Software and systems engineering — Methods and tools for product line measurement

This document, within the context of methods and tools that support the product line measurement and management and that demonstrate the quality of the products and a product line: — specifies processes for product line measurement (the processes are described in terms of purpose, inputs, tasks and outcomes); — specifies method capabilities to support the defined tasks of each process; — specifies tool capabilities that automate or semi-automate tasks and methods. This document does not concern the processes and capabilities of tools and methods for a single system but rather deals with those for a family of products.

Ingénierie du logiciel et des systèmes — Méthodes et outils pour les mesures de gammes de produits

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
04-Dec-2022
Current Stage
6060 - International Standard published
Start Date
05-Dec-2022
Due Date
10-Nov-2023
Completion Date
05-Dec-2022
Ref Project
Standard
ISO/IEC 26564:2022 - Software and systems engineering — Methods and tools for product line measurement Released:5. 12. 2022
English language
39 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC
STANDARD 26564
First edition
2022-12
Software and systems engineering —
Methods and tools for product line
measurement
Ingénierie du logiciel et des systèmes — Méthodes et outils pour les
mesures de gammes de produits
Reference number
© ISO/IEC 2022
© ISO/IEC 2022
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .v
Introduction . vi
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Reference model for product line measurement . 2
4.1 Overview . 2
4.2 Reference model for product line measurement . 3
5 Product line measurement management . 6
5.1 General . 6
5.2 Product line measurement planning . 6
5.2.1 Principal constituents . 6
5.2.2 Identify strategies for measurement operationalization . 7
5.2.3 Assign responsibility for measurement operationalization . 8
5.2.4 Define success measures for measurement operationalization . 8
5.2.5 Estimate adequate resources needed for measurement operationalization . 8
5.2.6 Document product line measurement plans . 9
5.3 Product line measurement enabling . 9
5.3.1 Principal constituents . 9
5.3.2 Enable product line measurement environment . 10
5.3.3 Define index, formula, and integration protocol for commonality and
variability measurement . 10
5.3.4 Provide guidance for measurement operationalization . 11
5.3.5 Enable measurement environments for quantifying measurement
operationalization . 11
5.4 Product line measurement managing .12
5.4.1 Principal constituents .12
5.4.2 Review measurement operationalization status with success measures .12
5.4.3 Control issues on measurement operationalization .13
5.4.4 Make corrective actions on measurement operationalization .13
6 Product line measurement operationalization.13
6.1 General .13
6.2 Product line measurement initiation . 14
6.2.1 Principal constituents . 14
6.2.2 Identify PL measurement participants . 14
6.2.3 Mobilize resources for PL measurement operation .15
6.2.4 Initiate PL measurement operation. 15
6.2.5 Perform preliminary PL measurement . 15
6.3 Product line measurement for commonality . 15
6.3.1 Principal constituents .15
6.3.2 Identify commonality for measurement . 17
6.3.3 Apply commonality index and formula for PL measurement . 18
6.3.4 Measure and determine the degree of PL commonality . 18
6.3.5 Communicate and escalate commonality measurement issues to relevant
roles and responsibilities (R&R) . 18
6.4 Product line measurement for variability. 19
6.4.1 Principal constituents . 19
6.4.2 Identify variability for measurement . 20
6.4.3 Apply variability index and formula for PL measurement . 21
6.4.4 Measure and determine the degree of PL variability . 21
6.4.5 Communicate and escalate variability measurement issues to relevant
roles and responsibilities (R&R) . 21
iii
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

