SIST EN ISO 19119:2016
(Main)Geographic information - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
Geographic information - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
ISO 19119:2016 defines requirements for how platform neutral and platform specific specification of services shall be created, in order to allow for one service to be specified independently of one or more underlying distributed computing platforms.
ISO 19119:2016 defines requirements for a further mapping from platform neutral to platform specific service specifications, in order to enable conformant and interoperable service implementations.
ISO 19119:2016 addresses the Meta:Service foundation of the ISO geographic information reference model described in ISO 19101‑1:2014, Clause 6 and Clause 8, respectively.
ISO 19119:2016 defines how geographic services shall be categorised according to a service taxonomy based on architectural areas and allows also for services to be categorised according to a usage life cycle perspective, as well as according to domain specific and user defined service taxonomies, providing support for easier publication and discovery of services.
Geoinformation - Dienste (ISO 19119:2016)
Information géographique - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
ISO 19119:2016 définit des exigences sur la façon dont une spécification de services propre à une plate-forme et applicable à toutes les plates-formes doit être créée, de manière à ce qu'un service puisse être spécifié indépendamment d'une ou de plusieurs plates-formes informatiques distribuées sous-jacentes.
ISO 19119:2016 définit des exigences pour une mise en correspondance supplémentaire des spécifications de services applicables à toutes les plates-formes avec les spécifications de services propres à une plate-forme, de manière à assurer des implémentations de services conformes et interopérables.
ISO 19119:2016 traite du fondement Méta:Service du modèle de référence d'information géographique ISO décrit dans l'ISO 19101‑1:2014, Articles 6 et 8.
ISO 19119:2016 définit la façon dont des services géographiques doivent être classés selon une taxonomie de services basée sur des domaines architecturaux, et permet également de classer les services selon une perspective de cycle de vie à l'usage ainsi que selon des taxonomies de services propres à un domaine et définies par l'utilisateur, ce qui fournit un support facilitant la publication et la découverte de services.
Geografske informacije - Storitve (ISO 19119:2016)
Ta mednarodni standard določa zahteve za ustvarjanje platformsko nevtralnih in platformsko specifičnih specifikacij storitev, tako da je omogočena določitev posamezne storitve neodvisno
od ene ali več osnovnih razdeljenih računalniških platform.
Ta mednarodni standard določa zahteve za nadaljnje preslikave iz platformsko nevtralnih v platformsko specifične specifikacije storitev, tako da omogoča skladne in interoperabilne implementacije storitev.
Ta mednarodni standard obravnava osnovo Meta:Service referenčnega modela geografskih informacij ISO, opisanega v standardu ISO 19101-1:2014, točki 6 in 8.
Ta mednarodni standard določa, kako morajo biti kategorizirane geografske storitve glede na taksonomijo storitev na podlagi arhitekturnih področij, in omogoča, da so storitve kategorizirane glede na uporabo z vidika življenjskega cikla ter glede na domensko in uporabniško določene taksonomije storitev z zagotavljanjem podpore za lažje objavljanje in odkrivanje storitev.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2016
1DGRPHãþD
SIST EN ISO 19119:2006
SIST EN ISO 19119:2006/A1:2011
Geografske informacije - Storitve (ISO 19119:2016)
Geographic information - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
Geoinformation - Dienste (ISO 19119:2016)
Information géographique - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: EN ISO 19119:2016
ICS:
03.080.01 Storitve na splošno Services in general
07.040 Astronomija. Geodezija. Astronomy. Geodesy.
Geografija Geography
35.240.70 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in science
znanosti
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
EN ISO 19119
EUROPEAN STANDARD
NORME EUROPÉENNE
February 2016
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
ICS 35.240.70 Supersedes EN ISO 19119:2006
English Version
Geographic information - Services (ISO 19119:2016)
Information géographique - Services (ISO 19119:2016) Geoinformation - Dienste (ISO 19119:2016)
This European Standard was approved by CEN on 20 February 2016.
CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this
European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration. Up-to-date lists and bibliographical references
concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN
member.
