ISO 13232-8:1996
(Main)Motorcycles — Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles — Part 8: Documentation and reports
Motorcycles — Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles — Part 8: Documentation and reports
Contains a basis for documentation, data exchange, confirmation of results by other researchers, direct comparison of results between different facilities and the recommended minimum contents of publications which describe tests done according to this Standard.
Motocycles — Méthodes d'essai et d'analyse de l'évaluation par la recherche des dispositifs, montés sur les motocycles, visant à la protection des motocyclistes contre les collisions — Partie 8: Documentation et rapports
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
IS0
INTERNATIONAL
13232-8
STANDARD
First edition
1996-12-15
Motorcycles - Test and analysis
procedures for research evaluation of rider
crash protective devices fitted to
motorcycles -
Part 8:
Documentation and reports
- Mkthodes d ’essai et d ’analyse de I’kvaluation par la
Mo tocycles
recherche des dispositifs, months sur /es motocycles, visant ti la protection
des motocyclistes con tre /es collisions -
Partie 8: Documentation et rapports
Reference number
I SO 13232-8: 1996(E)
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Contents Page
1 Scope 1
........................................................................................................................................................
2 Normative references . . . . 1
3 Requirements. . 2
3.1 Documentation for full-scale impact tests. . 2
3.2 Documentation for computer simulations . 2
3.3 Documentation for risk/benefit analysis . 2
3.4 Recommendations regarding publication of results . 2
Annexes
Forms for full-scale impact test documentation. . 6
A
% Forms for computer simulation documentation. .
37
Forms for risk/benefit analysis documentation . I.O. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .”
c 53
0 IS0 1996
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be
reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including
photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from the publisher.
International Organization for Standardization
Case postale 56 l CH-1211 Geneve 20 l Switzerland
Internet central@isocs.iso.ch
x.400 c=ch; a=rCOOnet; p=iso; o=isocs; s=central
Printed in Switzerland
II
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Foreword
IS0 (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies (IS0
member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through IS0 technical
committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been established has
the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in
liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. IS0 collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical
Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
Draft International Standards adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting.
Publication as an International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
This part of IS0 13232 was prepared by Technical Committee lSO/TC 22, Road vehicjes, Subcommittee SC 22,
Motorcycles.
At the request of the United Nations Economic Commission for Europe, Group for Road Vehicle General Safety
(UN/ECEnRANS/SCI/WP29/GRSG), this International Standard has been prepared by lSO/TC 22/SC 22,
Motorcycles, as eight interrelated parts, on the basis of original working documents submitted by the International
Motorcycle Manufacturers Association (IMMA).
This is the first version of the standard.
Test and analysis procedures for
IS0 13232 consists of the following parts, under the general title Motorcycles -
research evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to motorcycles:
Part 1: Definitions, symbols and general considerations
- Part 2: Definition of impact conditions in relation to accident data
- Part 3: Anthropometric impact dummy
- Part 4: Variables to be measured, instrumentation and measurement procedures
- Part 5: Injury indices and risk/benefit analysis
Part 6: Full-scale impact-test procedures
- Part 7: Standardized procedures for performing computer simulations of motorcycle impact tests
- Part 8: Documentation and reports
Annexes A, B and C form an integral part of IS0 13232-8.
. . .
III
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
Introduction
This International Standard has been prepared on the basis of existing technology. Its purpose is to define common
research methods and a means for making an overall evaluation of the effect that devices which are fitted to motor
cycles and intended for the crash protection of riders, have on injuries, when assessed over a range of impact
conditions which are based on accident data.
It is intended that the methods and recommendations contained in this International Standard should be used in all
basic feasibility research. However, researchers should also consider variations in the specified conditions (for
example, rider size) when evaluating the overall feasibility of any protective device. In addition, researchers may
wish to vary or extend elements of the methodology in order to research issues which are of particular interest to
them. In all such cases which go beyond the basic research, if reference is to be made to this International
Standard, a clear explanation of how the procedures used differ from the basic methodology should be provided.
In order to the standard properly it is strongly recommended that all eight parts be
I used’ together, particularly
apply
if the resul ts are to be published.
iv
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD @ IS0
Motorcycles - Test and analysis procedures for research
evaluation of rider crash protective devices fitted to
motorcycles -
Part 8:
Documentation and reports
1 Scope
This International Standard specifies the minimum requirements for research into the feasibility of protective devices
fitted to motor cycles, which are intended to protect the rider in the event of a collision.
