Surfaces for sports areas - Test method for the determination of Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Critical Fall Height (CFH)

This document specifies test methods for measuring the impact attenuation of sports surfaces. Three different methods are specified. In Procedure A, a series of tests are undertaken from differing drop heights and the HIC values are plotted, and the Critical Fall Height determined. In Procedure B, a single test is undertaken from differing drop heights and the HIC values are plotted, and the Critical Fall Height determined. In Procedure C a series of tests are made at a fixed drop height and the maximum value of HIC is calculated.
This test method is primarily intended for use on both natural and synthetic turf sport surfaces. It may be carried out in a laboratory on test specimens or in situ on installed sports surfaces. This test method may not be suitable for sports surfaces covered by EN 14904.

Sportböden - Prüfverfahren für die Bestimmung des Kopf-Verletzungs-Faktors (HIC) und der kritischen Fallhöhe (CFH)

Dieses Dokument legt Prüfverfahren für die Messung der Stoßdämpfung von Sportböden fest. Es werden drei verschiedene Verfahren festgelegt. In Verfahren A werden eine Reihe von Prüfungen aus unterschiedlichen Fallhöhen durchgeführt, die HIC Werte aufgezeichnet und die kritische Fallhöhe bestimmt. In Verfahren B wird eine einzige Prüfung aus unterschiedlichen Fallhöhen durchgeführt, die HIC Werte aufgezeichnet und die kritische Fallhöhe bestimmt. In Verfahren C werden eine Reihe von Prüfungen mit fester Fallhöhe durchgeführt und der Höchstwert des HIC berechnet.
Dieses Prüfverfahren ist vor allem für den Einsatz sowohl auf Natur  als auch auf Kunststoffrasenflächen vorgesehen. Es darf entweder in einem Labor an Probekörpern oder vor Ort an eingebauten Sportböden durchgeführt werden. Dieses Prüfverfahren könnte für Sportböden, die von EN 14904 erfasst werden, ungeeignet sein.

Sols sportifs - Méthode d'essai pour la détermination du Critère de blessure à la tête (HIC) et de la Hauteur de Chute Critique (HCC)

Le présent document spécifie les méthodes d'essai permettant de mesurer l'atténuation de l'impact des sols sportifs. Il indique trois méthodes différentes. Dans le Mode opératoire A, une série d'essais est réalisée à partir de différentes hauteurs de chute ; la courbe des valeurs du HIC est tracée, et la Hauteur de Chute Critique déterminée. Dans le Mode opératoire B, un unique essai est réalisé à partir de différentes hauteurs de chute ; la courbe des valeurs du HIC est tracée, et la Hauteur de Chute Critique déterminée. Dans le Mode opératoire C, une série d'essais est réalisée à une hauteur de chute fixe, et la valeur maximale du HIC est calculée.
La présente méthode d'essai est principalement destinée à être utilisée sur les sols sportifs en gazon naturel ou synthétique. Elle peut être appliquée en laboratoire sur des éprouvettes, ou sur site sur des sols sportifs installés. La présente méthode d'essai ne s'applique pas aux sols sportifs couverts par l'EN 14904.

Podloge za športne dejavnosti - Preskusna metoda za ugotavljanje kriterija poškodbe glave (HIC) in kritične višine padca (CFH)

General Information

Status
Not Published
Current Stage
5060 - Closure of Vote - Formal Approval
Due Date
30-Sep-2021
Completion Date
30-Sep-2021

Buy Standard

Draft
prEN 17435:2019
English language
18 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
01-november-2019
Podloge za športne dejavnosti - Preskusna metoda za ugotavljanje kriterija
poškodbe glave (HIC) in kritične višine padca (CFH)

Surfaces for sports areas - Test method for the determination of Head Injury Criterion

(HIC) and Critical Fall Height (CFH)

Sportböden - Prüfverfahren für die Bestimmung des Kopf-Verletzungs-Faktors (HIC) und

der kritischen Fallhöhe (CFH)

