Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Technology Compliance Specification; Draft IETF SIP RFC 3261; Part 2: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT) proforma specification

RTS/TIPHON-06021-2[2]

Harmonizacija telekomunikacij in internetnega protokola prek omrežij (TIPHON) - Specifikacija tehnološke ustreznosti - Osnutek IETF SIP RFC 3261 - 2. del: Abstraktni preskušalni niz (ATS) in delna dodatna informacija za preskušanje izvedbe protokola (PIXIT) - Proforma specifikacija

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
07-Oct-2003
Current Stage
12 - Completion
Due Date
16-Oct-2003
Completion Date
08-Oct-2003

Buy Standard

Technical specification
TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
English language
52 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
01-april-2004
Harmonizacija telekomunikacij in internetnega protokola prek omrežij (TIPHON) -
Specifikacija tehnološke ustreznosti - Osnutek IETF SIP RFC 3261 - 2. del:
Abstraktni preskušalni niz (ATS) in delna dodatna informacija za preskušanje
izvedbe protokola (PIXIT) - Proforma specifikacija
Telecommunications and Internet Protocol Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON);
Technology Compliance Specification; Draft IETF SIP RFC 3261; Part 2: Abstract Test
Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT)
proforma specification
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: TS 102 027-2 Version 2.1.1
ICS:
33.020 Telekomunikacije na splošno Telecommunications in
general
SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004

ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
Technical Specification

Telecommunications and Internet Protocol
Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON)
Technology Compliance Specification;
Draft IETF SIP RFC 3261;
Part 2: Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol
Implementation eXtra Information for Testing (PIXIT)
proforma specification





---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 2 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)



Reference
RTS/TIPHON-06021-2[2]
Keywords
ATS, IP, PIXIT, SIP, supplementary services,
telephony, Voice, VoIP
ETSI
650 Route des Lucioles
F-06921 Sophia Antipolis Cedex - FRANCE

Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00  Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16

Siret N° 348 623 562 00017 - NAF 742 C
Association à but non lucratif enregistrée à la
Sous-Préfecture de Grasse (06) N° 7803/88

Important notice
Individual copies of the present document can be downloaded from:
http://www.etsi.org
The present document may be made available in more than one electronic version or in print. In any case of existing or
perceived difference in contents between such versions, the reference version is the Portable Document Format (PDF).
In case of dispute, the reference shall be the printing on ETSI printers of the PDF version kept on a specific network drive
within ETSI Secretariat.
Users of the present document should be aware that the document may be subject to revision or change of status.
Information on the current status of this and other ETSI documents is available at
http://portal.etsi.org/tb/status/status.asp
If you find errors in the present document, send your comment to:
editor@etsi.org
Copyright Notification
No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission.
The copyright and the foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.

© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 2003.
All rights reserved.

TM TM TM
DECT , PLUGTESTS and UMTS are Trade Marks of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members.
TM
TIPHON and the TIPHON logo are Trade Marks currently being registered by ETSI for the benefit of its Members.
TM
3GPP is a Trade Mark of ETSI registered for the benefit of its Members and of the 3GPP Organizational Partners.
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 3 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
Contents
Intellectual Property Rights.5
Foreword.5
1 Scope .6
2 References .6
3 Definitions and abbreviations.7
3.1 Definitions.7
3.2 Abbreviations .7
4 Abstract Test Method (ATM).8
4.1 Network architecture .8
4.2 Protocol architecture.8
4.3 Test system architecture .9
4.3.1 Structure.9
4.3.2 Encoding/Decoding System requirements .9
4.3.2.1 Decoding requirements .10
4.3.2.2 Encoding requirements.10
4.3.3 Logging conventions.10
5 Untestable Test Purposes (TP) .11
6 ATS conventions.11
6.1 Naming conventions.11
6.1.1 Type definitions .11
6.1.1.1 General.11
6.1.1.2 PDU Type Definition .11
6.1.2 Template definition.11
6.1.3 Constant declarations.12
6.1.4 Enumeration declarations .12
6.1.5 Module parameter declarations.12
6.1.6 Variable declarations .12
6.1.7 Function declarations.12
6.1.8 Test Case declarations .12
6.1.8.1 General.12
6.1.8.2 Test Case (TC) identifier.12
6.1.9 Timer declarations .13
6.1.10 Group names.13
6.2 Implementation conventions .14
6.2.1 Type definitions .14
6.2.1.1 Messages .14
6.2.1.1.1 Request messages .14
6.2.1.1.2 Response messages.14
6.2.1.1.3 Raw messages.14
6.2.1.2 Headers .15
6.2.2 Constant definitions .17
6.2.2.1 Constants.17
6.2.3 Module Parameters .17
6.2.4 Template definitions .17
6.2.5 Dynamic part .17
7 PCTR conformance .17
8 PIXIT conformance.18
9 ATS Conformance.18
Annex A (normative): Abstract Test Suite (ATS) .19
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 4 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
Annex B (normative): Partial PIXIT proforma.20
B.1 Identification summary.20
B.2 ATS summary .20
B.3 Test laboratory.20
B.4 Client identification.21
B.5 SUT .21
B.6 Protocol layer information.21
B.6.1 Protocol identification .21
B.6.2 IUT information .22
Annex C (normative): PCTR Proforma .26
C.1 Identification summary.26
C.1.1 Protocol conformance test report.26
C.1.2 IUT identification.26
C.1.3 Testing environment.26
C.1.4 Limits and reservation .27
C.1.5 Comments.27
C.2 IUT Conformance status .27
C.3 Static conformance summary .27
C.4 Dynamic conformance summary.28
C.5 Static conformance review report.28
C.6 Test campaign report.29
C.8 Observations.51
History .52

