ETSI I-ETS 300 489-2 ed.1 (1996-10)
Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
DI/TE-01061-2
Terminalska oprema (TE) – Preskušanje skladnosti prenosa datotek prek digitalnega omrežja z integriranimi storitvami (ISDN) – 2. del: Profilsko specifična specifikacija preskušanja (PSTS) za profil FTAM (ETS 300 338)
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
SLOVENSKI STANDARD
01-december-2003
7HUPLQDOVNDRSUHPD7(±3UHVNXãDQMHVNODGQRVWLSUHQRVDGDWRWHNSUHN
GLJLWDOQHJDRPUHåMD]LQWHJULUDQLPLVWRULWYDPL,6'1±GHO3URILOVNRVSHFLILþQD
VSHFLILNDFLMDSUHVNXãDQMD3676]DSURILO)7$0(76
Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated
Services Digital Network (ISDN); Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the
FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: I-ETS 300 489-2 Edition 1
ICS:
33.080 Digitalno omrežje z Integrated Services Digital
integriranimi storitvami Network (ISDN)
(ISDN)
35.180 Terminalska in druga IT Terminal and other
periferna oprema IT peripheral equipment
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.
INTERIM
EUROPEAN I-ETS 300 489-2
TELECOMMUNICATION October 1996
STANDARD
Source: ETSI TC-TE Reference: DI/TE-01061-2
ICS: 33.080
Key words: FT, ISDN, protocol, testing
Terminal Equipment (TE);
Conformance testing for file transfer over
the Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN);
Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for
the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
X.400: c=fr, a=atlas, p=etsi, s=secretariat - Internet: secretariat@etsi.fr
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1996. All rights reserved.
Page 2
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.
Page 3
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Contents
Foreword .7
1 Scope .9
2 Normative references.9
3 Definitions, abbreviations and conventions.10
3.1 Definitions .10
3.2 Abbreviations .10
3.3 Conventions.11
4 General.11
5 Abstract Test Method (ATM).11
6 Test requirements .11
6.1 General requirements .11
6.2 Low layer requirements.12
6.3 Additional requirements .12
7 Profile Specific Test Specification .12
7.1 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 Initiator.12
7.1.1 Capability Test Cases .13
7.1.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases .14
7.1.3 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases .17
7.1.4 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.18
7.2 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 responder .19
7.2.1 Capability Test Cases .20
7.2.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases .21
7.2.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.24
7.3 Relevant Test Cases from full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 restart and recovery.25
7.3.1 Capability Test Cases initiator.25
7.3.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases initiator.26
7.3.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases initiator .27
7.3.4 Capability Test Cases responder .27
7.3.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases responder .28
7.3.6 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases responder.29
7.3.7 Invalid behaviour Test Cases responder.29
7.4 Relevant Test Cases from full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT3 Management .29
7.4.1 Capability Test Cases initiator.29
7.4.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases initiator.30
7.4.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases initiator .30
7.4.4 Capability Test Cases responder .31
7.4.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases responder .31
7.4.6 Invalid behaviour Test Cases responder.32
7.4.7 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases responder.32
7.5 Relevant Test Cases from ACSE .32
7.5.1 Valid behaviour Test Cases .32
7.5.2 Invalid behaviour Test Cases.33
7.6 Relevant Test Cases from the presentation layer.33
7.6.1 Interoperability Test Cases- initiator.33
7.6.2 Capability Test Cases - initiator.33
7.6.3 Valid behaviour Test Cases - initiator.34
7.6.4 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - initiator .34
7.6.5 Interoperability Test Cases - responder .34
7.6.6 Capability Test Cases - responder.35
7.6.7 Valid behaviour Test Cases- responder.35
Page 4
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.6.8 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - responder. 36
7.7 Relevant Test Cases from the session layer. 36
7.7.1 Capability Test Cases - initiator . 36
7.7.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases - initiator. 37
7.7.3 Inopportune behaviour tests - Initiator . 38
7.7.4 Capability Test Cases - responder . 40
7.7.5 Valid behaviour Test Cases- responder . 40
7.7.6 Invalid behaviour Test Cases - responder. 41
8 Profile specific conformance tests. 42
8.1 Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP). 42
8.1.1 Test Suite Structure (TSS) . 42
8.1.2 Additional Test Purposes. 42