6.5 Product line measurement result integration . 22
6.5.1 Principal constituents .22
6.5.2 Identify gaps for integration among commonality and variability indices .23
6.5.3 Integrate commonality and variability indices .23
6.5.4 Communicate and escalate PL measurement issues to relevant roles and
responsibilities (R&R) .23
6.6 Product line measurement result analysis and reporting . 24
6.6.1 Principal constituents . 24
6.6.2 Analyse PL measurement results with PL objectives . 24
6.6.3 Report PL measurement results . 25
6.6.4 Identify improvement opportunities for defined indices of PL measurement.25
7 Product line measurement support .26
7.1 General . 26
7.2 Conformance to product line measurement . 26
7.2.1 Principal constituents . 26
7.2.2 Objectively assure the conformance to the measurement of relevant
domain engineering assets . 27
7.2.3 Objectively assure the conformance to the measurement of relevant
application engineering assets . 27
7.2.4 Communicate and resolve non-compliance issues .28
7.2.5 Establish records on conformity assurance activities .28
7.3 Decision support for product line measurement .28
7.3.1 Principal constituents .28
7.3.2 Establish decision support policy for PL measurement .29
7.3.3 Tailor decision procedure for PL measurement .29
7.3.4 Guide the decision execution for PL measurement.29
7.3.5 Document the rationale for decisions concerning PL measurement .30
7.4 Uncertainty analysis for product line measurement .30
7.4.1 Principal constituents .30
7.4.2 Quantify uncertainty in PL measurement . 31
7.4.3 Assess the confidence level of commonality measurement results . 31
7.4.4 Assess the confidence level of variability measurement results. 32
7.4.5 Evaluate and improve uncertainty analysis in PL measurement . 32
Annex A (informative) Commonality/variability analysis matrix .33
Annex B (informative) Exemplary measurement for SSPL adoption .34
Annex C (informative) Capability maturity of SSPL measurement .36
Bibliography .38
iv
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are
members of ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical
committees established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical
activity. ISO and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the
work.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance
are described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria
needed for the different types of document should be noted. This document was drafted in
accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives or
www.iec.ch/members_experts/refdocs).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject
of patent rights. ISO and IEC shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights. Details of any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the
Introduction and/or on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents) or the IEC
list of patent declarations received (see https://patents.iec.ch).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to
the World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see
www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html. In the IEC, see www.iec.ch/understanding-standards.
This document was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology,
Subcommittee SC 7, Software and systems engineering.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards
body. A complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html and
www.iec.ch/national-committees.
v
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

Introduction
Software and systems product line (SSPL) engineering and management creates, exploits and manages
a common platform to develop a family of products (e.g. software products, systems architectures) at a
lower cost, with reduced time to market and better quality. As a result, it has gained increasing global
attention since the 1990s.
For the successful adoption of the SSPL approach, quantitative management of a product line is essential.
For quantitative management, the quality of product line processes and their work products should be
measured. This is important because a product line deals with products as a portfolio, and its quality
is not limited to a single product but multiple different products. Product line measurements deal with
the quality of domain assets, the quality of individual products associated with the quality of a product
line, and the quality of a product. Besides, for variability management, a product line should measure
the number of variabilities and their impacts on the success of a product line. Methods and tools of
product line measurements should consider these product line specific aspects.
This document can be used in the following modes:
— to provide guidance on how to perform product line measurement by organizations that want to
adopt SSPL for producing their products;
— to provide guidance on the evaluation and selection for methods and tools for product line
measurement by a product line organization;
— to provide guidance on implementing or developing methods and/or tools by specifying a
comprehensive set of methods and tools capabilities for supporting product line measurement by
either providers of methods or tools, or both.
The ISO/IEC 26550 family of standards addresses both engineering and management processes and
capabilities of methods and tools in terms of the critical characteristics of product line development.
This document provides processes and capabilities of methods and tools for variability modelling in
product lines.
Other standards in the ISO/IEC 26550 family are as follows: ISO/IEC 26550, ISO/IEC 26551,
ISO/IEC 26552, ISO/IEC 26553, ISO/IEC 26554, ISO/IEC 26555, ISO/IEC 26556, ISO/IEC 26557,
ISO/IEC 26558, ISO/IEC 26559, ISO/IEC 26560, ISO/IEC 26561, ISO/IEC 26562 and ISO/IEC 26563.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for domain requirements engineering and
application requirements engineering are provided in ISO/IEC 26551.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for domain design and application design are
provided in ISO/IEC 26552.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for domain realization and application realization
are provided in ISO/IEC 26553.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for domain testing and application testing are
provided in ISO/IEC 26554.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for technical management are provided in
ISO/IEC 26555.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for organizational management are provided in
ISO/IEC 26556.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for variability mechanisms are provided in
ISO/IEC 26557.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for variability modelling are provided in
ISO/IEC 26558.
vi
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for variability traceability are provided in
ISO/IEC 26559.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for product management are provided in
ISO/IEC 26560.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for product line technical probe are provided in
ISO/IEC 26561.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for product line transition management are provided
in ISO/IEC 26562.
— Processes and capabilities of methods and tools for product line configuration management are
provided in ISO/IEC 26563.
vii
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/IEC 26564:2022(E)
Software and systems engineering — Methods and tools for
product line measurement
1 Scope
This document, within the context of methods and tools that support the product line measurement
and management and that demonstrate the quality of the products and a product line:
— specifies processes for product line measurement (the processes are described in terms of purpose,
inputs, tasks and outcomes);
— specifies method capabilities to support the defined tasks of each process;
— specifies tool capabilities that automate or semi-automate tasks and methods.
This document does not concern the processes and capabilities of tools and methods for a single system
but rather deals with those for a family of products.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
application asset
output of a specific application engineering process (e.g. application realization) that may be exploited
in other lifecycle processes of application engineering and may be adapted as a domain asset (3.3) based
on a product management decision
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 26550:2015, 3.2, modified — Notes to entry have been removed.]
3.2
commonality index
index that captures the level of commonality of a feature, subsystem, component or a product line
Note 1 to entry: Commonality index is calculated as a formula such as measure (3.4) or combination of measures
(function). The formula for calculating the commonality index reflects the relative size, effort, complexity, or
importance of features, subsystems, components, or a product line as weights.
Note 2 to entry: Function points is one of the candidate cost estimation methods used to calculate efforts
required for establishing core assets or product line development. A commonality index is used in conjunction
with a function point.
Note 3 to entry: Annex A elaborates on the meaning of commonality and commonality index of the product line.
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