This International Standard is applicable to impact tests involving
- two wheeled motor cycles;
- the specified type of opposing vehicle;
- either a stationary and a moving vehicle or two moving vehicles;
- for any moving vehicle, a steady speed and straight line motion immediately prior to impact;
- one helmeted dummy in a normal seating position on an upright motor cycle;
- the measurement of the potential for specified types of injury by body region;
- evaluation of the results of paired impact tests (i.e.,
comparisons between motor cycles fitted and not
fitted with the proposed devices).
This part of IS0 13232 provides a common basis for
- test and simulation documentation;
- data exchange;
- confirmation of results by other researchers;
- direct comparison of results between different facilities;
- enabling other researchers to reproduce the experiment;
- the recommended minimum contents of publications which describe tests done according to this
International Standard.
This International Standard does not apply to testing for regulatory or legislative purposes.
2 Normative references
The following standards contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of this
International Standard. At the time of publication, the editions indicated were valid. All standards are subject to
revision, and parties to agreements based on this part of IS0 13232 are encouraged to investigate the possibility of
applying the most recent editions of the standards indicated below. Members of IEC and IS0 maintain registers of
currently valid International Standards.
IS0 13232-I: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 1 - Definitions, symbols and general considerations.
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
IS0 13232-2: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 2 - Definition of impact conditions in relation to accident data.
IS0 13232-3: 996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
impact dummy.
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 3 - Motor cyclist anthropometric
lS0 13232-4: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 4 - Variables to be measured, instrumentation and measurement procedures.
IS0 13232-5: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
Part 5 - Injury indices and risk/benefit analysis.
devices fitted to motor cycles -
IS0 13232-6: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 6 - Full-scale impact test procedures.
IS0 13232-7: 1996, Motor cycles - Test and analysis procedures for research evaluation of rider crash protective
devices fitted to motor cycles - Part 7 - Standardized procedures for performing computer simulations of motor cycle
impact tests.
49 CFR Part 572, subpart E: 1993, Anthropometric test dummies, United States of America Code of Federal
Regulations issued by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) Washington, D.C.
3 Requirements
31 . Documentation for full-scale impact tests
All full-scale impact tests which a re intended to meet this Inter national S tandard shall be documented to include the
information specified on forms A. 1 through A.8 in annex A.
The extent to which the requirements, recommendatio #ns, and procedures of this International Standard have or have
not been followed shall be documented on form A.7.
inf
A complete set of do cumen tatior 7 for Ia full -scale test shall include the corn Iplete ormation in annex A, including
high
still photogr #aph s and plots, plus copi es of the films from the required spee dc ameras.
3.2 Documentation for computer simulations
eet this International Standard
All computer simulations which are intended to m shall be documented to include the
information specified on forms B.l through B.8 in annex B.
and procedures of this International Standard have or have
The extent to which the requirements, recommendations,
been followed shall be documented on form B.7.
not
3.3 Documentation for risk/benefit analysis
All risk/benefit analyses which are intended to meet this International Standard shall be documented to include the
information specified on forms C. 1 through C.3 in annex C.
The extent to which the requirements, recommedation s, and proced ures of this International Standard have or have
on form C.3.
not been followed shall be documented
3.4 Recommendations regarding publication of results
The test or computer simulation documentation forms described in annexes A or B, respectively, should be
completed prior to publication of results of any test or computer simulation which is intended to meet this
International Standard, and which cites this International Standard in the text of the publication.
2
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
@ IS0 IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
The risk/benefit analysis documentation forms described in annex C should be completed prior to publication of
results of any risk/benefit analysis which is intended to meet this international Standard and which cites this
International Standard in the text of the publication.
3.4.1 Full-scale test publications
include
full-scale tests which are intended to meet this International Standard,
publications concerning
Any
a minimum.
the f ollowing information, at
3.4.1.1 Impact conditions
The publication should include
a) a description and drawing of the nominal impact configuration, according to the conventions described in
IS0 13232-2;
b) photographs (or tracings of photographs) from the high speed camera film for MC top view and MC side
view of the frame immediately preceding first MC/OV contact;
c) data for each test measured according to the procedures defined in IS0 13232-4:
1) MC impact speed,
2) OV impact speed,
3) OV contact point,
4) relative heading angle,
5) MC roll angle,
change in d ummy helmet centroid point and joint locations with respect to the MC relative to the
6)
pre-test set up photography.