ETSI

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 5 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
Intellectual Property Rights
IPRs essential or potentially essential to the present document may have been declared to ETSI. The information
pertaining to these essential IPRs, if any, is publicly available for ETSI members and non-members, and can be found
in ETSI SR 000 314: "Intellectual Property Rights (IPRs); Essential, or potentially Essential, IPRs notified to ETSI in
respect of ETSI standards", which is available from the ETSI Secretariat. Latest updates are available on the ETSI Web
server (http://webapp.etsi.org/IPR/home.asp).
Pursuant to the ETSI IPR Policy, no investigation, including IPR searches, has been carried out by ETSI. No guarantee
can be given as to the existence of other IPRs not referenced in ETSI SR 000 314 (or the updates on the ETSI Web
server) which are, or may be, or may become, essential to the present document.
Foreword
This Technical Specification (TS) has been produced by ETSI Project Telecommunications and Internet Protocol
Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON).
The present document is part 2 of a multi-part deliverable covering Telecommunications and Internet Protocol
Harmonization Over Networks (TIPHON); Conformance Testing for TIPHON Release 3; TIPHON profile for Session
Initiation Protocol (SIP), as described below:
Part 1: "Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification";
Part 2: "Abstract Test Suite (ATS) and partial Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for
Testing (PIXIT) proforma specification".
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 6 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
1 Scope
The present document specifies the Abstract Test Suite (ATS) for the Session Initiation Protocol SIP as defined in
RFC 3261 [1].
The objective of the present document is to provide a basis for conformance tests for SIP equipment giving a high
probability of inter-operability between different manufacturer's SIP equipments.
Annex A provides the Testing and Test Control Notation (TTCN-3) part of the ATS.
Annex B provides the Partial Protocol Implementation Extra Information for Testing (PIXIT) Proforma of the ATS.
Annex C provides the Protocol Conformance Test Report (PCTR) Proforma of the ATS.
2 References
The following documents contain provisions which, through reference in this text, constitute provisions of the present
document.
• References are either specific (identified by date of publication and/or edition number or version number) or
non-specific.
• For a specific reference, subsequent revisions do not apply.
• For a non-specific reference, the latest version applies.
Referenced documents which are not found to be publicly available in the expected location might be found at
http://docbox.etsi.org/Reference.
[1] IETF RFC 3261: "SIP: Session Initiation Protocol".
[2] ETSI ES 201 873-1 (V2.2.0): "Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); The Testing and
Test Control Notation version 3; Part 1: TTCN-3 Core Language".
[3] ETSI ES 201 873-5 (V1.1.1): "Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); The Testing and
Test Control Notation version 3; Part 5: TTCN-3 Runtime Interface (TRI)".
[4] ISO/IEC 9646-1 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
testing methodology and framework - Part 1: General concepts".
[5] ISO/IEC 9646-2 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
testing methodology and framework - Part 2: Abstract test suite specification".
[6] ISO/IEC 9646-4 (1991): "Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
Testing Methodology and Framework, Part 4: Test realisation".
[7] ISO/IEC 9646-5 (1991): "Information Technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
testing methodology and framework - Part 5: Requirements on test laboratories".
[8] ISO/IEC 9646-6 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
testing methodology and framework - Part 6: Protocol profile test specification".
[9] ISO/IEC 9646-7 (1991): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection - Conformance
testing methodology and framework - Part 7: Implementation conformance statement".
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 7 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
3 Definitions and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of the present document, the following terms and definitions apply:
• Terms defined in RFC 3261 [1];
• Terms defined in ES 201 873-1 [2];
• Terms defined in ES 201 873-5 [3].
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of the present document, the abbreviations given in ES 201 873-1 [2], ES 201 873-5 [3], and
RFC 3261 [1] apply. In particular, the following abbreviations apply:
ABNF Augmented Backus Naur Form
ATM Abstract Test Method
ATS Abstract Test Suite
EDS Encoding/Decoding System
ETS Executable Test Suite
IUT Implementation Under Test
PA Platform Adapter
PDU Protocol Data Unit
PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
PIXIT Protocol Implementation eXtra Information for Testing
PTC Parallel Test Component
SA SUT Adapter
SUT System Under Test
TC Test Cases
TCI TTCN-3 Control Interface
TE TTCN-3 Executable
TM Test Management
TP Test Purpose
TRI TTCN-3 Runtime Interface
TS Test System
TSS Test Suite Structure
TTCN Testing and Test Control Notation version 3
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 8 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
4 Abstract Test Method (ATM)
This clause describes the ATM used to test IETF SIP RFC as defined in [1].
4.1 Network architecture
The basic SIP network architecture is defined in figure 1. The ATS defines test cases for the IUT being in the role of
each displayed entity.