3.3
domain asset
output of domain engineering life cycle processes that can be reused in producing products during
application engineering
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 26550:2015, 3.11, modified — The alternative preferred term "core asset" and notes
to entry have been removed.]
3.4
measure
variable to which a value is assigned as the result of measurement (3.5)
Note 1 to entry: The term "measures" is used to refer collectively to base measures, derived measures, and
indicators.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 25000:2014, 4.18]
3.5
measurement
set of operations having the object of determining a value of a measure (3.4)
Note 1 to entry: Measurement can include assigning a qualitative category such as the language of a source
program (ADA, C, Java, etc.).
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 25000:2014, 4.20]
3.6
variability index
index that captures the level of variations across features, subsystems, components, products, or
product lines
Note 1 to entry: Variability index is calculated as a formula such as measure (3.4) or combination of measures
(function). The formula for calculating the variability index reflects the relative size, effort, complexity, or
importance of features, subsystems, components, or product lines as weights.
Note 2 to entry: Function points is one of the candidate cost estimation methods used to calculate the additional
efforts required for product development. A variability index is used in conjunction with a function point.
Note 3 to entry: Annex A elaborates on the meaning of variability and variability index of the product line.
4 Reference model for product line measurement
4.1 Overview
Measurements allow an organization to manage characteristics of software or systems quantifiably
or countably. Measurements are necessary for measuring performance, estimating and planning
work items, and measuring productivity. Software and systems product line (SSPL) engineering and
management manage common platforms and variability and derive individual products based on the
common platform and managed variability. These concepts are not necessary for the development of
single systems and are not considered in single system measurement.
NOTE ISO/IEC/IEEE 15939 describes concepts of measurement for software and systems engineering
projects.
In SSPL, different measures from single system measurement should be established to characterize
the properties of SSPL. Product line (PL) measurements include commonality- and variability-aware
measurement processes, tasks, and their supporting methods' and tools' capabilities. Product line
measurement also includes measurements for the variability model because they are linked to all
processes of product line lifecycles.
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

