iTeh StandardsiTeh Standards
EURUSD
Your shopping cart is empty.
ASTM

ASTM D3481-06(2011)

(Test Method)

Standard Test Method for Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions (Withdrawn 2018)

Standard Test Method for Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions (Withdrawn 2018)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method of applying force may be used as a standard test to compare the characteristics of a given design of container/child-resistant closure system with a standard or to compare the characteristics of container/child-resistant closure systems differing in construction.
It may be used to simulate certain manipulations that may be expected to occur in protocol testing (such as, prying with the teeth or objects in the room, biting, and pulling with the teeth).
This test method may be used to establish performance specifications.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the force required to separate (or “shell”) the snap-fitted outer cap from the inner cap of Type IA, IB, or IC child-resistant closures.
1.2 This test method does not measure the force required to separate parts of a child-resistant closure system that were originally “screwed-on” instead of “snapped-on” (for example, pull a cap over or through continuous or multi-start threads when the cap was originally screwed on).
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The inch-pound units given in parentheses are for information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
WITHDRAWN RATIONALE
This test method covered the measurement of the force required to separate (or "shell") the snap-fitted outer cap from the inner cap of Type IA, IB, or IC child-resistant closures.
Formerly under the jurisdiction of Committee F02 on Primary Barrier Packaging, this test method was withdrawn in May 2018. This standard is being withdrawn without replacement due to its limited use by industry.

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
31-Jul-2011
Withdrawal Date
31-May-2018
ICS
55.020 - Packaging and distribution of goods in general
Technical Committee
F02 - Primary Barrier Packaging
Drafting Committee
F02.25 - Rigid Container Closure Systems
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

ASTM D3481-06(2011) - Standard Test Method for Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions (Withdrawn 2018)ASTM D3481-06(2011) - Standard Test Method for Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions (Withdrawn 2018)
PreviousNext
Standard
ASTM D3481-06(2011) - Standard Test Method for Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions (Withdrawn 2018)
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D3481 − 06 (Reapproved 2011)
Standard Test Method for
Manual Shelling Two-Piece Child-Resistant Closures That
1
Are Activated by Two Simultaneous Dissimilar Motions
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D3481; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3. Terminology (see Classification D3475)
1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the force 3.1 Definitions:
required to separate (or “shell”) the snap-fitted outer cap from 3.1.1 Type IA child-resistant closure—a two-piece continu-
the inner cap of Type IA, IB, or IC child-resistant closures. ous thread closure requiring a random push down while
turning; no orientation of the push down force is necessary.
1.2 This test method does not measure the force required to
3.1.2 Type IB child-resistant closure—a two-piece continu-
separate parts of a child-resistant closure system that were
ous thread closure requiring a localized squeeze force while
originally “screwed-on” instead of “snapped-on” (for example,
turning; the force must be applied to a designated location on
pull a cap over or through continuous or multi-start threads
the closure skirt.
when the cap was originally screwed on).
3.1.3 Type IC child-resistant closure—a two-piece continu-
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
ous thread closure requiring a random squeeze while turning;
standard. The inch-pound units given in parentheses are for
no orientation of the squeeze force is necessary.
information only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
4. Summary of Test Method
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
4.1 This test method measures the force required to pry the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
outercapofftheinnercapusingafixturehavingacontactpoint
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
under the tip of the skirt of the outer cap and leverage being
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
placed on that point and the top of the cap. This procedure is
2. Referenced Documents used where a pivotal prying force can be successfully used to
2 separate the components of the closure system. Either a torque
2.1 ASTM Standards:
wrench or a torque meter can be used as a measuring device.
D3474 Practice for Calibration and Use of Torque Meters
Used in Packaging Applications
5. Significance and Use
D3475 Classification of Child-Resistant Packages
5.1 This test method of applying force may be used as a
E105 Practice for Probability Sampling of Materials
standardtesttocomparethecharacteristicsofagivendesignof
E122 Practice for Calculating Sample Size to Estimate,With
container/child-resistant closure system with a standard or to
Specified Precision, the Average for a Characteristic of a
compare the characteristics of container/child-resistant closure
Lot or Process
systems differing in construction.
2.2 Other Documents:
ISO Bulletin 2233 Packaging—Complete, Filled, Transport 5.2 It may be used to simulate certain manipulations that
3
4
Packages—Part 2: Conditioning for Testing
may be expected to occur in protocol testing (such as, prying
with the teeth or objects in the room, biting, and pulling with
the teeth).
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee F02 on Flexible
5.3 This test method may be used to establish performance
Barrier Packaging and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F02.25 on Rigid
Container Closure Systems.
specifications.
Current edition approved Aug. 1, 2011. Published November 2011. Originally
approved in 1976. Last previous edition approved in 2006 as D3481 – 06. DOI:
6. Apparatus
10.1520/D3481-06R11.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
6.1 Testing Machine(s):
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website.
3 4
Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St., Consumer Product Safety Commission’s Poison Prevention Packaging Act,
4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org. 1970.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
D3481 − 06 (2011)
Metric Equivalents
in. mm
3.00 76.2
1.00 25.4
1.70 43.2
0.50 12.7
0.22 5.6
0.04 1.0
0.07 1.8
0.88 22.4
0.38 9.7
0.60 15.2
0.85 21.6
2.10 53.3
Note A—0.040 in. (1.0 mm) or outer shell thickness.
3
Note B—Maximum 1 ⁄4 in. (34 mm)
Note C—He
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.

