state SOLE0 and SOLE2
and can therefore be replaced by OS SWITCH-OVER COM.
Subclause 18.8.2: In table 66, the action in the protection protocol FSM contradicts
subclause 18.6.2.3.1 in state SOLE0 and event MDU-prot(OS-switch-over com).
Replace "-" by "MDU-prot(reset SN error ind)".
Annex L, figure L.6: Some MDU-Protection primitives are missing for SR_PROTECT_SYSMGT:
reset SN com, reset SN ind, reset SN ack and Protocol error indication.
Annex L, figure L.29: Some MDU-Protection primitives are missing for SR_PROTECT_SYSMGT:
reset SN com, reset SN ind, reset SN ack, reset SN req and Protocol error
indication.
Annex L, figure L.33.2: In the bottom diagram, the symbol for the message LINK CONTROL ACK has
the wrong direction.
Annex L, figure L.36.4: The cause for start of timer TSO4 is misalignment of sequence numbers VP(S)
or VP(R) and repetition at the first timeout. Initialization of the sequence
numbers V(P) or V(P) is only done in the procedure for misaligned handling
according to figure L.14. This procedure is applied at the AN side and LE side.
When a misalignment is detected and TSO4 is running, there will be no further
protocol messages apart from RESET SN COM. Therefore, the sequence
numbers remain in their initialization values.
Amendment: Both figures L.13.4 and L.36.4 are corrected with a task symbol to
initialize VP(S) and V(P) before start of TSO4.
Annex L, figure L.36.5: A stop of timer TSO2 is missing in the bottom left branch.
Annex L, figure L.36.7: In the bottom diagram, the symbol for the message RESET SN ACK has the
wrong direction.
Annex M, table M.1: The following code points missing: RESET SN COM, RESET SN ACK and
PROTOCOL ERROR. Table M.1 is inconsistent with table 51.
Annex M, table M.2: The given values for EFaddr and V5DLaddr are not in line with table 1.
Technical
Annex C, item 14): This item defines the PSTN restart procedure in an asymmetrical way. This can
lead to a deadlock situation if the restart is requested from the AN and the LE at
the same time. Therefore a symmetrical restart procedure is proposed to cope
with this situation. For the V5.1 interface specification (ETS 300 324-1), the
necessary changes have been introduced via an amendment. This amendment
contains detailed text and SDL diagrams to provide the symmetrical PSTN
restart procedure for the V5.2 interface specification.
Amendment: The new text combines the two items 14 a) and 14 b) of annex C
into one. Because of the proposed symmetry, the PSTN restart procedure
becomes nearly independent of internal or external triggering. Internal triggering
describes the PSTN restart within system start-up or after PSTN-DL failure.
External triggering implies the PSTN restart after reception of a restart request
from the control protocol entity.
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 6
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
As far as the SDL diagrams are concerned, the restart procedure appears as
one of many other independent processes which make up the V5 system
management. There are no global states for the system management (like in the
V5.1 case). This independence of the triggering of the restart procedure makes
it easier to cope with the necessary changes and to produce a clean version of
the SDL diagrams.
Annex E, clause E.6: Link failure: In a number of exceptional cases where connections established in
the AN are unusable it is not specified how the AN time slot resource manager
behaves. In these cases, unnecessary messages used to de-allocate time slots
may aggravate the situation due to limited processing and transfer capacity. The
amendment intends to avoid different interpretation. It chooses the solution
which requires the least number of messages to clear a critical situation.
Amendment: In case of a link failure recognized by the LE, the LE may block the
link to make sure that the AN recognizes the situation. The AN's resource
manager shall than de-allocate all time slots concerned internally. The LE does
not need to send de-allocate commands for the individual time slots.
In case of AN internal fault reported by an AN FAULT message which contains
both the time slot and the port layer 3 address (and, in case of ISDN, the
B-channel), no de-allocate command is required to be sent by the LE. In case
that the AN is not able to indicate both ends of the allocation (the AN FAULT
message contains either only the time slot or the port's layer 3 address and, in
case of ISDN, the B-channel) the LE shall send a de-allocate message for the
allocation concerned to make sure that both ends are available for new
allocations.