8.1.3 Test Cases to Test Purposes selection and mapping . 42
Annex A (normative): Abstract Test Suite (ATS). 43
A.1 The TTCN Graphical form (TTCN.GR) . 43
A.2 The TTCN Machine Processable form (TTCN.MP) . 43
Annex B (normative): Profile specific PIXIT proforma for ETS 300 388. 44
B.1 Identification summary. 44
B.1.1 Protocol PIXIT . 44
B.1.2 Profile specific test suite summary. 44
B.1.3 Test laboratory . 45
B.1.4 Client . 46
B.1.5 SUT . 47
B.1.6 Ancillary protocols . 47
B.2 Profile information for ETS 300 388 . 48
B.2.1 Profile specific information . 48
B.2.2 IUT information. 48
B.2.2.1 Addresses. 48
B.2.2.2 Procedural information. 48
B.2.3 Virtual file store information tester side. 48
B.2.3.1 FILE #1 . 49
B.2.3.2 FILE #2 . 51
B.2.3.3 FILE #3 . 52
Annex C (normative): Protocol Conformance Test Report proforma (PCTR) . 54
C.1 Identification summary. 54
C.1.1 Profile Conformance Test Report . 54
C.1.2 IUT. 54
C.1.3 Testing environment. 54
C.1.4 Limits and reservations . 54
C.1.5 Comments. 55
C.2 IUT conformance status . 55
C.3 Static conformance summary. 55
C.4 Dynamic conformance summary. 55
C.5 Static conformance review report . 55
C.6 Test campaign report. 55
C.7 Observations. 55
Annex D (normative): System Conformance Test Report proforma (SCTR) . 56
Page 5
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
D.1 Identification summary .56
D.1.1 System conformance test report.56
D.1.2 Test laboratory.56
D.1.3 Client.56
D.1.4 SUT.56
D.1.5 Profile.57
D.1.6 Nature of conformance testing.57
D.1.7 Limits and reservations.57
D.1.8 Record of agreement.57
D.1.9 Comments .58
D.2 System report summary .59
D.2.1 Profile testing summary for ETS 300 388.59
D.2.2 Profile testing summary for ETS 300 080.60
D.2.3 Protocol layer testing summary for basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Initiator .61
D.2.4 Protocol layer testing summary for basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Responder .62
D.2.5 Protocol layer testing summary for Full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Initiator.63
D.2.6 Protocol layer testing summary for Full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 Responder.64
D.2.7 Protocol layer testing summary for full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 11 restart and
recovery .65
D.2.8 Protocol layer testing summary for full FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT 3 management.66
D.2.9 Protocol layer testing summary for ACSE.67
D.2.10 Protocol layer testing summary for presentation .68
D.2.11 Protocol layer testing summary for session .69
Annex E (normative): System Conformance Statement proforma (SCS).70
E.1 Identification summary .70
E.1.1 SCS identification.70
E.1.2 IUT identification .70
E.1.3 Client identification.70
E.1.4 Supplier identification.70
E.1.5 Manufacturer identification (if different from client).71
E.1.6 Protocols identification.71
E.1.7 Profile identification.71
E.2 Miscellaneous system information .72
E.2.1 Configuration.72
E.2.2 Other information .72
Annex F (informative): FTAM profile conformance Test Cases count.73
History.74
Page 6
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Blank page
Page 7
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Foreword
Part 2 of this Interim European Telecommunication Standard (I-ETS) has been produced by the Terminal
Equipment Technical (TE) Committee of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
An ETSI standard may be given I-ETS status either because it is regarded as a provisional solution ahead
of a more advanced standard, or because it is immature and requires a "trial period". The life of an I-ETS
is limited to three years after which it can be converted into an ETS, have its life extended for a further two
years, be replaced by a new version, or be withdrawn.
This is the second part of an I-ETS which comprises of two parts as follows:
"Terminal Equipment (TE); Conformance testing for file transfer over the Integrated Services Digital
Network (ISDN);
Part 1: Profile Test Specification Summary (PTS-Summary) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388);
Part 2: Profile Specific Test Specification (PSTS) for the FTAM profile (ETS 300 388)".
Proposed announcement date
Date of adoption of this I-ETS: 4 October 1996
Date of latest announcement of this I-ETS (doa): 31 January 1997
Page 8
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Blank page
Page 9
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
1 Scope
Part 2 of this Interim European Telecommunication Standard (I-ETS) provides the Profile Specific Test
Specification (PSTS) for ETS 300 388 [1]. It is compatible with the PSTS developed firstly under the CTS
projects and finally updated and published by the European Workshop for Open Systems (EWOS). The
minor additions to the Test Cases and the Tree and Tabular Combined Notation (TTCN) for these is
contained in annex A. The remainder of the Test Cases references EWOS ED 88 [4].
