Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions — Part 4: Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing application requirements

This document specifies the search methodology from software unit catalogues for acquiring candidate capability units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements.

Systèmes d'automatisation et intégration — Interopérabilité des unités de capacité pour les solutions d'applications industrielles — Partie 4: Évaluation des unités de capacité pour les exigences relatives aux applications manufacturières

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
01-Dec-2019
Current Stage
9020 - International Standard under periodical review
Start Date
15-Oct-2024
Completion Date
15-Oct-2024
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ISO 16300-4:2019 - Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions — Part 4: Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing application requirements Released:12/2/2019
English language
23 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
ISO 16300-4:2019 - Automation systems and integration -- Interoperability of capability units for manufacturing application solutions
English language
23 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 16300-4
First edition
2019-12
Automation systems and
integration — Interoperability of
capability units for manufacturing
application solutions —
Part 4:
Capability unit assessment for
the manufacturing application
requirements
Systèmes d'automatisation et intégration — Interopérabilité des
unités de capacité pour les solutions d'applications industrielles —
Partie 4: Évaluation des unités de capacité pour les exigences relatives
aux applications manufacturières
Reference number
©
ISO 2019
© ISO 2019
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Fax: +41 22 749 09 47
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Overview of capability unit assessment . 3
4.1 Brief of software unit catalogue . 3
4.2 Overall procedure of capability unit assessment . 4
5 Software unit catalogue retrieval procedure . 6
6 Functional assessment procedure . 8
7 Interface assessment procedure .10
8 Assessment reporting procedure.12
Annex A (informative) Example of a capability template .15
Annex B (informative) Example of a required capability profile .20
Annex C (informative) Example of an assessment report .22
Bibliography .23
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www .iso .org/
iso/ foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 184, Automation systems and integration,
Subcommittee SC 5, Interoperability, integration, and architectures for enterprise systems and automation
applications.
A list of all parts in the ISO 16300 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
iv © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

Introduction
The ISO 16300 series addresses requirements of users and suppliers of manufacturing software
regarding the interoperability of software in the area of industrial automation.
User interoperability requirements include:
— integrating an automation application system by combining capabilities of a set of software
components provided by various sources;
— integrating the capability of a software unit from one resource system platform to another platform;
— validating and verifying the capability of a software unit to meet the automation application system
requirements.
Supplier requirements include:
— representing the set of capabilities provided by a software component used in a software unit;
— verifying software component capability as a part of a required software unit capability;
— cataloguing a software unit in terms of its capability for interoperability in an automation application
system to support wide distribution.
The ISO 16300 series also addresses software interoperability services, which include:
— access to the description of a software capability to enable interoperability assessment;
— enabling the search and location of candidate software units and components, preferably
automatically, using search engines;
— representing the dependencies between software components for an automation application hosted
on a particular system platform.
Software capability is first defined as a set of functions and services with a set of criteria for evaluating
the performance of a capability provider. It is then expressed and represented as facts about the
software, how and what it can do. The ISO 16100 series, which deals with manufacturing software
capability profiling for interoperability, was developed with the aim of providing a standardized
method to describe capabilities of manufacturing software in terms of the Manufacturing Software
Unit (MSU) capability profile. In the ISO 16100 series, the software component is included in the MSU.
The ISO 16100 series also provides a way to exchange an MSU’s capability as information by means
of a capability profile. Software capability profiling is the basis for providing the above-mentioned
software interoperability services. The ISO 16100 series is used and applied as the foundation for the
ISO 16300 series.
To establish the ISO 16300 series, a number of steps were required. The initial step shows what
interoperability services are enabled by using software capability profiles. The subsequent steps
develop concrete methods and mechanisms to provide these interoperability services. The resulting
output from ISO 16300 is divided into the following parts.
— ISO 16300-1 specifies a framework for describing an automation solution in terms of a set of
capabilities provided by a set of MSUs. The framework also defines a set of capability elements
and composition rules to represent the interoperability criteria in terms of the automation system
capability requirements of an enterprise application.
— ISO 16300-2 specifies the template definition to describe the capability of a software unit of an
automation solution that can be mapped to the functional requirements of a target manufacturing
application. This document also specifies mapping rules for composing the contents of a software
unit catalogue item in terms of the properties of the capability.
— ISO 16300-3 specifies the framework for verifying interoperability of capability units associated
with application requirements and system solutions.
— This document (ISO 16300-4) specifies the search methodology for acquiring candidate capability
units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements from the software unit catalogues.
It also describes the structure of the report.
vi © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16300-4:2019(E)
Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of
capability units for manufacturing application solutions —
Part 4:
Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing
application requirements
1 Scope
This document specifies the search methodology from software unit catalogues for acquiring candidate
capability units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 16100-1:2009, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 1: Framework
ISO 16100-3, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates
ISO 16100-5:2009, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class
structures
ISO 16100-6:2018, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles based on
multiple capability class structures
ISO 16300-1:2018, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 1: Interoperability criteria of capability units per application
requirements
ISO 16300-2:2019, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 2: Capability templates and software unit cataloguing
ISO 16300-3:2017, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 3: Verification and validation of interoperability among
capability units
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 16100-1, ISO 16100-6,
ISO 16300-1, ISO 16300-2, ISO 16300-3 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
capability class
element within the capability profiling (3.5) method that represents capabilities with regard to the
capability unit’s role in a manufacturing activity
3.2
capability class structure
CCS
hierarchy of capability classes
Note 1 to entry: This structure is intended for modelling capability aggregation hierarchies in the target domains
of ISO 16100-1:2009, Figure 2.
[SOURCE: ISO 16100-6:2018, 3.2, modified — The abbreviated term "CCS" has been added.]
3.3
capability element
element used to indicate that a particular capability is supported by the entity or manufacturing
software unit to which the element belongs
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.3]
3.4
capability profile
instance of capability template filled with the concrete values corresponding to the target
manufacturing software unit
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.4]
3.5
capability profiling
selection of a set of offered services defined by a particular interface within a software interoperability
framework
[SOURCE: ISO 16100-1:2009, 3.5]
3.6
capability template
template
schema representing a capability class
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.6]
3.7
ca
...


INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 16300-4
First edition
2019-12
Automation systems and
integration — Interoperability of
capability units for manufacturing
application solutions —
Part 4:
Capability unit assessment for
the manufacturing application
requirements
Systèmes d'automatisation et intégration — Interopérabilité des
unités de capacité pour les solutions d'applications industrielles —
Partie 4: Évaluation des unités de capacité pour les exigences relatives
aux applications manufacturières
Reference number
©
ISO 2019
© ISO 2019
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting
on the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address
below or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: +41 22 749 01 11
Fax: +41 22 749 09 47
Email: copyright@iso.org
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Overview of capability unit assessment . 3
4.1 Brief of software unit catalogue . 3
4.2 Overall procedure of capability unit assessment . 4
5 Software unit catalogue retrieval procedure . 6
6 Functional assessment procedure . 8
7 Interface assessment procedure .10
8 Assessment reporting procedure.12
Annex A (informative) Example of a capability template .15
Annex B (informative) Example of a required capability profile .20
Annex C (informative) Example of an assessment report .22
Bibliography .23
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards
bodies (ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out
through ISO technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical
committee has been established has the right to be represented on that committee. International
organizations, governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work.
ISO collaborates closely with the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of
electrotechnical standardization.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are
described in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the
different types of ISO documents should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the
editorial rules of the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www .iso .org/ directives).
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of
patent rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights. Details of
any patent rights identified during the development of the document will be in the Introduction and/or
on the ISO list of patent declarations received (see www .iso .org/ patents).
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and
expressions related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the
World Trade Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www .iso .org/
iso/ foreword .html.
This document was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 184, Automation systems and integration,
Subcommittee SC 5, Interoperability, integration, and architectures for enterprise systems and automation
applications.
A list of all parts in the ISO 16300 series can be found on the ISO website.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards body. A
complete listing of these bodies can be found at www .iso .org/ members .html.
iv © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

