SIST EN 15341:2019
(Main)Maintenance - Maintenance Key Performance Indicators
Maintenance - Maintenance Key Performance Indicators
This European standard lists some significant Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of the Maintenance Function and gives guidelines to define a set of suitable indicators to appraise and to improve effectiveness, to appraise and to improve effectiveness, efficiency and sustainability in the maintenance of the existing physical assets, in the framework of the external and internal influencing factors
Instandhaltung - Wesentliche Leistungskennzahlen für die Instandhaltung
Dieses Dokument listet wesentliche Leistungskennzahlen (KPIs) für die Instandhaltungsfunktion auf und stellt Richtlinien bereit, um einen Satz geeigneter Kennzahlen festzulegen, um die Effektivität, Effizienz und Nachhaltigkeit in der Instandhaltung der vorhandenen Anlagen, entweder gewerbliche Anlagen, Infrastruk-turen, Betriebsanlagen, Zivilgebäude oder Verkehrssysteme usw., im Rahmen der externen und internen Einflussfaktoren zu beurteilen und zu verbessern.
Maintenance - Indicateurs de performance clés pour la maintenance
La présente Norme européenne énumère certains indicateurs de performance clés (IPC) importants de la fonction maintenance et fournit des lignes directrices pour définir un ensemble d'indicateurs appropriés afin d'évaluer et d'améliorer l'efficacité, l'efficience et la durabilité de la maintenance des actifs physiques existants, sous l'influence de facteurs externes et internes.
Vzdrževanje - Ključni kazalniki učinkovitosti in uspešnosti vzdrževanja
Ta evropski standard navaja seznam nekaterih ključnih kazalnikov učinkovitosti in uspešnosti funkcije vzdrževanja ter podaja smernice za določitev nabora primernih kazalnikov za ocenjevanje in izboljšanje učinkovitosti, uspešnosti ter trajnostnosti pri vzdrževanju obstoječega fizičnega premoženja v okviru zunanjih in notranjih vplivnih spremenljivk.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST EN 15341:2019
01-november-2019
Nadomešča:
SIST EN 15341:2007
Vzdrževanje - Ključni kazalniki učinkovitosti in uspešnosti vzdrževanja
Maintenance - Maintenance Key Performance Indicators
Instandhaltung - Wesentliche Leistungskennzahlen für die Instandhaltung
Maintenance - Indicateurs de performance clés pour la maintenance
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN 15341:2019
ICS:
03.100.99 Drugi standardi v zvezi z Other standards related to
organizacijo in vodenjem company organization and
podjetja management
SIST EN 15341:2019 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
August 2019
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 03.100.99 Supersedes EN 15341:2007
English Version
Maintenance - Maintenance Key Performance Indicators
Maintenance - Indicateurs de performance clés pour la Instandhaltung - Wesentliche Leistungskennzahlen für
maintenance die Instandhaltung
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 14 July 2019.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN 15341:2019 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
Contents Page
European foreword . 3
Introduction . 4
1 Scope . 5
2 Normative references . 5
3 Terms and definitions . 5
4 Maintenance function . 6
5 KPIs and their objectives . 8
5.1 General . 8
5.2 Influencing factors . 9
5.3 Maintenance Resources . 9
5.4 Maintenance Processes . 10
6 Maintenance KPIs Matrix . 10
7 KPIs of “Maintenance within Physical Asset Management” . 11
8 KPIs of Sub-function “Health-Safety-Environment (HSE)” on Maintenance . 16
9 KPIs of Sub-function “Maintenance Management” . 20
10 KPIs of Sub-function “People Competence” . 26
10.1 General . 26
10.2 Qualification . 27
11 KPIs of Sub-function “Maintenance Engineering” . 30
12 KPIs of Sub-function “Organization and Support” . 33
13 KPIs of Sub-function “Administration and Supply”. 39
14 KPIs of Sub-function “Information and Communication Technology” . 44
15 Process to improve maintenance performance . 47
15.1 Use of KPI . 47
15.2 Classification of Maintenance Indicators . 48
15.3 Steps for an Improvement Process . 48
15.4 Maintenance assessment . 49
Bibliography . 51
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
European foreword
This document (EN 15341:2019) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 319
“Maintenance”, the secretariat of which is held by UNI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by February 2020, and conflicting national standards shall
be withdrawn at the latest by February 2020.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
This document supersedes EN 15341:2007.
