Improving transparency in financial and business reporting -- Harmonization topics

Titre manque

General Information

Status
Published
Current Stage
5020 - FDIS ballot initiated: 2 months. Proof sent to secretariat
Start Date
08-Jun-2021
Completion Date
08-Jun-2021
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Draft
ISO/PRF 5116-2 - Improving transparency in financial and business reporting -- Harmonization topics
English language
36 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (sample)

FINAL
INTERNATIONAL ISO/FDIS
DRAFT
STANDARD 5116-2
ISO/TC 68/SC 9
Improving transparency in
Secretariat: AFNOR
financial and business reporting —
Voting begins on:
2021-06-08 Harmonization topics —
Voting terminates on:
Part 2:
2021-08-03
Guidelines for data point modelling
RECIPIENTS OF THIS DRAFT ARE INVITED TO
SUBMIT, WITH THEIR COMMENTS, NOTIFICATION
OF ANY RELEVANT PATENT RIGHTS OF WHICH
THEY ARE AWARE AND TO PROVIDE SUPPOR TING
DOCUMENTATION.
IN ADDITION TO THEIR EVALUATION AS
Reference number
BEING ACCEPTABLE FOR INDUSTRIAL, TECHNO-
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
LOGICAL, COMMERCIAL AND USER PURPOSES,
DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS MAY ON
OCCASION HAVE TO BE CONSIDERED IN THE
LIGHT OF THEIR POTENTIAL TO BECOME STAN-
DARDS TO WHICH REFERENCE MAY BE MADE IN
NATIONAL REGULATIONS. ISO 2021
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO 2021

All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may

be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting

on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address

below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
Contents Page

Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................................iv

Introduction ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................v

1 Scope ................................................................................................................................................................................................................................. 1

2 Normative references ...................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

3 Terms and definitions ..................................................................................................................................................................................... 1

4 What is a data model ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 3

4.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................... 3

4.2 The term “model” .................................................................................................................................................................................. 3

4.3 Data-oriented process of modelling ..................................................................................................................................... 3

4.4 The conceptual data model as a first step aiming for a database system ............................................ 4

4.5 Description of data modelling approaches for supervisory purposes .................................................... 4

4.5.1 General...................................................................................................................................................................................... 4

4.5.2 Using the “form centric” modelling approach ........................................................................................ 5

4.5.3 Using the “data centric” modelling approach ......................................................................................... 6

4.6 Description of dimensional modelling ............................................................................................................................... 8

4.7 The concept of normalization .................................................................................................................................................... 9

5 Why use a multidimensional data model ................................................................................................................................13

5.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................13

5.2 Multidimensional data model .................................................................................................................................................13

5.3 Operations that can be carried out on a multidimensional data model .............................................14

6 Why data modelling is essential for collecting supervisory information ..............................................16

6.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................16

6.2 Objective of Data Point modelling .......................................................................................................................................16

6.3 Main features .........................................................................................................................................................................................18

6.3.1 Increase of knowledge and understanding ............................................................................................18

6.3.2 Improvement of integration of changes....................................................................................................18

6.3.3 Reduction of risk of duplicate information ............................................................................................19

6.3.4 Higher harmonization ..............................................................................................................................................22

6.4 Classification of Data Point modelling in the data modelling concept .................................................23

6.5 Area of application ............................................................................................................................................................................24

6.6 What are the technical constraints .....................................................................................................................................25

7 How do you proceed in creating a Data Point Model ...................................................................................................26

7.1 General ........................................................................................................................................................................................................26

7.2 Define dictionary elements .......................................................................................................................................................27

7.3 Specify hierarchies ............................................................................................................................................................................28

7.4 Define Data Points .............................................................................................................................................................................29

7.5 Define normalized tables and ensure quality of Data Point Model ........................................................29

7.6 Distribute Data Point Model .....................................................................................................................................................31

8 What the future holds for us .................................................................................................................................................................31

Bibliography .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................34

© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved iii
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
Foreword

ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards

bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out

through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical

committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International

organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.

ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of

electrotechnical standardization.

The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are

described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the

different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the

editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).

Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of

patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of

any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or

on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).

Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not

constitute an endorsement.

For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and

expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the

World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT), see www .iso .org/

iso/ foreword .html.

This document was prepared by the European Committee for Standardization (CEN) (as CWA

XBRL 002) and was adopted with the following modifications by Technical Committee ISO/TC 68,

Financial services, Subcommittee SC 9, Information exchange for financial services.