Sols sportifs - Méthode d'essai pour la détermination du Critère de blessure à la tête

(HIC) et de la Hauteur de Chute Critique (HCC)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: prEN 17435
ICS:
97.220.10 Športni objekti Sports facilities
oSIST prEN 17435:2019 en,fr,de

2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
DRAFT
EUROPEAN STANDARD
prEN 17435
NORME EUROPÉENNE
EUROPÄISCHE NORM
September 2019
ICS 97.220.10
English Version
Surfaces for sports areas - Test method for the
determination of Head Injury Criterion (HIC) and Critical
Fall Height (CFH)

Sols sportifs - Méthode d'essai pour la détermination Sportböden - Prüfverfahren für die Bestimmung des

du Critère de blessure à la tête (HIC) et de la Hauteur Kopf-Verletzungs-Faktors (HIC) und der kritischen

de Chute Critique (HCC) Fallhöhe (CFH)

This draft European Standard is submitted to CEN members for enquiry. It has been drawn up by the Technical Committee

CEN/TC 217.

If this draft becomes a European Standard, CEN members are bound to comply with the CEN/CENELEC Internal Regulations

which stipulate the conditions for giving this European Standard the status of a national standard without any alteration.

This draft European Standard was established by CEN in three official versions (English, French, German). A version in any other

language made by translation under the responsibility of a CEN member into its own language and notified to the CEN-CENELEC

Management Centre has the same status as the official versions.

CEN members are the national standards bodies of Austria, Belgium, Bulgaria, Croatia, Cyprus, Czech Republic, Denmark, Estonia,

Finland, France, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Iceland, Ireland, Italy, Latvia, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Netherlands, Norway,

Poland, Portugal, Republic of North Macedonia, Romania, Serbia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey and

United Kingdom.

Recipients of this draft are invited to submit, with their comments, notification of any relevant patent rights of which they are

aware and to provide supporting documentation.

Warning : This document is not a European Standard. It is distributed for review and comments. It is subject to change without

notice and shall not be referred to as a European Standard.
EUROPEAN COMMITTEE FOR STANDARDIZATION
COMITÉ EUROPÉEN DE NORMALISATION
EUROPÄISCHES KOMITEE FÜR NORMUNG
CEN-CENELEC Management Centre: Rue de la Science 23, B-1040 Brussels

© 2019 CEN All rights of exploitation in any form and by any means reserved Ref. No. prEN 17435:2019 E

worldwide for CEN national Members.
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
Contents Page

European foreword ............................................................................................................................................ 3

Introduction .......................................................................................................................................................... 4

1 Scope .......................................................................................................................................................... 5

2 Normative references .......................................................................................................................... 5

3 Terms and definitions ......................................................................................................................... 5

4 Test apparatus ....................................................................................................................................... 6

4.1 Suitability ................................................................................................................................................. 6

4.2 Components of the apparatus .......................................................................................................... 6

4.3 Accuracy of apparatus ......................................................................................................................... 8

5 Test conditions .................................................................................................................................... 10

5.1 General.................................................................................................................................................... 10

5.2 Laboratory tests .................................................................................................................................. 10

5.3 Site tests conditions ........................................................................................................................... 10

6 Test specimens .................................................................................................................................... 10

6.1 General.................................................................................................................................................... 10

6.2 Laboratory test specimens .............................................................................................................. 10

6.3 Tests on site .......................................................................................................................................... 11

7 Test procedure ..................................................................................................................................... 11

7.1 Principle ................................................................................................................................................. 11

7.2 Conditions for testing ........................................................................................................................ 11

7.3 Measurement of HIC ........................................................................................................................... 11

7.4 Procedure A - Three drop method for Critical Fall Height (CFH) ...................................... 12

7.5 Procedure B – Determination of HIC at fixed drop height ................................................... 13

8 Test report ............................................................................................................................................. 14

Annex A (informative) Single drop method .............................................................................................. 15

Annex B (informative) Typical examples of trace acceleration against time and curve of HIC

values against drop height............................................................................................................... 16

