SIST EN 16864:2017
(Main)Building hardware - Mechatronic padlocks - Requirements and test methods
Building hardware - Mechatronic padlocks - Requirements and test methods
This European Standard specifies requirements for performance and testing of mechatronic padlocks (MPs) and their keys and/or electronic keys.
It establishes categories of use based on performance tests and grades of security based on design requirements and on performance tests that simulate attack. If the design incorporates mechanical security means in addition to the mechatronic means, these are also tested.
This European Standard does not cover any other element of a security system, other than those directly involved in the control of a padlock.
This European Standard does not cover the physical testing of multi-function devices such as Smartphones that may be used as part of the control system.
Schlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische Hangschlösser - Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren
Diese Europäische Norm legt Anforderungen an die Leistung und Prüfung von mechatronischen Hangschlössern (MH) und deren Schlüsseln und/oder elektronischen Schlüsseln fest.
Sie legt auf Leistungsprüfungen basierende Gebrauchsklassen sowie Sicherheitsklassen fest, die auf Konstruktionsanforderungen und Leistungsprüfungen beruhen, die Angriffe simulieren. Sofern die Konstruktion zusätzlich zu den mechatronischen Vorrichtungen mechanische Schutzvorrichtungen enthält, werden auch diese geprüft.
Die vorliegende Europäische Norm behandelt keine weiteren Elemente eines Sicherheitssystems als die¬jenigen, die unmittelbar mit der Bedienung eines Hangschlosses verbunden sind.
Diese Europäische Norm deckt nicht die physikalische Prüfung von Multifunktionsgeräten wie z. B. Smartphones ab, die als Teil des Kontrollsystems genutzt werden können.
Quincaillerie du bâtiment - Cadenas mécatroniques - Exigences et méthodes d'essai
La présente Norme européenne spécifie les exigences de performance et d'essai des cadenas mécaniques (MP) et de leurs clés et/ou de leurs clés électroniques.
Elle définit des catégories d'utilisation basées sur des essais de performance et des niveaux de sécurité basés sur des exigences de conception et sur des essais de performance simulant une effraction. Si la conception intègre des dispositifs de sécurité mécanique, en complément de dispositifs mécatroniques, ces dispositifs sont également soumis à essai.
La présente Norme européenne ne couvre aucun élément d’un système de sécurité autre que ceux directement mis en jeu dans la manoeuvre d’un cadenas.
La présente Norme européenne ne traite pas de l'essai physique des dispositifs multi-fonctionnels tels que les smartphones, qui peuvent être utilisés comme éléments du système de contrôle.
Stavbno okovje - Mehatronske obešanke - Zahteve in preskusne metode
Ta evropski standard določa zahteve za delovanje in preskušanje mehatronskih obešank (MP) ter njihovih ključev in/ali elektronskih ključev.
Določa kategorije uporabe na podlagi preskusov delovanja in varnostne stopnje na podlagi zahtev glede zasnove in preskusov delovanja, ki simulirajo napad. Če načrtovanje poleg mehatronskih sredstev zajema tudi mehanska varnostna sredstva, se te tudi preskusi.
Ta evropski standard ne zajema drugih elementov varnostnega sistema, ki niso neposredno vključeni v nadzor obešanke.
Ta evropski standard ne zajema fizičnega preskušanja večfunkcijskih naprav, kot so pametni
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Stavbno okovje - Mehatronske obešanke - Zahteve in preskusne metodeSchlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische Hangschlösser - Anforderungen und PrüfverfahrenQuincaillerie du bâtiment - Cadenas mécatroniques - Exigences et méthodes d'essaiBuilding hardware - Mechatronic padlocks - Requirements and test methods91.190Stavbna opremaBuilding accessoriesICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 16864:2017SIST EN 16864:2017en,fr,de01-november-2017SIST EN 16864:2017SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
SIST EN 16864:2017
EUROPEAN STANDARD NORME EUROPÉENNE EUROPÄISCHE NORM
EN 16864
September
t r s y ICS
{ sä s { r English Version
Building hardware æ Mechatronic padlocks æ Requirements and test methods Quincaillerie pour le bâtiment æ Cadenas mécatroniques æ Exigences et méthodes d 5essai
Schlösser und Baubeschläge æ Mechatronische Hangschlösser æ Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren This European Standard was approved by CEN on
s s May
t r s yä
egulations which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alterationä Upætoædate lists and bibliographical references concerning such national standards may be obtained on application to the CENæCENELEC Management Centre or to any CEN memberä
translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CENæCENELEC Management Centre has the same status as the official versionsä
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austriaá Belgiumá Bulgariaá Croatiaá Cyprusá Czech Republicá Denmarká Estoniaá Finlandá Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedoniaá Franceá Germanyá Greeceá Hungaryá Icelandá Irelandá Italyá Latviaá Lithuaniaá Luxembourgá Maltaá Netherlandsá Norwayá Polandá Portugalá Romaniaá Serbiaá Slovakiaá Sloveniaá Spainá Swedená Switzerlandá Turkey and United Kingdomä
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre:
Avenue Marnix 17,
B-1000 Brussels
9
t r s y CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Membersä Refä Noä EN
