SIST CWA 17796:2021

Responsibility-by-design - Guidelines to develop long-term strategies (roadmaps) to innovate responsibly

This document provides guidelines to develop long-term strategies (roadmaps) for innovating responsibly, thereby helping organizations to achieve socially desirable outcomes from their innovation processes.
These roadmaps encourage a “responsibility-by-design” approach that integrates considerations of technical, ethical, social, environmental, and economic aspects all along the research, development, and design process leading to an innovation.
The document aims at all organizations and agents involved in planning and performing research and innovation and technological development.
The focus is on innovation enabled by transformative technologies.
This document has been designed to be consistent with, and to support, as much as possible, existing management system standards and management/governance standards (e.g. EN ISO 9001). Particular attention has been given to social responsibility (i.e. EN ISO 26000).
This document has been designed to be consistent with, and to support, as much as possible, existing management system standards and management/governance standards (e.g. EN ISO 9001). Particular attention has been given to social responsibility (i.e. EN ISO 26000).

Odgovornost pri načrtovanju - Smernice za razvoj dolgoročnih strategij (načrtov) za odgovorno inoviranje

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 11-Oct-2021
• ICS: 03.100.02 - Governance and ethics
• ICS: 03.100.40 - Research and development
• Technical Committee: I13 - Imaginarni 13
• Current Stage: 6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
• Start Date: 06-Oct-2021
• Due Date: 11-Dec-2021
• Completion Date: 12-Oct-2021
• Ref Project: CWA 17796:2021 - Responsibility-by-design - Guidelines to develop long-term strategies (roadmaps) to innovate responsibly

Standards Content (sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST CWA 17796:2021
01-november-2021
Odgovornost pri načrtovanju - Smernice za razvoj dolgoročnih strategij (načrtov)
za odgovorno inoviranje

Responsibility-by-design - Guidelines to develop long-term strategies (roadmaps) to

innovate responsibly
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CWA 17796:2021
ICS:
03.100.02 Upravljanje in etika Governance and ethics
03.100.40 Raziskave in razvoj Research and development
SIST CWA 17796:2021 en,fr,de

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CEN
CWA 17796
WORKSHOP
September 2021
AGREEMENT
ICS 03.100.02; 03.100.40
English version
Responsibility-by-design - Guidelines to develop long-term
strategies (roadmaps) to innovate responsibly

This CEN Workshop Agreement has been drafted and approved by a Workshop of representatives of interested parties, the

constitution of which is indicated in the foreword of this Workshop Agreement.

The formal process followed by the Workshop in the development of this Workshop Agreement has been endorsed by the

National Members of CEN but neither the National Members of CEN nor the CEN-CENELEC Management Centre can be held

accountable for the technical content of this CEN Workshop Agreement or possible conflicts with standards or legislation.

This CEN Workshop Agreement can in no way be held as being an official standard developed by CEN and its Members.

This CEN Workshop Agreement is publicly available as a reference document from the CEN Members National Standard Bodies.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia, Finland,

France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal,

Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and United Kingdom.

EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels

© 2021 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved worldwide for CEN national Members.

Ref. No.:CWA 17796:2021 E
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
Contents

Foreword ......................................................................................................................................... 3

Introduction..................................................................................................................................... 5

1 Scope ........................................................................................................................................ 7

2 Normative references ............................................................................................................. 7

3 Terms and definitions ............................................................................................................ 8

4 Principles for implementing RRI ......................................................................................... 15

5 Methodological approach .................................................................................................... 19

6 Framework for developing an RRI roadmap ...................................................................... 20

6.1 General ................................................................................................................................................ 20

6.2 Top management commitment and leadership ........................................................................ 21

6.3 Context analysis ................................................................................................................................ 21

6.4 Materiality analysis ........................................................................................................................... 23

6.5 Experiment and engage .................................................................................................................. 27

6.6 Validation ............................................................................................................................................ 28

6.7 Roadmap design ............................................................................................................................... 29

Annex A (Informative) Examples of RRI actions .......................................................................................... 33

Annex B (Informative) Examples of tools .............................................................................................. 39

Annex C (Informative) Examples of applying the guidelines ............................................................. 41

Annex D (Informative) SWOT analysis for RRI implementation in industry .................................... 42

Annex E (Informative) Tools for materiality and stakeholder analysis ............................................. 43

Annex F (Informative) Methods for stakeholder engagement ........................................................... 46

Annex G (Informative) Criteria for impact analysis of RRI actions .................................................... 48

Annex H (Informative) Examples of RRI key performance indicators .............................................. 50

Annex I (Informative) Informative resources from other initiatives .................................................... 53

Bibliography.................................................................................................................................. 55

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
Foreword

This CEN Workshop Agreement (CWA 17796:2021) has been developed in accordance with the CEN-

CENELEC Guide 29 “CEN/CENELEC Workshop Agreements – A rapid prototyping to standardization” and

with the relevant provisions of CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations - Part 2. It was approved by a Workshop

of representatives of interested parties on 2021-04-21, the constitution of which was supported by CEN

following the public call for participation made on 2019-06-27. However, this CEN Workshop Agreement does

not necessarily include all relevant stakeholders.

