ISO/IEC 16022:2006/Cor 1:2008
(Corrigendum)Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Data Matrix bar code symbology specification — Technical Corrigendum 1
Information technology — Automatic identification and data capture techniques — Data Matrix bar code symbology specification — Technical Corrigendum 1
Technologies de l'information — Techniques automatiques d'identification et de capture des données — Spécification de symbologie de code à barres Data Matrix — Rectificatif technique 1
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 16022:2006
TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1
Published 2008-10-01
INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION • МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ОРГАНИЗАЦИЯ ПО СТАНДАРТИЗАЦИИ • ORGANISATION INTERNATIONALE DE NORMALISATION
INTERNATIONAL ELECTROTECHNICAL COMMISSION • МЕЖДУНАРОДНАЯ ЭЛЕКТРОТЕХНИЧЕСКАЯ КОМИССИЯ • COMMISSION ÉLECTROTECHNIQUE INTERNATIONALE
Information technology — Automatic identification and data
capture techniques — Data Matrix bar code symbology
specification
TECHNICAL CORRIGENDUM 1
Technologies de l'information — Techniques automatiques d'identification et de capture des données —
Spécification de symbologie de code à barres Data Matrix
RECTIFICATIF TECHNIQUE 1
Technical Corrigendum 1 to ISO/IEC 16022:2006 was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1,
Information technology, Subcommittee SC 31, Automatic identification and data capture techniques.
Page 106, M.1.2
Replace list items b) to e) with the following:
b) For each modulation grade level apply the parameter grade overlay technique described in
ISO/IEC 15415:
1) For each side of the L (L1 and L2 in Figure M.1) and each quiet zone area (QZL1 and QZL2, adjacent
to L1 and L2 respectively in Figure M.1), assume that all modules not achieving that grade or a higher
grade are module errors, and derive a notional damage grade based on the grade thresholds shown
in Table M.1. Take the lower of the modulation grade level and the notional damage grade.
2) The grade for each segment shall be the highest resulting grade for all modulation grade levels.
ICS 01.080.50; 35.040 Ref. No. ISO/IEC 16022:2006/Cor.1:2008(E)
© ISO/IEC 2008 – All rights reserved
Published in Switzerland
ISO/IEC 16022:2006/Cor.1:2008(E)
c) Additionally, for both square and rectangular symbols with more than one data region, repeat steps a) and
b) above where L1 and L2 start with the module in the quiet zone and end at the module in the clock track
area of the same data region and QZL1 and QZL2 consist of the quiet zone adjacent to these L1 and L2
segments as defined like Figure M.1. In other words treat the lower left data region as if it were a symbol
with a single data region. If this grade is lower than that obtained from L1, L2, QZL1, and QZL2 in steps a)
and b) then replace the grade obtained in steps a) and b) with this grade.
d) Additionally, for segments L1 and L2, verify that all gaps are separated by at least four correct modules
and that no gaps are wider than three modules; if this test fails, the grade obtained from the above steps
shall be reduced to 0 at that modulation grade level.
Page 107, M.1.3
Replace the first paragraph with the following:
This section defines the measurement of damage to the internal alignment patterns (when present) and also
external clock tracks and associated quiet zone areas. These tests are applied separately to each segment of
the internal alignment patterns, the clock tracks, and associated quiet zone areas that bound the data region,
or individual data regions of larger symbols. Each segment consists of a clock track portion and a solid area
portion (which is part either of the quiet zone or of an internal alignment bar).
A clock track portion commences with a dark module in the L si
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.