Enhancement of port unblocking
Subclause 3.1: Technical (Port state alignment procedure after interface start up):
Add a new definition of the relevant user port due to the accelerated port
unblocking (refer to subclause 15.4).
Subclause 15.4: Technical (Port state alignment procedure after interface start up).
Transposition dates
Date of adoption of this amendment: 2 May 1997
Date of latest announcement of this amendment (doa): 31 August 1997
Date of latest publication or endorsement of this amendment (dop/e): 28 February 1998
Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 28 February 1998
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 7
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Amendments
Page 16, clause 2
Replace normative reference [8] by:
[8] ETS 300 324-1 (1994) including amendment A1 (1996): "Signalling Protocols
and Switching (SPS); V interfaces at the digital Local Exchange (LE); V5.1
interface for the support of Access Network (AN); Part 1: V5.1 interface
specification".
Page 18, subclause 3.1
Insert the following definition:
"relevant user port: A user port for which a layer 3 address has been assigned to."
Page 30
Insert a new subclause 8.7.4:
"8.7.4 Flow control using LAPV5-DL mechanisms
LAPV5-DL provides flow control mechanisms. Details are defined in subclause 10.4.
NOTE: LAPV5-DL, as specified in clause 10, provides flow control mechanisms for the V5
data links using e.g. RNR or RR frames. These procedures shall also be used to
control the flow of V5 messages at layer 3. This means, if one side is not able to
receive V5 messages at layer 3 this should be indicated to the peer side via the
existing mechanisms at layer 2 (i.e. via RNR frames).
Furthermore, if the peer layer 2 entity indicates via existing mechanisms at layer 2 that
the peer side is currently in an overload situation, layer 3 shall not initiate sending of
new V5 messages, but wait until the overload situation has disappeared. This includes,
that re-transmission timers shall not be started until the overload situation has
disappeared.
The above mechanisms require co-ordination between layer 2 and layer 3 via system
management."
Page 35, subclause 13.5
Change the reference from ETS 300 324-1 [8] to ETS 300 102-1 [6].
Page 42, subclause 15.3.3.3.4, second paragraph
Replace the state name "Operational" (AN2.0) to "Access Operational" (AN2.0).
Page 42, subclause 15.3.3.3.4, fourth paragraph
Replace the first sentence of the fourth paragraph by:
"For AN and LE, when in "Remote unblock" (AN1.2x, LE1.2x) state and receiving FE204 or FE203
respectively, the port state FSM is returned back to "Blocked" (AN1.0, LE1.0), and a MPH-BI sent to
management."
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 8
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Page 44, subclause 15.3.3.4, last paragraph
Change "local manager" to "system management".
Page 44, subclause 15.3.3.5, last paragraph
Change "local manager" to "system management".
Page 45, subclause 15.4 and table 9
Replace the complete text of subclause 15.4 by:
"15.4 Control protocol
15.4.1 Control protocol message definition and content
The contents of this subclause are identical to subclause 14.4.1 of ETS 300 324-1 [8].
15.4.2 General message format and information element coding
The contents of this subclause are identical to subclause 14.4.2 of ETS 300 324-1 [8] with the exception
of table 54 of ETS 300 324-1 [8] which is modified due to two additional Control function elements
required for the ISDN primary rate port, and with the exception of table 55 of ETS 300 324-1 [8] which is
modified due to five additional Control function Ids for the accelerated alignment procedure. Tables 9 and
9a show the modified tables 54 and 55 of ETS 300 324-1 [8], respectively.
Table 9: Coding of Control function element
Bits (octet 3)
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Control function element
0
0 0 0 0 0 1 FE101 (activate access)
0 0 0 0 0 1 0 FE102 (activation initiated by user)
0 0 0 0 0
1 1 FE103 (DS activated)
0 0 0 0 1 0 0 FE104 (access activated)
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 FE105 (deactivate access)
0
0 0 0 1 1 0 FE106 (access deactivated)
0 0 1 0 0
0 1 FE201/202 (unblock)
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 FE203/204 (block)
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 FE205 (block request)
0
0 1 0 1 1 0 FE206 (performance grading)
0 0 1 0 1 1 1 FE207 (D-channel block)
0 0 1 1
0 0 0 FE208 (D-channel unblock)
0 0 1 1 0 0 1 FE209 (TE out of service)
0 0 1 1 0 1 0 FE210 (failure inside network)
NOTE: All other values are reserved.