— minor editorial change to Clause 1;
— Clause 2, Normative references, added;
— minor editorial changes.
A list of all parts in the ISO 5116 series can be found on the ISO website.

This document uses different verbal forms from those listed in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.

Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A

complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
iv © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
Introduction
0.1 General

The purpose of this document is to support supervisory experts in the creation of a Data Point Model

(DPM). According to the definition of the European Banking Authority (EBA), a DPM “is a structured

formal representation of the data [...], identifying all the business concepts and its relations, as well as

validation rules, oriented to all kinds of implementers.”

The underlying rules for the creation of such methods were initially introduced by the Eurofiling

Initiative and developed further by the European Insurance and Occupational Pensions Authority

(EIOPA). The main objective of data point modelling, the process of creating a DPM, is as follows: “[it]

should help to produce a better understanding of the legal background to the prudential reporting data

and make data analysis much easier for both the institutions and regulators” .

Further goals are to prevent redundancies, lower maintenance efforts and, in general, to facilitate

working with national extensions on the European agreed-upon data set to facilitate the descriptions

of requirements that are sharable across national legislations. It is a requirement to have all the

information collected by the national supervisory agencies, particularly in Europe, transformed into the

same data structure with the same quality in order to be able to carry out standardized analysis of the

data across Europe. The current implementations are not able to meet these European requirements for

supervision “to achieve higher quality and better comparability of data” . The main reasons for this are

the differences between the data definitions and the data formats of the various national supervisory

agencies, making comparison of reported data virtually impossible.
0.2 Objective

The aim to harmonize the European supervisory reporting is to be able to carry out more comprehensive

analysis and an increase of comparability of data. Since the supervisory agencies are already acquainted

with the representation of regulations specified in laws, this document is going to introduce the reader

to the concept of Data Point modelling methodology, as well as to its main terms and definitions that will

enable you to create Data Point Models that contain “all the relevant technical specifications necessary

for developing an IT reporting format” on your own.
0.3 Target audience

In general, as a banking supervisor you are responsible for communicating with Information

Technology (IT) experts in order to support the transfer of the essence of regulatory reporting to IT

systems. In 2009, the Eurofiling Initiative published the concept of Data Point modelling. Structures

of data represented in supervisory tables, as well as underlying laws and guidelines, were defined in

order to enable the interpretation of the reporting information by IT applications. IT specialists are

responsible for the development of software. However, most of the time they do not have the special

business knowledge needed to gather reporting requirements from various sources, such as legal texts

like Solvency Regulations and National Banking Acts, in order to build a flawless system. Therefore, the

task of creating a DPM is assigned to you.

This document introduces the basic principles deemed necessary in the modelling process. On the basis

of the explanations given in this document, you will be able to provide prerequisites for deriving data

formats on the basis of a DPM, as well as setting up a powerful data warehouse. This implies that the

model is published in a format that is understood by both parties involved in transforming legislation

into a model: business experts and IT specialists. The topics regarding supervisory reporting are kept

short and limited to the content relevant for this document. The idea is to convey the creation of the

Data Point Model to you, as you are a supervisor with analytical capabilities and personal interest in

this topic. No special IT knowledge is expected. The first sections will give you an overview on the

required IT knowledge.
1) EBA (2011a), p.22
2) EBA (2011a), p.30
3) EBA (2011a), p.29
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved v
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)

National banking supervisors have a mandate to evaluate the financial situation of financial

institutions in their country. To be able to perform the necessary analytics, financial data is required

from these institutions. The requirements are described in the form of texts and tables of data. To make

a comprehensive model from these texts and tables, a model is being created to enable IT support in

communicating and storing the necessary data. A common problem with the National Supervisory

Authorities (NSAs) is that IT staff has little financial background and financial specialists have little

IT background. This makes data modelling a problematic area, as both specialities are needed. This

document is aimed at providing the tools and knowledge of creating a DPM by the financial specialists.

The result, a model, can be perfected by IT staff later in the process.
vi © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
FINAL DRAFT INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
Improving transparency in financial and business
reporting — Harmonization topics —
Part 2:
Guidelines for data point modelling
1 Scope

This document provides guidelines for data point modelling for supervising experts. The main body

consists of four sections. The interrogative form helps in choosing which section may best answer your

question and lead you to a good understanding of the subject matter.

After this first introductory section and the section containing terms and definitions, the main part

starts to provide basic knowledge about different types of data models and data modelling approaches.

