Information technology — Object Management Group Automated Function Points (AFP), 1.0

1.1 Purpose This International Standard defines a method for automating the counting of Function Points that is generally consistent with the Function Point Counting Practices Manual, Release 4.3.1 (IFPUG CPM) produced by the International Function Point Users Group (IFPUG). Guidelines in this International Standard may differ from those in the IFPUG CPM at points where subjective judgments have to be replaced by the rules needed for automation. The IFPUG CPM was selected as the anchor for this International Standard because it is the most widely used functional measurement specification with a large supporting infrastructure maintained by a professional organization. 1.2 Applicability This International Standard is applicable to the functional sizing of transaction-oriented software applications, and in particular those with data persistency. To be consistent with the IFPUG CPM, the International Standard provides details on the support of applications using relational databases. However, the International Standard can be used and extended for any type of transactional application with data persistency. 1.3 Limitations This International Standard does not address the sizing of enhancements to an application or maintained functionality (often called Enhancement Function Points). Extensions of the automated counting methods described in this International Standard such as Automated Enhancement Function Points will be addressed in future addendums to this International Standard. This International Standard does not address sizing for the non-functional components of a software application. Non-functional components (as defined by IFPUG) include: — Structural Quality Constraints Reliability, Security, Performance Efficiency, Maintainability, etc. — Organizational Constraints locations for operations, target hardware, compliance to standards, etc. — Environmental Constraints interoperability, security, privacy, safety, etc. — Implementation Constraints development language, delivery schedule, etc.

Titre manque

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
05-May-2019
Current Stage
9020 - International Standard under periodical review
Start Date
15-Apr-2024
Completion Date
15-Apr-2024
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ISO/IEC 19515:2019 - Information technology -- Object Management Group Automated Function Points (AFP), 1.0
English language
28 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO/IEC
STANDARD 19515
First edition
2019-05
Information technology — Object
Management Group Automated
Function Points (AFP), 1.0
Reference number
ISO/IEC 19515:2019(E)
©
ISO/IEC 2019

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 19515:2019(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO/IEC 2019
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Fax: +41 22 749 09 47
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO/IEC 2019 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO/IEC 19515:2019(E)

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
1.1 Purpose . 1
1.2 Applicability . 1
1.3 Limitations . 1
2 Conformance and Compliance . 1
2.1 Conformance . 1
2.2 Compliance . 2
2.3 Consistency with IFPUG CPM . 2
3 References . 3
3.1 Normative . 3
3.2 Non-normative . 3
4 Terms and Definitions . 3
5 Symbols (and abbreviated terms) . 5
6 Additional Information . 5
6.1 Overview of Function Points . 5
6.2 Function Point Usage Scenarios . 6
6.3 Inputs to Automated Function Point Counting .
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.