Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows

This European Standard covers hinged or pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves, timber framed glazed doors and openable timber framed windows. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from fire resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1. This standard covers doorsets with internal structural elements which are comprised of timber. Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover all or some of the following examples: integrity (E), integrity/radiation (EW) or integrity/insulation (EI1 or EI2) classification; glazed elements including vision panels and framed glazed doorsets, louvres and/or vents; side, transom or overpanels; items of building hardware; decorative finishes; intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals; alternative supporting construction(s). The effect on the Classification ‘C’ for the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed in this European Standard.

Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 3: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Drehflügeltüren und Fenstern aus Holz

Diese Europäische Norm behandelt Drehflügeltüren aus Holzwerkstoffen, verglaste Holztüren und Fenster aus Holz. Sie beschreibt die Methodologie zur Erweiterung der Anwendung von Ergebnissen der Prüfung(en) der Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit nach EN 1634-1. Diese Norm behandelt Türen mit einer tragenden Innenkonstruktion aus Holz.
In Abhängigkeit von der Durchführung der entsprechenden Prüfung(en) kann der erweiterte Anwendungs-bereich einige oder alle der folgenden Bereiche abdecken:
-   Klassifizierungen von nicht wärmegedämmten Elementen (E) sowie solchen mit Anforderungen an die Strahlung (EW) oder wärmegedämmten Elementen (EI1 oder EI2);
-   verglaste Teilbereiche, einschließlich Glasfenster und verglaste Türen;
-   Lüftungsgitter und/oder Ventilationsöffnungen;
-   Seitenteile, Oberteile mit oder ohne Kämpfer;
-   Baubeschläge;
-   dekorative Beschichtungen;
-   dämmschichtbildende Dichtungen sowie Dichtungen zur Verhinderung von Rauchdurchtritt, Durchzug oder Schallübertragung;
-   alternative Tragkonstruktion(en).
Die Auswirkung der Klassifizierung „C“ für Türen im Rahmen des Prozesses eines erweiterten Anwendungs-bereichs ist nicht Gegenstand dieser Europäischen Norm.

Application étendue des résultats d'essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 3 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en bois et des fenêtres à ossature bois

La présente Norme européenne couvre les blocs-portes pivotants ou battants, à vantaux à base de bois, les blocs-portes vitrés à ossature bois et les fenêtres à ossature bois. Elle prescrit la méthodologie permettant d'étendre l'application des résultats obtenus à partir d’un ou plusieurs essai(s) de résistance au feu effectué(s) conformément à l'EN 1634-1. La présente norme traite des blocs-portes ayant des éléments structuraux intérieurs en bois.
Sous réserve de la réalisation de l'essai ou des essais approprié(s), l'application étendue peut couvrir tout ou partie des exemples suivants :
-   classement de l'étanchéité au feu (E), de l'étanchéité au feu/rayonnements (EW) ou de l'étanchéité au feu/isolation (EI1 ou EI2) ;
-   éléments vitrés, y compris les regards vitrés et les blocs-portes vitrés ;
-   jalousies et/ou grille de ventilation ;
-   panneaux latéraux, panneaux d'imposte ;
-   éléments de quincaillerie de bâtiment ;
-   finitions décoratives ;
-   joints intumescents, joints d'étanchéité à la fumée, joints d'étanchéité à l'air ou joints acoustiques ;
-   autre(s) construction(s) support.
L'effet sur le classement « C » des blocs-portes à la suite d'un processus d'application étendue n'est pas traité dans la présente Norme européenne.

Razširjena uporaba rezultatov preskusov požarne odpornosti in/ali dimotesnosti za vrata, zaporne elemente in okna, ki se odpirajo, vključno z njihovim okovjem - 3. del: Požarna odpornost lesenih vrat in oken s tečaji

Ta evropski standard pokriva vrata z lesenim vrtljivim krilom, vrata z leseno oblogo in okna z leseno oblogo. Predpisuje metodologijo za razširitev uporabe rezultatov preskusa, pridobljenih iz preskusov požarne odpornosti, izvedenih v skladu s standardom EN 1634-1. Ta standard pokriva vrata z notranjimi lesenimi strukturnimi elementi. Razširjena uporaba lahko (glede na opravljene ustrezne preskuse) pokriva vse naslednje primere ali nekatere od njih: razvrstitev integriteta (E), integriteta/sevanje (EW) ali integriteta/izolacija (EI1 ali EI2); stekleni elementi, vključno z zastekljenimi ploščami in steklenimi vrati, prezračevalne rešetke z žaluzijskimi loputami in/ali prezračevalne odprtine; stranice, tramovi ali podboji; elementi stavbnega okovja; okrasni zaključki; intumescentna, dimna, akustična tesnila in tesnila za preprečevanje prepiha; druge podporne gradbene enote. Ta evropski standard ne vpliva na Razvrstitev C za vrata v skladu s postopkom razširjene uporabe.