The first and the second sections provide an overview of data models in general, in contrast to the

third section that highlights the necessity of data modelling for supervisory data. This third section

draws on the objectives and background information of the preceding sections. Furthermore, a

paragraph classifies the Data Point Model introduced by the Eurofiling Initiative and elaborated by

EIOPA and EBA, where many new terms related to DPM are introduced. Another paragraph explains

the areas of application for the DPM. The third section concludes with a paragraph introducing a subset

of the technical constrains that need to be considered in the creation process of the DPM. The fourth

section gives step-by-step instructions on how to create a DPM. The paper concludes with remarks on

the progress achieved so far, and provides an outlook on the software that is being developed at the

moment to support you during the creation process.
2 Normative references
There are no normative references in this document.
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.

ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:

— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/

NOTE The terms and definitions used in connection with Data Point modelling are inspired by vocabulary

already known through their use in describing multidimensional databases and data warehouses. IT specialists

originally introduced these terms. However, for an understanding and creation of Data Point Models, they are

now established in the language of business specialists as well.
3.1
data point

combination of quantitative and qualitative aspects to describe a reportable information

3.2
default member

specific element of a dimension which is applied when a dimension is not explicitly associated to a Data

Point
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 1
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
3.3
dictionary element

abstract term for all qualitative and quantitative aspects of a multidimensional model

3.4
dimension

data set of one characteristic area which is composed of individual and non-overlapping data elements

used to define “by” conditions which represent the qualitative aspects of a Data Point

Note 1 to entry: Dimensions literally describe the dimensioned element in order to limit the range of interpretation

and thereby qualify the dimensioned element. One dimension either has a definite (i.e. countable) number of

members, which is called an explicit dimension, or an infinite number of members represented as values, that

follow a specific typing pattern, which is known as a typed dimension.
3.5
dimensioned element

element that shows the nature of the data by typing it and holds information about the underlying

structure of the cell that is specified

Note 1 to entry: In IT contexts, a dimensioned element is referred to as metadata.

3.6
domain
category with items that share a common semantic identity

Note 1 to entry: A Domain provides, therefore, an unambiguous collection of items in a value range. The items of

a Domain can have a definite, and therefore countable, number of items, or an infinite number of elements that

follow a specific (syntax) pattern.
3.7
domain member
element that is part of a domain

Note 1 to entry: It is also possible to have members that do not belong to a domain; they can refer to a dimension

directly.

Note 2 to entry: Domain members can either be explicitly named or defined by a type.

3.8
enumerable dimension
dimension that specifies a finite number of members
3.9
fact
quantitative aspect of data reported
EXAMPLE An amount, a number, a string of text, a date.
3.10
hierarchy

nesting (setting relationships in a parent–child-like architecture) of dictionary elements

3.11
non-enumerable dimension

dimension that specifies an undefined number of elements by defining syntactic constraints on the

values of the members, i.e. a data type or a specific pattern
3.12
sub-domain
subset of the members of a domain
2 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
3.13
taxonomy
description of a valid Data Point Model
3.14
template
graphical representation of a set of supervisory data
4 What is a data model
4.1 General

Data models outline the relationships between data. It is important that the person responsible for

modelling takes the time to capture all relations between data that can be shown in the model. It is

essential that the model is reviewed by third parties involved for errors to be identified in advance.

Furthermore, it helps to get a clearly structured model that can save time and costs later.

4.2 The term “model”

The term model has its origin in the Middle French noun “modelle”. In IT context, a model pictures a

target-oriented system instead of directly intervening in the complex system. Specifically, in terms

of data models, this means a real system, a system from the domain comprising real components that

are tangible and dynamic, which is mapped to a model to reduce complexity. This may help to find a

suitable solution to an existing problem. The model needs to be created as close to reality as possible,

with attention to requirements regarding structure and behaviour. Nevertheless, in order to raise the

comprehensibility, aspects irrelevant for the purpose of modelling may be left out. The importance of

a single aspect, and whether it is worth being specified in the model, depends on the decision of the

domain experts. This strongly depends on the modeller’s understanding, creativity and capability to

associate the object system with the model.

The challenge of data modelling is that a data model “must be simple enough to communicate [it]

to the end user [...] [and] [...] detailed enough for the database design to use it to create the physical

structure“. The same principle applies to message design and its physical representation.

In the following paragraph, the procedure of data-oriented modelling is presented.

4.3 Data-oriented process of modelling

The data-oriented process focuses on describing the static structure of the reporting system, in contrast

to the function-oriented process, which begins with modelling the functions of the reporting system

and adds the data in a later stage.