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 9
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Table 9a: Coding of Control function ID
Bits (octet 3) Optional information element
7 6 5 4 3 2 1 Control function ID considered mandatory
0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Verify re-provisioning Variant
0 0 0 0 0 0 1 Ready for reprovisioning Variant
0 0 0
0 0 1 0 Not ready for reprovisioning Variant, Rejection cause
0 0 0 0 0 1 1 Switch over to new variant Variant
0 0 0 0 1 0 0
Re-provisioning started Variant
0 0 0 0 1 0 1 Cannot re-provision Variant, Rejection cause
0 0 0 0 1 1 0 Request variant and interface ID -
0 0
0 0 1 1 1 Variant and Interface ID Variant, Interface ID
0 0 0 1 0 0 0 Blocking started -
0 0 1 0 0 0 0 Restart -
0 0 1 0 0 0 1 Restart acknowledge -
0 0
1 0 0 1 0 UNBLOCK ALL RELEVANT PORTS REQUEST -
0 0 1 0 0 1 1 UNBLOCK ALL RELEVANT PORTS ACCEPTED -
0 0 1 0 1 0
0 UNBLOCK ALL RELEVANT PORTS REJECTED -
0 0 1 0 1 0 1 UNBLOCK ALL RELEVANT PORTS COMPLETED -
NOTE: All other values are reserved.
15.4.3 State definition of the control protocol
The contents of this subclause are identical to subclause 14.4.3 of ETS 300 324-1 [8].
15.4.4 Control protocol procedures
The contents of this subclause are identical to subclause 14.4.4 of ETS 300 324-1 [8].
15.4.5 Accelerated alignment of the port related protocol entities and FSMs
Alternatively it is possible to align port states in AN and LE by the commands: "Unblock all relevant ports
request". This can be accepted or rejected. After acceptance by the other side, all relevant ports are
brought to the unblocked state on both sides except those considered unsuitable to be unblocked. After
completion, MPH-BI is issued for each port considered to be unsuitable for unblocked state. See annex C
for details."
Page 46, figure 11
Add the formerly "invisible" text to figure 11:
Link Control Link Control
V5.2 link
Layer 1
Layer 1
FSM
FSM
Link Link
MPH
FSM FSM MPH
Signals
System System
FE-IDx link link
Management FE-IDx Management
MDU MDU
Control Control
FE30x FE30x
Protocol L3 Protocol L3
Link control Link control
data link L2
data link L2
C-channel C-channel
Figure 11: Link control functional model
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 10
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Page 53, subclause 16.2.4.1, fourth paragraph
Change "managers" to "system management".
Page 59, subclause 6.2.4.4, second paragraph, first sentence
Change "system manager" to "system management".
Page 60, table 17
Add the following note:
"NOTE 5: Notification to system management about L1 fault."
Apply note 5 to state LE0.1 for events MDU-LUBR, FE302 and FE305.
Page 60, subclause 16.2.4.5, second paragraph, first sentence
Change "system manager" to "system management".
Page 61, table 19
Complete table 19 as follows:
Table 19: LINK CONTROL message content
Message Type: LINK CONTROL
Direction: both
Information element Reference Direction Type Length
Protocol Discriminator 13.2.1 both M 1
Layer 3 Address 16.3.2.1 both M 2
Message Type 13.2.3 both M 1
Link Control Function 16.3.2.2 both M 3
Page 62, subclause 16.3.2, table 21 and figure 14
Change the link control function coding from "00100001" to "00110000".
Page 79, subclause 17.4.1, third paragraph, last sentence
Replace "renerating" by "generating".
Page 83, subclause 17.4.2.5, second paragraph
Add the following text to the end of the second paragraph:
"(This is not checked by the LE)"
Page 85, table 42
Add the following row to table 42:
Cause Diagnostic Length
V5 link unavailable (blocked) V5 time slot identification or Multi-slot map 4 or 11
information element
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 11
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Insert the following paragraph below table 42:
"If the length of the diagnostics in the reject cause information element is not correct (i.e. does not comply
with a value given in table 42), the LE shall react according to subclause 17.5.8.7."