The final text of this CEN Workshop Agreement was provided to CEN for publication on 2021-08-02.

Results incorporated in this CWA received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and

innovation programme under grant agreement No 710059.

The following organizations and individuals developed and approved this CEN Workshop Agreement:

− Andrea Porcari, Airi - Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca Industriale – Chairman

− Ibo van de Poel, Vice chair
− Giovanni Baldi, Colorobbia Consulting
− Francesca Braca, Laboratori ARCHA Srl
− Giulia Bubbolini, CISE – Centro per l’innovazione e lo sviluppo economico
− Mario M. D’Elios, University of Florence

− Donato Di Donato, Agrate & Castelletto Site Labs & Sustainability Quality Manager

− Marc Dreyer, Futopedia Consulting
− Linden Farrer
− Luisa Fracassini Agrate & Castelletto Site Labs & Sustainability Manager

− Jonathan Hankins, Foreign Scientific Correspondent – Fondazione Giannino Bassetti

− Kostas Iatridis, School of Management University of Bath
− Pim Klaassen, Assistant professor
− Zenlin Kwee, Delft University of Technology
− Joost Groot Kormelink, Delft University of Technology
− Agata Gurzawska, TRILATERAL RESEARCH
− Panagiotis Isigonis, Ca Foscari University of Venice

− Maria Maia, Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) - Institute for Technology Assessment and

Systems Analysis (ITAS)
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
− Ineke Malsch, Malsch TechnoValuation
− Elvio Mantovani
− Christopher Nathan, University of Warwick
− Francesco Niglia, CEO - KOYS srls
− Daniela Pimponi, Airi - Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca Industriale
− Tom Sorell, Professor of Politics and Philosophy, University of Warwick
− Rene Von Schomberg

− Bernd Carsten Stahl, De Montfort University, Centre for Computing and Social Responsibility

− Emad Yaghmaei, Delft University of Technology
− Thamar Zijlstra, Consultant Standards Development – NEN, SHERPA project

Attention is drawn to the possibility that some elements of this document may be subject to patent rights. CEN-

CENELEC policy on patent rights is described in CEN-CENELEC Guide 8 “Guidelines for Implementation of

the Common IPR Policy on Patent”. CEN shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent

rights.

Although the Workshop parties have made every effort to ensure the reliability and accuracy of technical and

non-technical descriptions, the Workshop is not able to guarantee, explicitly or implicitly, the correctness of

this document. Anyone who applies this CEN Workshop Agreement shall be aware that neither the Workshop,

nor CEN, can be held liable for damages or losses of any kind whatsoever. The use of this CEN Workshop

Agreement does not relieve users of their responsibility for their own actions, and they apply this document at

their own risk. The CEN Workshop Agreement should not be construed as legal advice authoritatively

endorsed by CEN/CENELEC.
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
Introduction

Responsible research and innovation (RRI) addresses the development of products and processes that are

safe, ethically acceptable, and responsive to the needs and expectations of people and society.

The essential difference between RRI and existing practices regarding corporate social responsibility (CSR),

responsible business conduct, risk, and quality management is RRI’s focus on the research and innovation

(R&I) process, from the early stages to prototyping to going to market, and the high degree of societal

involvement RRI requires to assess potential (future) ethical and social impacts of innovation. The goal of RRI

is to design and develop innovations that have socially desirable outcomes, thus addressing specific ethics

and social concerns and providing solutions for acknowledged societal challenges (e.g., sustainable

development goals). Some examples are provided in the Annex III.

The ability to translate technological developments into innovations that generate benefits and value for the

organization and its shareholders and stakeholders and for society is a core aspect of RRI.

Initiatives to put RRI into practice in industry, for instance in the form of action plans, are still limited, with most

being related to cooperative projects within EU framework programmes or national equivalents. Examples

include Horizon 2020’s SwafS (Science with and for Society) projects such as Responsible Industry, Compass,

SMART-map, Liv-In, Orbit, Satori, Sherpa, Sienna, and TechEthos.

