Particle size analysis — Dynamic light scattering (DLS)

ISO 22412:2017 specifies the application of dynamic light scattering (DLS) to the measurement of average hydrodynamic particle size and the measurement of the size distribution of mainly submicrometre-sized particles, emulsions or fine bubbles dispersed in liquids. DLS is also referred to as "quasi-elastic light scattering (QELS)" and "photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS)," although PCS actually is one of the measurement techniques. ISO 22412:2017 is applicable to the measurement of a broad range of dilute and concentrated suspensions. The principle of dynamic light scattering for a concentrated suspension is the same as for a dilute suspension. However, specific requirements for the instrument setup and specification of test sample preparation are required for concentrated suspensions. At high concentrations, particle-particle interactions and multiple light scattering can become dominant and can result in apparent particle sizes that differ between concentrated and dilute suspensions.

Analyse granulométrique — Dispersion lumineuse dynamique (DLD)

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
05-Feb-2017
Current Stage
9092 - International Standard to be revised
Completion Date
17-Aug-2022
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ISO 22412:2017 - Particle size analysis -- Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
English language
34 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 22412
Second edition
2017-02
Particle size analysis — Dynamic light
scattering (DLS)
Analyse granulométrique — Dispersion lumineuse dynamique (DLD)
Reference number
ISO 22412:2017(E)
©
ISO 2017

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO 2017, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Symbols and units . 3
5 Principle . 4
6 Apparatus . 5
7 Test sample preparation . 7
7.1 General . 7
7.2 Concentration limits . 7
7.3 Checks for concentration suitability. 7
8 Measurement procedure . 8
9 Evaluation of results .10
9.1 General .10
9.2 Correlation analysis .11
9.2.1 Cumulants method .11
9.2.2 Distribution calculation algorithms .11
9.3 Frequency analysis .12
10 System qualification and quality control .13
10.1 System qualification .13
10.2 Quality control of measurement results .13
10.3 Method precision and measurement uncertainty .14
11 Test report .14
Annex A (informative) Theoretical background .16
Annex B (informative) Guidance on potential measurement artefacts and on ways to
minimize their influence .25
Annex C (informative) Online measurements .28
Annex D (informative) Recommendations for sample preparation .29
Bibliography .33
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved iii

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following
URL: w w w . i s o .org/ iso/ foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 24, Particle characterization including
sieving, Subcommittee SC 4, Particle characterization.
This second edition of ISO 22412 cancels and replaces ISO 22412:2008 and ISO 13321:1996.
iv © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

Introduction
Particle size analysis in the submicrometre size range is performed on a routine basis using the dynamic
light scattering (DLS) method, which probes the hydrodynamic mobility of the particles. The success of
the technique is mainly based on the fact that it provides estimates of the average particle size and
size distribution within a few minutes, and that user-friendly commercial instruments are available.
Nevertheless, proper use of the instrument and interpretation of the result require certain precautions.
Several methods have been developed for DLS. These methods can be classified in several ways:
a) by the difference in raw data acquisition (autocorrelation, cross-correlation and frequency
analysis);
b) by the difference in optical setup (homodyne versus heterodyne mode);
c) by the angle of observation.
In addition, instruments show differences with respect to the type of laser source and often allow
application of different data analysis algorithms (e.g. cumulants, NNLS, CONTIN, etc.).
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved v

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 22412:2017(E)
Particle size analysis — Dynamic light scattering (DLS)
1 Scope
This document specifies the application of dynamic light scattering (DLS) to the measurement of average
hydrodynamic particle size and the measurement of the size distribution of mainly submicrometre-
sized particles, emulsions or fine bubbles dispersed in liquids. DLS is also referred to as “quasi-elastic
light scattering (QELS)” and “photon correlation spectroscopy (PCS),” although PCS actually is one of
the measurement techniques.
This document is applicable to the measurement of a broad range of dilute and concentrated
suspensions. The principle of dynamic light scattering for a concentrated suspension is the same as
for a dilute suspension. However, specific requirements for the instrument setup and specification of
test sample preparation are required for concentrated suspensions. At high concentrations, particle-
particle interactions and multiple light scattering can become dominant and can result in apparent
particle sizes that differ between concentrated and dilute suspensions.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 9276-1, Representation of results of particle size analysis — Part 1: Graphical representation
ISO 9276-2, Representation of results of particle size analysis — Part 2: Calculation of average particle
sizes/diameters and moments from particle size distributions
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http:// www .iso .org/ obp
3.1
particle
minute piece of matter with defined physical boundaries
Note 1 to entry: A physical boundary can also be described as an interface.
Note 2 to entry: A particle can move as a unit.
[SOURCE: ISO 26824:2013, 1.1, modified]
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved 1