Page 86, subclause 17.4.2.6, third paragraph
Replace "reject cause types" by "Protocol error cause types" twice.
Page 86, subclause 17.4.2.6, sixth paragraph
Replace the reference to "16.5.8" by "17.5.8".
Page 87, table 44
Insert the following paragraph below table 44:
"If the length of the diagnostics in the Protocol error cause information element is not correct (i.e. does not
comply with a value given in table 44), the LE shall react according to subclause 17.5.8.7."
Page 87, figure 24
Replace the information element identifier coding "11000001" by "01000110" and figure 24 as follows:
87654 321
01000 110 octet 1
Information element identifier
Length of the information element content octet 2
1 ext. Reason octet 3
(note)
NOTE: Bit 8 is marked "1 ext." as this is the last octet in the extension domain. Additional octets may
be defined later ("1 ext." will change to "0/1 ext.") and equipment shall be prepared to receive
such additional octets although the equipment need not be able to interpret or act upon the
content of these octets.
Figure 24: Connection incomplete information element
Page 91, subclause 17.5.5.2, first paragraph, first sentence
Delete the replication of "entity".
Page 93, subclause 17.5.8, third paragraph, first sentence
Change the first sentence to read: "If more than 3 optional information elements.".
Page 94, subclause 17.5.8.4, heading
Replace the heading of subclause 17.5.8.4 by:
"17.5.8.4 Repeated mandatory information element"
Page 95, top of page
Insert a new heading before "Whenever an optional information element (.)":
"17.5.8.4a Repeated optional information element"
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 12
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Page 97, table 46, Timer number Tbcc3
Replace state "LE Bcc2" by "LE Bcc0".
Page 97, table 46, Timer number Tbcc4
Replace state "LE Bcc3" by "LE Bcc0".
Page 98, table 47, first row, first column
Delete the sign "-" (indicating "no state change") for event "MDU-BCC (Allocation request)", state "Bcc null
(LEBcc0)".
Page 106, table 49
Change "TSO2" to "TSO3", delete row "MDU-Protection (reset SN req)" and add a new row for
"PROTOCOL ERROR" as indicated below:
Name Direction Description
MDU-Protection PROTECT_AN --> SYS The Protection protocol entity indicates the expiry of
(switch-over error ind) timer TSO3 to the system management
MDU-Protection PROTECT_AN --> SYS The Protection protocol entity indicates to system
(reset SN req) management that reset of SN has been requested by
the peer entity
PROTOCOL ERROR PROTECT_AN --> PROTECT_LE Used by AN to indicate to the LE about protocol error
Page 110, table 56, last row
Replace the reference to "18.5.5" by "18.5.4".
Page 110, table 57
Replace the references to "17.5.1", "17.5.2" and "17.5.5" by "18.5.1", "18.5.2" and "18.5.5", respectively.
Page 117, subclause 18.6.2.3.1, sixth paragraph
Replace the reference to "17.6.2.2" by "18.6.2.2".
Page 123, subclause 18.6.6.3
Replace the heading of subclause 18.6.6.3 by:
"18.6.6.3 Repeated mandatory information element"
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 13
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Page 127, table 66, second row
Modify event "MDU-Prot.(OS switch-over com)" as indicated below:
MDU-Prot. OS SWITCH-OVER COM; / OS SWITCH-OVER COM;
(OS switch-over com) start TSO2; SOLE1 start TSO2; SOLE1
(NOTE 1) MDU-Prot.(reset SN error ind);
-
Page 130, annex C, item(5)
Insert at the end of item 5):
"The remote side shall react on a MPH-UBR within a time limit of 5 min with MPH-BI or MPH-UBI."
Page 132, annex C, item(12), "Re-provisioning verification:"
Replace the second sentence "This procedure (.) re-provisioning" by:
"This procedure avoids a situation in which ports are operational while there is a mismatch of
variant ID or interface ID after re-provisioning."
