CEN/TS 16702-1:2020

Electronic fee collection - Secure monitoring for autonomous toll systems - Part 1: Compliance checking

This document specifies transactions and data for Compliance Checking - Secure Monitoring. The Scope of this document consists of:
—-   the concept and involved processes for Secure Monitoring;
-   the definition of transactions and data;
-   the use of the OBE compliance checking transaction as specified in EN ISO 12813, for the purpose of Compliance Checking - Secure Monitoring;
-   the use of back end transactions as specified in EN ISO 12855, for the purpose of Compliance Checking – Secure Monitoring. This includes definitions for the use of optional elements and reserved attributes;
-   a specification of technical and organizational security measures involved in Secure Monitoring, on top of measures provided for in the EFC Security Framework;
-   the interrelations between different options in the OBE, TSP and TC domain and their high level impacts.
NOTE   Outside the Scope of this document is: The information exchange between OBE and TR, choices related to compliance checking policies e.g. which options are used, whether undetected/unexpected observations are applied, whether fixed, transportable or mobile compliance checking are deployed, locations and intensity of checking of itinerary freezing and checking of toll declaration, details of procedures and criteria for assessing the validity or plausibility of Itinerary Records.

Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Sichere Überwachung von autonomen Mautsystemen - Teil 1: Einhaltsprüfung

Perception de télépéage - Surveillance sécurisée pour systèmes autonomes de péage - Partie 1 : Contrôle de conformité

Elektronsko pobiranje pristojbin - Varnostno spremljanje avtonomnih cestninskih sistemov - 1. del: Preverjanje skladnosti

Ta dokument določa transakcije in podatke za preverjanje skladnosti (varnostno spremljanje). Področje uporabe tega dokumenta vključuje:
– koncept in vključene postopke za varnostno spremljanje;
– definicijo novih transakcij in podatkov;
– uporabo transakcije za preverjanje skladnosti OBE, kot je določeno v standardu EN ISO 12813, za namen preverjanja skladnosti (varnostno spremljanje);
– uporabo transakcij s povratno informacijo, kot je določeno v standardu EN ISO 12855, za namen preverjanja skladnosti (varnostno spremljanje). To vključuje definicije za uporabo izbirnih elementov in rezerviranih atributov;
– specifikacijo tehničnih in organizacijskih varnostnih ukrepov, vključenih v varnostno spremljanje, poleg ukrepov, ki so opredeljeni v varnostnem okviru elektronskega pobiranja cestnin (EFC);
– povezave med različnimi možnostmi v domenah OBE, TSP in TC ter njihove vplive na visoki ravni.
OPOMBA: Na področje uporabe tega dokumenta ne spadajo: izmenjava informacij med OBE in TR, odločitve, povezane s politiko preverjanja skladnosti, npr. katere možnosti so uporabljene, ali so uporabljena nezaznana/nepričakovana opažanja, ali je uvedeno fiksno, prenosljivo ali mobilno preverjanje skladnosti, lokacije in intenzivnost preverjanja zamrznitve načrta poti ter preverjanja izjav o plačilu cestnine, podrobnosti o postopkih in merila za ocenjevanje veljavnosti ali verjetnosti zapisov o načrtu poti.

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 21-Jan-2020
• ICS: 03.220.20 - Road transport
• ICS: 35.240.60 - IT applications in transport
• Technical Committee: CEN/TC 278 - Road transport and traffic telematics
• Drafting Committee: CEN/TC 278/WG 1 - Electronic fee collection and access control (EFC)
• Current Stage: 9060 - Closure of 2 Year Review Enquiry - Review Enquiry
• Start Date: 02-Sep-2023
• Completion Date: 02-Sep-2023
• Mandate: M/338 - Standardisation mandate to CEN, CENELEC and ETSI in support of interoperabilty of electonic road toll systems in the community
• Ref Project: SIST-TS CEN/TS 16702-1:2020 - Electronic fee collection - Secure monitoring for autonomous toll systems - Part 1: Compliance checking

Relations

• Replaces: CEN/TS 16702-1:2014 - Electronic fee collection - Secure monitoring for autonomous toll systems - Part 1: Compliance checking
• Effective Date: 29-Jan-2020

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-marec-2020
Nadomešča:
SIST-TS CEN/TS 16702-1:2015
Elektronsko pobiranje pristojbin - Varnostno spremljanje avtonomnih cestninskih
sistemov - 1. del: Preverjanje skladnosti
Electronic fee collection - Secure monitoring for autonomous toll systems - Part 1:
Compliance checking
Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Sichere Überwachung von autonomen
Mautsystemen - Teil 1: Einhaltsprüfung
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: CEN/TS 16702-1:2020
ICS:
35.240.60 Uporabniške rešitve IT v IT applications in transport
prometu
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