3.4.1.2 Items not complied with
A list and explanation of all items not complied with, based upon form A.7, should be included in the publication.
3.4.1.3 Vehicle information
The following information should be included in the publication:
- OV make and model;
- MC make and model;
- photographs or scaled drawings of the protective device, in at least two views (from front, side, or top), as
fitted, and deployed, if deployable.
3.4.1.4 Impact sequence information
The impact sequence data described in A.8.2 should be included in the publication.
3.4.1.5 Performance data
A listing of values for all of the injury assessment variables, injury potential variables, and injury indices described in
IS0 13232-5 and listed in A.8.4 should be included in the publication.
3.4.1.6 Paired comparison information
Only tests which meet the impact condition requirements described in 4.5 of IS0 13232-6 should be published.
3
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
@ IS0
IS0 13232-8:1996(E)
standard MC and the MC with protective device) should
Only complete paired comparisons (i.e., results for both the
be published.
If an out of tolerance test is published, the publication should clearly identify for each such test
- that the test was out of tolerance;
- the amount by which it was out of tolerance;
- that according to IS0 13232, such test is not considered to be a valid basis for a paired comparison.
The following minimum information should be included in the publication.
3.4.1.6.1 Paired comparisons summary statements
Within each paired comparison:
a) if the injury assessment variables, injury potential variables, and injury indices all show the same kind of
effect of the protective device (e.g., all variables show benefits, or all show harm, or all show no effect),
then a statement of this should be included in the publication;
b) if the variables are mixed with regard to the effect of the protective device, then a statement of this
should be included. In this case, the result should be summarized in the publication by referring to the
effect of the protective device on:
1) the body region of interest (e.g., the head for a head protective device, or leg for a leg protective
device),
2) the head injury potential variables,
3) the normalized probable injury cost.
3.4.1.6.2 Comparisons across impact configurations summary statements
For each set of paired comparisons (i.e., involving more than one impact configu ration), and for a given pro tecti ve
device, the f ‘ollowing minimum information should be included in the publication:
- for all of the injury assessment variables, injury potential variables, and injury indices listed in table 1,
summary statements of the following form should be included, depending on the test results (the following
is an example);
“In 4 out of 7 test pairs the neck maximum torsion moment i ncreased, in 2 out of 7 test pairs it remained
the same, and in 1 out of 7 test pairs it decreased, when the protective device fitted.”
was
- if zero precedes “out of” in the summary statement . “in 0 out of 7 test pairs” ), then the phrase
(e 9 -I
containing the zero may be omitted;
- a statement referring to the need to eva luate protective devices across the population of impact
configurations.
3.4.2 Risk/benefit analyses publications
Any publications concerning risk/benefit analysis which are intended to meet this International Standard should
include the information in form C-2, and a list and explanation of all items not complied with, based upon form C-3,
at a minimum.
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
Table 1. List of injury assessment variables, injury potential variables, and injury indices
for inclusion in publications of paired comparisons
Time window
Injury assessment variable, injury potential variable, injury index
Entire
Head maximum GAMBIT
Entire
HIC
Entire
Head PAIS
For head protective device research:
Entire
- neck shear injury index;
Entire
- neck tension injury index;
Entire
- neck compression injury index;
Entire
- neck flexion injury index;
Entire
- neck extension injury index;
Entire
- neck torsion injury index.
For all research:
Entire
- chest PAIS;
Entire
- abdomen PAIS;
Entire
- number of femur fractures;
Entire
- number of knee dislocations;
Entire
- number of tibia fractures;
Primary
- maximum vertical difference in helmet trajectory
(protective device minus baseline);
At first helmet/OV
- percentage change in helmet resultant velocity
contact
(protective device compared to baseline);
Entire
- partial permanent incapacity index;
Entire
- probability of fatality, from GAMBIT;
Entire
- risk of life threatening brain injury, from HIC;
Entire
- total normalized injury cost.