However, it’s worth noting that principles and approaches related to RRI have elements in common with

acknowledged business and innovation management methods and practices, such as theory of change,

business model generation, stakeholder management, design-thinking, and agile management.

The guidelines offered here were developed by the PRISMA project, which worked with eight industrial pilot

projects dealing with the application of transformative technologies in different sectors. The pilots were used

to integrate RRI principles in the participating companies’ strategies and actions in order to improve the societal

value and overall performances of their R&D (research and development) outcomes and to develop specific

“pilot RRI roadmaps”.

For an effective RRI uptake, it is essential for companies to identify strategies and practices that fit within the

realities and constraints in which they operate. The roadmap described in these guidelines aims to help them

do just that. The overall goal is to help strengthen aspects of responsibility all along the research, development,

and design process for innovations and thus to support a “responsibility-by-design” approach.

Besides helping to identify a vision, a set of actions, and a timeline (roadmap) for implementing RRI

approaches, this guideline also analyses the potential barriers, opportunities, and benefits in pursuing RRI.

Within this guidance, we understand research and innovation as intertwined: research (besides its role of

creating knowledge) has an applied character and is oriented towards innovation, with the final goal of

generating both economic and societal value.

At the industry level, technology roadmapping is already a quite widely utilized method in strategy planning. A

technology roadmap visualizes an organization’s strategic aims (vision/development plans) and can be utilized

to structure its research, development, and business activities. In recent years, the concept of IPRM

(innovation policy roadmapping methodology) has been developed to connect the development of technologies

and innovations to a wider societal sphere. A main aspect of IPRM is identifying those societal needs that

create a potential demand for new solutions and possibly favour the emergence of new products and markets.

A description of the relevance of these methods for RRI is provided in Dreyer et al., 2017.

The PRISMA project received funding from the EU’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme

(grant agreement No. 710059). More information is available on the PRISMA website: www.rri-prisma.eu/

Ahlqvist, T., Valovirta, V., & Loikkanen, T. (2012). Innovation policy roadmapping as a systemic instrument

for forward-looking policy design. Science and Public Policy, 39(2), 178–190
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)

IPRM integrates a foresight exercise into enabling technologies, applications, products, and markets with

analysis of socio-economical and sectorial drivers and policy and regulatory tools and strategies.

The RRI roadmap proposed in this guideline adapts a generic IPRM architecture to the definition of long-term

visions and action plans for RRI uptake within the innovation strategies of organizations and others agents

(e.g., cooperative projects) active in research and innovation. It provides the methodological and technical

conditions to address RRI principles in the context of rapid (and possibly disruptive) scientific and technological

developments to ensure such developments are relevant to society.
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
1 Scope

This document provides guidelines to develop long-term strategies (roadmaps) for innovating responsibly,

thereby helping organizations to achieve socially desirable outcomes from their innovation processes.

These roadmaps encourage a “responsibility-by-design” approach that integrates considerations of technical,

ethical, social, environmental, and economic aspects all along the research, development, and design process

leading to an innovation.

The document aims at all organizations and agents involved in planning and performing research and

innovation and technological development.
The focus is on innovation enabled by transformative technologies.

This document has been designed to be consistent with, and to support, as much as possible, existing

management system standards and management/governance standards (e.g. EN ISO 9001). Particular

attention has been given to social responsibility (i.e. EN ISO 26000).
2 Normative references

The existing management standards and normative references used in this document are listed below. For

dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced

document (including any amendments) applies.
EN ISO 26000, Guidance on social responsibility
ISO 31000, Risk management – Guidelines

ISO 45001, Occupational health and safety management systems – Requirements with guidance for use

EN ISO 14001, Environmental management
EN ISO 9001, Quality management systems – Requirements
Series CEN/TS 16555, Innovation management
Series CWA 17145, Ethics assessment for research and innovation
IWA 26 Using ISO 26000:2010, in management systems

UNI/PdR 27, Guidelines for management and processes development for responsible innovation

UNI/PdR 18, Social responsibility in organizations – Guidance to the application of UNI ISO 26000

These standards and guidelines (in their scope and contents) refer to and can be used to contribute to the

UN’s Sustainable Development Goals. This document also takes into account the Rome Declaration on

Responsible Research and Innovation in Europe (European Union, 2014). In addition, it recognizes the need

to consider efforts towards responsibility in research and innovation within the broader framework of corporate

sustainability, responsible business, and sustainable finance practices (UN Global Compact:

unglobalcompact.org), though these aspects are not explicitly addressed within the scope of this guidance.