CEN/TS 16702-1
TECHNICAL SPECIFICATION
SPÉCIFICATION TECHNIQUE
January 2020
TECHNISCHE SPEZIFIKATION
ICS 35.240.60 Supersedes CEN/TS 16702-1:2014
English Version
Electronic fee collection - Secure monitoring for
autonomous toll systems - Part 1: Compliance checking
Perception du télépéage - Surveillance sécurisée pour Elektronische Gebührenerhebung - Sichere
systèmes autonomes de péage - Partie 1 : Contrôle de Überwachung von autonomen Mautsystemen - Teil 1:
conformité Einhaltsprüfung
This Technical Specification (CEN/TS) was approved by CEN on 25 November 2019 for provisional application.

The period of validity of this CEN/TS is limited initially to three years. After two years the members of CEN will be requested to
submit their comments, particularly on the question whether the CEN/TS can be converted into a European Standard.

CEN members are required to announce the existence of this CEN/TS in the same way as for an EN and to make the CEN/TS
available promptly at national level in an appropriate form. It is permissible to keep conflicting national standards in force (in
parallel to the CEN/TS) until the final decision about the possible conversion of the CEN/TS into an EN is reached.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,
Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,
Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and
United Kingdom.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION

EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG

CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels
© 2020 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. CEN/TS 16702-1:2020 E
worldwide for CEN national Members.

Contents Page
European foreword . 4
Introduction . 5
1 Scope . 7
2 Normative references . 7
3 Terms and definitions . 9
4 Abbreviations .12
5 Processes .13
5.1 Overview .13
5.2 Profiles .15
5.3 Itinerary Freezing .20
5.3.1 Introduction .20
5.3.2 Generate Itinerary .21
5.3.3 Real-time freezing .22
5.3.4 Freezing per declaration .23
5.4 Checking of Itinerary Freezing .23
5.4.1 Introduction .23
5.4.2 Observing a vehicle .24
5.4.3 Retrieving Proof of Itinerary Freezing (PIF) .24
5.4.4 Checking PIF against Observation.25
5.5 Checking of Toll Declaration .26
5.5.1 Introduction .26
5.5.2 Retrieve Itinerary Data .26
5.5.3 Check Itinerary Consistency .26
5.5.4 Checking Toll Declaration against Itinerary .27
5.6 Inconsistency report .27
5.7 Providing EFC Context Data .27
5.8 Key Management .28
5.8.1 Introduction .28
5.8.2 Requirements .28
6 Transactions .29
6.1 Introduction .29
6.2 Description of Itinerary Data .31
6.2.1 Introduction .31
6.2.2 Itinerary Leaf .32
6.2.3 Itinerary Record Data Elements .33
6.3 Retrieving PIF in real-time (DSRC Transaction) .35
6.3.1 Transactional Model .35
6.3.2 Syntax and Semantics .36
6.3.3 Security .38
6.4 Toll Declaration .38
6.4.1 Transactional Model .38
6.4.2 Syntax and semantics.39
6.4.3 Itinerary Trunk . 39
6.4.4 Security . 41
6.5 Back end data checking . 41
6.5.1 Introduction . 41
6.5.2 Transactional model . 41
6.5.3 Checks of the Itinerary . 43
6.5.4 Syntax and semantics . 44
6.5.5 Security . 44
6.6 Inconsistency Report . 44
6.6.1 Transactional model . 44
6.6.2 Syntax and semantics . 45
6.6.3 Security . 46
6.7 Providing EFC Context Data . 46
6.7.1 Transactional model . 46
6.7.2 Syntax and semantics . 47
6.7.3 Security . 47
7 Security . 47
7.1 Security functions and elements . 47
7.1.1 Hash functions . 47
7.1.2 MAC . 47
7.1.3 Digital signatures . 48
7.1.4 Public Keys, Certificates and CRL . 48
7.2 Key Management. 48
7.2.1 Key Exchange between Stakeholders . 48
7.2.2 Key generation and certification . 49
7.3 Trusted Recorder and SM_CC Verification SAM characteristics . 49
7.3.1 Introduction . 49
7.3.2 Trusted Recorder. 50
7.3.3 SM_CC Verification SAM . 51
Annex A (normative) Data type specification . 52
Annex B (normative) Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement Proforma . 53
Annex C (informative) Example transactions . 62
Annex D (informative) Relationships to other standards . 69
Annex E (informative) Essentials of the SM_CC concept . 71
Annex F (informative) Use of this document for the EETS . 85
Bibliography . 87

Eur
...