The main technical changes compared to the previous EN 15341:2007 are the following:
— the standard was fully revised;
— the vision on all the Maintenance Components was enlarged, structuring the standard in a more
complete way maintaining the economical, technical, organizational KPI of the previous edition.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia,
Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland,
Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Republic of North
Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United
Kingdom.
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
Introduction
Maintenance Key Performance Indicators (KPI) of the Maintenance Function apply to all the physical
assets either industrial, infrastructures or civil buildings or transportation systems, etc.
These indicators should be used to:
a) measure the status;
b) compare (internal and external benchmarks);
c) diagnose (analysis of strengths and weaknesses);
d) identify objectives and define targets to be reached;
e) plan improvement actions;
f) regular measurement of changes over time.
Maintenance of software alone is not covered in this document. However, maintenance of items and
systems containing software is considered.
4
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
1 Scope
This document lists Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) of the Maintenance Function and gives guidelines
to define a set of suitable indicators, to appraise and to improve effectiveness, efficiency and
sustainability in the maintenance of the existing physical assets either industrial, infrastructures,
facilities, civil buildings or transportation systems, etc. in the framework of the external and internal
influencing factors.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 13306:2017, Maintenance — Maintenance terminology
EN 15628:2014, Maintenance — Qualification of maintenance personnel
IEC 60050-192:2015, International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV) — Part 192: Dependability
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in EN 13306:2017 and in
IEC 60050-192:2015, and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at http://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
asset
item that has potential or actual value for the organization
[SOURCE: EN 13306:2017, 3.2]
3.2
main area
fundamental part of a management discipline, which represents the more important knowledge and
competence to achieve and maintain an excellent status within existing influencing factors
3.3
indicator
quantitative or qualitative measure of a characteristic or a set of characteristics of a phenomenon or
performance of activities, according to defined criteria or a given formula or questionnaire
Note 1 to entry: The indicator is a tool for development and implementation of a strategy for monitoring progress
towards the goals outlined in the strategy.
5
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
3.4
item
part, component, device, subsystem, functional unit, equipment that can be individually described and
considered
[SOURCE: EN 13306:2017, 3.1]
3.5
key performance indicator
KPI
indicator considered significant
3.6
time
generally used to describe time units related to the physical assets-equipment and its performance
3.7
man-hour
points the hours of labour spent in delivering maintenance activities
3.8
work order
document used by the maintenance function
Note 1 to entry: It specifies the deliverables, scope and cost of the approved work.
Note 2 to entry: It contains a pre-defined set of activities with specified materials, spare parts, tools and labour
required to complete the job.
4 Maintenance function
The Maintenance Function is operating in various industrial plants, facilities, infrastructures, acting in
different frameworks and contexts with different sizes, structures, objectives, specific constraints and
influencing factors (see 5.2 and 5.3).
In this context, it is suitable to define an organizational Model of Maintenance Function, as standard
reference to be implemented in relation with required objectives, available resources, and existing
constraints.
This Model of Maintenance Function is reported in Figure 1.
The Model considers that for the Maintenance function to achieve the assigned objectives and excellence,
it shall use an appropriate combination or parts of the various disciplines as HSE (Health Safety
Environment), Administration, ICT (Information and Communication Technology), etc.
It is Management task:
a) to implement the appropriate resources, knowledge, rules, procedures activities;
b) to select how the maintenance needs to build and organize the various matters and disciplines in the
following Sub Functions/Areas:
— HSE on Maintenance;
— Maintenance Management;
— Maintenance People Competence;
6
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
— Maintenance Engineering;
— Organization and Support for Maintenance;
— Administration and Supply.
The maintenance function maintains the physical assets so that it can perform the required functions and
consequently, the management shall act in a core framework that involves:
— The company
— The available resources
— The application of ICT and Enabling Technologies (e.g. Industry 4.0)
Acknowledging the fast development within maintenance, both from organizational and technological
point, this document provides an overview of the content of sub-functions, activities, and tools to be
considered when establishing activities and indicators to reach the targets.
It is suitable to use all the disciplines of Maintenance Function in the integrated framework to achieve the
objectives assigned to the Maintenance of the Physical Assets with the support of ICT and Enabling
Technologies (e.g. Industry 4.0).