OUTBOUND

User Agent User Agent
PROXY
      ….
Client/Server Client/Server
PROXY


A B
Registrar







REDIRECT SERVER




A: caller interface

Registrar B: callee interface




Figure 1: SIP network architecture
4.2 Protocol architecture
The Implementation Under Test (IUT) for which this test case specification applies consists of the SIP protocol (see
figure 2).
IUT

SIP

UDP TCP
IP
(LAN)

Figure 2: SIP protocol architecture
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 9 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
SIP messages are considered in TTCN-3 description as PDU and analysed independently of the transport layer that has
been used. The ATS does not care if the several SIP messages have been received in a same frame or in several frames
and expect SIP messages one by one. It is up to the TRI to manage those considerations. The choice of the transport
protocol used is taken into account by the ATS while the port are initialized at the beginning of each test component by
calling a dedicated init function (initUDPport(), initUDPMTCport, etc.).
4.3 Test system architecture
Test systems that implement this ATS shall conform to the requirements as defined in this clause.
4.3.1 Structure
An abstract architecture for a test system (TS) implementing a TTCN-3 ATS is displayed in figure 3 and also stated in
ES 201 873-5 [3].

Figure 3: Abstract Test System Architecture
A TS has two interfaces, the TTCN-3 Control Interface (TCI) and the TTCN-3 Runtime Interface (TRI), which specify
the interface between Test Management (TM) and TTCN-3 Executable (TE) entities, and TE, SUT Adapter (SA) and
Platform Adapter (PA) entities, respectively. Out of these two interfaces the TRI has been standardized in
ES 201 873-5 [3], whereas the specification and implementation of the TCI is currently considered to be proprietary.
The part of TS that deals with interpretation and execution of TTCN-3 modules, i.e. the Executable Test Suite (ETS), is
shown as part of the TTCN-3 Executable (TE). This ETS corresponds either to the executable code produced by a
TTCN-3 compiler or a TTCN-3 interpreter from the TTCN-3 ATS in a TS implementation. The remaining part of the
TS, which deals with any aspects that cannot be concluded from information being present in the TTCN-3 ATS alone,
can be decomposed into Test Management (TM), SUT Adapter (SA), and Platform Adapter (PA) entities. In general,
these entities cover a TS user interface, test execution control, test event logging, communication of test data with the
SUT, and timer implementation.
The SA for a SIP TS shall implement the TRI adaptation as well as the SIP transport protocol architecture described in
clause 4.2. The Encoding/Decoding System (EDS) entity with the TE and Test Logging (TL) entity within the TM shall
comply with the conventions defined in following clauses.
4.3.2 Encoding/Decoding System requirements
SIP is a text-based protocol that allows different syntactical presentations of the same information. In general, an
implementation of this ATS should use a EDS to parse received encoded messages into TTCN-3 type structures and
values, and encode structured TTCN-3 type structures and values into encoded messages. This EDS is not part of the
ATS. Still all encoded messages, i.e. the messages as they are transmitted by the SA to or received by the SA from the
SUT, shall be logged.
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 10 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
The following terms shall be used for the conventions defined below:
Syntactic delimiter Syntactic delimiters are characters like "=" or ";" that are used to separate encoded values
LWS linear white spaces as defined SIP [1]
Parameter name name of header parameters as defined in SIP [1].
Parameter value the value of a parameter as defined in SIP
Undefined method an undefined method is a method other than: "INVITE", "ACK", "OPTIONS", "BYE",
"CANCEL" and "REGISTER".
Undefined header an undefined header is a header other than general-header, entity-header, request-header and
response header as defined in SIP [1].
Unexpected header an unexpected header is a header, which shall not be present in a specific request message.
This definition complies to the definition of NOT APPLICABLE in SIP [1]/10 for request
messages.
4.3.2.1 Decoding requirements