This European Standard exists in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language made by
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2016 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. EN ISO 19119:2016 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
Contents
European foreword . 3
European foreword
This document (EN ISO 19119:2016) has been prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 211
“Geographic information/Geomatics” in collaboration with Technical Committee CEN/TC 287
“Geographic Information” the secretariat of which is held by BSI.
This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an
identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by August 2016, and conflicting national standards shall
be withdrawn at the latest by August 2016.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. CEN [and/or CENELEC] shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent
rights.
This document supersedes EN ISO 19119:2006.
According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organizations of the
following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria,
Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia,
France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta,
Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland,
Turkey and the United Kingdom.
Endorsement notice
The text of ISO 19119:2016 has been approved by CEN as EN ISO 19119:2016 without any modification.
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 19119
Second edition
2016-01-15
Geographic information — Services
Information géographique — Services
Reference number
ISO 19119:2016(E)
©
ISO 2016
ISO 19119:2016(E)
© ISO 2016, Published in Switzerland
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form
or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on the internet or an intranet, without prior
written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below or ISO’s member body in the country of
the requester.
ISO copyright office
Ch. de Blandonnet 8 • CP 401
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva, Switzerland
Tel. +41 22 749 01 11
Fax +41 22 749 09 47
copyright@iso.org
www.iso.org
ii © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .vi
Introduction .vii
1 Scope . 1
2 Conformance . 1
2.1 Claiming conformance . 1
2.2 General . 1
2.3 Enterprise viewpoint . 1
2.4 Computational viewpoint . 1
2.5 Information viewpoint . 2
2.6 Service taxonomies . 2
2.7 Engineering viewpoint . 2
2.8 Technology viewpoint . 2
3 Normative references . 3
4 Terms and definitions and abbreviations . 3
4.1 Terms and definitions . 3
4.2 Abbreviations . 5
5 Notation . 7
5.1 General . 7
5.2 Conformance class . 7
5.3 Requirements class . 7
5.4 Rules . 8
5.5 Identifiers . 8
5.6 Conceptual schemas . 8
5.7 Descriptions of concepts . 8
5.8 Architecture patterns . 8
6 Overview of geographic services architecture . 9
6.1 Purpose and justification . 9
6.2 Relationship to ISO 19101-1 . 9
6.3 Interoperability reference model based on ISO RM-ODP .10
6.4 Service abstraction .11
6.5 Interoperability .13
6.6 Use of other geographic information standards in service specifications .14
7 Enterprise viewpoint: A context for services .14
7.1 Enterprise viewpoint .14
7.2 Enterprise viewpoint service specifications .15
7.3 Examples of relevant standards .16
7.4 Example and tools .17
8 Computational viewpoint: A basis for service interfaces and chaining .17
8.1 Component and service interoperability and the computational viewpoint .17
8.2 Services, interfaces and operations .18
8.3 Computational viewpoint service specifications .19
8.3.1 Requirements class for computational viewpoint service specifications .19
8.3.2 Service interfaces with operations .19
8.3.3 Service behaviour and constraints .21
8.4 Service chaining .23
8.4.1 General.23
8.4.2 Anatomy of a service chain .24
8.4.3 Service chain modelling .25
8.4.4 Services organizer folder .27
8.4.5 Services to enable service chaining .27
8.4.6 Architecture patterns for service chaining.28
ISO 19119:2016(E)
8.4.7 Variations on chaining patterns .33
8.5 Service metadata .34
8.6 Simple service architecture .34
8.7 Examples of relevant standards .35
8.8 Examples and tools: Service modelling with SoaML .35
9 Information viewpoint: A basis for semantic interoperability .35
9.1 Information model interoperability and the information viewpoint .35
9.2 Information viewpoint Service specifications .36
10 Service taxonomies .39
10.1 Need for multiple service taxonomies .39
10.2 Service taxonomies and requirements .40
10.3 Architectural reference model .40
10.4 Definition of the Architectural reference model .40
10.5 Uses of the Architectural reference model .40
10.6 Overview of the Architectural reference model .41
10.6.1 Services and service interfaces .41
10.6.2 Identifying services and service interfaces for geographic information .42