s x z x vã t r s y ESIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 2 Contents Page European foreword . 4 Introduction . 5 1 Scope . 6 2 Normative references . 6 3 Terms, definitions and symbols . 7 4 Requirements . 10 Table 1 — Bump and vibration requirements . 11 Table 2 — Environmental resistance MP . 12 Table 3 — Environmental resistance of electronic key for MP . 13 Table 4 — Mechanical codes. 13 Table 5 — Code attack resistance . 14 Table 6 — Audit trail and time zone . 14 Table 7 — Security requirements . 16 5 Testing, assessment and sampling methods . 18 Figure 1 — Drill test rig . 26 Figure 2 — Shackle twisting test . 27 Figure 3 — Extraction of plug. 28 Figure 4 — Torque test . 29 Figure 5 — Shackle pulling arrangement . 30 Figure 6 — Sawing test . 31 Figure 7 — Shackle cutting test . 32 Table 8 — Shackle attack requirements . 32 Table 9 — Shackle dimensions . 33 Figure 8 — Gauge for measuring shackle accessibility . 33 Figure 9 — Impact on padlock body . 34 Figure 10 — Impact on padlock shackle . 34 Figure 11 — MP mounting arrangement . 35 6 Classification system . 37 Table 10 — Classification system . 38 Table 11 — Examples of classification of MP . 39 Table 12 — Examples of classification of electronic key . 39 7 Marking . 39 SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 3 Annex A (normative)
Tool sets for attack resistance tests . 40 Table A.1 . 40 Table A.2 . 41 Table A.3 . 42 Annex B (normative)
Table of test procedures . 43 Table B.1 — Test procedures for MP . 43 Table B.2 — Test procedures for electronic keys . 44 Bibliography . 45
SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 4 European foreword This document (EN 16864:2017) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 33 “Doors, windows, shutters, building hardware and curtain walling”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR. This European Standard shall be given the status of a national standard, either by publication of an identical text or by endorsement, at the latest by March 2018, and conflicting national standards shall be withdrawn at the latest by March 2018. Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent rights. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. According to the CEN-CENELEC Internal Regulations, the national standards organisations of the following countries are bound to implement this European Standard: Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and the United Kingdom. SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 5 Introduction Mechanical padlocks have been used to provide security and control of external doors, cabinets and movable items. Increasing demand for the flexibility of master key systems, audit trail, copy control of keys, etc. has made it desirable to incorporate additional functions into such mechanical padlocks, and new technologies have made it possible to develop mechatronic padlocks. A mechatronic padlock uses either pure electrically operated means or combination of electrically operated and mechanical means to achieve security. The test methods are specified in detail to ensure reproducibility at any testing establishment within Europe, and the acceptance criteria are defined objectively to ensure consistency of assessment. Mechanical performance of the mechatronic padlock is based on EN 12320:2012. It is assumed that mechatronic padlocks (MPs) will conform to the legal regulations i.e. of the Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC) Directive 2014/30/EU, The Low Voltage (LV) Directive 2014/35/EU, Radio and Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (RTTED) - Directive 1999/5/EC and other relevant directives concerning electronic apparatus. On occasions there may be a need for additional functions within the design of the padlock. Purchasers should satisfy themselves that the products are suitable for their intended use. This is particularly important when the operation of such additional functions is safety related. Accordingly, this European Standard includes assessment of such features when they are included in the padlock design. SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 6 1 Scope This European Standard specifies requirements for performance and testing of mechatronic padlocks (MPs) and their keys and/or electronic keys. It establishes categories of use based on performance tests and grades of security based on design requirements and on performance tests that simulate attack. If the design incorporates mechanical security means in addition to the mechatronic means, these are also tested. This European Standard does not cover any other element of a security system, other than those directly involved in the control of a padlock. This European Standard does not cover the physical testing of multi-function devices such as Smartphones that may be used as part of the control system. 