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Public Enquiry End Date
28-Feb-2012
Publication Date
18-Oct-2012
Withdrawal Date
11-Jan-2023
Technical Committee
Current Stage
9900 - Withdrawal (Adopted Project)
Start Date
06-Jan-2023
Due Date
29-Jan-2023
Completion Date
12-Jan-2023

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
EN 15269-3:2012
English language
74 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day
Draft
k FprEN 15269-3:2012
English language
73 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 3: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Drehflügeltüren und Fenstern aus HolzApplication étendue des résultats d'essais en matière de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et ouvrants de fenêtre, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie intégrés - Partie 3 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en bois et des fenêtres à ossature boisExtended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows91.060.50Vrata in oknaDoors and windows13.220.50Požarna odpornost gradbenih materialov in elementovFire-resistance of building materials and elementsICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 15269-3:2012SIST EN 15269-3:2012en,fr,de01-november-2012SIST EN 15269-3:2012SLOVENSKI
STANDARD



SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 15269-3
August 2012 ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50 English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows
Application étendue des résultats d'essais de résistance au feu et/ou d'étanchéité à la fumée des blocs-portes, blocs-fermetures et fenêtres, y compris leurs éléments de quincaillerie - Partie 3 : Résistance au feu des blocs-portes battants et pivotants en bois et des fenêtres à ossature bois
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer Baubeschläge - Teil 3: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Drehflügeltüren und Fenstern aus Holz This European Standard was approved by CEN on 16 June 2012.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
Management Centre:
Avenue Marnix 17,
B-1000 Brussels © 2012 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members. Ref. No. EN 15269-3:2012: ESIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 2 Contents Page Foreword .31 Scope .42 Normative references .43 Terms and definitions .54 Determination of the field of extended application .64.1 General .64.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A .64.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application .64.4 Analysis of test results .75 Extended application report .76 Classification report .7Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations .9Annex B (normative) Arrangements for doorsets incorporating side and/or overpanels . 70 SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 3 Foreword This document (EN 15269-3:2012) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by February 2013, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by February 2013. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the European Free Trade Association. This document is one of a series entitled “EN 15269, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware” which consists of the following parts:  Part 1: General requirements;  Part 2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets;  Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows;  Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets;  Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted, metal framed, glazed doorsets and openable windows;  Part 6: Fire resistance of sliding timber doorsets;  Part 7: Fire resistance of sliding steel doorsets;  Part 8: Fire resistance of horizontally folding timber doorsets;  Part 9: Fire resistance of horizontally folding steel doorsets;  Part 10: Fire resistance of steel rolling shutter assemblies;  Part 11: Fire resistance of operable fabric curtains;  Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metal framed glazed doorsets. According to the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 4
1 Scope This European Standard covers hinged or pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves, timber framed glazed doors and openable timber framed windows. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of test results obtained from fire resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1. This standard covers doorsets with internal structural elements which are comprised of timber. Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests, the extended application may cover all or some of the following examples:  integrity (E), integrity/radiation (EW) or integrity/insulation (EI1 or EI2) classification;  glazed elements including vision panels and framed glazed doorsets,
 louvres and/or vents;  side, transom or overpanels;  items of building hardware;  decorative finishes;  intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;  alternative supporting construction(s). The effect on the Classification ‘C’ for the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed in this European Standard. 2 Normative references The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. EN 179, Building hardware — Emergency exit devices operated by a lever handle or push pad, for use on escape routes — Requirements and test methods EN 844 (all parts), Round and sawn timber — Terminology EN 1125, Building hardware — Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal bar, for use on escape routes — Requirements and test methods EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests — Part 1: General requirements EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware — Part 1: Fire resistance test for doors, shutters and openable windows
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and elements of building hardware — Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building hardware EN 12519, Windows and pedestrian doors — Terminology SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 5 EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification using test data from fire resistance tests excluding ventilation services EN 15254-4 Extended application of results from fire resistance tests — Non-loadbearing walls — Part 4: Glazed constructions EN 15269-1:2010, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware — Part 1: General Requirements EN ISO 13943, Fire safety — Vocabulary (ISO 13943) 3 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1363-1, EN 12519, EN ISO 13943, EN 1634-1, EN 1634-2 and EN 15269-1 and the following apply. 3.1 core material fitted centrally within the thickness of a door leaf which may consist of a single sheet of material or a combination either of sheets of the same material or layers of different materials 3.2 effective rebate depth dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame, transom or side panel or flush overpanel
Note 1 to entry: At the meeting edges and for rebated leaves this dimension will be the rebate where the intumescent seal is fitted or, if no seal is fitted, the depth of the largest rebate (see Figure 1).
3.3 leaf symmetry construction of a door leaf, without consideration of any leaf edge rebates, viewed either side of an imaginary plane drawn centrally in the thickness of the leaf