5
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Annex A
(normative)
Forms for full-scale impact test documentation
The forms which are required to be completed for documentation of each full-scale impact test are given below.
A.2 contains the motor cycle information. A.3 contains the protective
Form A.1 is the document cover page.
device information. A.4 contains the opposing vehicle information. A.5 contains information on the dummy and
instrumentation. A.6 contains impact condition information. A.7 contains a checklist of procedures complied with.
A.8 contains the resulting test data.
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Q IS0
A. 1 Documentation for motor cycle/opposing vehicle
full-scale impact test
According to IS0 13232
Test number:
Motor cycle/protective device:
Impact configuration code:
Test facility:
For items requiring yes/no responses, indicate “no” if the
Note: Complete all information on the following pages.
“no ”) is given, attach an explanation.
Wherever a negative response (i.e.,
response is unknown or negative.
7
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8:1996(E)
Test number
A.2 - Motor cycle information (IS0 13232-6, 52.2)
Manufacturer:
,
L
Model:
Year:
Engine displacement: cc
Optional accessories, as tested:
I I
I
Colour, as tested:
Frame serial number:
I I
Weight (empty, no dummy, with test equipment and protective device, if fitted):
Pretest photographs (without dummy) are attached (side, front views)
At the time of the test, the motor cycle was in sound condition with no structural damage or
Yes No
alteration except those related to the fitment of the protective device, if present: Qcl
A.3 - Protective device information (if fitted)
Device description:
I I
Photographs or scale drawings in two views are attached:
A.4 - Opposing vehicle information (IS0 13232-6, 4.1)
.
Manufacturer:
Model:
I I
Year:
I
Colour, as tested:
I
Vehicle identification number:
I I
8
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
Test number
Weight Weight (empty, (empty, with with test test equipment): equipment): Left Left front: front:
kg kg
/ / , ,
Right Right front: front:
kg kg
. .
Left Left rear: rear:
kg kg
, ,
Right Right rear: rear:
kg kg
Total: Total:
kg kg
\
Overall length:
Overall width:
Overall height:
cm
I
Yes No
Pre-test photographs attached (side, front views): cm
A.5 - Dummy and instrumentation information (IS0 13232-3, IS0 13232-4, IS0 13232-6)
A.5.1 Dummy mechanical
Yes No
The test dummy meets the requirements of IS0 13232-3: cm
Notes:
Number of full-scale impact tests since calibration of (IS0 13232-6,4.3-l ):
head:
neck:
thorax:
knee, L:
knee, R:
9
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
@ IS0
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Test number
A.5.2 Dummy frangible component conformity of production test data (IS0 13232-3)
Initial and
subsequent
COP
data attached
Abdominal insert:
Frangible femurs:
L
R
Frangible knee shear pins:
L varus valgus
L torsion
R varus valgus
R torsion
Frangible knee compliance elements:
L varus valgus
L torsion
R varus valgus
R torsion
Frangible tibias:
L
R
All frangible components were new and not previously used:
I
A.5.3 Sensor, data acquisition and post processing systems verification (IS0 1 1232-6)
The verification test described in 4.3.3 and 5.3.1 was done and the time Yes No
history plot is attached: q cl
\
A.5.4 Joint tensions (IS0 13232-6)
Yes No
All joint tensions were set according to annex A cm
I
10
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
0 IS0 IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Test number
A.5.5 Helmet (IS0 13232-6)
Manufacturer:
Model: Size: cl M (56 cm); cl L (58 cm)
Yes No
Meets all requirements of 4.3.7: clcl
cm
The helmet was installed on the dummy according to annex D:
cl0
Dimension A of the helmet alignment tool was not modified:
If modified, the new dimension was: mm
A.5.6 Instrumentation (IS0 132324)
A.5.6.1 Electronic variables recorded (4.1 I
Time histories for the following recorded variables are attached in A-8.3 in the following sequence:
Full-scale IPlot attached to A-8.31
Plot
Required electronic Recorder recording
(y 1 Secondary 1
page
variables recorded: channel and plotting
sequence
1 Yes 1 No 1 Yes 1 No 1
range
-
I 1
First MC/OV contact
occurrence ‘)
r
Head:
It 4oog 1
al
1
1
* 4oog
a2
1
* 4oog 1
a3
* 4oog 2
a4
r 1
It 4oog 2
a5
1
* 4oog 2
a6
.