2 Normative references The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies. EN 12320:2012, Building hardware - Padlocks and padlock fittings - Requirements and test methods EN 1670:2007, Building hardware - Corrosion resistance - Requirements and test methods EN 60068-2-1, Environmental testing - Part 2-1: Tests - Test A: Cold EN 60068-2-2, Environmental testing - Part 2-2: Tests - Test B: Dry heat EN 60068-2-6:2008, Environmental testing - Part 2-6: Tests - Test Fc: Vibration (sinusoidal) EN 60068-2-27:2009, Environmental testing - Part 2-27: Tests - Test Ea and guidance: Shock EN 60068-2-30:2005, Environmental testing - Part 2-30: Tests - Test Db: Damp heat, cyclic (12 h + 12 h cycle) EN 60529:1991, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code) EN 61000-4-2, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) - Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques - Electrostatic discharge immunity test EN ISO 10666:1999, Drilling screws with tapping screw thread - Mechanical and functional properties (ISO 10666:1999) EN ISO 15480, Hexagon washer head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15480) EN ISO 15481, Cross recessed pan head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15481) EN ISO 15482, Cross recessed countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15482) EN ISO 15483, Cross recessed raised countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15483) ISO 10899, High-speed steel two-flute twist drills — Technical specifications SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 7 3 Terms, definitions and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply. 3.1.1 audit trail capability degree of functionality intended to provide a record of the mechatronic padlock (MP) and/or its electronic key events that will identify the individual credential used to operate the mechatronic padlock 3.1.2 attack unauthorised attempt to open a mechatronic padlock (MP) by various techniques (destructive and/or non-destructive techniques) 3.1.3 cryptographic attack use of codes and credentials that are randomly or algorithmically generated to defeat the electronic security of the MP 3.1.4 spoofing presentation of a forged credential Note 1 to entry Spoofing includes the use of devices to capture an unencrypted code. 3.1.5 brute force attack the use of a high speed code generator to try and enter a valid code or credential 3.1.6 dictionary attack the use of a list of common words or number sequences to try and shorten the duration of a code-guessing attack 3.1.7 cam component of the mechatronic padlock (MP) to provide the movement necessary to effect locking or to move a locking part that retains the shackle, such as a pawl or ball 3.1.8 cylinder device, usually distinct from its associated lock or latch, operated by a key 3.1.9 detaining elements parts of the padlock, which should be moved by the authorisation of the electronic key and key (if available) into a pre-determined position before the locking mechanism can move SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 8 3.1.10 code mechanism any combination of mechanical and/or electronic elements that may be given various values in order to restrict the opening of the padlock to the correct keys 3.1.11 effective mechanical code variation difference between locking mechanisms of padlocks of similar design achieved only by the movable detainer, which enables each padlock to be operated only by the correct key or keys 3.1.12 electronic code variation difference between locking mechanisms of padlocks of similar design achieved only by the electronic code which enables each padlock to be operated only by the correct key or keys 3.1.13 electronic dummy key electronic key which cannot electronically operate the mechatronic padlock (MP) Note 1 to entry: If applicable, the electronic dummy key has the right mechanical code. 3.1.14 electronic key discrete device containing the information necessary to authorise operation of the mechatronic padlock 3.1.15 key separate device corresponding to the operating means of the mechatronic padlock, which can mechanically operate the padlock 3.1.16 knob element of the mechatronic padlock for mechanical hand operation of the padlock 3.1.17 mechatronic padlock
MP independent locking device comprising a body, a code mechanism, a locking mechanism and a shackle. The code mechanism includes an electronic component that interfaces with mechatronic detaining elements after verification 3.1.18 plug part of a mechatronic padlock that can be moved when the proper key is used 3.1.19 steps cuts in the surface of a bit or blade which operate the mechanical code elements 3.1.20 time zone degree of functionality intended to provide security by limiting the time that a valid credential will operate the MP SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 9 3.1.21 manufacturer entity or organisation that is legally responsible for putting the product on the market 3.1.22 credential portion of data that serves to identify the user as valid 3.1.23 staple part of the padlock fitting through which the padlock shackle is passed 3.1.24 mean time to compromise MTC average estimated time for a cryptographic attack to defeat the electronic security of the MP 3.1.25 whitelist database of authorised users 3.2 Symbols For the purposes of this document, the following symbols apply. Symbol Unit Definition d mm Diameter of shackle F1 kN Push/pull force on cylinder plug/locking mechanism F2 kN Pull force on shackle or staple F3 kN Cutting force on shackle or staple F4 kN Maximum possible push/pull force on cylinder plug/locking mechanism h mm Height through which weight is dropped (impact test) M1 Nm Torque on key to test for inter-passing M2 Nm Torque on cylinder plug/locking mechanism M3 Nm Twisting torque on shackle or staple n - Minimum number of effective key differs N - Number of electronic codes available W - Maximum number of users in the Whitelist A - Number of code attempts possible within one hour t min Drilling/sawing resistance time T °C Temperature of product for impact testing m g Drop mass for impact test SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 10 4 Requirements 4.1 General The structure of the following requirements and test procedures reflects the classification in accordance with Clause 6. 