Note 1 to entry: A symmetrical door leaf will be identical either side of this imaginary plane, whilst an asymmetrical door leaf will differ. 3.4 exposed intumescent seal intumescent seal which is fitted in the perimeter of the leaf or in the door frame rebate and is visible when the leaf is in the open position 3.5 concealed intumescent seal intumescent seal which is fitted in the perimeter of the leaf or in the door frame rebate and is not visible when the leaf is in the open position, including seals behind veneers and laminates 3.6 facing (and decorative facing) outer layer of material on the leaf or panel normally only used for decorative, not for structural, purposes 3.7 subfacing layer (or layers) of material between the core and the facing in the leaf or panel normally used for structural purposes SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 6 4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General 4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, a representative doorset shall have been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 to achieve a test result which could generate a classification in accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification subsequently required from extended application considerations. 4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However, this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that achieved during any one test, unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables. 4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any part of the classified product cannot be covered by the extended application rules then that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended application report and classification report. 4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an extended application report. 4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of Annex A. 4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) of Annex A and establish from the contents of column (4) of Annex A whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application rules in EN 1634-1 without the need for further testing. 4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible, it can be recorded in the extended application report together with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) of Annex A. 4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test can be made on a similar specimen type i.e. a doorset of the same or more onerous configuration where the leaf construction is fundamentally the same as that tested. Alternatively, column (5) of Annex A identifies an option for alternative testing and relevant test parameters. 4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application 4.3.1 It is possible to provide an extended field of application from a single test. However, where a manufacturer envisages to manufacture a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double doors with or without side, transom or over panels, with or without glazing, louvres or ventilation grilles, with alternative element of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the complete range of doorset designs and options. This helps to minimise the testing required before testing commences. 4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be part of the product range. 4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many as possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series. 4.3.4 Conduct the first fire resistance test or a series of tests and then establish which of the original desired parameter variations have not been covered by the fire resistance tests, including direct application possibilities. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 7 4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible without further testing. 4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in column (4) in Annex A. 4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of direct application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.5. 4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also include double leaf configurations. Where only single doorsets are to be part of the product range, the outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single leaf doorset. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the outstanding construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may be incorporated into either repeated single leaf doorset tests or, in the weakest option, as defined in column 5 of Table A.2,double leaf doorset configurations.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A and observe from column (5) in Annex A which are the most appropriate, weakest specimen options for further testing. 4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated with the additional product variations incorporated. 4.4 Analysis of test results 4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall record details of any premature integrity and/or insulation failure, as well as details of any significant distortion.
4.4.2 Where a series of tests forms the basis for the extended application, the field of extended application shall be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variations. 4.4.3 Where it has been possible to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for all other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the premature failure(s).
5 Extended application report Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of EN 15269-1:2010, based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above. 6 Classification report The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and presented in accordance with EN 13501-2. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 8 Dimensions in millimetres
Key x1: Example of effective rebate depth in doorset to be tested x2: Example of resulting effective rebate depth during testing after movement of 20mm y1: Example of over rebate to frame face clearance in doorset to be tested y2: Example of over rebate to frame face clearance in doorset after movement of 20mm Figure 1 — Effective rebate depth
SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 9 Annex A (normative)
Construction parameter variations This table is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance testing of hinged or pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves. This table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive fire resistance test to EN 1634-1 has generated a classification according to EN 13501-2.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested. The influence of variation on performance characteristic is identified in column 3 as, integrity, insulation or radiation (E, I or W respectively). For some parameters, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the case, the following levels shall be used to establish high, medium and low distortion doorsets as measured using the maximum relative movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf and door frame or between the meeting edges of door leaves or the relative movement of the framing members for panelled systems. The measurements shall be taken from the start of the test at any time during the complete required classification period. The deflections shall be measured at the positions given in EN 1634-1:  Low: < 40 % of effective rebate depth;  Medium: ≥ 40 % and ≤ 85 % of effective rebate depth;  High: > 85 % of effective rebate depth. The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in column 3 under E for effects under I for integrity, for effects on insulation (whether I1 or I2) and under W for the effects on radiation. These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application, the results of which are given in column 4. In certain cases in column 4, it is a requirement to achieve Category B; the requirements for this are given in EN 1634-1. Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, the type of specimen approved for incorporation of the changed parameter is defined in column 5. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single action doorsets to double action doorsets.
In order to maximize the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests, the parameter changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each parameter are dependant on the classification required and the preferred options. Solid timber can be replaced by other solid timber of the same group of equal or higher density or solid timber of a higher group, where Group 4 in Table A.1 is the highest group.
SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 10 Table A.1 — Timber groupings Group Nr. Type of timber Medium density [kg/m3] 1 Softwood and Beech* (Fagus sylvatica) > 350 < 450 2 Hardwood
excluding Beech* > 350 < 450 3 Softwood ≥ 450 4 Hardwood
excluding Beech* ≥ 450
The following definitions are taken from EN 844, Round and sawn timber — Terminology. Softwood Wood of trees of the botanical group Gymnosperms
NOTE Most commercial softwoods belong to the group “conifers” which is a part of the botanical group Gymnosperms. Hardwood Wood of trees which represent one group of the Angiosperms known as the Dicotyledons Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also be taken into account.
SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 11
Table A.2 — Construction parameter variations Table A.2 – Key to symbols in Column 3 (which is informative only) >
-
higher performance anticipated
<
-
lower performance anticipated =
- no significant change in performance anticipated ≥
- equal or higher performance anticipated