The PSTS follows the recommendations of ISO/IEC 9646-6 [2] and ETS 300 406 [3]. The base standard
is ISO/IEC 8571 [9]. The work follows ISO/IEC ISP 10607, part 3 [7] and part 6 [8]. These Sips are
referenced in ISO/IEC TR 10000-2 [16] as AFT 11 and AFT 3 respectively.
2 Normative references
This I-ETS incorporates by dated or undated reference, provisions from other publications. These
normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications
apply to this I-ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the
latest edition of the publication referred to applies.
[1] ETS 300 388 (1995): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); File Transfer
and Access Management (FTAM) over ISDN based on simple file transfer
protocol".
[2] ISO/IEC 9646, parts 1 to 7 (1994): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance testing methodology and framework".
[3] ETS 300 406 (1995): "Methods for Testing and Specification (MTS); Protocol
and profile conformance testing specifications; Standardization methodology".
[4] EWOS ED 88 (1994): "EWOS/CTS FTAM Abstract Test Suite, (Binders 0
to 12)".
[5] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 2:
Definition of document types, constraint sets and syntaxes".
[6] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-2(a), Addendum 1 (1991): "Information technology -
International Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management
- Additional definitions".
[7] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-3 (1990): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 3:
AFT11 - Simple File Transfer Service (unstructured)".
[8] ISO/IEC ISP 10607-6 (1991): "Information technology - International
Standardized Profiles Aft - File Transfer, Access and Management - Part 6:
AFT3 - File Management Service".
[9] ISO/IEC 8571, Parts 1 to 5: "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - File Transfer, Access and Management -
Part 1: General introduction;
Part 2: Virtual Filestore definition;
Part 3: File Service definition;
Part 4: File Protocol specification;
Part 5: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement Proforma 3".
Page 10
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
[10] ETS 300 080 (1992): "Integrated Services Digital Network (ISDN); ISDN lower
layer protocols for telematic terminals".
[11] ISO 8649 (X.217) (1988): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Service definition for the association control service element".
[12] ISO 8650 (X.227) (1988): "Connection-oriented protocol specification for the
association control service-element".
[13] ISO/IEC 8822 (X.216): "Information technology - Open Systems Interconnection
- Presentation service definition".
[14] ISO/IEC 8823-1 (X.226): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Connection oriented presentation protocol: Protocol
specification".
[15] ISO 8327 (X.225): "Information processing systems - Open Systems
Interconnection - Basic connection oriented session protocol specification".
[16] ISO/IEC TR 10000-2 (1994): "Information technology - Framework and
taxonomy of International Standardized Profiles - Part 2: Principles and
Taxonomy for OSI Profiles".
[17] ISO/IEC 10170-1 (1993): "Information technology - Open Systems
Interconnection - Conformance test suite for the FTAM Protocol - Part 1: Test
suite structure and test purposes".
3 Definitions, abbreviations and conventions
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this part of the I-ETS, the definitions given in ISO/IEC 9646, parts 1 to 7 [2],
ISO/IEC 8571 [9], ETS 300 388 [1] and ISO/IEC ISP 10607, parts 2, 2a, 3 and 6 ([5], [6], [7] and [8]) apply.
3.2 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this I-ETS, the following abbreviations apply:
ACSE Association Control Service Element
AFT Application File Transfer profile
ATC Abstract Test Case
ASN.1 Abstract Syntax Notation One
ATM Abstract Test Method
ATS Abstract Test Suite
e extended subset
EWOS European Workshop for Open Systems
FTAM File Transfer Access and Management
ICS Implementation Conformance Statement
ISDN Integrated Services Digital Network
ISP International Standardized Profile
ISPICS ISP Implementation Conformance Statement
IUT Implementation Under Test
PIXIT Implementation eXtra Information for Testing
MTS Methods for Testing and Specification
PCO Point of Control and Observation
PCTR Protocol Conformance Test Report
PDU Protocol Data Unit
Profile ICS Profile Implementation Conformance Statement
PSTS Profile Specific Test Specification
s selected subset
SCS System Conformance Statement
SUT System Under Test
Page 11
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
TE Terminal Equipment
TSAP Transport Service Access Point
TTCN Tree and Tabular Combined Notation
Along with the abbreviations of ISO/IEC 10170-1 [17].