10.7 Types of geographic information services .42
10.7.1 Requirement for service taxonomy .42
10.7.2 Types of information technology services relevant to geographic information .42
10.7.3 Extension of service types for geographic information .44
10.8 Geographic architecture services taxonomy .44
10.8.1 Geographic architecture services taxonomy requirements .44
10.8.2 Geographic boundary/human interaction services .45
10.8.3 Geographic model/information management services .46
10.8.4 Geographic workflow/task management services .47
10.8.5 Geographic processing services .47
10.8.6 Geographic communication services .50
10.8.7 Geographic system management and security services .50
10.9 ISO suite of International Standards in geographic architecture services taxonomy .51
10.10 Geographic service chaining validity .51
10.11 User-perspective Lifecycle model for Services .52
10.12 User-defined service taxonomies.53
10.13 Services organizer folder (SOF) .53
10.13.1 Grouping of services .53
10.13.2 Image exploitation SOF .53
10.13.3 Geographic data fusion SOF .54
10.14 Semantic information models .55
10.15 Examples of relevant standards .56
10.16 Examples and tools . .57
11 Engineering viewpoint: A basis for distribution and communication patterns .57
11.1 Distribution transparencies and the engineering viewpoint .57
11.2 Distributing components using a multi-tier architecture model.58
11.3 Distribution transparencies .61
11.4 Engineering viewpoint Service specifications .62
11.5 Multi-style SOA.63
11.6 Relevant architectural styles .63
11.6.1 Service-oriented architectures .63
11.6.2 Representational State Transfer (REST) .64
11.6.3 Web 2.0 .65
12 Technology viewpoint: A basis for cross platform interoperability .66
12.1 Infrastructure interoperability and the technology viewpoint .66
12.2 Need for multiple platform-specific specifications .67
12.3 Conformance between platform-neutral and platform-specific service specifications .67
12.4 From platform-neutral to platform-specific specifications .68
12.5 Technology objects .68
iv © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
12.6 Technology viewpoint service specifications .68
12.6.1 Requirements class for technology viewpoint .68
12.6.2 Technology mappings .69
12.7 Architectural classification according to cloud computing service categories .71
Annex A (normative) Conformance .72
Annex B (informative) Example user scenarios .78
Annex C (informative) Principles for mapping to distributed computing platforms .81
Annex D (informative) Use case-based methodology .92
Annex E (informative) Example — Use case template .95
Annex F (informative) Service modelling – SoaML .98
Bibliography .101
ISO 19119:2016(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www.iso.org/patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation on the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions related to conformity
assessment, as well as information about ISO’s adherence to the WTO principles in the Technical
Barriers to Trade (TBT) see the following URL: Foreword - Supplementary information.
The committee responsible for this document is ISO/TC 211, Geographic information/Geomatics.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 19119:2005), which has been technically
revised. It also incorporates the Amendment ISO 19119:2005/Amd 1:2008.
vi © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
Introduction
The widespread application of computers and use of geographic information systems (GIS) have led to
the increased analysis of geographic data within multiple disciplines. Based on advances in information
technology, society’s reliance on such data are growing. Geographic datasets are increasingly being
shared, exchanged, and used for purposes other than their producers’ intended ones. GIS, remote
sensing, automated mapping and facilities management (AM/FM), Spatial Data Infrastructure (SDI),
traffic analysis, geopositioning systems, and other technologies for Geographic Information (GI) are
entering a period of radical integration.
This International Standard provides a framework for platform neutral and platform specific
specification of services that can enable users to access, process and manage geographic data from a
variety of sources, potentially for various distributed computing platforms (DCPs).
— “a framework for platform neutral and platform specific specification of services” means that this
International Standard provides requirements for how services shall be specified in such a way
that one service can be specified independently of one or more underlying distributed computing
platforms. The framework provides requirements for a further mapping to specific platforms in
order to enable conformant platform specific specifications to ensure conforming and interoperable
service implementations.