4.2 Category of use NOTE If all requirements 4.2.1 to 4.2.8 of this section are met, the MP is classed as Grade 1 Category of use. 4.2.1 Key strength When tested in accordance with 5.4.1 the electronic key shall not break under an applied torque of 2,5 Nm. After the test, the electronic key shall be capable of being removed from the MP and re-used to operate the same MP with a torque not exceeding 1,5 Nm. 4.2.2 Operation of release mechanism The operating torque of the MP shall not exceed 1,5 Nm. 4.2.3 Stability of electronic key and MP The electronic key and the MP shall be able to withstand a free-fall from 1,5 m height, with the electronic key not inserted without loss of function and without the need for reassembly. Compliance is checked by the test method given in 5.4.2. 4.2.4 Wrong electronic code When using an electronic dummy key with the right mechanical code the MP shall be capable of resisting a torque on the key of 3,5 Nm (or the maximum torque that can be transmitted with the normal manufacturer's key if less than 3,5 Nm) without loss of function. Compliance is checked by the test method given in 5.4.1 however with a torque of 3,5 Nm. If a MP is equipped with a knob or thumb turn (replacing the key function) and this MP is not protected by a clutch to prevent damage in case of excessive torque being applied to the knob or thumb turn, the
%), without loss of function. 4.2.5 Bump requirements The MP and its electronic keys shall be able to withstand bumps typical of daily usage. The MP shall conform to the requirements given in Table 1. Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 5.4.3. 4.2.6 Vibration requirements The MP and its electronic keys shall be able to withstand vibrations typical of daily usage. The MP and its electronic key shall conform to the requirements given in Table 1. Compliance is checked by the test methods given in 5.4.4 The MP shall remain secured during the test and shall operate normally afterwards.5.4.4. SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 11 Table 1 — Bump and vibration requirements Requirements Test method 40 G (100 bumps / 3 directions) duration per bump 6 ms 1. Bump test EN 60068–2–27:2009 -Frequency range: 10 to 150 Hz -Displacement amplitude: 0,35 mm -Acceleration amplitude: 5 G -Number of sweep cycles for each axis: 5 -Crossover frequency : 58 Hz to 62 Hz -Sweep rate: 1 octave per minute 3.a Vibrations EN 60068–2–6:2008 4.2.7 Electrostatic discharge requirement The MP and its electronic keys shall be able to withstand and function after an accidental electro-static discharge. It shall conform to the requirements given in EN 61000-4-2 and conform to the specification in Table 7 for Grade 1. The MP and the electronic keys may have temporary degradation or loss of function and/or data, but the electric blocking of the MP shall remain in the secured condition. Verification after the test shall be done after a rest of 10 s and within one minute. Compliance is checked by the test method given in 5.11.14. 4.2.8 Minimum knob transmission Where a MP is equipped with a knob protected by a clutch in order to prevent damage if an excessive torque is applied, the clutch shall be able to transmit a minimum torque of 1,5 Nm having been released 100 times within 20 min. Compliance is checked by the test method given in 5.2.3 4.3 Durability requirements Grade 0: no requirements Grade 1: 10 000 cycles When tested in accordance with 5.5 it shall be possible to operate the padlock using a maximum torque on the authorized electronic key or knob of 1,5 Nm, applying the relevant sequence of 5.2 4.4 Corrosion resistance requirements After the corrosion test of 5.6 the MP shall operate, using the maximum torque on the authorized electronic key or knob specified in 4.2.2. Compliance is checked by the relevant test method in 5.2. Corrosion resistance is applicable for environmental resistance, grades 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 in compliance with EN 1670:2007 as below. This corrosion test shall apply to functionality only.
SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 12 Grade 0, no requirement Grade 1, -0 h Grade 2, -0 h Grade 3, -0 h Grade 4, -0 h Grade 5, -0 h 4.5 Environmental Requirements 4.5.1 Resistance of MP against water After being tested as in 5.7.2 for grades 2, 3, and 4 in Table 2 the MP shall operate with its authorized electronic key using a maximum torque on the authorized electronic key or knob of 1,5 Nm. 4.5.2 Dry heat and cold The MP and its electronic key shall continue to function within the temperature ranges specified for the relevant grades, as given in Tables 3 and 4 Compliance is checked by the test methods of 5.7.3 and 5.7.4 using a maximum torque on the authorized electronic key or knob of 1,5 Nm. 4.5.3 Damp heat cyclic As from Grade 3, for the MP and Grade 4 for the key, correct function shall be maintained in an environment of high relative humidity. See Tables 3 and 4 for environmental resistance requirements for the MP and electronic keys respectively, using a maximum torque on the authorized electronic key or knob of 1,5 Nm. Compliance is checked by the test method of 5.7.5 4.5.4 Resistance of electronic key against water As from Grade 2 the electronic key shall be able to operate its MP after being exposed to water in accordance with the test described in 5.7.6. Table 2 — Environmental resistance MP Requirement clause Requirement -
Test clause Grade 0 1 2 3 4 4.5.1 Protection of MP against water - 5.7.2 - - Yes IPX4 Yes IPX5 Yes IPX6 4.5.2 Dry heat - 5.7.3 -
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª x w ¹ Cá 16 h 4.5.2 Cold - 5.7.4 -
ª w ¹ Cá 16h
ª w ¹ Cá 16 h
«10° C, 16 h
«25° C, 16 h 4.5.3 Damp heat (cyclic) - 5.7.5 - - -