This May Also Interest You

ASTM
ASTM D7860-14(2022)(Test Method)
Standard Test Methods for Measurement of Torque Retention for Child Resistant and Non-Child Resistant Packages with Continuous Thread Closures Using Automated Torque Testing Equipment

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method allows for the measurement of the torque retention properties of container/continuous thread closure systems of various designs, materials, and manufacture, and is suitable for package development and engineering evaluation.  
5.2 Each test method can be used for the evaluation of non child resistant container/continuous thread closure systems under controlled conditions such as when the application torque is known and the applied downward force to the closure is zero or for Type I, style “A” push down and turn child resistant container/continuous thread closure systems under controlled conditions such as when the application torque and the applied downward force to the closure is known.  
5.3 This test method measures torque retention properties of container/continuous thread closure systems with the use of an automated transducer based torque meter operating at a known rotational velocity (rpm) or known torque ramp.  
5.4 This test method is intended for measurement of dry torque only.
SCOPE
1.1 These test methods evaluate the torque retention of continuous thread closures on containers with matching finishes, for predetermined environmental conditions over time. Methods are defined for both Type I, style “A” push down and turn Type II2 child resistant and non child resistant type closures.  
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
Note 1: The SI unit system is the recommended system.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F1307-20(Test Method)
Standard Test Method for Oxygen Transmission Rate Through Dry Packages Using a Coulometric Sensor

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 Oxygen gas transmission rate is an important determinant of the protection afforded by barrier materials. It is not, however, the sole determinant, and additional tests, based on experience, must be used to correlate package performance with O2GTR. This test method is suitable as a referee method of testing, provided that the user and source have agreed on sampling procedures, standardization procedures, test conditions, and acceptance criteria.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers a procedure for the determination of the steady-state rate of transmission of oxygen gas into packages. More specifically, the method is applicable to packages that in normal use will enclose a dry environment.  
1.2 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    7 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F2097-20(Guide)
Standard Guide for Design and Evaluation of Primary Flexible Packaging for Medical Products

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 This design and evaluation guide describes multiple categories for evaluating flexible medical packages and packaging materials. These include safety, barrier, material and package performance attributes and characteristics, package integrity, visibility and appearance, processing, printed ink, distribution simulation, and conditioning.  
4.2 The intent of this design and evaluation guide is to evaluate all cited categories and select those that are applicable. Once the product has been characterized and the sterilization methodology has been defined, there are numerous sets of requirements for any specific package. This design and evaluation guide provides an avenue for assessing these requirements and choosing test methods for both evaluating the package design and monitoring package compliance.
Note 1: Many of the standards included in this guide are consensus standards that are recognized by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Selection and use of a U.S. FDA recognized consensus standard is voluntary and the sole responsibility of the user in determining its applicability. For further information, consult the U.S. FDA Standards and Conformity Assessment Program at https://www.fda.gov/medical-devices/device-advice-comprehensive-regulatoryassistance/standards-and-conformity-assessment-program  
4.3 Product characterization shall include mass or weight, geometry (length and width, height, and shape) and product composition.  
4.4 All categories must be considered for applicability.  
4.5 The Summary of Test Methods for Medical Packaging Design and Evaluation (Fig. 1) provides a compact graphical presentation of the test methods referenced in this guide.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide provides directions for the design and evaluation of primary flexible packages for medical products. The package materials must be selected appropriately for manufacturing process, end use, and the product being packaged.  
1.2 This guide provides a compendium of test methods, practices, and procedures. Specific individual test methods must be selected based on the pertinent characteristics of the specific product to be packaged and the purpose for testing, research and development, or compliance. Not all test methods will be applicable.  
1.3 This guide does not address acceptability criteria, which need to be determined jointly by the package producer and the medical products manufacturer.  
1.4 This guide does not assess the product to be packaged or the sterilization method to be used.  
1.5 The units cited in the referenced standard should be used.  
1.6 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    27 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    27 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D3475-20(Classification)
Standard Classification of Child-Resistant Packages