- equal or lower performance anticipated >=< - the influence on performance could be worse, equal or better: hence variations are not possible unless specific, limited conditions are identified
Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
A Door leaf. In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side, transom and overpanels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated in column (1). For double leaf doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction. A.1 General A.1.1 Number of leaves. Only applicable to doorsets tested without transom and/or overpanels. See Annex B. Single leaf from double leaf door test. >=< = = Possible for doorsets with exposed intumescent seals only and when the distortion of the leaf is low. In doorsets where there is an inactive and an active leaf, only the construction and parameters of the active leaf may be used for the single leaf doorset; otherwise not possible without additional test. Intumescent seals and their positioning shall be retained in the (primary) active leaf or positioned in the door frame if they were in the inactive leaf. Annex B gives the test protocol and hierarchy for various options on leaf (and panel) configurations. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 12 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
A.1.2 Number of leaves Only applicable to doorsets tested without transom and/or overpanels. See Annex B. Double leaf from single leaf door test. < = = Not possible without additional test. Annex B gives the test protocol and hierarchy for various options on leaf (and panel) configurations. A.1.3 Intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to frame interface). See Figure A.1. Location towards the frame rebate. ≤ = = Not possible without additional test.
Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf depending upon the required configuration. A.1.4 Intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to frame interface). See Figure A.2. Location away from the frame rebate. ≥ = = Possible for a proportionate movement in line with an increase in leaf thickness and frame rebate depth, otherwise not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf depending upon the required configuration. A.1.5 Intumescent seals (fitted in meeting edges). Location change. >=< = = Possible to change the tested seal arrangement from the leaf in which it was tested to the opposite leaf providing the leaves were low distortion and the seal arrangement is replicated and the minimum tested length of intumescent seal is retained (including at building hardware positions), otherwise not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf depending upon the required configuration. A.1.6 Intumescent seals. Location change. ≤ = = Not possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa. Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 13 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
A.1.7 Non intumescent seals (draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) – Reaction to Fire class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Location change. >=< = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not possible without additional test.
Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.8 Non-intumescent seals (draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) – , Reaction to Fire class B-F(fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Location change. >=< = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not possible without additional test.
Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.9 Non-intumescent seals (draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) - Reaction to Fire class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Add. >=< = = Possible providing the gap is not increased and the expansion of the intumescent seal is not affected, otherwise not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.10 Non intumescent seals (draught / smoke / acoustic etc.) - Reaction to Fire class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Remove. < = = Not possible without additional test. Further test to prove the leaf to frame detail with no seal fitted. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.11 Non-intumescent seals (draught/smoke/acoustic etc.) – Reaction to Fire class B-F (fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Add. < = = Not possible without additional test.
Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position on a similar doorset. Test can be single or double leaf. In the case of a double door test the leaf to frame seals may be different between the 2 leaves generating evidence on alternative types of seals from a single test. SIST EN 15269-3:2012



EN 15269-3:2012 (E) 14 Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation on performance characteristic Possibility of extension Additional Evidence Required (1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
E I W
A.1.12 Non-intumescent seals (draught/smoke/acoustic etc. – Reaction to Fire class B-F (fitted in leaf or frame including threshold). Remove. < = = Not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal fitted in the required position. Test can be single or double leaf. A.1.13 Louvres in door leaf or panel. Add. >=< = = Possible to change tested louvre from the active leaf to the inactive leaf but not vice versa. Also possible to add louvre to single leaf doorset if it was tested in the active leaf of a double-leaf doorset. In both cases, the louvre cannot be greater than 25 % of the leaf area, otherwise not possible without additional test. Additional test to include louvre fitted in the required position. Test can be single or active leaf of double leaf. A.1.14 Louvres in door leaf or panel. Remove. ≥ = =
...