3.3 Conventions
For the purposes of this I-ETS, the following conventions apply:
The names of Abstract Test Cases (ATC) are generally derived directly from the relevant Test Purpose
where there is a one to one mapping. There is, in addition, a prefix to indicate the Abstract Test Suite
(ATS) name and whether the tests are for the Initiator or Responder case.
EXAMPLE 1: A111_I_CA_KE_1.
However, especially in cases where several parameters on a single Protocol Data Unit (PDU) are being
tested by a series of Test Purposes, these can all be combined or "summarized" by a single ATC. The
name of that ATC reflects this by the use of "SUM" as the final part of the name.
EXAMPLE 2: A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_SUM_1.
4 General
This I-ETS describes all the aspects of testing, directly or by reference to EWOS ED 88 [4].
5 Abstract Test Method (ATM)
The FTAM conformance tests use the remote single layer Abstract Test Method (ATM), whilst the testing
for Session and Presentation uses the remote embedded single layer ATM.
6 Test requirements
6.1 General requirements
For this conformance test specification, any requirements to carry out the tests are specified.
To realize this conformance test specification it shall be necessary that all the lower layers are operating
correctly. For this reason, the lower layers shall be checked before by any relevant conformance test
specifications.
This test specification does not deal with the details of the human interface. Only PDUs and Parameters
are observed and are controlled at the Point of Control and Observation (PCO).
The relevant conformance test specifications are identified in figure 1.
Page 12
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Initiator/Responder/
Management
Restart and Recovery
FTAM ISO/IEC 8571
FTAM ISO/IEC 8571
[13], AFT3
[13], AFT11
ACSE
conformance test specification
SUT
Presentation layer
conformance test specification
Session layer
conformance test specification
ISDN
Figure 1: Relevant conformance tests specifications
6.2 Low layer requirements
Clause 10 of ETS 300 388 [1] shall apply without any additional rules.
6.3 Additional requirements
Two additional documents exist in the EWOS specifications. The first is called Initiator actions and defines
the requirements on an Initiator Implementation Under Test (IUT) in order to drive the tests. The second is
the Naming conventions used, where these go beyond ISO/IEC 10170-1 [17]. The relevant ones are
described in subclause 3.2.
In order to ensure that directories can be read two new Test Cases have been developed. These are
based on existing Test Purposes for capability tests but use NBS-9 document type.
7 Profile Specific Test Specification
An implementation claiming basic conformance shall be capable of performing all the AFT 11 Initiator and
Responder Test Cases listed below. An implementation claiming full conformance shall be capable of
performing all the Test Cases listed below.
However, since this profile is designed for small terminals, in order to reduce testing time, a
recommended subset of the FTAM specific tests has been selected. These are indicated by "s" (selected
subset) for the basic tests and "e" (extended subset) for full tests. It is believed that these subsets will give
adequate coverage as at least one test has been selected in each test group. Those not selected are in
general only minor variants of parameters.
7.1 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 Initiator
The list of Test Cases used for the FTAM profile conformance test specification are described in
ISO/IEC 8571 [9], basic FTAM AFT 11 Initiator (EWOS ED 88 [4] - Binder 1).
This I-ETS describes all references used for testing the FTAM Simple File Transfer profile
(ETS 300 388 [1]).