As data is the focus point of the banking supervisors, the data-oriented process is applied. Additionally,

in the course of time, data [objects] do not change as much as processes do. Functions are not being

taken into account here.

Applying the data-oriented process, data objects are specified first, as well as the attributes that belong

to each data object. The next step is to put the objects in relation to each other. Furthermore, the data

model can imply integrity conditions and define operations that can be carried out on the data.

4) Cf. Gartner (2012)
5) Harper,D.(2013)
6) Cf. Ferstl, O./ Sinz,E. (2013), p. 22
7) Cf. ibidem, p. 20
8) ZaZa Network (2007)
9) Cf. Baeumle-Courth P./Nieland S./Schröder H. (2004), p.56
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 3
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
4.4 The conceptual data model as a first step aiming for a database system

The data-oriented modelling takes place on 3 different levels that are built upon one another.

Figure 1 — Levels of data-oriented modelling

The conceptual data model reflects your reporting requirements. You are in the best position to know

what pieces of information are requested. The conceptual model helps you in the communication

with your IT specialists. This is an important step to avoid unpleasant surprises later when the

model is implemented in the IT department. The model is built regardless of the database system

10)

or data warehouse to be used. Relevant facts of the object system are to be specified without loss

of information. However, you, as the creators of the conceptual model do not need to be technically

skilled because the succeeding steps of data modelling are carried out by IT specialists. They should be

concerned about the technical requirements. It is very important that this first step of preparing the

conceptual data model is carefully elaborated before transferring the information to the IT. This can be

ensured by early reviews, which include all parties concerned.

The logical data model, as well as the physical data model, is prepared by the IT specialists. In essence,

the logical data model immediately follows the conceptual model (see Figure 1). When aimed at a

database approach, in contrast to the conceptual model, it also takes the requirements of the database

11)

or the data warehouse into account. The physical data model, as a final step, describes the actual

12)
implementation into an existing database system.
4.5 Description of data modelling approaches for supervisory purposes
4.5.1 General

This paragraph deals with the methods that are used to disseminate data and identify all of its

appropriate aspects. The two most appropriate methods of expressing regulatory data in a structure to

determine the context of the information will be discussed here.
10) Cf. 1keydata (2013a)
11) Cf. 1keydata (2013b)
12) Cf. 1keydata (2013c)
4 © ISO 2021 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)
Both modelling approaches refer to metadata.
Definitions for data and metadata are given below:

Data is “information processed or stored by a computer. This information may be in the form of text

documents, images, audio clips, software programs, or other types of data. Computer data may be

13)

processed by the computer's CPU and is stored in files and folders on the computer's hard disk.”

14)

Metadata “describes data. It provides information about a certain item's content.”

While data is a number like “50”, the metadata adds qualifying information to the number. The

explanation on the “form centric” and the “data centric” modelling approaches will clarify the difference.

4.5.2 Using the “form centric” modelling approach

The “form centric” approach is an ordinary table format with information held in a cell of a predefined

table called a template. Here a template is understood as a graphical representation of a set of

supervisory data. This approach identifies reporting data by their position in the templates. In this case,

each datum is defined by its coordinate in the table that is represented by the combination of columns

and rows of a template. Each coordinate has a code that is based on the row code and the column code.

This means that the data reported on the basis of coordinate codes is meaningless without the context

of the template. In the following example, each cell that represents a data requirement is described by a

code combination of its column and its row of the table Market Risk: Standardised form for position risk

in equities (MKR SA EQU) of the COREP framework. The form represents market risk equity positions

of the institutions that are subject to mandatory reporting. Throughout the whole document, this table

serves as an example to introduce terms and concepts of Data Point modelling to you. The table with

annotations can be found in the appendix in full size in order to deliver better clarity.

15)
Figure 2 — Table MKR SA EQU as an example of a form centric approach
13) TechTerms (2013a)
14) TechTerms (2013b)
15) EBA (2013)
© ISO 2021 – All rights reserved 5
---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------
ISO/FDIS 5116-2:2021(E)

The “form centric” approach is oriented as the visualization of the data. Dependencies between the

codes of the data are only shown in the templates, i.e. by identifying the appropriate headlines or by

the indents of the label rows. A report based on the “form centric” approach, which uses codes for the

identification of data, is not able to incorporate the dependencies visibly.
Figure 3 — Close up of table MKR SA EQU for higher visibility on important a
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.