Product line measurement aims to establish and improve a product line organization's ability to achieve
product line objectives through measurement results to planning, organizing, controlling, or evolving
a product line.
4.2 Reference model for product line measurement
The reference model specifies the structure of supporting processes and subprocesses for a product line
measurement. Figure 1 shows that a product line measurement can be structured into three processes:
product line measurement management, product line measurement operationalization, and product
line measurement support. In the rest of this document, tasks, methods, and tools are described for
processes and subprocesses defined in the reference model.
Each process is divided into subprocesses, and each subprocess is described in terms of the following
attributes:
— the title of the subprocess;
— the purpose of the subprocess;
— the inputs to produce the outcomes;
— the tasks to achieve the outcomes;
— the outcomes of the subprocess.
Figure 1 — Reference model for the product line measurement
The product line measurement management process provides managerial supports for planning
product line measurement (e.g. resource estimation, responsibility allocation, success measures),
supports for providing necessary resources, tools, and infrastructures for deploying measurement
plans, and supports for analysing the plan versus the actual status of product line measurement. The
product line measurement management does the following:
— product line measurement planning establishes plans for initiating, operationalizing, and
supporting product line measurement; product line measurement plan includes scope, measurement
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

and performance objectives, and strategies of product line measurement, outcomes of major
measurement activities, schedules for product line measurement, and required resources;
— product line measurement enabling defines, maintains, and assures the availability of environments,
guidance, and resources necessary to performing product line measurement; environments include
tools to automate the measurement process, collaborative environment, repository to store and
maintain historical data, collected data, calculated results, and reports;
— product line measurement managing provides integrated management for the measurement
operationalization; this subprocess reviews the measurement operationalization's actual status
against plans, measurement and performance objectives, controls issues, and takes corrective
actions if necessary.
The product line measurement operationalization process performs measurement operations for
quantifiable or countable management of product line engineering and management. This process
performs measurements for variability model, commonality, variability, and individual products
and integrates results to assess product line engineering and management processes and identify
opportunities for improvements. The product line measurement operationalization does the following:
— product line measurement initiation performs pilot PL measurements and gradually expands PL
measurement throughout the entire PL organization; during initiation, participants with specific
responsibilities for data collection are identified; resources are mobilized to start PL measurement;
the PL measurement enablers can be improved after pilot PL measurement;
— product line measurement for commonality performs measurements for processes and artefacts
concerning commonality of a product line; commonality index and formula are defined and
measured throughout domain engineering and application engineering;
— product line measurement for variability performs measurements for processes and artefacts
concerning variabilities of a product line; variability index and formula are defined and measured
throughout domain engineering and application engineering;
— product line measurement result integration integrates measurement results of commonality
and variability to characterize properties of a PL; integration protocol is applied to integrate
measurement results of commonality and variability that have gaps in relative sizes, complexities,
and efforts;
— product line measurement results analysis and reporting perform statistical analysis of
measurement results from process stability, capability, and performance; create analysis reports,
and communicate with stakeholders to identify improvement opportunities for stable and capable
product line process appropriate to achieve PL objectives.
The product line measurement support process provides the supports required to perform the product
line measurement operations and produce reliable measurement results for a product line. To achieve
these, the product line measurement support does the following:
— conformance to product line measurement objectively evaluates the conformance to the
measurement of relevant domain engineering assets and application engineering assets; actions
are taken to resolve nonconformity issues;
— decision support for product line measurement supports decision making required during product
line measurement operations such as selecting appropriate measures, interpreting measurement
results, and fining improvement opportunities;
— uncertainty analysis for product line measurement calculates uncertainties of measurement
processes and measurement components used to determine the acceptability of product line
measurement; acceptability of product line measurement is assessed through confidence interval
of commonality and variability measurement results.
Identifying and analysing the key differentiators between single-system engineering and management
and product line engineering and management can help the organizations understand the product
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