ª w w ¹ Cá 6 cycles
ª w w ¹ Cá 6 cycles SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 13 Table 3 — Environmental resistance of electronic key for MP Requirement clause Requirement -
Test clause Grade 0 1 2 3 4 4.5.2
Dry heat - 5.7.3 -
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª w w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª x w ¹ Cá 16 h 4.5.2
Cold - 5.7.4 -
ª w ¹ Cá 16 h
ª w ¹ Cá 16 h
«10° C, 16 h
«25° C, 16 h 4.5.3
Damp heat (cyclic) - 5.7.5 - - - -
ª w w ¹ Cá 6 cycles 4.5.4 Resistance of electronic key against water - 5.7.6 - - Yes Yes Yes 4.6 Key related security 4.6.1 Minimum number of effective mechanical code variations For classification of mechanical code variation (5th character of Table 10), the minimum number of effective mechanical code variations of the MP shall be as specified in Table 4. Table 4 — Mechanical codes Mechanical codes Correlation with EN 12320:2012 Grade 0: - no grade Grade 1: 300 grade 1 Grade 2: 1000 grade 2 Grade 3: 2500 grade 3 Grade 4: 5 000 grade 4 Grade 5: 10 000 grade 5 Grade 6: 20 000 grade 6 Compliance is checked by the test method of 5.8.2. NOTE Grade 0 includes MPs without mechanical code variations. For a MP having a mechanical locking feature, the maximum number of steps on the same level shall be 60 %, maximum two adjacent and a minimum of three levels. 4.6.2 Non-interpassing of keys with just one interval effective differ When tested in accordance with 5.2 it shall not be possible to operate the padlock with keys differing from the correct key by one interval, i.e. the next closest key. The next closest key shall be defined by the manufacturer according to its key coding system. Compliance is checked by the test method of 5.7.5. 4.6.3 Direct coding on key Direct key coding shall not be visibly marked on electronic keys. SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 14 4.6.4 Code attack resistance For classification of electronic code variation (6th character Table 10), the MP shall resist cryptographic and spoofing attacks for the periods specified in Table 5 The Mean Time to Compromise (MTC) is defined as the average time it will take a user without the code to find a valid code using commonly available tools, such as a password generator. The MTC is calculated from the following equation: ()2NMTC=WA×× where: N is the number of codes available according to the manufactures information W is the maximum number of users possible in the whitelist A is the number of codes accepted per hour, including lock-out times The existence of anti-spoofing measures shall be demonstrated and documented by the manufacturer. Non-exhaustive examples of spoofing resistance are the combination of a mechanical key with the electronic key, rolling codes that change with each use and the use of a second credential such as a manually entered code. Verification of compliance shall be by the manufacturer's declaration. Compliance is checked by the test method of 5.7.5 Table 5 — Code attack resistance Requirements 0 A B C D Mean time to compromise No req. 6 h 12 h 24 h 48 h Spoofing protection No req. No req. No req. Yes Yes 4.7 System management The audit trail record, where implemented, shall be stored in a form of non-volatile memory, The MP shall have time zoning capability as specified in Table 6. Table 6 — Audit trail and time zone Grade 0 No requirement Grade 1 Time zone without audit trail Grade 2 Audit trail capability of at least 50 events without time zone Grade 3 Audit trail capability of at least 50 events and time zone Time zone and audit trail capability shall be protected against manipulation. Compliance is checked by the test method of 5.10. SIST EN 16864:2017
EN 16864:2017 (E) 15 4.8 Mechanical attack resistance requirements 4.8.1 General The MP shall conform to the requirements based on: — Mechanical part without key (MP only); — Electronic dummy key with the right mechanical code. In case an MP is equipped with a knob, the MP should conform to the same performance (test requirements) of grades 1 - 6 by using an appropriate tool for attacking the knob. When the knob can be disassembled with common tools, the test shall be performed without the knob. For the tests in this section the MP is required to remain locked, but it does not need to continue to function normally. For grades 4, 5 and 6 the key shall be retained when the padlock is in the open condition. The requirements for each grade are described in Table 7. 4.8.2 Resistance to drilling When tested in accordance with 5.11.2 the MP shall resist drilling for a time t as in Table 7. 4.8.3 Resistance to attack by twisting of shackle When tested in accordance with 5.11.3, the shackle shall resist a torque M3 Table 7. 4.8.4 Resistance to attack by plug/cylinder extraction When tested in accordance with 5.11.4, the cylinder plug or the locking mechanism shall resist a force F1, from Table 7. 4.8.5 Torque resistance of plug/cylinder with dummy key When tested in accordance with 5.11.5using a Dummy key with the correct mechanical cuts but without the correct electronic code the plug/cylinder shall not rotate using the applied torque specified in Table 7. 4.8.6 Torque resistance of plug/cylinder relevant to attack resistance When tested in accordance with 5.11.6 the plug /cylinder shall not rotate using the applied torque specified in Table 7. 4.8.7 Resistance to pulling of shackle When tested in accordance with 5.11.7 the shackle shall resist a force F2 Table 7. 4.8.8 Resistance to sawing When tested in accordance with 5.11.8 the MP and its shackle shall resist for the time t, Table 7. 4.8.9 Resistance to cutti
...