Page 133, annex C, item(13)
Insert at the end of item 13):
"During the system startup procedure all user ports shall enter the blocked state. After the
completion of the system startup procedure, all relevant ports shall go through the co-ordinated
unblock procedure. In case of an unsuccessful check of the variant&interface ID a notification shall
be given to the maintenance entity and the process shall be stopped. A system integrity process
shall ensure that the system management is put into the SYSTEM STARTUP state repeatedly."
Page 133, annex C, item(14)
Replace the complete text of item 14) by:
"14) Restart procedure
The restart procedure shall be invoked by the system management in the AN or LE or by the OS.
Subclauses L.1.8.4 and L.2.8.4 in annex L provide the SDL description of the restart procedure.
Only for the PSTN protocol a specific restart procedure is defined. For the control protocol, the
system management shall use the port blocking procedure, if required. For the link control protocol,
the system management shall use the link blocking procedure if required.
A restart procedure shall be initiated:
a) during a system start-up as described in item 13);
b) after a PSTN-V5DL failure as described in item 17); or
c) if a MDU-CTRL(restart request) is received from the control protocol entity.
---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 14
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
In case of a) and b), a MDU-CTRL(restart request) shall be sent to the control protocol entity, a
MDU-CTRL(restart request) shall be sent to all PSTN protocol entities and the timers TR1 and TR2
shall be started.
In case of c), a MDU-CTRL(restart request) shall be sent to all PSTN protocol entities and the
timers TR1 and TR2 shall be started.
Upon reception of the MDU-CTRL(restart complete) from the control protocol entity timer TR2 shall
be stopped; upon reception of the MDU-CTRL(restart ack) indication from all PSTN protocol
entities, timer TR1 shall be stopped and a MDU-CTRL(restart complete) shall be sent to the control
protocol entity.
When the MDU-CTRL(restart complete) indication from the control protocol and the
MDU-CTRL(restart ack) indications from all PSTN protocol entities have been received, a
MDU-CTRL(restart complete) indication shall be sent to all PSTN protocol entities.
Upon expire of timer TR1 or TR2 a notification of the unsuccessful restart shall be given to the
maintenance entity.
If the timer expire occurs during the system start-up, a system integrity process shall ensure that
the system start-up is repeated periodically (e.g. every 5 minutes)."
Page 134, annex C, item(17), seventh paragraph
Replace the last sentence "A MDU-CTRL(.) of the PSTN_DL" by:
"The PSTN restart procedure (refer to annex C, item 14) shall be invoked after the re-establishing
of the PSTN_DL. On completion of the PSTN restart a MDU-CTRL (port unblocked) shall be sent to
the appropriate PSTN protocol FSMs."
Page 135, annex C, table C.1
Replace the Cause for start for timer TC2 and add two new timers TU1 and TU2 as indicated below:
Timer Timer value Cause for start Normal stop
TC2 1 minute Expiry of TC1 reception of
MDL-ESTABLISH-CONFIRM or
MDL-ESTABLISH-INDICATION
from CONTROL-DL
TU1 100 s MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL
RELEVANT PORTS REQUEST) RELEVANT PORTS ACCEPTED)
sent received
TU2 1 minute MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL
RELEVANT PORTS REQUEST) RELEVANT PORT COMPLETED)
received received
---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------
SIST ETS 300 347-1:1997/A1:1998
Page 15
ETS 300 347-1: September 1994/A1: May 1997
Page 136, annex C
Add a new item:
"28) Accelerated alignment procedure
The accelerated alignment procedure allows alignment of port states without issuing block and
unblock messages for each individual port. Subclauses L.1.8.7 and L.2.8.7 in annex L provide the
SDL description of the accelerated alignment procedure. The procedure is defined as follows:
a) When alignment for all ports of the interface is necessary a MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL
RELEVANT PORTS REQUEST) shall be sent to the control protocol entity. Timer TU1 shall
be started.
Upon reception of MDU-CTRL(UNBLOCK ALL RELEVANT PORTS ACCEPTED) from the
common control protocol entity, timer TU1 shall be stopped. All relevant ports shall directly
enter the unblocked state without any negotiation with the peer entity, except those that are
considered unsuitable (the latter shall be blocked again for mutual re-alignmen
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.