ISO 16100-1:2009
(Main)Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability — Part 1: Framework
Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability — Part 1: Framework
ISO 16100-1:2009 specifies a framework for the interoperability of a set of software products used in the manufacturing domain and to facilitate its integration into a manufacturing application. This framework addresses information exchange models, software object models, interfaces, services, protocols, capability profiles and conformance test methods.
Systèmes d'automatisation industrielle et intégration — Profil d'aptitude du logiciel de fabrication pour interopérabilité — Partie 1: Cadre
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 16100-1
Second edition
2009-12-15
Industrial automation systems and
integration — Manufacturing software
capability profiling for interoperability —
Part 1:
Framework
Systèmes d'automatisation industrielle et intégration — Profil d'aptitude
du logiciel de fabrication pour interopérabilité —
Partie 1: Cadre
Reference number
©
ISO 2009
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but
shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In
downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat
accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation
parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In
the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
© ISO 2009
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or
ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2009 – All rights reserved
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction.v
1 Scope.1
2 Normative references.1
3 Terms and definitions .1
4 Abbreviated terms .5
5 Manufacturing application.5
5.1 Reference application framework.5
5.2 Manufacturing domain.6
5.3 Manufacturing processes.7
5.4 Manufacturing resources.7
5.5 Manufacturing information.8
6 Manufacturing software interoperability framework .8
6.1 Manufacturing software unit interoperability .8
6.2 Functional relationships between the manufacturing software units .9
6.3 Services, interfaces and protocols.10
6.4 Manufacturing software unit capability profiling .10
7 Conformance .11
Annex A (informative) Manufacturing application reference model.12
Annex B (informative) Examples of the manufacturing activity reference model.16
Annex C (informative) Use cases .41
Bibliography.45
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 16100-1 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 184, Automation systems and integration,
Subcommittee SC 5, Architecture, communications and integration frameworks.
This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition (ISO 16100-1:2002), which has been technically
revised.
ISO 16100 consists of the following parts, under the general title Industrial automation systems and
integration — Manufacturing software capability profiling for interoperability:
⎯ Part 1: Framework
⎯ Part 2: Profiling methodology
⎯ Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates
⎯ Part 4: Conformance test methods, criteria and reports
⎯ Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class structures
The following part is planned:
⎯ Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles based on multiple capability class structures
iv © ISO 2009 – All rights reserved
Introduction
The motivation for ISO 16100 stems from the industrial and economic environment noted by ISO/TC 184/SC 5.
In particular, there is broad recognition by industry that application software and the expertise to apply that
software are assets of the enterprise. Industry feedback has noted the need for improvement and continued
development of current design and manufacturing standards to enable software interoperability.
ISO 16100 specifies a manufacturing information model that characterizes software-interfacing requirements.
With interfacing requirements clearly expressed, standard interfaces can be more easily and quickly
developed using the Interface Definition Language (IDL) or an appropriate programming language, such as
Java and C++. These standard interfaces are expected to enable the interoperability among manufacturing
software tools (modules or systems).
The Unified Modeling Language (UML) is used in this International Standard for modelling these interfaces.
Also, the manufacturing information model can be used to develop commonly sharable database schema
using languages such as the Extensible Markup Language (XML).
Sectors of the manufacturing industry ⎯ such as automotive, aerospace, machine tool manufacturing,
computer peripheral manufacturing, and mould and die manufacturing ⎯ that intensively use computer-aided
design (CAD), computer-aided manufacturing (CAM), numerical control (NC) programming, computer-aided
engineering (CAE), product data management (PDM) and manufacturing execution systems (MES) will
directly benefit from ISO 16100. The software interface requirements in ISO 16100 will facilitate the
development of:
a) interoperable design and manufacturing software tools leading to shortened product development time;
b) new software tools that can be easily integrated with current technologies leading to more choices in the
market;
c) new application software leading to reduced capital expenditures to replace legacy systems;
d) programming interfaces and database schema leading to cost savings by not having to develop
proprietary interfaces for point-to-point software integration.
The end result will be a reduction in product and manufacturing information management cost and lower
product costs.
ISO 16100 enables manufacturing software integration by providing the following:
⎯ standard interface specifications that allow information exchange among software units in industrial
automation systems developed by different vendors;
⎯ software capability profiling, using a standardized method to enable users to select software units that
meet their functional requirements;
⎯ conformance tests that ensure the integrity of the software integration.
At the time of publication of this edition of this part of ISO 16100, there are five published parts to ISO 16100
and one planned part. This part of ISO 16100 specifies a framework for interoperability of a set of
manufacturing software products used in the manufacturing domain and its integration into a manufacturing
application. ISO 16100-2 specifies a methodology for constructing profiles of manufacturing software
capabilities, and includes a methodology for creating manufacturing software capability profiles as well as for
using these profiles at the developing stage of manufacturing applications. ISO 16100-3 specifies the interface
protocol and templates for various manufacturing application areas. ISO 16100-4 specifies the concepts and
rules for the conformity assessment of the other parts of ISO 16100. ISO 16100-5 specifies a methodology for
profile matching using multiple capability class structures. ISO 16100-6 will specify the interface services and
protocols for matching profiles based on multiple capability class structures.
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16100-1:2009(E)
Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing
software capability profiling for interoperability —
Part 1:
Framework
1 Scope
This part of ISO 16100 specifies a framework for the interoperability of a set of software products used in the
manufacturing domain and to facilitate its integration into a manufacturing application (see Annex A for a
discussion of a manufacturing application). This framework addresses information exchange models, software
object models, interfaces, services, protocols, capability profiles and conformance test methods.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 15745-1, Industrial automation systems and integration — Open systems application integration
framework — Part 1: Generic reference description
ISO 16100 (all parts), Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the following terms and definitions apply.
3.1
advanced planning
production planning over time horizons of months or years using constraint models that treat both materials
and capacity
NOTE In some cases, the planning system includes master production scheduling, material requirements planning or
capacity planning.
3.2
bill of materials
BOM
〈manufacturing〉 list of parts that are scheduled to be manufactured in the factory
NOTE For each part, a BOM contains part number, description, quantity, description, etc. The manufacturing BOM is
the manufacturing version of product structure known as “as-built configuration”.
3.3
CAD/PDM
computer-aided design/product data management
computer systems that are used for product design and modelling, engineering, product data management
and process data management
3.4
capability
〈software〉 set of functions and services with a set of criteria for evaluating the performance of a capability
provider
NOTE This definition differs from that given in ISO 15531-1 and ISO 19439, where capability is defined as the quality
of being able to perform a given activity. See IEC 62264-1 for a general definition of capability.
3.5
capability profiling
selection of a set of offered services defined by a particular interface within a software interoperability
framework
3.6
CAPP/CAM
computer-aided process planning/computer-aided manufacturing
computer systems that are used for process planning and programming of numerically controlled machines
3.7
controller
〈digital systems〉 hybrid hardware/software systems that are used for controlling machines
EXAMPLES Distributed control systems (DCS), programmable logic controllers (PLC), numerical controller (NC), and
supervisory control and data acquisition (SCADA) systems.
3.8
data collection
gathering of information on workpieces, timing, personnel, lots and other critical entities for production
management in a timely manner
3.9
design knowledge
rules and logic that a human designer brings to bear on design problems, including design and
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.