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
01-julij-2015
Stavbno okovje - Mehatronske obešanke - Zahteve in preskusne metode
Building hardware - Mechatronic padlocks - Requirements and test methods
Schlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische Hangschlösser - Anforderungen und
Prüfverfahren
Quincaillerie du bâtiment - Cadenas mécatroniques - Exigences et méthodes d'essai
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 16864
ICS:
91.190 Stavbna oprema Building accessories
oSIST prEN 16864:2015 en,fr,de
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
EUROPEAN STANDARD
DRAFT
prEN 16864
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
May 2015
ICS 91.190
English Version
Building hardware - Mechatronic padlocks - Requirements and
test methods
Quincaillerie du bâtiment - Cadenas mécatroniques - Schlösser und Baubeschläge - Mechatronische
Exigences et méthodes d'essai Hangschlösser - Anforderungen und Prüfverfahren
This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee CEN/TC 33.
If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations which
stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.
This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other language
made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC Management
Centre has the same status as the official versions.
CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania,
Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Romania, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United
Kingdom.
Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are aware and to
provide supporting documentation.
Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without notice and
shall not be referred to as a European Standard.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Avenue Marnix 17, B-1000 Brussels
© 2015 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 16864:2015 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
Contents Page
Foreword .6
Introduction .7
1 Scope .8
2 Normative references .8
3 Terms, definitions and symbols .9
3.1 Terms and definitions .9
3.2 Symbols . 11
4 Requirements . 11
4.1 General . 11
4.2 Category of use . 11
4.2.1 General . 11
4.2.2 Key strength . 11
4.2.3 Operation of release mechanism . 12
4.2.4 Stability of electronic key and MP . 12
4.2.5 Wrong electronic code . 12
4.2.6 Bump requirements . 12
4.2.7 Vibration requirements . 12
4.2.8 Electrostatic discharge requirement . 13
4.2.9 Minimum knob transmission . 13
4.3 Durability requirements . 13
4.4 Corrosion resistance requirements . 13
4.5 Environmental requirements . 14
4.5.1 Resistance of MP against water . 14
4.5.2 Dry heat and cold . 14
4.5.3 Damp heat cyclic. 14
4.5.4 Resistance of electronic key against water . 14
4.6 Key related security . 15
4.6.1 Minimum number of effective mechanical code variations . 15
4.6.2 Non-interpassing of keys with just one interval effective differ . 15
4.6.3 Direct coding on key . 15
4.6.4 Code attack resistance . 16
4.7 System management . 16
4.8 Mechanical attack resistance requirements . 17
4.8.1 General . 17
2
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
4.8.2 Resistance to drilling . 17
4.8.3 Resistance to attack by twisting of shackle . 17
4.8.4 Resistance to attack by plug/cylinder extraction . 17
4.8.5 Torque resistance of plug/cylinder with dummy key . 17
4.8.6 Torque resistance of plug/cylinder relevant to attack resistance . 17
4.8.7 Resistance to pulling of shackle . 17
4.8.8 Resistance to sawing . 17
4.8.9 Resistance to cutting of shackle . 17
4.8.10 Resistance to impact at low temperature . 18
4.8.11 Manual Attack . 18
4.8.12 Attack by vibrations . 18
4.8.13 Increased voltage attack . 18
4.8.14 Electrostatic discharge attack . 18
4.8.15 Magnetic field attack . 18
4.8.16 Manual attack resistance . 18
4.9 Requirements for product information . 20
5 Testing, assessment and sampling methods . 20
5.1 General . 20
5.2 Operational test . 21
5.2.1 General . 21
5.2.2 MPs operated by key . 21
5.2.3 MPs operated by knob . 21
5.2.4 MPs with freely rotating means, operated by key . 22
5.2.5 MPs with freely rotating means, operated by knob . 22
5.3 Performance tests . 23
5.3.1 General . 23
5.3.2 Re-testing - general . 23
5.3.3 Re-testing of 5.11.12 and 5.11.15 . 23
5.4 Category of use . 23
5.4.1 Key strength . 23
5.4.2 Stability . 23
5.4.3 Bump test . 24
5.4.4 Vibration test . 24
5.5 Durability tests . 24
5.6 Corrosion tests . 25
5.7 Environmental resistance tests . 25