line and formulate a strategy for the successful implementation of product line engineering and
management. The key aspects have been defined in ISO/IEC 26550; and Table 1 shows the category of
the critical aspects.
Table 1 — Key aspects for identifying product line measurement tasks
Category Aspects
application engineering, domain assets, domain engineering, product management,
Reuse management
platform, reusability
Variability management binding, variability
Complexity manage- collaboration, configuration, enabling technology support, reference architecture, tex-
ment ture, traceability
Quality management measurement and tracking, cross-functional verification and validation
The following is the description for each aspect concerning product line measurement. The product
line measurement processes and tasks shall be identified based on these aspects. The product line
measurement concerns are to enable the organization to understand product line measurement
processes, subprocesses, tasks, methods, and tools' capabilities.
— Application engineering: Not only individual products produced through application engineering
need to be measured like a single system, but application engineering processes should also
participate in measurements of variability models, commonality, and variability.
— Binding: Impacts of binding times on product line objectives such as reusability and flexibility
should be measured or considered when a product line is characterized.
— Collaboration: Participants of domain and application engineering should closely collaborate with
each other and with management roles because product line measurement activities are performed
between relevant subprocesses of two engineering processes.
— Configuration: Measures to characterize configuration complexity, configuration space, or
configurability should be selected, and appropriate data should be collected.
— Domain asset: Measures to characterize domain assets should be selected, and proper data should
be obtained.
— Domain engineering: Domain engineering processes should participate in measurements of
variability models, commonality, and variability.
— Enabling technology support: Resources and infrastructures necessary to initiate, operate, and
support product line measurement should be enabled.
— Measurement and tracking: Product line measurement processes and their artefacts should be
measured and controlled.
— Platform: Measures to characterize platforms are selected, and appropriate data should be collected.
— Product management: Decisions and outcomes of product management should be measured to
determine their influences on the achievement of product line objectives.
— Reference architecture: The impact of decisions made for designing a reference architecture should
be measured for identifying improvement opportunities.
— Reusability: Reusability is one of the significant measurement objects in product line measurement.
— Texture: Measurements for commonality and variability should consider textures concerning their
efficiencies, supporting the reusability of a product line.
— Traceability: Traceability is one of the significant measurement objects in product line measurement.
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

— Cross-functional validation and verification: Artefacts, processes, and tasks related to product line
measurement should be validated and verified when the needs arise.
— Variability: Variability is one of the significant measurement objects in product line measurement.
5 Product line measurement management
5.1 General
The product line measurement management supports the following:
a) product line measurement planning;
b) product line measurement enabling;
c) product line measurement managing.
5.2 Product line measurement planning
5.2.1 Principal constituents
5.2.1.1 Purpose
The purpose of this subprocess is to produce and coordinate a practical and workable product line
measurement plan.
The product line measurement planning determines the scope of the measurement, goals of product
line measurement, strategies of product line measurement, product line objective measures, outcomes
of major measurement activities, success measures, schedules for measurement including entry/exit
criteria, and required resources to accomplish the purpose of measurement.
The scope and strategies of product line measurement include how the measurements of commonality
and variability of a product line are performed at processes when an important decision is made, such
as product line technical probe, product line transition, and scoping.
5.2.1.2 Inputs
The following inputs should be available to perform the process:
a) PL business objectives;
b) product line transition plan (from ISO/IEC 26562);
c) organizational standard PL processes.
NOTE Annex B provides an exemplary measurement for quantitatively clarifying the objectives of SSPL
adoption.
5.2.1.3 Outcomes
The following outcomes shall be available as a result of the successful implementation of the process:
a) Product line measurement is planned, including the scope, measurement and performance
objectives, and strategies of product line measurement, outcomes of major measurement activities,
schedules for product line measurement, and required resources.
b) Product line measurement plans are approved.
c) Required resources and supporting technologies are formally requested and committed.
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