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
01-februar-2012
5D]ãLUMHQDXSRUDEDUH]XOWDWRYSUHVNXVRYSRåDUQHRGSRUQRVWLLQDOLGLPRWHVQRVWL
]DYUDWD]DSRUQHHOHPHQWHLQRNQDNLVHRGSLUDMRYNOMXþQR]QMLKRYLPRNRYMHP
GHO3RåDUQDRGSRUQRVWOHVHQLKYUDWLQRNHQVWHþDML
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door,
shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware -
Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber
framed windows
Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit
und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer
Baubeschläge - Teil 3: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von Drehflügeltüren und Fenstern aus
Holz
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: FprEN 15269-3
ICS:
13.220.50 Požarna odpornost Fire-resistance of building
gradbenih materialov in materials and elements
elementov
91.060.50 Vrata in okna Doors and windows
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012


EUROPEAN STANDARD
FINAL DRAFT
FprEN 15269-3
NORME EUROPÉENNE

EUROPÄISCHE NORM

December 2011
ICS 13.220.50; 91.060.50
English Version
Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or
smoke control for door, shutter and openable window
assemblies, including their elements of building hardware - Part
3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and
openable timber framed windows
 Erweiterter Anwendungsbereich von Prüfergebnissen zur
Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit und/oder Rauchdichtigkeit von
Türen, Toren und Fenstern einschließlich ihrer
Baubeschläge - Teil 3: Feuerwiderstandsfähigkeit von
Drehflügeltüren und Fenstern aus Holz
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for unique acceptance procedure. It has been drawn up by the Technical
Committee CEN/TC 127.

If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which
stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language
made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland,
Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland and United Kingdom.

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to
provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without notice and
shall not be referred to as a European Standard.


EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2011 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. FprEN 15269-3:2011: E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Contents Page
Foreword .3
1 Scope .4
2 Normative references .4
3 Terms and definitions .5
4 Determination of the field of extended application .5
4.1 General .5
4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A .6
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application .6
4.4 Analysis of test results .7
5 Extended application report .7
6 Classification report .7
Annex A (normative) Construction parameter variations .9
Annex B (normative) Arrangements for doorsets incorporating side and/or overpanels . 70

2

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Foreword
This document (FprEN 15269-3:2011) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 127 “Fire safety
in buildings”, the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This document is currently submitted to the Unique Acceptance Procedure.
This document has been prepared under a mandate given to CEN by the European Commission and the
European Free Trade Association.
This document is one of a series entitled “EN 15269 Extended application of test results for fire resistance
and/or smoke control for door, shutter and openable window assemblies, including their elements of building
hardware” which consists of the following:
Part 1: General requirements;
Part 2: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted steel doorsets;
Part 3: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted timber doorsets and openable timber framed windows;
Part 4: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted glass doorsets;
Part 5: Fire resistance of hinged and pivoted, metal framed, glazed doorsets and openable windows;
Part 6: Fire resistance of sliding timber doorsets;
Part 7: Fire resistance of sliding steel doorsets;
Part 8: Fire resistance of horizontally folding timber doorsets;
Part 9: Fire resistance of horizontally folding steel doorsets;
Part 10: Fire resistance of steel rolling shutter assemblies;
Part 11: Fire resistance of operable fabric curtains;
Part 20: Smoke control for hinged and pivoted steel, timber and metal framed glazed doorsets.



3

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
1 Scope
This European Standard covers hinged or pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves, timber framed glazed
doors and openable timber framed windows. It prescribes the methodology for extending the application of
test results obtained from fire resistance test(s) conducted in accordance with EN 1634-1.
Subject to the completion of the appropriate test or tests the extended application may cover all or some of the
following examples:
integrity (E), integrity/radiation (EW) or integrity/insulation (EI or EI ) classification;
1 2
glazed elements including vision panels and framed glazed doorsets,
louvres and/or vents;
side, transom or overpanels;
items of building hardware;
decorative finishes;
intumescent, smoke, draught or acoustic seals;
alternative supporting construction(s).
The effect on the Classification „C‟ for the doorsets following an extended application process is not addressed
in this European Standard.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 179, Building hardware — Emergency exit devices operated by a lever handle or push pad, for use on
escape routes — Requirements and test methods
EN 844 (all parts), Round and sawn timber — Terminology
EN 1125, Building hardware — Panic exit devices operated by a horizontal bar, for use on escape routes —
Requirements and test methods
EN 1363-1, Fire resistance tests — Part 1: General requirements
EN 1634-1, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and
elements of building hardware — Part 1: Fire resistance test for doors, shutters and openable windows
EN 1634-2, Fire resistance and smoke control tests for door, shutter and openable window assemblies and
elements of building hardware - Part 2: Fire resistance characterisation test for elements of building hardware
EN 12519, Windows and pedestrian doors — Terminology
EN 13501-2, Fire classification of construction products and building elements — Part 2: Classification using
test data from fire resistance tests excluding ventilation services
4