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

3.2
average hydrodynamic diameter
x
DLS
hydrodynamic diameter that reflects the central value of the underlying particle size distribution
Note 1 to entry: The average particle diameter is either directly determined without calculation of the particle
size distribution, or calculated from the computed intensity-, volume- or number-weighted particle size
distribution or from its fitted (transformed) density function. The exact nature of the average particle diameter
depends on the evaluation algorithm.
Note 2 to entry: The cumulants method yields a scattered light intensity-weighted harmonic mean particle
diameter, which is sometimes also referred to as the “z-average diameter.”
Note 3 to entry: Arithmetic, geometric and harmonic mean values can be calculated from the particle size
distribution according to ISO 9276-2.
Note 4 to entry: Mean values calculated from density functions (linear abscissa) and transformed density
functions (logarithmic abscissa) may significantly differ (ISO 9276-1).
Note 5 to entry: x also depends on the particle shape and the scattering vector (and thus on the angle of
DLS
observation, laser wavelength and refractive index of the suspension medium).
3.3
polydispersity index
PI
dimensionless measure of the broadness of the size distribution
Note 1 to entry: The PI typically has values less than 0,07 for a monodisperse test sample of spherical particles.
3.4
scattering volume
volume defined by the intersection of the incident laser beam and the scattered light intercepted by the
detector
3.5
scattered intensity
intensity of the light scattered by the particles in the scattering volume
3.6
count rate
photocurrent
I
s
number of photon pulses per unit time
Note 1 to entry: It is also a photodetector current which is proportional to the scattered intensity as measured
by a detector.
3.7
validation
proof with reference material that a measurement procedure is acceptable for all elements of its scope
Note 1 to entry: Evaluation of trueness requires a certified reference material.
3.8
reference material
RM
material, sufficiently homogeneous and stable with respect to one or more specified properties, which
has been established to be fit for its intended use in a measurement process
[SOURCE: ISO Guide 30:2015, 2.1.1, modified]
2 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

3.9
certified reference material
CRM
reference material characterized by a metrologically valid procedure for one or more specified
properties, accompanied by a certificate that provides the value of the specified property, its associated
uncertainty, and a statement of metrological traceability
[SOURCE: ISO Guide 30:2015, 2.1.2, modified]
3.10
qualification
proof with reference material that an instrument is operating in agreement with its specifications
4 Symbols and units
C(Γ) normalized distribution function of decay rates or dimensionless
characteristic frequencies
2
D translational diffusion coefficient metres squared per m /s
T
second
2
D collective diffusion coefficient metres squared per m /s
c
second
2
D self-diffusion coefficient metres squared per m /s
s
second
f frequency, f = ω/(2 π) hertz Hz
(1)
g (τ) normalized electric field correlation function dimensionless
(2)
G (τ) scattered intensity correlation function arbitrary units
G(Γ ) normalized distribution function of the individual arbitrary units
j
decay rate Γ
j
I scattered intensity, count rate, photocurrent arbitrary units
s
I intensity of the incident light arbitrary units
0
M number of steps in the histogram dimensionless
n refractive index of the suspension medium dimensionless
P(ω) power spectrum arbitrary units
PI polydispersity index dimensionless
ΔQ scattered light intensity-weighted amount of particles in dimensionless
int,i
size fraction i,
i.e. x < x < = x
i−1 i
x within this document: hydrodynamic diameter of a nanometres nm
particle
average hydrodynamic diameter nanometres nm
x
DLS
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved 3