Annex C (informative) Verification of computer algorithm used for the calculation of HIC .. 17

Bibliography ....................................................................................................................................................... 18

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
European foreword

This document (prEN 17435:2019) has been prepared by Technical Committee CEN/TC 217 “Surfaces

for sports areas”, the secretariat of which is held by AFNOR.
This document is currently submitted to the CEN Enquiry.
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
Introduction

Sports injuries occur for a variety of reasons; in many contact sports they are as a result of athlete on

athlete collisions. Injuries also occur when athletes fall onto the surface on which they are playing. Of

these the most severe are likely to be injuries to the head, which can be life changing or even life

threatening. Consequently, a test method has been developed to measure the ability of sports surfacing

materials to reduce the likelihood of severe head injuries occurring. It is intended that this test method

will be specified in standards for sports surfaces used for activities where head impacts with the surface

are likely.

The test method is based on work undertaken by CEN committee CEN/TC 136 “Sports, playground and

other recreational facilities and equipment”. The Head Injury Criterion (HIC) at a tolerance level of 1 000

has been adopted as it is considered to be the upper limit for the brain injury severity unlikely to have

disabling or fatal consequences.

By choosing the measurement of HIC as one criterion of sports surfacing athlete protection, the method

considers only the kinetic energy of the head when it impacts the surface. This is considered to be the

best model available to predict the likelihood of head injury from falls.

The HIC value of 1 000 is merely one data point on a risk severity curve where an HIC of 1 000 is

equivalent to a 3 % chance of a critical injury (MAIS 5), a 18 % probability of a severe (MAIS 4) head

injury, a 55 % probability of a serious (MAIS 3) head injury, a 89 % probability of a moderate injury

(MAIS 2), and a 99,5 % chance of a minor head injury (MAIS 1), to an average male adult.

This method of test and HIC and Critical Fall Height (CFH) performance requirements are specified in

product and facility specifications published by CEN and a number of sports governing bodies.

1) Maximum Abbreviated Injury Scale, first developed by the Association for the Advancement of Automotive

Medicine and used extensively in the automotive industry as an indicator of the severity of head-related injuries.

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
1 Scope

This document specifies test methods for measuring the Head Injury Criterion (HIC) of sports surfaces.

Two different methods are specified. In Procedure A, a series of tests are undertaken from differing drop

heights and the HIC values are plotted, and the Critical Fall Height determined. In Procedure B, a series

of tests are made at a fixed drop height and the mean value of HIC is calculated.

This test method is primarily intended for use on synthetic turf sport surfaces. It may be carried out in a

laboratory on test specimens or in situ on installed sports surfaces.

NOTE Annex A contains an indicative test method where a single test is made at each drop height and an

indicative value of HIC is calculated. This test method can also be used on other forms of sports surfacing that may

be intended to provide impact protection against head impacts.
2 Normative references

The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content

constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For

undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.

EN 12229, Surfaces for sports areas - Procedure for the preparation of synthetic turf and needle-punch test

pieces

EN 12504-2, Testing concrete in structures - Part 2: Non-destructive testing - Determination of rebound

number
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.

ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:

• IEC Electropedia: available at http://www.electropedia.org/
• ISO Online browsing platform: available at https://www.iso.org/obp
3.1
impact attenuation

property of a surface, which dissipates the kinetic energy of an impact by localized deformation or

displacement such that the acceleration is reduced
3.2
critical fall height
calculated drop height producing a HIC value of 1 000
3.3
Head Injury Criterion (HIC) value

measure of the severity of a head injury likely to arise from an impact, determined as described in

Clause 7 of this standard
3.4
test position

position on the surfacing to be tested, located vertically below the centre of the headform

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
3.5
drop height

distance between the test position on the surfacing and the lowest point of the free falling headform prior

to release

Note 1 to entry: In the case of a guided headform, this value is calculated from measurement of velocity at impact.