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
EN 15254-4 Extended application of results from fire resistance tests — Non-loadbearing walls — Part 4:
Glazed constructions
EN 15269-1, Extended application of test results for fire resistance and/or smoke control for door, shutter and
openable window assemblies, including their elements of building hardware — Part 1: General Requirements
EN ISO 13943, Fire safety — Vocabulary (ISO 13943:2008)
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 1363-1, EN 12519, EN ISO 13943,
EN 1634-1, EN 1634-2 and EN 15269-1 and the following apply.
3.1
core
material fitted centrally within the thickness of a door leaf. It may consist of a single sheet of material or a
combination either of sheets of the same material or layers of different materials
3.2
effective rebate depth
dimension of the door leaf thickness of overlapping adjacent edges of door leaf relative to the door frame,
transom or side panel or flush overpanel. At the meeting edges and for rebated leaves this dimension will be
the rebate where the intumescent seal is fitted or if no seal is fitted, the depth of the largest rebate, Figure 1.
3.3
leaf symmetry
construction of a door leaf, without consideration of any leaf edge rebates, viewed either side of an imaginary
plane drawn centrally in the thickness of the leaf. A symmetrical door leaf will be identical either side of this
imaginary plane, whilst an asymmetrical door leaf will differ
3.4
exposed intumescent seal
intumescent seal which is fitted in the perimeter of the leaf or in the door frame rebate and is visible when the
leaf is in the open position
3.5
concealed intumescent seal
intumescent seal which is fitted in the perimeter of the leaf or in the door frame rebate and is not visible when
the leaf is in the open position, including seals behind veneers and laminates
3.6
facing (and decorative facing)
outer layer of material on the leaf or panel normally only used for decorative, not structural, purposes
3.7
subfacing
layer (or layers) of material between the core and the facing in the leaf or panel normally used for structural
purposes
4 Determination of the field of extended application
4.1 General
4.1.1 Before there can be any consideration for extended application, a representative doorset shall have
been tested in accordance with EN 1634-1 to achieve a test result which could generate a classification in
5

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
accordance with EN 13501-2 at least equal to the classification subsequently required from extended
application considerations.
4.1.2 A review of the doorset construction parameters can indicate that one or more characteristics may be
improved by a particular parameter variation. All evaluations shall be made on the basis of retaining the
classifications obtainable from testing to EN 1634-1, including those lower than the test duration. However,
this shall never lead to an increased classification for any specific parameter beyond that achieved during any
one test unless specifically identified in the relevant Construction Parameter Variation tables.
4.1.3 If, when following the extended application procedure, any part of the classified product cannot be
covered by the extended application rules then that part shall be omitted from the subsequent extended
application report and classification report.
4.2 How to use the extended application rules in Annex A
4.2.1 Identify the variations from the original test specimen(s) which are required to be covered by an
extended application report.
4.2.2 Locate the variations in the appropriate parameter variation by reference to columns (1) and (2) of
Annex A.
4.2.3 Review the type of classification to be retained from column (3) of Annex A and establish from the
contents of column (4) of Annex A whether any extended application is available beyond the direct application
rules in EN 1634-1 without the need for further testing.
4.2.4 Where this is deemed to be possible it can be recorded in the extended application report together
with any appropriate restrictions and the stated rules from column (4) of Annex A.
4.2.5 Where the variations required can only be achieved from additional testing, the additional test can be
made on a similar specimen type i.e. a doorset of the same or more onerous configuration where the leaf
construction is fundamentally the same as tested. Alternatively, column (5) of Annex A identifies an option for
alternative testing and relevant test parameters.
4.3 Procedure for maximum field of extended application
4.3.1 It is possible to provide an extended field of application from a single test. However, where a
manufacturer envisages to manufacture a range of doors incorporating single doors and also double doors
with or without side, transom or over panels, with or without glazing, louvres or ventilation grilles, with
alternative element of building hardware, etc., it is recommended that careful consideration is given to the
complete range of doorset designs and options in order to minimise the testing required before testing
commences.
4.3.2 Establish all the parameter variations which are required to be part of the product range.
4.3.3 Determine which are the most important specification requirements and incorporate as many as
possible into the specimen(s) for the first tests in the series.
4.3.4 Conduct the first fire resistance test or a series of tests and then establish which of the original
desired parameter variations have not been covered by the fire resistance tests, including direct application
possibilities.
4.3.5 Identify these parameter variations in Annex A and establish if any extended application is possible
without further testing.
4.3.6 Record this for the extended application report together with any restrictions and rules given in column
(4) in Annex A.
6