Page 13
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.1.1 Capability Test Cases
Table 1: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator capability Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_CA_KE_1 s
AFT11_I_CA_SUM_0 s
AFT11_I_CA_KE_3 s
AFT11_I_SUM_1 s
AFT11_I_CA_KE_5 s
AFT11_I_CA_KE_6 s
AFT11_I_CA_RD_1 s
AFT11_I_CA_RD_2 s
AFT11_I_SUM_6 s
AFT11_I_SUM_8 s
AFT11_I_CA_WR_1 s
AFT11_I_CA_WR_2 s
AFT11_I_SUM_10 s
AFT11_I_SUM_11 s
AFT11_I_CA_WR_6 s
AFT11_I_CA_WR_7 s
AFT11_I_SUM_50 s
AFT11_I_CA_LM_2 s
AFT11_I_SUM_20 s
Page 14
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.1.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases
Table 2: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_CE_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_CE_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_CE_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_1
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_11 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_19
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_23
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_25
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_30
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_32
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_I_PAB_33
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_11 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_19 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_23
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_25
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_30
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_32
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_33 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_11
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_19
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_23
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_25 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_30
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_32
AFT11_I_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_33
AFT11_I_BV_PI_RD_TRE_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_35 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_WR_DTE_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_WR_TRE_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_44 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_4
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_3
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_4
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_2
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_3 s
(continued)
Page 15
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 2 (continued): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_4
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_5 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_6
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_7 s
AFT11_I_BV_PI_GP_FT_GANEG_8
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_SUM_21 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_SUM_22 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_SUM_23 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_AR_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_SC_6
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_FU_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_2
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_3
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_SL_SUM_24 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_SL_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_SL_AT_2
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_DS_SUM_25 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_DS_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_DS_AR_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_DS_CH_2
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_DS_CH_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_KE_TR_CH_2
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_5 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_SUM_26 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_DT_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_NRQ_SUM_27 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_SH_SUM_28 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_EX_SUM_29 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_NAX_SUM_30 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_7 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_DTE_SUM_31 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_DTE_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_DTE_AR_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_TRE_SUM_33 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_TRE_SUM_32 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_TRE_AR_3
(continued)
Page 16
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 2 (continued): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_TRE_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_I_SUM_34 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_I_AR_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_I_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_R_SUM_36 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_R_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_RD_CN_R_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_9 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_SUM_37 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_CT_DT_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_CC_NRQ_SUM_38 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_CC_SH_SUM_39 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_CC_EX_SUM_40 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_OP_CC_NAX_SUM_41 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_TRE_SUM_43 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_TRE_SUM_42 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_TRE_AR_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_TRE_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_I_SUM_45 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_I_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_I_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_R_SUM_46 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_R_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_WR_CN_R_AR_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_16 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_SUM_49 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_17 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_FN_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_1
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_4 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_6
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_8 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_51 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SA_2
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_52 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_FAV_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_FAV_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_FAV_4
(continued)
Page 17
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 2 (concluded): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_FF_2
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_53 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_54 s
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_18 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_DL_SUM_56 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_DL_AR_3
AFT11_I_BV_SUM_19 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_DL_CH_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_SUM_58 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_SUM_57 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AR_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AR_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_3
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_4
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_5 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_6 s
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_7
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_8
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_9
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_10
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_11
AFT11_I_BV_PV_LM_RDA_AT_12 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FT_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FT_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FT_3 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FTM_1 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FTM_2 s
AFT11_I_BV_PC_KE_SC_FU_FTM_3 s
7.1.3 Inopportune behaviour Test Cases
Table 3: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 initiator inopportune behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_IN_1 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_IN_2 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_IN_3 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_DXI_1 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_DXI_2 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_RD_4 s
AFT11_I_BO_INOP_WR_4 s
AFT11_I_BO_PI_RD_1 s
AFT11_I_BO_PI_LM_CR_1 s
AFT11_I_BO_PI_LM_CR_2 s
Page 18
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.1.4 Invalid behaviour Test Cases
Table 4: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 initiator invalid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BI_PI_GP_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_SR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_PVN_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_SC_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_FU_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_FU_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_AG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_FQS_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_CTL_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_CTL_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_CE_CW_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_SL_SR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_SL_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_SL_AT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_SL_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_DS_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_DS_CH_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_DS_CH_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_DS_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_TR_CH_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_AB_UAB_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_AB_UAB_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_AB_PAB_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_KE_AB_PAB_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_OP_SR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_OP_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_OP_CT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_OP_CC_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_OP_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_DTE_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_DTE_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_TRE_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_TRE_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CL_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CL_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CN_I_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CN_I_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CN_R_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_RD_CN_R_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_OP_SR_1
(continued)
Page 19
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 4 (concluded): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 initiator invalid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_OP_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_OP_CT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_OP_CC_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_OP_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_TRE_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_TRE_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CL_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CL_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CN_I_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CN_I_DG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CN_R_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_WR_CN_R_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_CR_SR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_CR_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_CR_IAT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_CR_IAT_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_CR_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_DL_AR_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_DL_CH_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_DL_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_RDA_AR_1
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_RDA_AT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PV_LM_RDA_DG_1
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_SC_FU_FT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_SC_FU_FT_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_SC_FU_FTM_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_SC_FU_FTM_2 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_AG_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_CTL_1
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_CTL_3 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_KE_CE_CW_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_RD_OP_CT_1 s
AFT11_I_BI_PC_WR_OP_CT_1 s
7.2 Relevant Test Cases from basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571 AFT11 responder
The list of Test Cases used for the FTAM profile conformance test specification are described in
ISO/IEC 8571 [9] basic FTAM AFT 11 Responder (EWOS ED 88 [4] - Binder 2).