Measurement and performance objectives are described as quantitative or qualitative objectives.
The objectives can include the use of statistical and other quantitative techniques or can possibly not
include them.
5.2.1.4 Tasks
The organization shall implement the following tasks with respect to the process:
a) Identify strategies for measurement operationalization: Define product line measurement scopes
and measurement and performance objectives from selected PL business objectives, and thereafter
identify strategies that guide measurement operationalization.
b) Assign responsibility for measurement operationalization: Define roles, responsibilities and
general principles, and management expectations for performing PL measurement operation.
c) Define success measures for measurement operationalization: Define measures, including quality
criteria used for quality evaluation and insight into product line measurement performance.
d) Estimate adequate resources needed for measurement operationalization: Identify resources,
efforts, schedule, supporting technologies, and costs for product line measurement to be performed.
d) Document product line measurement plans: Consolidate, review, approve, and document the
PL measurement plans. Acquire formal commitment for the required resources and supporting
technologies. Plans include PL measurement responsibilities and authorities, criteria for identifying
configuration items, applicable policies, PL-specific measurement process, schedule, support tools,
and resources.
5.2.2 Identify strategies for measurement operationalization
NOTE Measurement and performance objectives are primarily able to track PL business objectives. A mature
PL organization uses statistical and quantitative techniques to develop the measurement and performance
objectives traceable to the achievement of PL business objectives.
a) The method should support the task with the following capabilities:
1) analysing product line context based on PL business objectives and the product line transition
plan;
2) assessing the organization's ability to achieve PL business objectives;
3) tailoring PL organization's product line measurement process;
4) establishing a strategy for product line measurement, including measurement and performance
objectives, success measures, evaluation criteria, and measures for strategy evaluation.
b) A tool should support the task by allowing the user to:
1) access PL business objectives and product line transition plans;
2) refer to statistical and quantitative measurement and performance data of single product
development or a PL development if possible;
3) allow communication and discussion about alternatives of PL strategies with participants for
selecting crucial components of a measurement strategy.
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

5.2.3 Assign responsibility for measurement operationalization
NOTE PL measurement has two additional dimensions, i.e. the measurement for commonality and
variability. Business performance primarily depends on the performance of commonality- and variability-
relevant processes. The degree of product line commonality and variability and performance are acquired
from mature manageable, controllable, and predictable processes. Roles and responsibilities for measurement
operations are defined from the two additional dimensions and those for managing and controlling performance
at other various work levels.
a) The method should support the task with the following capabilities:
1) analysing critical roles, responsibilities, general principles/rules for measurement data
collection, and expectations for PL measurement;
2) collating required roles, responsibilities, and general principles/rules for measurement
data collection, and expectations with their candidate roles and responsibilities of the PL
organization structure;
3) deciding on roles and responsibilities of measurement data collection, reporting, and who
takes the reports, including general principles and rules adhered to.
b) A tool should support the task by allowing the user to:
1) access the PL organization structure;
2) distribute defined roles and responsibilities, including their general principles and rules
adhered to relevant participants of a PL.
5.2.4 Define success measures for measurement operationalization
a) The method should support the task with the following capabilities:
1) defining success measures that can tie measurement operations of multiple dimensions to
measurement goals;
2) defining formulae of success measures covering associated measures of product line
management, domain engineering, and application engineering measurement activities;
3) identifying actionable product line management processes and tying them to success measures;
4) establishing tracking mechanisms with measurement operations of multiple dimensions and
management processes to collect and support success measures.
b) A tool should support the task by allowing the user to:
1) access the overall objectives of a product line, strategies, and processes;
2) collect and support success measures through established tracking mechanisms.
5.2.5 Estimate adequate resources needed for measurement operationalization
a) The method should support the task with the following capabilities:
1) providing factors that should be considered for the estimation of PL measurement;
2) analysing relations among factors using historical data built for the previous PL or for products
produced before adopting PL.
b) A tool should support the task by allowing the user to:
1) access historical data for managing the performance of the previous PL and appropriate single
products;
© ISO/IEC 2022 – All rights reserved

2) (semi-)automatically calculate estimation results;
3) store estimation results for the further improvement of estimation for the next product line.
5.2.6 Document product line measurement plans
a) The method should support the task with the following capabilities:
1) providing the documentation standard for a product line measurement plan (the contents
of the plan include stakeholder, measurement strategy, measurement processes used, and
estimates, staffing including required training);
2) providing examples for each product line measurement plan item.
b) A tool should support the task by allowing the user to:
1) edit/fill out a product line measurement plan using an editable and changeable template;
2) maintain the version control of the product line measurement plan documents;
3) share the product line measurement plan with the stakeholders.
5.3 Product line measurement e
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

Loading comments...