3.6
drop test
single impact measurement from the selected drop height
4 Test apparatus
4.1 Suitability

The same apparatus and recording procedures are used for the three methods of test described in this

document.
4.2 Components of the apparatus
4.2.1 General

The equipment comprises: a headform (4.2.2) fitted with one or more accelerometer(s) (4.2.3), optionally

a signal processor (4.2.4), a release system for the headform (4.2.7), means for measuring the effective

free fall height (4.2.6), a signal transmission system (4.2.8) and impact measuring equipment (4.2.9). If

the equipment is using a uniaxial accelerometer, it shall also have a guidance system for the headform

(4.2.5).
4.2.2 Headform
4.2.2.1 The headform shall consist of either
a) an aluminium alloy ball; or
b) a hemispherical ended aluminium alloy missile.

4.2.2.2 The impacting face of the headform shall have a diameter of 160 mm ± 5 mm. The maximum

(1)

deviation from the hemispheric surface shall be 0,5 mm . The total mass of the headform shall be

4,6 kg ± 0,05 kg. In the case of a wired headform, the weight of any connector which is directly attached

to or mounted on the headform and the mass of 1,5 m of the wire or cable shall be included in the

determination of the mass of the headform.

NOTE The inclusion of the mass of the wiring is to avoid errors in measurement caused by vibrations of the

lower boundary.

If the alloy from which the headform is made is too soft, deformation of the surface of the aluminium may

occur when testing hard or rigid sports surfaces. This will result in unquantifiable errors in the

measurement of HIC. When testing surfaces of this type, the impacting surface of the headform should be

inspected frequently. If deformation of the headform surface is observed, the test shall be considered

invalid.
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
4.2.3 Accelerometer

The measuring accelerometer(s) shall be comprised and be incorporated into the headform as follows:

a) accelerometer(s) aligned to measure 3 axes for free falling headform, mounted at the centre of

gravity (+ or – 5 mm in the vertical or horizontal axis) of the headform; or

b) a uniaxial accelerometer for guided headforms, aligned to measure in the vertical axis ± 5° and

located directly above the centre of mass.
4.2.4 Signal processor (optional)

Depending on the accelerometer technology, different signal processors may be used. This could be, for

example, a charge amplifier (internal or external), a wheatstone bridge and an amplifier or an integrated

electronic conditioner.
4.2.5 Guidance system

When using a uniaxial accelerometer, a vertical guidance for the headform shall be provided, including a

means to measure the velocity of the headform immediately prior to impact (see 4.2.6.2).

4.2.6 Fall height measuring equipment
4.2.6.1 General

In all cases, the effective free fall height of the headform shall be recorded using one of the following

methods:
4.2.6.2 Free-fall impact tests

By physical measuring of the drop height or by calculating the drop height from the measured time

between release and contact of the headform with the surface.

When calculating the drop height from the measured time between release and contact of the missile

with the surface special attention should be paid to possible time differences between the start of time

measurement and the effective release of the headform (e.g. caused by permanent magnetism in a

magnetic release system). A comparison of the measured height of fall and the calculated height of fall

may be needed.
4.2.6.3 For guided impact tests

By measuring the velocity of the headform immediately prior to the impact and calculating the theoretical

free fall drop height. To allow for frictional losses, the velocity of the headform immediately prior to

impact shall be recorded and the equivalent drop height calculated, as if the headform had been in free

fall.
4.2.7 Release system

The release system for free-fall impact test shall not create a significant rotation moment or any other

forces on the headform, when released.

NOTE A rotation moment or other forces on the headform would cause additional accelerations at impact in

the accelerometer, leading to an uncontrollable error of the resultant for the vertical measurement.

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
oSIST prEN 17435:2019
prEN 17435:2019 (E)
4.2.8 Signal transmission system

When using a signal cable for transmission of the acceloromter signal it shall not cause any significant

restraining, or pushing forces or cause unsteadiness of the headform.
4.2.9 Impact measuring equipment

4.2.9.1 The impact measuring equipment shall consist of an accelerometer measurement system (see

4.2.9.2), a recording device (see 4.2.9.3) and an HIC calculation progr
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.