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
4.3.7 Evaluate which, if any, of the desired parameter variations have not been covered by the field of direct
application or the initial field of extended application derived from 4.3.5.
4.3.8 Determine if the product range is to include only single leaf doorsets or if the range is to also include
double leaf configurations. Where only single doorsets are to be part of the product range then the
outstanding construction parameter variations shall only be incorporated into specimens for the single leaf
doorset. Where single leaf and double leaf doorsets are to be included in the product range, the outstanding
construction parameter variations for the extended application of single leaf doorsets may be incorporated into
either repeated single leaf doorset tests or in the weakest option, as defined in column 5 of Table A.2,double
leaf doorset configurations.
4.3.9 Select the required outstanding parameter variations from column (1) and column (2) of Annex A and
observe from column (5) in Annex A which are the most appropriate, weakest specimen options for further
testing.
4.3.10 If the complete selection of required parameter variations has not been covered by the tests
completed in accordance with 4.3.8 and 4.3.9 above, then an appropriate test or tests may be repeated with
the additional product variations incorporated.
4.4 Analysis of test results
4.4.1 In order to maximise the field of extended application, it is important that the test reports shall record
details of any premature integrity and/or insulation failure also record details of any significant distortion.
4.4.2 Where a series of tests forms the basis for the extended application, the field of extended application
shall be based on the lowest performance achieved from the complete series of tests unless premature failure
has been attributed to one or more specific construction parameter variation.
4.4.3 Where it has been possible to identify specific parameter failures, the extended application for all
other construction parameter variations can be based on the performance achieved after isolating the
premature failure(s).
5 Extended application report
Prepare an extended application report in accordance with the requirements of Clause 6 of EN 15269-1,
based on the results of evaluations in accordance with the above.
6 Classification report
The classification report shall be determined from the results of the extended application report and presented
in accordance with EN 13501-2.
7

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Dimensions in millimetres



Figure 1 — Effective rebate depth

8

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Annex A
(normative)

Construction parameter variations
This table is designed to be used by experts competent in the field of fire resistance testing of hinged or
pivoted doorsets with timber based leaves.
This table shall only be used to assess a field of extended application when at least one positive fire
resistance test to EN 1634-1 has generated a classification according to EN 13501-2.
The first two columns identify possible variations to the construction details of the specimen tested.
The Influence of variation on performance characteristic is identified from column 3 as, integrity, insulation or
radiation (E, I or W respectively). For some parameters, it is necessary to evaluate whether the specimen
displayed a high, medium or low level of distortion during the test. Where this is the case the following levels
shall be used to establish high, medium and low distortion doorsets as measured using the maximum relative
movement at any position between the edge of the door leaf and door frame or between the meeting edges of
door leaves or the relative movement of the framing members for panelled systems. The measurements shall
be taken from the start of the test at any time during the complete required classification period (the
deflections shall be measured at the positions given in EN 1634-1):
low < 40 % of effective rebate depth;
medium ≥ 40 % and ≤ 85 % of effective rebate depth;
high > 85 % of effective rebate depth.
The effect of the change in each parameter is evaluated for each characteristic in column 3 under E for effects
on integrity, I for effects on insulation (whether I or I ) and W for the effects on radiation.
1 2
These evaluations lead to the judgement of the possibility of the extension of the field of application the results
of which are given in column 4. In certain cases in Column 4, it is a requirement to achieve Category B, the
requirements for this are given in EN 1634-1.
Where additional tests are deemed to be necessary, the type of specimen approved for incorporation of the
changed parameter is defined in column 5. Where it is possible to use information from tests performed on
one configuration for evidence on a different configuration, this allowance has been made in order to reduce
the overall number of tests required for extended application evaluation e.g. single action doorsets to double
action doorsets
In order to maximize the possible field of extended application from a minimum number of tests the parameter
changes have been spread over a series of test specimens. The recommended tests for each parameter are
dependant on the classification required and the preferred options.
Solid timber can be replaced by other solid timber of the same group of equal or higher density or solid timber
of a higher group, where Group 4 in Table A.1 is the highest group.
9

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Table A.1 — Timber groupings
Group Type of timber Medium density
3
Nr. [kg/m ]
1 Softwood and > 350 < 450
*
Beech (Fagus
sylvatica)
2 Hardwood > 350 < 450

*
excluding Beech
3 Softwood ≥ 450
4 Hardwood ≥ 450

*
excluding Beech

Definitions taken from EN 844, Round and sawn timber — Terminology.
Softwood
Wood of trees of the botanical group Gymnosperms
NOTE Most commercial softwoods belong to the group “conifers” which is a part of the botanical group
Gymnosperms
Hardwood
Wood of trees which represent one group of the Angiosperms known as the Dicotyledons
Where more than a single parameter variation is required, the influence on other variations shall also be taken
into account.