Introduction
The ISO 16300 series addresses requirements of users and suppliers of manufacturing software
regarding the interoperability of software in the area of industrial automation.
User interoperability requirements include:
— integrating an automation application system by combining capabilities of a set of software
components provided by various sources;
— integrating the capability of a software unit from one resource system platform to another platform;
— validating and verifying the capability of a software unit to meet the automation application system
requirements.
Supplier requirements include:
— representing the set of capabilities provided by a software component used in a software unit;
— verifying software component capability as a part of a required software unit capability;
— cataloguing a software unit in terms of its capability for interoperability in an automation application
system to support wide distribution.
The ISO 16300 series also addresses software interoperability services, which include:
— access to the description of a software capability to enable interoperability assessment;
— enabling the search and location of candidate software units and components, preferably
automatically, using search engines;
— representing the dependencies between software components for an automation application hosted
on a particular system platform.
Software capability is first defined as a set of functions and services with a set of criteria for evaluating
the performance of a capability provider. It is then expressed and represented as facts about the
software, how and what it can do. The ISO 16100 series, which deals with manufacturing software
capability profiling for interoperability, was developed with the aim of providing a standardized
method to describe capabilities of manufacturing software in terms of the Manufacturing Software
Unit (MSU) capability profile. In the ISO 16100 series, the software component is included in the MSU.
The ISO 16100 series also provides a way to exchange an MSU’s capability as information by means
of a capability profile. Software capability profiling is the basis for providing the above-mentioned
software interoperability services. The ISO 16100 series is used and applied as the foundation for the
ISO 16300 series.
To establish the ISO 16300 series, a number of steps were required. The initial step shows what
interoperability services are enabled by using software capability profiles. The subsequent steps
develop concrete methods and mechanisms to provide these interoperability services. The resulting
output from ISO 16300 is divided into the following parts.
— ISO 16300-1 specifies a framework for describing an automation solution in terms of a set of
capabilities provided by a set of MSUs. The framework also defines a set of capability elements
and composition rules to represent the interoperability criteria in terms of the automation system
capability requirements of an enterprise application.
— ISO 16300-2 specifies the template definition to describe the capability of a software unit of an
automation solution that can be mapped to the functional requirements of a target manufacturing
application. This document also specifies mapping rules for composing the contents of a software
unit catalogue item in terms of the properties of the capability.
— ISO 16300-3 specifies the framework for verifying interoperability of capability units associated
with application requirements and system solutions.
— This document (ISO 16300-4) specifies the search methodology for acquiring candidate capability
units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements from the software unit catalogues.
It also describes the structure of the report.
vi © ISO 2019 – All rights reserved

INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 16300-4:2019(E)
Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of
capability units for manufacturing application solutions —
Part 4:
Capability unit assessment for the manufacturing
application requirements
1 Scope
This document specifies the search methodology from software unit catalogues for acquiring candidate
capability units which satisfy the manufacturing application requirements.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content
constitutes requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For
undated references, the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 16100-1:2009, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 1: Framework
ISO 16100-3, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 3: Interface services, protocols and capability templates
ISO 16100-5:2009, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 5: Methodology for profile matching using multiple capability class
structures
ISO 16100-6:2018, Industrial automation systems and integration — Manufacturing software capability
profiling for interoperability — Part 6: Interface services and protocols for matching profiles based on
multiple capability class structures
ISO 16300-1:2018, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 1: Interoperability criteria of capability units per application
requirements
ISO 16300-2:2019, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 2: Capability templates and software unit cataloguing
ISO 16300-3:2017, Automation systems and integration — Interoperability of capability units for
manufacturing application solutions — Part 3: Verification and validation of interoperability among
capability units
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO 16100-1, ISO 16100-6,
ISO 16300-1, ISO 16300-2, ISO 16300-3 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminological databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at http:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
capability class
element within the capability profiling (3.5) method that represents capabilities with regard to the
capability unit’s role in a manufacturing activity
3.2
capability class structure
CCS
hierarchy of capability classes
Note 1 to entry: This structure is intended for modelling capability aggregation hierarchies in the target domains
of ISO 16100-1:2009, Figure 2.
[SOURCE: ISO 16100-6:2018, 3.2, modified — The abbreviated term "CCS" has been added.]
3.3
capability element
element used to indicate that a particular capability is supported by the entity or manufacturing
software unit to which the element belongs
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.3]
3.4
capability profile
instance of capability template filled with the concrete values corresponding to the target
manufacturing software unit
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.4]
3.5
capability profiling
selection of a set of offered services defined by a particular interface within a software interoperability
framework
[SOURCE: ISO 16100-1:2009, 3.5]
3.6
capability template
template
schema representing a capability class
[SOURCE: ISO 16300-1:2018, 3.6]
3.7
ca
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.