* 4oog 3
a7
/ ,
* 4oog 3
a8
1
* 4oog 3
a9
,
Chest:
/
I * 60mm 6
UL
I
I k 60mm 6
uR
* 60mm 6
Ii,
/
k 60mm 6
II,
\
Upper neck (for head
protective device research):
I 1
F zk 4kN 4
x,n
F + 4 kN 4
Yfn
I
f: 8 kN 4
F
z,n
1
M k 400 N l m 5
WJ
,
M
1 *60N-m I 5 I I I I
I z,n I I
11) Label the first MC/OV contact ,signal on all plots on which it appears.
I
11
---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Q IS0
Test number
Full-scale
Required electronic Recorder recording
variables recorded:
channel and plotting
range
Upper femurs (for leg
protective device research):
F k 12kN
z.uF.L
M rt 600 N em
x,uF,L
M
i 600 N l m
v,uF,L
F
k 12kN
z,uF,R
M
k 600 N l m
x,uF,R
M k 600 N em
v,uF,R
Upper tibias (for leg
protective device research):
M
f: 400 N l m
x,uT,L
M
k 400 N l m
y,uT,L
M k 400 N em
x.uT.R
M k 400 N l m
y,uT,R
Full-scale
Plot attached
I
Plot
Permissible electronic
Recorder recording
page
variables recorded: channel and plotting
sequence
range
Upper neck:
M k 120N.m
5
x,n
Lumbar spine:
F
f: 5 kN 10
X.1 I
F
k 5kN
10
I
F
Z,l I
M
I
Upper femurs:
M
z,uF,L
M
z,uF,R
Lower femurs:
F
z,lF,L I
M
x,lF,L I
Mv,IF.L
M
z,lF,L I
F
z.1F.R I
M~.IF.R I
M
z,lF,R
I
Upper tibias:
M
* 200 N l m 1
14 I I I I
z,uT,L I
M k 200 N l m
14
z,uT,R
12
---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
Test number
Plot attached
Full-scale
Plot ,
Recorder recording
Permissible electronic
Prir?Dr\l luau y f I Seconda ’ry
page
channel and plotting r
variables recorded:
sequence Yes No Yes No
range
Lower tibias:
AI 40 kN 15
F
z,lT,L
1
=t 400 N . m 15
M
x,lT,L
k 400 N em 15
My,lT,L
. m
F zk 40 kN 16
z,lT,R
16
k 400 N l m
M
x,lT,R
M~,IT,R * 400 N am 16
A.5.6.2 Datr 3 acquisition external cable usage (according to 4.5 and 4.5.1 of IS0 132324)
There were no external cables attached to the dummy except detachable cables, as described in yes no
4.5.1: Only detachable cables, meeting the requirements of 4.5, were used (recommended):
Non-detachable cables were used (not recommended):
a) If used, each non-detachable cable had a mass of less than or equal to l/3 kg:
b) If used, each non-detachable cable had a length of greater than or equal to 12 m:
c) If used, the total mass of the non-detachable cables was less than or equal to 4 kg:
d) If used, the non-detachable cables were arranged so that each was unrestrained:
e) If used, the non-detachable cables were not attached to the MC, the dummy, or any
other cable,, except at the cable extremities:
f) If used, the non-detachable cables were attached to the dummy by means of a connector
attached to the rear portion of the pelvis:
T
A.6 - Impact condition information (IS0 13232-2, IS0 13232-4, IS0 13232-6)
A.6.1 Nominal test condition (according to IS0 13232-2)
Code: /
RHA MCS
OVCP MCCP ovs
m/s m/s
Indicate with an arrow approximately 2 cm long, which
represents the MC, the intended orientation and position
of the MC centre line at first MUOV contact.
Indicate with a dot the intended contact point on the OV,
and on the MC centre line (front end, mid-point, or rear
end).