The size and the depth of utilization depends on the maturity degree of each maintenance department
and from its commitment to develop Maintenance activities towards the excellence.
During the life of each physical asset and its components, it is necessary to carry out maintenance
activities to repair the failures, contain the degradation and wear with appropriate preventive actions, so
as to lengthen the life of the unit and meet the required level of performance.
The Maintenance Function is an integration of 6 Sub-functions with the addition of methodology of
Physical Asset Management and hardware and software of the Information and Communication
Technology (see Figure 1).
Figure 1 — Maintenance function and core framework
7
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
In this integrated maintenance system each sub function shall be developed in order to achieve the
objectives assigned to the Maintenance Function. These objectives can include e.g. H.S.E. issues, integrity
and competitiveness of the physical assets, balancing productivity, costs and service.
In order to cover all the major aspects of physical assets management the key performance indicators are
structured into eight groups, one for physical asset management, six dedicated to maintenance sub-
functions, and the last one for the information communication technologies.
5 KPIs and their objectives
5.1 General
When the actual or expected performance is not satisfactory, management shall define objectives and
strategies to improve the resources utilization of involved sub-functions using the KPIs, allowing the
organization to:
a) define the objectives;
b) measure the performance;
c) compare the performance versus the historical value of benchmarks;
d) identify strengths and weaknesses;
e) control progress and changes;
f) define plan and strategies of improvements;
g) make regular measurement of changes over time;
h) share the results.
These indicators can be used:
• on a periodic basis, for instance by preparing and following-up a budget, during performance
assessment, comparing results in many ways: budgeted, expected, predicted, planned, actual, etc.;
• on a spot basis, for instance within the framework of specific audits, studies and/or benchmarking.
The period of time to be considered for measurement depends on the organization policy, aims and time
constants of measured phenomena; it can be: day, week, month, quarter, semester, year, etc.
The KPIs can be often calculated as a ratio between factors (numerator and denominator) measuring the
activities, resources or events, according to a given formula, but can also be the result of the quantitative
or qualitative questionnaire.
The numerical values, the qualitative and the quantitative data to calculate each KPI shall be collected
and elaborated based on available methods and procedures of general industrial accounting and specific
management accounting rules, applied to the maintenance function.
These indicators are used to measure any qualitative or quantitative characteristics of an item or a
process to create a homogeneous base to compare and set objectives to improve.
In some cases it is suitable to use specific pre-prepared questionnaire to give to the managers and experts
the possibility to carry out qualitative assessments in a simple and efficient way.
8
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
5.2 Influencing factors
The Influencing factors are variable conditions outside of Maintenance Function which have an impact
on the measured indicator. They can be general or specific, internal or external, controllable or non-
controllable.
Examples of external influencing factors are:
a) location,
b) society culture,
c) national labour policies and costs,
d) market and economy,
e) laws and regulations,
f) sector / branches,
g) stakeholders,
h) technology,
i) environmental conditions.
Examples of internal Influencing factors are:
j) organization culture,
k) organization scale,
l) organization objectives,
m) criticality of the physical asset,
n) severity and complexity of the process,
o) product mix,
p) physical assets scale and complexity,
q) utilization rate,
r) age of physical asset.
These factors shall be considered as reference conditions to understand the framework where
maintenance is operating. It is necessary to consider the influence and the impact of factors, in order to
achieve homogeneous and appropriate evaluations without misunderstandings and misleading.
5.3 Maintenance Resources
The maintenance resources are:
— competence of direct and indirect people;
— labour internal and external;
9
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
— spare parts and materials;
— diagnostics and predictive technologies;
— maintenance tools and equipments;
— engineering knowledge;
— good maintenance practices to repair, restore, prevent and improve;
— information technology systems: hardware and software and enabling technologies (e.g Industry
4.0);
— supply and supporting services.
The role of management is to achieve the best maintenance performance, in line with the stated company
objectives, using and dosing the appropriate resources, optimizing all the management, organizational
and administrative aspects with an integrated information system.
5.4 Maintenance Processes
The maintenance processes are the various actions used by each sub-function to implement the activities
to achieve the best competitiveness and suitable results according to the stated aim of the organization,
see EN 17007.