5.7.1 Application of samples . 25
5.7.2 Resistance of MP against water . 25
3
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
5.7.3 Dry heat test . 25
5.7.4 Cold test . 26
5.7.5 Damp heat test (cyclic) . 26
5.7.6 Resistance of electronic key against water . 27
5.8 Key related security . 27
5.8.1 General . 27
5.8.2 Minimum number of effective mechanical code variations . 27
5.8.3 Non-interpassing of keys . 27
5.8.4 Torque resistance of plug/ cylinder or knob relevant to key related security . 27
5.9 Code security . 27
5.10 System management . 27
5.11 Attack resistance tests . 27
5.11.1 General . 27
5.11.2 Resistance to drilling . 28
5.11.3 Resistance to twisting of shackle . 28
5.11.4 Resistance to attack by plug/cylinder extraction . 29
5.11.5 Torque resistance applied with electronic dummy key . 31
5.11.6 Torque resistance applied with any tool . 31
5.11.7 Resistance to pulling of shackle . 31
5.11.8 Resistance to sawing . 32
5.11.9 Resistance to cutting of shackle . 33
5.11.10 Resistance to impact at low temperature . 34
5.11.11 Manual attack . 36
5.11.12 Attack by vibrations test . 37
5.11.13 Increased voltage attack test . 37
5.11.14 Electrostatic discharge test . 38
5.11.15 Magnetic field attack test . 38
6 Classification system . 39
6.1 Classification . 39
6.2 Category of use: (1st character) . 39
6.3 Durability (2nd character) . 39
6.4 Corrosion resistance (3rd character). 39
6.5 Environmental resistance (4th character) . 39
6.6 Mechanical key related security (5th character) . 39
6.7 Electronic key related security (6th character) . 39
7 System management (7th character) . 39
7.1 General . 39
7.2 Attack resistance (8th character) . 40
4
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
7.3 Example of classification. 40
8 Marking . 40
Annex A (normative) Tool sets for attack resistance tests . 41
Annex B (normative) Table of test procedures . 43
5
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
Foreword
This document (prEN 16864:2015) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 33 “Doors, windows,
shutters, building hardware and curtain walling”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
6
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
Introduction
Mechanical padlocks have been used to provide security and control of external doors, cabinets and movable
items. Increasing demand for the flexibility of master key systems, flow control, copy control of keys, etc. has
made it desirable to incorporate additional functions into such mechanical padlocks, and new technologies
have made it possible to develop mechatronic padlocks. A mechatronic padlock uses electrically operated
means to achieve security.
The performance tests incorporated in this European Standard are considered to be reproducible and as such
will provide a consistent and objective assessment of the performance of these devices throughout CEN
Member States.
Mechanical performance of the mechatronic padlock is based on EN 12320:2012.
It is assumed that mechatronic padlocks (MPs) will conform to the legal regulations i.e. of the Electromagnetic
Compatibility (EMC) - Directive 2004/108EG, The Low Voltage (LV) - Directive 2006/95/EG, Radio and
Telecommunications Terminal Equipment (R and TTE) - Directive 1999/5/EC and other relevant directives
concerning electronic apparatus.
On occasions there may be a need for additional functions within the design of the padlock. Purchasers
should satisfy themselves that the products are suitable for their intended use. This is particularly important
when the operation of such additional functions is safety related. Accordingly, this European Standard
includes assessment of such features when they are included in the padlock design.
7
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
1 Scope
This European Standard specifies requirements for performance and testing of mechatronic padlocks (MPs)
and their keys and/or electronic keys.
It establishes categories of use based on performance tests and grades of security based on design
requirements and on performance tests that simulate attack. If the design incorporates mechanical security
means in addition to the mechatronic means, these are also tested.
This European Standard does not cover any other element of a security system, other than those directly
involved in the control of a padlock.
This European Standard does not cover the physical testing of multi-function devices such as Smartphones
that may be used as part of the control system.