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

−1
scattered light intensity-weighted average value of the reciprocal seconds s
Γ
distribution function of the decay rate or characteristic
frequency
−1
Γ maximum decay rate (histogram method) reciprocal seconds s
max
−1
Γ minimum decay rate (histogram method) reciprocal seconds s
min
η viscosity of the suspension medium millipascal seconds mPa·s
θ scattering angle degrees °
λ wavelength of the laser light in vacuum nanometres nm
0
−2
μ second cumulant of the distribution function of decay reciprocal square s
2
rates or characteristic frequencies seconds
3
ρ particle density grams per cubic g/cm
centimetre
τ correlation time seconds s
−1
q modulus of the scattering vector reciprocal nm
nanometres
φ particle volume fraction dimensionless
ω angular frequency radian per seconds rad/s
5 Principle
Particles suspended in a fluid are in constant Brownian motion as the result of the interaction with
[1]
the molecules of the suspending fluid. In the Stokes-Einstein theory of Brownian motion , particle
motion of smooth spheres at very low concentration is determined by the suspending fluid viscosity
and temperature, as well as the size of the particles. Thus, from a measurement of the particle motion in
a fluid of known temperature and viscosity, the particle size can be determined.
[2][3][4][5][6]
The DLS technique probes the particle motion optically. The suspended particles are
illuminated with a coherent monochromatic light source. The light scattered from the moving
suspended particles has a time-dependent phase imparted to it from the time-dependent position. The
time-dependent phase of the scattered light can be considered as either a time-dependent phase shift
or as a spectral frequency shift from the central frequency of the light source. Measured over time,
random particle motion forms a distribution of optical phase shifts or spectral frequency shifts. These
shifts are determined by comparison either with all scattered light (homodyne or self-beating mode)
or by using a portion of the incident light as reference (heterodyne mode). Regardless of the setup, the
optical signals received from the particles are related to the scattering efficiency of the particles and
are thus scattered intensity-weighted.
Sedimentation of particles, dependent on their density, sets an upper limit to the particle size that can
be assessed by the technique; typically, the upper limit is much less than 10 μm.
DLS was developed for static suspensions. Provided that orthogonal flow and observation axes are
adopted, flowing samples may, under some circumstances, be measured if the procedure is properly
validated (see Annex C).
Different modes of diffusion, particle-particle interaction, multiple scattering and fluorescence can
significantly influence the apparent particle diameter calculated from a DLS experiment. Annex B
should be consulted.
4 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

6 Apparatus
A typical apparatus consists of the following components:
6.1 Laser, emitting coherent monochromatic light, polarized with its electric field component
perpendicular to the plane formed by the incident and detected rays (vertical polarization). Any kind of
lasers may be used, e.g. gas lasers (He-Ne laser, Ar-ion laser), solid-state lasers, diode-pumped solid-state
lasers and laser diodes.
6.2 Optics, lenses and equipment used to focus the incident laser light into a scattering volume and
to detect scattered light. Optical fibres are often used as a part of the detection system and for light-
delivering optics.
The use of a coherent optical reference allows using interference between the scattered light and
the reference to measure the frequency shift of the scattered light. Two methods of referencing are
commonly used and are illustrated in Figures 1 a) and b).
a) Homodyne b) Heterodyne c) Cross-correlation
(= two simultaneous homodyne
experiments)
Key
1 laser
2 sample
3 detector
4 correlator or spectrum analyser
5 beam splitter
6 lens
Figure 1 — Typical optical arrangement for DLS
— In homodyne detection (also referred to as “self-beating detection”) [Figure 1 a)], the mixing at the
optical detector of all of the collected scattered light provides the reference for frequency- or phase-
difference measurement.
— In heterodyne detection [Figure 1 b)], the scattered light is mixed with a portion of the incident
light. The unshifted incident light provides the reference for the frequency- or phase-difference
measurement.
NOTE In DLS, “heterodyne” is understood as mixing of scattered light with unscattered light from the
same source. This convention differs from, for example, the use in optical interferometry.
— In a cross-correlation setup [Figure 1 c)], two homodyne scattering measurements are performed
simultaneously in such a way that the two scattering vectors and scattering volumes are the same, but
the corresponding wave vectors are not coincident. These two laser beams produce two correlated
fluctuation patterns. The correlation is not perfect, since on the one hand, both detectors collect
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved 5