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
EN ISO 56000, Innovation management – Fundamentals and vocabulary
EN ISO 56002, Innovation management – Innovation management system – Guidance
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.

ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following

addresses:
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
• IEC Electropedia: available at https://www.electropedia.org/
3.1
context of the organization

combination of internal and external issues that can have an effect on an organization’s approach to developing

and achieving its objectives.

Note 1 to entry: The organization’s objectives can be related to its products and services, investments and

behaviour towards its interested parties.

Note 2 to entry: The concept of context of the organization is equally applicable to not-for-profit or public

service organizations as it is to those seeking profits.

Note 3 to entry: In English, this concept is often referred to by other terms such as “business environment”,

“organizational environment”, or “ecosystem of an organization”.

Note 4 to entry: Understanding the infrastructure can help to define the context of the organization.

[SOURCE: ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems -- Fundamentals and vocabulary]

3.2
corporate social responsibility (CSR)

a concept whereby companies integrate social and environmental concerns in their business operations and

in their interaction with their stakeholders on a voluntary basis”, as well as “the responsibility of enterprises for

their impacts on society.
[SOURCE: European Commission, 2011].
3.3
documented information

information required to be controlled and maintained by an organization and the medium on which it is

contained.

Note 1 to entry: Documented information can be in any format and media, and from any source.

Note 2 to entry: Documented information can refer to:
- the management system, including related processes;
- information created in order for the organization to operate (documentation);
- evidence of results achieved (records).
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
3.4
engagement
involvement in, and contribution to, activities to achieve shared objectives.

[SOURCE: ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems -- Fundamentals and vocabulary]

3.5
ethics

systematic reflection on right and wrong conduct according to norms and values that we believe should be

followed. Ethics refers to duties, responsibilities, rights, welfare, justice and the avoidance of harms. Typical

moral values include autonomy, freedom, dignity, privacy, justice, well-being and responsibility.

[SOURCE: Series CWA 17145]
3.6
framework

an outline, or skeleton, of interlinked items and actions that supports a particular approach to a specific

objective and serves as a guide that can be modified as required by adding or deleting items.

3.7
human-centred design (HCD)
characterized by:

- The design is based upon an explicit understanding of users, tasks and environment;

- Users are involved throughout design and development;
- The design is driven and refined by user-centred evaluation;
- The process is iterative;
- The design addresses the whole user experience;
- The design team includes multidisciplinary skills and perspectives.
[SOURCE: ISO 9241-210:2010]
3.8
impact assessment

assessment of research and innovation for its projected or actual societal impacts.

[SOURCE: Series CWA 17145]
3.9
involvement
taking part in an activity, event or situation.

[SOURCE: ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems -- Fundamentals and vocabulary]

3.10
innovation
new or changed entity, realizing or redistributing value.

Note 1 to entry: Novelty and value are relative to, and determined by the perception of, the organization and

interested parties.

Note 2 to entry: An innovation can be a product, service, process, model, method etc.

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)

Note 3 to entry: Innovation is an outcome. The word “innovation” sometimes refers to activities or processes

resulting in, or aiming for, innovation. When “innovation” is used in this sense, it should always be used with

some form of qualifier, e.g., “innovation activities”.

Note 4 to entry: For the purpose of statistical measurement, refer to the Oslo Manual (OECD/Eurostat, 2018):

New or changed entity’ corresponds to ‘a new or improved product or process, or combination thereof, that

differs significantly from the unit’s previous products or processes’. Realising or redistributing value’

corresponds to ‘and that has been made available to potential users or brought into use by the unit’.

[SOURCE: EN ISO 56000]
3.11
innovation ecosystem

system of organizations, people and resources, complementing each other and contributing to a common

objective with regards to innovation.

Note 1 to entry: An innovation ecosystem can include private companies, public authorities, universities,

institutes, individual entrepreneurs, investors, researchers as well as funding and infrastructures.

Note 2 to entry: An innovation ecosystem generally includes intangible and qualitative interactions and

relationships necessary for its effectiveness.
[SOURCE: EN ISO 56000]
3.12
management system

set of interrelated or interacting elements of an organization to establish policies and objectives and processes

to achieve those objectives.

Note 1 to entry: A management system can address a single discipline or several disciplines.

Note 2 to entry: The system elements include the organization’s structure, roles and responsibilities, planning,

and operation.