2 Normative references
The following documents, in whole or in part, are normatively referenced in this document and are
indispensable for its application. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references,
the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
EN 12320:2012 Building hardware — Padlocks and padlock fittings — Requirements and test methods
EN 1670:2007, Building hardware — Corrosion resistance — Requirements and test methods
EN 60068-2-1, Environmental testing — Part 2-1: Tests — Test A: Cold (IEC 60068-2-1)
EN 60068-2-2, Environmental testing — Part 2-2: Tests — Test B: Dry heat (IEC 60068-2-2)
EN 60068-2-6:2008, Environmental testing — Part 2-6: Tests — Test Fc: Vibration (sinusoidal) (IEC 60068-2-
6:2007)
EN 60068-2-27:2009, Environmental testing — Part 2-27: Tests — Test Ea and guidance: Shock (IEC 60068-
2-27:2008)
EN 60068-2-30:2005, Environmental testing — Part 2-30: Tests — Test Db: Damp heat, cyclic (12 h + 12 h
cycle) (IEC 60068-2-30:2005)
EN 60529:1991, Degrees of protection provided by enclosures (IP Code) (IEC 60529:1989)
EN 61000-4-2, Electromagnetic compatibility (EMC) — Part 4-2: Testing and measurement techniques —
Electrostatic discharge immunity test (IEC 61000-4-2)
EN ISO 10666, Drilling screws with tapping screw thread — Mechanical and functional properties (ISO 10666)
EN ISO 15480, Hexagon washer head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15480)
EN ISO 15481, Cross recessed pan head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15481)
EN ISO 15482, Cross recessed countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO 15482)
EN ISO 15483, Cross recessed raised countersunk head drilling screws with tapping screw thread (ISO
15483)
ISO 10899, High-speed steel two-flute twist drills — Technical specifications
8
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
3 Terms, definitions and symbols
3.1 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1.1
audit trail capability
degree of functionality intended to provide a record of the mechatronic padlock (MP) and/or its electronic key
events that will identify the individual credential used to operate the mechatronic padlock
3.1.2
attack
unauthorised attempt to open a mechatronic padlock (MP) by various techniques (destructive and/or non-
destructive techniques)
3.1.3
cryptographic attack
use of codes and credentials that are randomly or algorithmically generated to defeat the electronic security of
the MP
3.1.4
spoofing
presentation of a forged credential. Spoofing includes the use of devices to capture an unencrypted code
3.1.5
brute force attack
use of a high speed code generator to try and enter a valid code or credential
3.1.6
dictionary attack
use of a list of common words or number sequences to try and shorten the duration of a code-guessing attack
3.1.7
cam
component of the mechatronic padlock (MP) to provide the movement necessary to effect locking or to move
a locking part that retains the shackle, such as a pawl or ball
3.1.8
cylinder
device, usually distinct from its associated lock or latch, operated by a key
3.1.9
detaining elements
parts of the padlock, which should be moved by the authorisation of the electronic key and key (if available)
into a pre-determined position before the locking mechanism can move
3.1.10
code mechanism
any combination of mechanical and/or electronic elements that may be given various values in order to restrict
the opening of the padlock to the correct keys
3.1.11
effective mechanical code variation
difference between locking mechanisms of padlocks of similar design achieved only by the movable detainer,
which enables each padlock to be operated only by the correct key or keys
9
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
3.1.12
electronic code variation
difference between locking mechanisms of padlocks of similar design achieved only by the electronic code
which enables each padlock to be operated only by the correct key or keys
3.1.13
electronic dummy key
electronic key which cannot electronically operate the mechatronic padlock (MP)
If applicable, the electronic dummy key has the right mechanical code
3.1.14
electronic key
discrete device supplied by the manufacturer containing the information necessary to authorise operation of
the mechatronic padlock
3.1.15
key
separate device corresponding to the operating means of the mechatronic padlock, which can mechanically
operate the padlock
3.1.16
knob
element of the mechatronic padlock for mechanical hand operation of the padlock
3.1.17
mechatronic padlock (MP)
independent locking device comprising a body, a code mechanism, a locking mechanism and a shackle. The
code mechanism includes an electronic component that interfaces with mechatronic detaining elements after
verification
3.1.18
plug
part of a mechatronic padlock that can be moved when the proper key is used
3.1.19
steps
cuts in the surface of a bit or blade which operate the mechanical code elements
3.1.20
time zone
degree of functionality intended to provide security by limiting the time that a valid credential will operate the
MP
3.1.21
manufacturer
entity or organisation that is legally responsible for putting the product on the market
3.1.22
credential
portion of data that serves to identify the user as valid
3.1.23
staple
part of the padlock fitting through which the padlock shackle is passed
10
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 16864:2015
prEN 16864:2015 (E)
3.1.24
MTC (mean time to compromise)
average estimated time for a cryptographic attack to defeat the electronic security of the MP
3.1.25
whitelist
database of authorised users
3.2 Symbols
For the purposes of this European Standard, the following symbols apply.
Symbol Unit Definition
d mm Diameter of shackle
F1 kN Push/pull force on cylinder plug/locking mechanism
F2 kN Pull force on shackle or staple
F3 kN Cutting force on shackle or staple
F4 kN Maximum possible push/pull force on cylinder plug/locking mechanism
h mm Height through which weight is dropped (impact test)
M1 Nm Torque on key to test for inter-passing
M2 Nm Torque on cylinder plug/locking mechanism
M3 Nm Twisting torque on shackle or staple
n Minimum number of effective key differs
N Number of electronic codes available
W Maximum number of users in the Whitelist
A Number of code attempts possible within one hour
t min Drilling/sawi
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.