13
---------------------- Page: 17 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
@ IS0
Test number
A.6.2 Motor cycle (with or without dummy, as specified) (IS0 13232-6)
Yes No
Requirements described in 5.2.2 were met:
Hand grip outboard end height at centre (before dummy is placed on the MC) (C. 1)
L: cm; R: cm
Yes No
Handlebars are adjusted to the same position for all tests within a paired comparison: q u
Ride height, centre of headlamp (5.3.5)
cm
I
Ride height, centre of taillamp (5.3.5)
cm
I
Overall length (5.2.2)
cm
I
Type of foot rest (C.2.2):
I
A.6.3 Dummy (positioned on MC) (IS0 13232-6)
Which procedure was used to position the boots: C.2.2.1, C.2.2.2, or C.2.2.31
Yes No
Did any part of the right boot lie below the brake pedal? on
If yes, the distance from the forward edge of the right boot to the
forward edge of the right foot rest: cm
Yes No
Did any part of the left boot lie below the gear shift pedal?
clcl
If yes, the distance from the forward edge of the left boot to the
forward edge of the left foot rest:
cm
Distance between knee centre line indices (C.2.3):
cm
L:
R:
Upper torso pitch angle (forward of vertical): (C.2.4.2)
deg
Yes No
Upper torso pitch angle set at standard value: (C.2.4) cm
If “no ”, then the reason was because there was an obstruction between the
dummy and the .
Yes No
Helmet alignment tool upper edge was horizontal: (D.3) cm
If “no ”, then the helmet alignment tool upper edge deviation from the horizontal
WI
Nodding block set number used (D.3): Set no. cl
14
---------------------- Page: 18 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Test number
A.6.4 Opposing vehicle (IS0 13232-6)
Ride height (5.2.1)
cm
Front, leading edge of bonnet at centre line:
1
I
cm
Right, top of rain gutter at rear corner of door:
Left, top of rain gutter at rear corner of door:
I cm I
cm
Rear, bottom edge of boot lid at centre line:
I I
A.6.5 Pre-test measurements (IS0 13232-4, IS0 13232-W
all dimensions in metres
Yes No
Camera specification page attached (see IS0 13232-8, A.6.5.1): cm
cm
Target location page attached (see IS0 13232-8, A-6.5.2):
Photograph of the MC with the dummy in the proper position is attached (IS0 13232-4,4.7): clcl
MC side MC top OV side
Perpendicular distances from targets to camera view camera view camera view camera
lens (IS0 13232-4, 5.1):
Ground target 1
Ground target 2
MC main frame front target
MC main frame rear target
OV side reference target
Helmet centroid
1
Distance between photo-optic or electro-mechanical contact switches, if used (IS0 13232-4, 5.1):
ov: cm MC: cm
15
---------------------- Page: 19 ----------------------
IS0 13232-8: 1996(E)
Test number
cj
?ii
0
cl
M
NE
III
c
0
.-
+Ir 1
i!!
Q
0
cl
SE
z
P
z
XE
0
c
0
.-
E
.-
k
NE
c
0
.-
+
s
0
SE
c1
a
P I
c
XE
”
‘9
a
17
---------------------- Page: 20 ----------------------
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Test number
13232-4,4.3.2 and 4.3.3)
A.6.5.3 MC and OV target information (IS0
the drawings provided. Complete
Mark and number the MC and OV targets on the respective tables.
X
LL
Left
Right
I I
Z
z
Front Rear
c
Target location
1
Target Description
z, m
YI ffl
MC-l
MC-2
MC-3
MC-4
.
.
.
.
Right
Left
I
Z
Ta ‘get location
Description L
Target
x, fn Y, m z, m
1
/
ov-1
ov-2
ov-3
ov-4
.
18
---------------------- Page: 21 ----------------------
@ IS0
IS0 13232=8:1996(E)
Test number
A.6.6 Measured impact conditions (IS0 132324 and IS0 13232-6)
Absolute Relative tolerance
requirement met with
tolerance
requirement met respect to test
I
number:
(IS0 13232-6,4.5.4)
I
Yes Yes No
Relative heading angle (IS0 13232-4, 5.3.2): ml
m/s
OV impact speed (IS0 13232-4,5.3.1):
cl or fiim analysis cl
measurement was electronic
m/s
MC impact speed (IS0 13232-4. 5.3.1):
cl
measurement was electronic cl or film analysis
MC roll angle (IS0 13232-4, 5.3.3):
OV contact point from reference point
(centre line of OV leading edge) (IS0 13232-4, 5.3.4): cm
Pre-test still camera First MClOV contact, high Tolerance
Dummy target positions
speed
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.