— “access, process and manage” means that geodata users can query remote databases and control
remote processing resources and also take advantage of other distributed computing technologies,
such as software delivered to the user’s local environment from a remote environment for
temporary use;
— “from a variety of sources” means that users will have access to data acquired in a variety of ways
and stored in a wide variety of relational and non-relational databases;
— “across a generic computing interface” means that ISO 19119 interfaces provide reliable communication
between otherwise disparate software resources that are equipped to use these interfaces;
— “within an open information technology environment” means that this International Standard
enables geoprocessing to take place outside of the closed environment of monolithic GIS, remote
sensing, and AM/FM systems that control and restrict database, user interface, network and data
manipulation functions;
— services shall be categorised according to a service taxonomy based on architectural areas and may
also be categorised according to a usage life cycle perspective, as well as according to domain specific
and user defined service taxonomies, providing support for publication and discovery of services.
The difference between this version of this International Standard and the previous ISO 19119:2005
version is the following:
This International Standard has defined a set of requirements and related abstract tests for the
specification of services according to enterprise, computational, information, engineering and
technology viewpoints. This International Standard has defined a set of requirements for categorizing
services according to service taxonomies. The service metadata has been moved to ISO 19115-1.
Service policies, service contracts including service level agreements (SLAs) are currently not specified
as part of this International Standard, as these are considered most relevant for service deployment
and service ownership, which is not currently a focus for this International Standard.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 19119:2016(E)
Geographic information — Services
1 Scope
This International Standard defines requirements for how platform neutral and platform specific
specification of services shall be created, in order to allow for one service to be specified independently
of one or more underlying distributed computing platforms.
This International Standard defines requirements for a further mapping from platform neutral to
platform specific service specifications, in order to enable conformant and interoperable service
implementations.
This International Standard addresses the Meta:Service foundation of the ISO geographic information
reference model described in ISO 19101-1:2014, Clause 6 and Clause 8, respectively.
This International Standard defines how geographic services shall be categorised according to a
service taxonomy based on architectural areas and allows also for services to be categorised according
to a usage life cycle perspective, as well as according to domain specific and user defined service
taxonomies, providing support for easier publication and discovery of services.
2 Conformance
2.1 Claiming conformance
Any product claiming conformance with the conformance classes in this International Standard shall
pass all the associated requirements described in the abstract test suite given in Annex A.
2.2 General
This International Standard defines six conformance classes shown in Table 1 to Table 6, matching the
six requirements classes described in Clause 7 to Clause 12. Any service claiming conformance to any
requirements class in this International Standard shall pass all of the tests listed in the corresponding
conformance class, which are described in detail in the abstract test suites in Annex A. Each test relates
to one or more specific requirements, which are explicitly indicated in the description of the test.
2.3 Enterprise viewpoint
The enterprise viewpoint conformance class is shown in Table 1.
Table 1 — Enterprise viewpoint conformance class
Conformance class /conf/enterpriseviewpoint
Requirements /req/enterpriseviewpoint (Table 11)
Tests All tests in A.2
2.4 Computational viewpoint
The computational viewpoint conformance class is shown in Table 2.
ISO 19119:2016(E)
Table 2 — Computational viewpoint conformance class
Conformance class /conf/computationalviewpoint
Dependency /conf/enterpriseviewpoint
Requirements /req/computationalviewpoint (Table 12)
Tests All tests in A.3
2.5 Information viewpoint
The information viewpoint conformance class is shown in Table 3.
Table 3 — Information viewpoint conformance class
Conformance class /conf/informationviewpoint
Dependency /conf/uml (2.4)
Requirements /req/informationviewpoint (Table 18)
Tests All tests in A.4
2.6 Service taxonomies
The service taxonomy conformance class is shown in Table 4.
Table 4 — Service taxonomies conformance class
Conformance class /conf/servicetaxonomies
Dependency /conf/uml (2.4)
Requirements /req/servicetaxonomies (Table 19)
Tests All tests in A.5
2.7 Engineering viewpoint
The engineering viewpoint conformance class is shown in Table 5.