10

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)

Table A.2 — Construction parameter variations
Table A.2 – Key to symbols in Column 3 (which is informative only)
> - higher performance anticipated
< - lower performance anticipated
= - no significant change in performance anticipated
≥ - equal or higher performance anticipated
≤ - equal or lower performance anticipated
>=< - the influence on performance could be worse, equal or better hence variations not possible unless specific, limited conditions are identified

Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
 E I W
A Door leaf.
In certain cases, the rules given in Section A are also appropriate to side, transom and overpanels or the door frame; where this is the case it is clearly indicated in column (1). For double leaf
doorsets, both leaves shall be of the same basic construction.
A.1 General
A.1.1 Number of leaves. Only applicable Single leaf from double leaf >=< = = Possible for doorsets with exposed intumescent seals only Annex B gives the test protocol
to doorsets tested without transom and/or door test. and when the distortion of the leaf is low. In doorsets and hierarchy for various
overpanels. See Annex B. where there is an inactive and an active leaf, only the options on leaf (and panel)
construction and parameters of the active leaf may be configurations.
used for the single leaf doorset otherwise not possible
without additional test. Intumescent seals and their
positioning shall be retained in the (primary) active leaf or
positioned in the door frame if they were in the inactive
leaf.
11

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
 E I W
A.1.2 Number of leaves Only applicable Double leaf from single leaf < = = Not possible without additional test. Annex B gives the test protocol
to doorsets tested without transom and/or door test. and hierarchy for various
overpanels. See Annex B. options on leaf (and panel)
configurations.
A.1.3 Intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to Location towards the frame ≤ = = Not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal
frame interface) – See Figure A.1. rebate. fitted in the required position.
Test can be single or double
leaf depending upon the
required configuration.
A.1.4 Intumescent seals (fitted at leaf to Location away from the frame ≥ = = Possible for a proportionate movement in line with an Additional test to include seal
frame interface) – See Figure A.2.
rebate. increase in leaf thickness and frame rebate depth fitted in the required position.
otherwise not possible without additional test. Test can be single or double
leaf depending upon the
required configuration.
A.1.5 Intumescent seals (fitted in meeting Location change. >=< = = Possible to change the tested seal arrangement from the Additional test to include seal
edges). leaf in which it was tested to the opposite leaf providing fitted in the required position.
the leaves were low distortion and the seal arrangement is Test can be single or double
replicated and the minimum tested length of intumescent leaf depending upon the
seal is retained (including at building hardware positions) required configuration.
otherwise not possible without additional test.
A.1.6 Intumescent seals. Location change. ≤ = = Not possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa. Additional test to include seal
fitted in the required position.
Test can be single or double
leaf.
12

---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
 E I W
A.1.7 Non intumescent seals (draught / Location change. >=< = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and Additional test to include seal
smoke / acoustic etc.) – Reaction to Fire from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges fitted in the required position.
class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not Test can be single or double
incl. threshold). possible without additional test.  leaf.
A.1.8 Non intumescent seals (draught Location change. >=< = = Possible to change from leaf to frame and vice versa and Additional test to include seal
/smoke / acoustic etc.) – , Reaction to from one leaf to the opposing leaf at the meeting edges fitted in the required position.
Fire class B-F(fitted in leaf or frame incl. providing the seal arrangement is replicated, otherwise not Test can be single or double
threshold). possible without additional test. leaf.
A.1.9 Non intumescent seals (draught / Add. >=< = = Possible providing the gap is not increased and the Additional test to include seal
smoke / acoustic etc.) - Reaction to Fire expansion of the intumescent seal is not affected fitted in the required position.
class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame otherwise not possible without additional test. Test can be single or double
incl. threshold). leaf.
A.1.10 non intumescent seals (draught / Remove. < = = Not possible without additional test. Further test to prove the leaf to
smoke / acoustic etc.) - Reaction to Fire frame detail with no seal fitted.
class A1 or A2, (fitted in leaf or frame Test can be single or double
incl. threshold). leaf.
A.1.11 non intumescent seals (draught / Add. < = = Not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal
smoke / acoustic etc.) – Reaction to Fire fitted in the required position on
class B-F (fitted in leaf or frame incl. a similar doorset. Test can be
threshold). single or double leaf. In the
case of a double door test the
leaf to frame seals may be
different between the 2 leaves
generating evidence on
alternative types of seals from a
single test.
13

---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
kSIST FprEN 15269-3:2012
FprEN 15269-3:2011 (E)
Construction Parameter Variation Influence of variation Possibility of extension Additional Evidence

on performance Required
characteristic
(1) (2) (3) (4) (5)
 E I W
A.1.12 non intumescent seals (draught / Remove. < = = Not possible without additional test. Additional test to include seal
smoke / acoustic etc. – Reaction to Fire fitted in the required position.
class B-F (fitted in leaf or frame incl. Test can be single or double
threshold). leaf.
A.1.13 Louvres in door leaf or panel. Add. >=< = = Possible to change tested louvre from the active leaf to the Additional test to include louvre
inactive leaf but not vice versa. Also possible to add louvre fitted in the required position.
to single leaf doorset if it was tested in the active leaf of a Test can be single or active leaf
double-leaf doorset. In both cases the louvre cannot be of double leaf.
greater than 25 % of the leaf area. Otherwise not possible
without additional test.
A.1.14 Louvres in door leaf or panel. Remove. ≥ = = Possible providing tested louvre size 25 % of leaf area T
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.