This I-ETS describes all references used for testing to the FTAM Simple File Transfer profile
(ETS 300 388 [1]).
Page 20
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.2.1 Capability Test Cases
Table 5: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 responder capability Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
A111_R_CA_KE_1 s
A111_R_CA_KE_2 s
A111_R_CA_KE_3 s
A111_R_CA_KE_5 s
A111_R_CA_KE_6 s
A111_R_CA_KE_7 s
A111_R_CA_RD_1 s
A111_R_CA_RD_2 s
A111_R_CA_RD_3 s
A111_R_CA_RD_4 s
A111_R_CA_WR_4 s
A111_R_CA_WR_6 s
A111_R_CA_WR_7 s
A111_R_CA_LM_1 s
A111_R_CA_LM_2 s
A111_R_CA_LM_3 s
Page 21
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.2.2 Valid behaviour Test Cases
Table 6: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 responder valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_11 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_24 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_UAB_30 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_11 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_24 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_AB_R_PAB_30 s
A111_R_BV_PI_RD_CN_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_RD_CN_2 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_2 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_3 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GAPOS_4 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_2 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_3 s
A111_R_BV_PI_GP_FT_GBPOS_4
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_PVN_1
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_SC_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_SC_6 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_FU_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_FU_2
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_FU_3
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_1
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_2
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_3 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_AG_4
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_CE_SC_2
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_FU_4
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_CE_QOS_1 s
A111_R_BV_PI_KE_CE_FU_1
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_PVN_3
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_1
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_2
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_3 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_CE_CTL_4
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_1
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_3 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_4
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_5
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_6 s
(continued)
Page 22
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 6 (continued): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 responder valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_RQA_8 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_AT_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_AB_UAB_AR_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_AB_PAB_AR_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_OP_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_PM_1
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_PM_2
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_OP_PM_2
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_CL_DG_2
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_CN_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_CN_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_WRB_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_WRB_FO_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_CN_R_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_WR_CN_R_DG_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_SUM_3 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_CRPW_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AP_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_3(2a)
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AXCL_3 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AXCL_1
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_AXCL_2
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_RDA_ATN_KE_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_RDA_ATN_ST_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_RDA_ATN_SG_1
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_RDA_ATN_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PC_KE_CE_SC_FU_FT_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_CC_EX_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_CC_EX_4
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_CC_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_CC_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_KE_SL_CC_SUM_3 s
(continued)
Page 23
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
Table 6 (concluded): Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 responder valid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_3
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_2 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_CC_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CC_SUM_1 s
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_4
A111_R_BV_PV_RD_OP_CT_PCTA_DT_5 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_4 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_5
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_6 s
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_CTA_DT_7
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_IAT_SUM_3
A111_R_BV_PV_LM_CR_AXPW_SUM_1
A111_R_BV_PI_RD_OP_4 s
A111_R_BV_PI_RD_RBD_2 s
A111_R_BV_PI_LM_RDA_2 s
A111_R_BV_PC_LM_CR_RA_1 s
A111_R_BV_PC_KE_SL_1 s
A111_R_BV_PC_RD_OP_PM_2 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_1 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_2
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_3 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_4
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_5 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_LM_6
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_WR_1 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_WR_2
A111_R_BV_VFI_IRG_WR_3
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_RD_4
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_RD_5
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_RD_6
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_RD_7 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_RD_8
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_WR_6
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_WR_7
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_LM_1
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_LM_3 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_LM_4 s
A111_R_BV_VFI_BRG_LM_6
Page 24
I-ETS 300 489-2: October 1996
7.2.3 Invalid behaviour Test Cases
Table 7: Basic FTAM ISO/IEC 8571, AFT11 responder invalid behaviour Test Cases
Test Case identifier Notes
A111_R_BI_PV_KE_SL_2 s
A111_R_BI_PV_KE_SL_CC_1
A111_R_BI_PV_RD_OP_PM_1a s
A111_R_BI_PV_RD_OP_CT_1a s
A111_R_BI_PV_GP_BG_TH_1 s
A111_
...








Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.
Loading comments...