6 Maintenance KPIs Matrix
Table 1 shows the KPIs of Maintenance within a Physical Asset Management, the 6 maintenance Sub-
functions and the Information Communication Technology.
The KPIs reported in the matrix related to each subsystems/methodology are divided in areas, which
represent the fundamental contents or characteristic to be measured, controlled and improved to achieve
a quantitatively and qualitatively excellent assessment.
Most indicators can be used at different aggregation levels depending on whether they are used to
measure the performance of physical assets, production lines, given equipment, item, etc.
The indicators can be split by professional levels in relation to the organizational structure established
by each organization.
10
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
Table 1 — Maintenance KPIs matrix
SUB FUNCTIONS,
TOOLS AND KPIs MAIN AREAS
METHODOLOGIES
Capacity
Maintenance within
Sustainability Effectiveness Service Level Economics
PHA
physical asset
i
i = 1 to 3 Integrity i = 12 to 13 i = 14 to 20
management
i = 4 to 11
Sub-function 1 Laws- Rules Statistical Prevention and
Safe Practice
HSE
Health - Safety conformity Records Improvements
i
i = 13 to 17
Environment i = 1 to 3 i = 4 to 12 i = 18 to 22
Sub-function 2 Technical Continuous
Strategy Function
M
Maintenance Assessment Improvement
i
i = 1 to 3 i = 4 to 10
Management i = 11 to 16 i = 17 to 22
Maintenance
Maintenance
Maintenance Supervisor/
Sub-function 3 Technician Education
P
i Manager Maintenance
People Competence Specialist i = 13 to 21
i = 1 to 3 Engineer
i = 10 to 12
i = 4 to 9
Capability
Sub-function 4 Preventive Engineering
Durability
E
Maintenance Maintenance Improvements
i Criticality
i = 4 to 9
Engineering i = 10 to 16 i = 17 to 19
i = 1 to 3
Sub-function 5 Structure and Planning and Productivity
Quality
O&S
Organization and Support Control Effectiveness
i
i = 29 to 30
Support i = 1 to 8 i = 9 to 22 i = 23 to 28
Sub-function 6 Budget Outsourcing Materials and
Economics
A&S
Administration and &Control services spare parts
i
i = 1 to 6
Supply i = 7 to 19 i = 20 to 25 i = 26 to 29
Information
Engineering
Administration Organization
Communication
Management
ICT i = 14 to 20
and Supply and Support
i
Technology,
i = 1 to 6
i = 7 to 10 i = 11 to 13
TEC 18.20
Enabling technologies
7 KPIs of “Maintenance within Physical Asset Management”
Maintenance within physical asset management allows the optimal life cycle management of physical
assets to sustainably achieve the stated organization objectives.
The Maintenance activities play a significant role in the life cycle management of physical assets, because
the maintenance function takes care of their integrity for the majority of the life.
Physical asset management indicates the appropriate importance of maintenance in the various life cycle
stages and helps the maintenance management to define effective long term maintenance strategy.
The physical assets management provides the interrelations between the maintenance and the other
physical asset processes, in order to measure the performances through the whole asset life, in line with
vision, mission, values and organization objectives.