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

light from the other scattering experiment, and on the other hand, multiply scattered light of the
incoming laser beams is totally uncorrelated. The two contributions of the multiply scattered light
to the detector signal, however, do not contribute to the time-dependent signal but to an enhanced
background.
6.3 Test sample holder, allowing fluctuations of the sample temperature to be controlled to
within ±0,3 °C. While precise knowledge of the sample temperature is required for evaluation, it is not
necessary to regulate the temperature to any defined value.
6.4 Photodetector, with an output that is proportionally related to the intensity of the collected
scattered light. A photomultiplier tube or an (avalanche) photodiode is typically used. Detectors can be
placed at any angle. Data collection can be performed in a linear or logarithmic manner.
6.5 Signal processing unit, capable of taking the time-dependent scattered light intensity signal
and outputting the autocorrelation function, cross-correlation function or power spectrum of the input
signal. This correlation can be performed by hardware and/or software correlators, operating linearly,
logarithmically or in a mixed mode.
The resulting output from either mode contains a distribution of characteristic frequencies or time-
dependent phases representative of the particle size of the suspended particles. Photon detection has a
probability distribution of photon arrival times, which means that a fluctuating signal is obtained even
if the intensity of the incident light is constant. The intensity of the photons arriving at varying time
intervals is superimposed on this already fluctuating signal. In correlation analysis, the uncorrelated
signal is constant, whereas the signal associated with the diffusing particles decays exponentially.
In spectrum analysis, the uncorrelated signal is akin to a DC or zero frequency term which is not
recorded. The time-dependent component is analysed to determine the particle-size distribution using
the theory of DLS.
6.6 Computation unit, capable of signal processing to obtain the particle size and/or particle size
distribution. Some computation units also function as the signal processing unit.
— Evaluation via the autocorrelation function allows determination of a mean diameter without
determination of the particle size distribution, but determination of the distribution is also possible.
— Evaluation via the frequency distribution determines the particle size distribution using the power
spectrum of the signal.
— Evaluation via photon cross-correlation allows quantification/minimization of the effects of
multiple scattering, thus extending the useful concentration range towards higher concentrations
(however, the effect of particle-particle interaction cannot be eliminated). The disadvantage of this
method is that it requires a more complex optical setup.
6.7 Instrument location, placed in a clean environment, free from excessive electrical noise and
mechanical vibration and out of direct sunlight. If organic liquids are used as the suspension medium,
there shall be due regard to local health and safety requirements, and the area shall be well ventilated.
The instrument shall be placed on a rigid table or bench to avoid the necessity for frequent realignment
of the optical system.
WARNING — DLS instruments are equipped with a low- or medium-power laser whose radiation
can cause permanent eye damage. Never look into the direct path of the laser beam or its
reflections. Ensure highly reflecting surfaces are not in the path of the laser beam when the
laser is on. Observe local regulations for laser radiation safety.
6 © ISO 2017 – All rights reserved

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

7 Test sample preparation
7.1 General
Test samples should consist of well-dispersed particles in a liquid medium. Dispersion procedures like
sonication, filtration, etc. may influence the result and therefore have to be reported. The suspension
liquid shall
a) be sufficiently transparent (non-absorbing) and non-fluorescent at the laser wavelength,
b) be free of particulate contamination,
c) not dissolve, swell or coagulate the particulate material,
d) have a known refractive index that is sufficiently different from that of the particulate materials,
e) have a known value of viscosity within ±2 % over the operational range of temperature to be
used, and
NOTE As x is directly proportional to η, the uncertainty of x will always be larger than the
DLS DLS
uncertainty of η.
f) meet the guidelines of the instrument for low background scattering.
(This can be checked by measuring the count rate for the suspending medium alone and the dark
count with no sample or solvent present. The former should be at least one order of magnitude
lower than the sample, and the latter should be within the recommended range for the instrument.)
Inadequate suppression of the double layer can have a significant influence on the hydrodynamic
diameter. A medium with ionic strength high enough to suppress the electric or diffuse double layer
can improve agreement between results obtained by DLS and electron microscopy. A conductivity of
1 mS/cm is usually sufficient to achieve this between the hydrodynamic diameter and that obtained by
microscopy techniques, especially for small particles.
Water is often used as a suspension medium. The use of freshly deionised and filtered (pore size 0,2 µm)
water is recommended. A trace of ionic additive (e.g. NaCl at a concentration of 10 mmol/l = 0,6 g/l) may
be added to such samples to reduce the double-layer thickness. However, precaution has to be made
that such ionic strength adjustment will not make sample unstable or that the additive does not react
with the sample (e.g. Cl with Ag ions).
7.2 Concentration limits
The lower concentration limit of the working range of DLS is determined, amongst other factors like
particle size, detector sensitivity, etc., by the number of particles that are present in the scattering volume.
The scattered light intensity (e.g. expressed as count rate or I ) of the sample containing the dispersed
s
particles should ideally be ≥10 times the signal obtained by the suspension medium alone. Scattered
intensity ratios below 10, either caused by low particle mass fractions or by very broad particle size
distributions, will result in higher variation of results and poorer precision.
The maximum concentration of dispersed particles that can be measured without the concentration
influencing the particle size reported is determined by particle-particle interaction and multiple
scattering. This concentration limit should be determined empirically by dilution (see Annex B).
7.3 Checks for concentration suitability
Different instruments adopt differing optical observation angles and optical arrangements. The
observations and checks given are for the general case, but the specific instrument operational advice
should also be considered.
© ISO 2017 – All rights reserved 7

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
ISO 22412:2017(E)

The following observations and checks are recommended.
a) Visually inspect the dispersed sample prior to placing it into the instrument. At low concentrations,
the sample will look almost transparent. At higher concentrations, a milky or opaque appearance
is seen.
b) Ensure that the sample is placed in the instrument prior to performing the measurement, allowing
the sample to equalize its temperature. Check the count rate or signal level. The count rate or signal
level (I ) can be adjusted by changing an aperture in the receiver (which also changes the degree
s
of c
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.