Table 5 — Engineering viewpoint conformance class
Conformance class /conf/engineeringviewpoint
Dependency /conf/uml (2.4)
Requirements /req/engineeringviewpoint (Table 26)
Tests All tests in A.6
2.8 Technology viewpoint
The technology viewpoint conformance class is shown in Table 6.
Table 6 — Technology viewpoint conformance class
Conformance class /conf/technologyviewpoint
Dependency /conf/uml (2.4)
Requirements /req/technologyviewpoint (Table 27)
Tests All tests in A.7
NOTE The definition of an abstract test suite appears in ISO 19105.
2 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
3 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated
references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC 10746-1, Information technology — Open Distributed Processing — Reference model:
Overview — Part 1
ISO 19101-1:2014, Geographic information — Reference model — Part 1: Fundamentals
ISO 19103, Geographic information — Conceptual schema language
ISO 19115-1:2014, Geographic information — Metadata — Part 1: Fundamentals
1)
[SoaML] Service oriented architecture Modeling Language v 1.0.1, May 2012, OMG standard
4 Terms and definitions and abbreviations
4.1 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
4.1.1
capability
real-world effect that a service (4.1.12) provider is able to provide to a service consumer
[SOURCE: SOA-RAF]
4.1.2
computational viewpoint
viewpoint (4.1.15) on an ODP system and its environment that enables distribution through functional
decomposition of the system into objects which interact at interfaces (4.1.8)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-3:2015, 4.1.1.3]
4.1.3
distribution transparency
property of hiding from a particular user the potential behaviour of some parts of a distributed system
Note 1 to entry: Distribution transparencies enable complexities associated with system distribution to be
hidden from applications where they are irrelevant to their purpose.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-2:2009, 11.1.1]
4.1.4
engineering viewpoint
viewpoint (4.1.15) on an ODP system and its environment that focuses on the mechanisms and functions
required to support distributed interaction between objects in the system
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-3:2009, 4.1.1.4]
4.1.5
enterprise viewpoint
viewpoint (4.1.15) on an ODP system and its environment that focuses on the purpose, scope and policies
for that system
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-3:2009, 4.1.1.1]
1) http://www.omg.org/spec/SoaML/1.0.1/
ISO 19119:2016(E)
4.1.6
entity
something that has separate and distinct existence and objective or conceptual reality
4.1.7
information viewpoint
viewpoint (4.1.15) on an ODP system and its environment that focuses on the semantics of information
and information processing
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-3:2009, 4.1.1.2]
4.1.8
interface
named set of operations (4.1.10) that characterize the behaviour of an entity (4.1.6)
Note 1 to entry: See 8.2 for a discussion of interface.
4.1.9
interoperability
capability to communicate, execute programs, or transfer data among various functional units in a
manner that requires the user to have little or no knowledge of the unique characteristics of those units
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 2382:2009, 2121317]
4.1.10
operation
specification of a transformation or query that an object may be called to execute
Note 1 to entry: An operation has a name and a list of parameters.
Note 2 to entry: See 8.2 for a discussion of operation.
4.1.11
real world effect
actual result of using a service (4.1.12), rather than merely the capability (4.1.1) offered by a service
provider
Note 1 to entry: See 8.3 for a discussion of service.