11
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
The main KPIs, named PHA , shared by driven areas as reported in Table 2 are the following:
i
— Sustainability: PHA1, PHA2, PHA3;
— Capacity, Effectiveness, Integrity: PHA4, PHA5, PHA6, PHA7, PHA8, PHA9, PHA10, PHA11;
— Service Level: PHA12, PHA13;
— Economics: PHA14, PHA15, PHA16, PHA17, PHA18, PHA19, PHA20
Table 2 — KPI of maintenance within physical asset
KPI FACTORS DEFINITIONS AND NOTES
Annual maintenance cost to The cost of maintenance resources spent
PHA1
improve sustainability yearly to improve the sustainability
Maintenance
contribution to improve
sustainability
Annual turnover generated by the physical
Physical assets turnover
(%)
asset
Maintenance
PHA2
Maintenance issues/projects included in
issues/projects included in
Maintenance issues-
the strategic life plan of the physical assets
the strategic life plan
projects
included in the strategic
Maintenance issues-projects Strategic issues/projects evaluated and
life plan
proposed proposed by maintenance in the budget
(%)
Annual turnover generated by the physical
PHA3 Physical asset turnover
asset
Capital intensity
required
Estimated amount of capital(quantity of
Physical asset replacement
to generate turnover money) that would be required to replace
value
the physical asset to required function
Actual production output Total effective output
PHA4
Utilization rate of
Production capacity in term of output is
production capacity
Standard production pre-defined production standard capacity
(%)
capacity for a period of time according to
manufacturing rules
Annual expenditures to replace the existing
Replacement costs
physical assets
PHA5
Rate of replacement
Estimated amount of capital that would be
(%)
Physical assets replacement
required to replace the physical assets to
value
required function
12
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
KPI FACTORS DEFINITIONS AND NOTES
Required time less down time due to
maintenance reasons as:
− stoppages due to failures,
− anomalous situations as reduction of
R1
quality, quantity and speed,
Maintenance effectiveness
(availability defined in − preventive actions: predictive, on
IEC 60050-192:2015) condition predetermined,
(%)
− maintenance improvements
Required time fulfilling the expected
technical standard and product
characteristics
Required time less down time due to
maintenance less lost time due to
manufacturing causes as:
− start up,
− shutdown,
PHA6
− change over,
Total equipment
− speed reduction,
1
effectiveness
− less quantity and quality for
R2
R1 x R2 x R3
operations reasons
Manufacturing effectiveness
(%) (see Figure 2)
(%)
Required time less lost time due to
maintenance reasons as:
− failures stoppages,
− anomalous situations as reduction of
quality, quantity and speed,
− preventive actions: predictive, on
condition, predetermined,
− maintenance improvements
Lost time due to non conformity of quality
materials, and process yield with technical
standard
R3
Quality
Manufacturing time less lost time due to
effectiveness
manufacturing reasons as a start-up,
(%)
shutdown, change over, speed reduction,
quality defects of materials and poor quality
for operation mistakes
1) T.E.E., time based, see Figure 2. Named also Overall Equipment Effectiveness =O.E.E.
13
---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
KPI FACTORS DEFINITIONS AND NOTES
The appraisal values due to the compliance
of existing physical asset to:
a) laws,
-High
b) regulations,
-Medium
PHA7
c) international standard,
-Sufficient
Integrity
-Insufficient
d) physical status measured by:
-Poor
1) integrity tests
2) predictive analysis
3) non-destructive tests
Total Operating time
Time when the physical asset is performing
as required
PHA8
Time when the physical asset is performing
Operational availability
Total Operating time + as required plus the time lost due to
due to maintenance
Downtime failures and preventive maintenance
(%)
activities
Total operating time
Actual cumulative
PHA9
operational life
See maintenance records
Age of physical asset
Expected cumulative Expected operating time
(%)
operational life See management reports
PHA10 Total actual cumulative Life See maintenance records
Economic life ratio
Depreciation Life See economics reports book keeping rules
(%)
PHA11 Total costs direct and indirect related to the
Total unavailability costs
Average unavailability unavailability due to maintenance
Costs due to
Total hours of unavailability due to
maintenance reasons
Total hours of unavailability
maintenance reasons
(Euro/hour)
Mix of performance as safety, operational
PHA12
Achieved availability, total maintenance cost,
Maintenance service
performance/required quantity of preventive maintenance, etc.
level
performance measured by predefined indicators to
(%)
compare the achieved versus the required
PHA13 Total maintenance cost See M15
Average maintenance
cost for operational
Hours of operational
See maintenance records
available time
availability
(Euro/Hour)
PHA14 Annual maintenance costs See M15 (annually)
Annual maintenance
cost on annual total life
Annual total industrial life See total industrial annual cost to keep the
cost
cost physical asset running
(%)
14
---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------
SIST EN 15341:2019
EN 15341:2019 (E)
KPI FACTORS DEFINITIONS AND NOTES
Annual maintenance cost See M15 (annually)
PHA15
Impact of maintenance
Annual technical standard output of a
on standard technical
Annual standard technical physical asset is the quantitative output
output
output generated fulfilling the qualitative
(Euro/output unit)
characteristics
Saving generated by
PHA16
See accounting reports
improvements
Return on
improvements
Cost of the implemented Total expenditures due to the
(%)
improvements implementation of the improvements
PHA17 Total maintenance cost See M15
Impact of maintenance
cost on an annual
Turnover generated by the sales of
turnover of physical
Annual turnover products/service
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.