TTCN-3 fields should not contain syntactic delimiters like white space, semicolon, equal characters etc. in fully
decoded fields. Instead the information provided by a parser shall be used to build the decoded message in TTCN-3.
Decoded messages shall use the TTCN-3 enumeration types where ever appropriate, e.g. for the method and the header
field name.
For charstring fields the following decoding rules shall be applied by the EDS:
• Subsequent LWS shall compress to a single space character " ".
• Decoded parameter names shall use only lower case letters.
• Parameter values containing an integer value shall be decoded to a TTCN-3 integer value where a TTCN-3
integer type is used for a SIP parameter value.
The following decoding rules shall be applied by the EDS to each received message in the following order:
1) In case a request message indicating an undefined method is received by the test system, the message shall not
be passed in the TE to the ETS. However the message is subject to logging as defined in clause 4.3.3.
2) In case an undefined header has been received the header field shall be decoded as UndefinedHeader field.
3) The SIP standard [1] allows for multiple header field values of the same kind to either arrive in one or multiple
occurrences of the corresponding header field. The SIP ATS has been written assuming only the first format.
Therefore, should the EDS receive multiple header fields of the same kind in a SIP message, e.g., of a Via
header field, it shall convert them into the equivalent single header field with multiple values. This can be
achieved by adding the value of , e.g. the second received Via header field as the last value to the value(s) of
the first Via header field.
4.3.2.2 Encoding requirements
Encoders shall follow all encoding rules that are defined in SIP ABNF [2] when encoding structured values received
from templates. This applies in particular to but it is not restricted to clause [1]/3 "SIP Message Overview" and [1]/10.5
"Header Field Format".
Values of type RawMessage shall be send to the SUT without any modification.
4.3.3 Logging conventions
As the ATS defines on an abstract level the message exchange between TS and SUT the messages encoded messages
send and received shall be logged. The TM entity in the TS shall provide access to this log.
ETSI

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST-TS TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1:2004
 11 ETSI TS 102 027-2 V2.1.1 (2003-10)
5 Untestable Test Purposes (TP)
This clause gives a list of TP, which are not implemented in the ATS due to the chosen ATM or other restrictions :
None
6 ATS conventions
The ATS conventions are intended to give a better understanding of the ATS, but they also describe the conventions
made for the development of the ATS. These conventions shall be considered during any later maintenance or further
development of the ATS.
The ATS conventions contain two clauses, the naming conventions and the implementation conventions. The naming
conventions describe the structure of the naming of all ATS elements. The implementation conventions describe the
functional structure of the ATS.
6.1 Naming conventions
6.1.1 Type definitions
This clause describes the naming conventions used for structured and unstructured types as well as for the field names
of structured types.
6.1.1.1 General
Type identifiers use mixed cased with the first letter of each internal word capitalized.
EXAMPLE: RequestLine

Field identifiers use mixed cased with a lowercase first letter. Internal words start with a capital letter.
EXAMPLE: requestLine
Names of type as well as field identifiers attempt to follow the naming chosen of ABNF elements (if a counterpart
exists) as closely as possible.
EXAMPLES: NameAddr
hostName
In case type and identifier names should give a hint on their structure the term describing the structure should be
separated with an underscore ("_") at the end of the name.
EXAMPLES: CommaParam_List
ContactBody_Union
6.1.1.2 PDU Type Definition
Names of types used as PDUs follow the general conventions as defined in clause 6.1.1.1.
EXAMPLE: Request
6.1.2 Template definition
Template identifiers consist of the type name, an identifier denoting whether the template is for sending or receiving
and a sequential number.
EXAMPLE: Request_r_1 denotes a template
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.