Note 3 to entry: The scope of a management system may include the whole of the organization, specific and

identified functions of the organization, specific and identified sections of the organization, or one or more

functions across a group of organizations.
[SOURCE: ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint technical Coordination Group]
3.13
management standard

management standard designed to be widely applicable across economic sectors, various types and sizes of

organizations and diverse geographical, cultural and social conditions.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, 2018]
3.14
management system standard (MSS)

MSS designed to be widely applicable across economic sectors, various types and sizes of organizations and

diverse geographical, cultural and social conditions.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1, Consolidated ISO Supplement, 2018]
---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
3.15
materiality

identification and understanding of priorities within the context of social responsibility in which an organization

operates. These priorities reflect the economic, social, and environmental factors that need to be considered.

[SOURCE: UNI/PdR 18 Social responsibility in organizations – Guidance to the application of

UNI EN ISO 26000]
3.16
monitoring
determining the status of a system, a process or an activity.

Note 1 to entry: To determine the status, there may be a need to check, supervise or critically observe.

[SOURCE: ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint technical Coordination Group]
3.17
organization

person or group of people that has its own functions with responsibilities, authorities and relationships to

achieve its objectives.

Note 1 to entry: The concept of organization includes, but is not limited to sole-trader, company, corporation,

firm, enterprise, authority, partnership, charity or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether

incorporated or not, public or private.
[SOURCE: ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint technical Coordination Group]
3.18
participatory design

a “practice of collective creativity” that emphasizes active involvement by the users and all the stakeholders in

design and development of new systems.
[SOURCE: Niemelä et al., 2014].
3.19
process

set of interrelated or interacting activities which transforms inputs into outputs.

[SOURCE: ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint technical Coordination Group]
3.20
performance
measurable result.

Note 1 to entry: Performance can relate either to quantitative or qualitative findings.

Note 2 to entry: Performance can relate to the management of activities, processes, products (including

services), systems or organizations.
[SOURCE: ISO/TMB/JTCG Joint technical Coordination Group]
---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
3.21
quadruple helix stakeholder

key local actors from public institutions, private organizations, academia and the public.

[SOURCE: Carayannis et al., 2009]
3.22
quality management
management with regard to quality.

Note 1 to entry: Quality management can include establishing quality policies and quality objectives, and

processes to achieve these quality objectives through quality planning, quality assurance, quality control, and

quality improvement.
[SOURCE: ISO 9000:2015 Quality management systems — Fundamentals and vocabulary]
3.23
responsible research and innovation (RRI)

transparent, interactive process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each

other with a view to the (ethical) acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process

and its marketable products (in order to allow a proper embedding of scientific and technological advances in

our society).
[SOURCE: Von Schomberg, 2012]
3.24
responsible research and innovation (RRI) maturity level

how RRI is perceived and valued within an organization. Empirical research has identified five different stages:

unaware (the organization is not aware of RRI or its components); exploratory/reactive (the organization reacts

to external pressures concerning aspects of RRI); defined (the organization has definitions for RRI components

and has integrated these components into its practices); proactive (the organization realizes the benefits of

RRI and increasingly integrates RRI into its business); strategic (the organization has adopted RRI as a

component of its strategic framework and aims to ensure that all R&D activities consider most of the RRI

components).
[SOURCE: Stahl et al., 2017]
3.25
roadmap

strategic plan that defines a goal or desired outcomes and includes the major steps or milestones needed to

reach them.
3.26
roadmapping exercise

collaborative learning process and a tool for drawing up strategies, reaching consensus on requirements and

needs, and driving proactive planning and future studies.
---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------
SIST CWA 17796:2021
CWA 17796:2021 (E)
3.27
risk
effect of uncertainty on objectives.

Note 1 to entry: An effect is a deviation from the expected. It can be positive, negative or both, and can

address, create or result in opportunities and threats.

Note 2 to entry: Objectives can have different aspects and categories, and can be applied at different levels.

Note 3 to entry: Risk is usually expressed in terms of risk sources, potential events, their consequences and

their likelihood.
[SOURCE: ISO 31000:2018 Risk management — Guidelines]
3.28
risk assessment
overall process of risk identification, risk analysis and risk evaluation.
3.29
risk identification
process of finding, recognizing and describing risks.
3.30
risk analysis
process to comprehend the nature of risk and to determine the level of risk.
3.31
risk evaluation

process of comparing the results of risk analysis with risk criteria to determine whether the risk and/or its

magnitude is acceptable or tolerable.
[SOURCE: ISO Guide 73:2009 Risk management – Vocabulary]
3.32
RRI product

research and innovation output (e.g., product, service, process, model, method) selected by the organization

as the focus of the RRI roadmap design.
3.33
social responsibility

responsibility of an organization for the impacts of its decisions and activities on socie

...