[SOURCE: OASIS RAF, 3.2.3]
4.1.12
service
distinct part of the functionality that is provided by an entity (4.1.6) through interfaces (4.1.8)
4.1.13
service chain
sequence of services (4.1.12) where, for each adjacent pair of services, occurrence of the first action is
necessary for the occurrence of the second action
4.1.14
technology viewpoint
viewpoint (4.1.15) on an ODP system and its environment that focuses on the choice of technology
in that system
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-3:2009, 4.1.1.5]
4 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
4.1.15
viewpoint (on a system)
form of abstraction achieved using a selected set of architectural concepts and structuring rules, in
order to focus on particular concerns within a system
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 10746-2, 3.2.7]
4.1.16
workflow
automation of a business process, in whole or part, during which documents, information or tasks are
passed from one participant to another for action, according to a set of procedural rules
4.2 Abbreviations
API Application Programming Interface
BPEL Business Process Execution Language
BPMN Business Process Modelling Notation
CORBA Common Object Request Broker Architecture
CSL Conceptual schema language
DAG Directed Acyclic Graph
DCP Distributed Computing Platform
DEM Digital Elevation Model
DTD Document type definitions
EJB Enterprise Java Beans
ERP Enterprise Resource Planning
GIOP General Inter-ORB Protocol
GFM General feature model
HTI Human Technology Interface
HTML Hypertext Markup language
HTTP Hypertext Transfer Protocol
IaaS Infrastructure as a Service
IDL Interface Definition Language
IIOP Internet Inter-ORB Protocol
INSPIRE Infrastructure for Spatial Information in Europe
IT Information Technology
J2EE Java 2 Enterprise Edition with EJB
JDBC Java Data Base Connectivity
OASIS Organization for the Advancement of Structured Information Standards
ISO 19119:2016(E)
OCL Object Constraint Language
ODBC Open Database Connectivity
ODMG Object Database Management Group
ODP Open Distributed Processing (see RM-ODP)
OGC Open Geospatial Consortium
OMG Object Management Group
ORB Object Request Broker
OWL Web Ontology Language
PaaS Platform as a Service
QoS Quality of Service
QVT Query/View/Transformation
REST Representational state transfer
RDF Resource Description Framework
RMI Remote Method Invocation
RM-ODP Reference Model of Open Distributed Processing (ISO/IEC 10746)
RPC Remote Procedure Call
SaaS Software as a Service
SDI Spatial Data Infrastructure
SDAI Standard Data Access Interface (ISO 10303-22)
SOA Service Oriented Architecture
SoaML Service oriented architecture Modelling Language (OMG)
SOAP Simple Object Access Protocol
SOF Service Organizer Folder
SPS Spatial Planning Service
SQL Structured Query Language
UML Unified Modeling Language
URI Uniform Resource Identifier
W3C World Wide Web Consortium
WFS Web Feature Service
WMS Web Map Service
XML Extensible Markup Language
6 © ISO 2016 – All rights reserved
ISO 19119:2016(E)
XML RDF XML Resource Description Framework
XSLT XML Stylesheet Language Transformations
Concepts from schemas defined in some other International Standards are designated with names that
start with bi-alpha codes as follows:
TM ISO 19108:2002 Temporal Schema, Temporal Objects
5 Notation
5.1 General
This International Standard describes how to describe a service. In addition to stating the rules for
creating service descriptions, this International Standard provides guidance through examples.
5.2 Conformance class
Conformance to this International Standard is possible at a number of levels, specified by conformance
classes (Clause 2). Each conformance class is summarized using the template shown as Table 7.
Table 7 — Conformance class template
Conformance class /conf/{classM}
Dependency [identifier for another conformance class]
Requirements /req/{classA}
Tests [reference to clause(s) containing tests]
All tests in a class shall be passed, so dependencies are on other conformance classes (see Resolution 570
of ISO/TC 211, N3262). Each conformance class tests conformance to a set of requirements packaged in
a requirements class (Clause 7 and Clause 8).
5.3 Requirements class
Each normative statement (requirement or recommendation) in this International Standard forms part
of a specific requirements class. In this International Standard, each requirements class is described in
a discrete clause or subclause and summarized using the template shown as Table 8.
Table 8 — Requirements class template
Requirements class /req/{classM}
Target type [artefact or technology type]
Dependency [identifier for another requirements class]
Requirement /req/{classM}/{reqN}
Recommendation /req/{classM}/{recO}
Requirement /req/{classM}/{reqP}
Requirement /Recommendation [repeat as necessary]
All requirements in a class shall be satisfied, so the requirements class is the unit of re-use and
dependency. Hence, the value of a Dependency requirement is another requirements class.
ISO 19119:2016(E)
5.4 Rules
All rules are normative and each rule is presented using the following template where /req/[classM]/
[reqN] identifies the requirement or recommendatio
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...