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 This classification scheme defines the type of motions, skills, or tools required for a particular type of child-resistant package and provides examples of current packaging within that type.  
3.2 Reference to a particular package in this classification is not intended in any manner to denote endorsement or approval of the package by ASTM.  
3.3 Packages have been included as examples based on manufacturers' claims of child-resistance. Child-resistant package functionality for any specific product type must be determined by the packager/manufacturer following the guidelines of the PPPA of 1970 and the most current version of the CFR Title 16 Part 1700 and Title 40 Part 157.2 The listing of a package in this classification is not an indication of whether or not it has been successfully tested in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines.  
3.4 Additions or deletions to the examples should be reported to Subcommittee F02.50 on Package Design and Development, for incorporation into this classification during the next revision.  
3.5 Additions require F02.50 Task Group review of CFR Title 16 Part 1700 full protocol testing reports. Reports should cover procedures and all CFR Title 16 Part 1700 required reporting elements. Additional information may be requested.  
3.6 Use of a package cited in this classification allows for the statement “CONFORMS TO ASTM D3475,” and does not allow for the use of the ASTM logo or result in an ASTM certification mark.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers various types of child-resistant packages.  
1.2 The examples for each type of child-resistant packaging are not intended to be all-inclusive, but are included only as an aid in the understanding and comprehension of each type of classification.  
1.3 Listings are not to be considered endorsements or approval of the package by ASTM.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F2475-20(Guide)
Standard Guide for Biocompatibility Evaluation of Medical Device Packaging Materials

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 The compatibility of packaging materials with a medical device is a requirement of many regulatory bodies. Since most medical devices are used or implanted in, around, or on the human body, the benefits of these devices must outweigh the risks. Therefore, the packaging materials that come in contact with the medical device must also be evaluated and determined to be safe for use with the human body in that they have no negative impact on the physical, chemical, or biological properties of the device. This evaluation may include both a study of relevant experience with, and actual testing of, packaging materials. Such an evaluation may result in the conclusion that no testing is needed if the material has a demonstrable history of safe use in the specific role that is the same as that of the package under design.  
5.2 The medical device manufacturer determines the need for appropriate testing, with consideration of the device/package interactions, if any. When screening information is needed regarding the biocompatibility of the packaging, cytotoxicity testing from the supplier is typically performed.
SCOPE
1.1 This guide provides information to determine the appropriate testing for biocompatibility of medical device packaging materials that have the potential to contact the patient directly or indirectly.  
1.2 This guide does not apply to secondary or tertiary packaging materials.  
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Guide
    3 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D4334-18(Practice)
Standard Practice for Determination of the Dip Tube Retention of a Mechanical Pump Dispenser

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
2.1 This practice may be used to establish performance specifications.  
2.2 This practice may be used as a quality control assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the determination of the force necessary to separate the dip tube from the body of a mechanical pump dispenser (spray or flow types).  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D4335-18(Practice)
Standard Practice for Determination of Component Retention of a Mechanical Pump Dispenser

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 This practice may be used to establish performance specifications.  
3.2 This practice may be used to establish quality control assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers the evaluation of the force required to remove the hood and the actuator from a mechanical dispensing pump.  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    2 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D3475-18(Classification)
Standard Classification of Child-Resistant Packages

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 This classification scheme defines the type of motions, skills, or tools required for a particular type of child-resistant package and provides examples of current packaging within that type.  
3.2 Reference to a particular package in this classification is not intended in any manner to denote endorsement or approval of the package by ASTM.  
3.3 Packages have been included as examples based on manufacturers' claims of child-resistance. Child-resistant package functionality for any specific product type must be determined by the packager/manufacturer following the guidelines of the PPPA of 1970 and the most current version of the CFR Title 16 Part 1700 and Title 40 Part 157.2 The listing of a package in this classification is not an indication of whether or not it has been successfully tested in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines.  
3.4 Additions or deletions to the examples should be reported to Subcommittee F02.50 on Package Design and Development, for incorporation into this classification during the next revision.  
3.5 Additions require F02.50 Task Group review of CFR Title 16 Part 1700 full protocol testing reports. Reports should cover procedures and all CFR Title 16 Part 1700 required reporting elements. Additional information may be requested.  
3.6 Use of a package cited in this classification allows for the statement “CONFORMS TO ASTM D3475,” and does not allow for the use of the ASTM logo or result in an ASTM certification mark.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers various types of child-resistant packages.  
1.2 The examples for each type of child-resistant packaging are not intended to be all-inclusive, but are included only as an aid in the understanding and comprehension of each type of classification.  
1.3 Listings are not to be considered endorsements or approval of the package by ASTM.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM F3263-17(Guide)
Standard Guide for Packaging Test Method Validation

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Addressing consensus standards with inter-laboratory studies (ILS) and methods specific to an organization. Test methods need to be validated in many cases, in order to be able to rely on the results. This has to be done at the organization performing the tests but is also performed in the development of standards in inter-laboratory studies (ILS), which are not substitutes for the validation work to be performed at the organization performing the test.  
4.1.1 Validations at the Testing Organization—Validations at the test performing organization include planning, executing, and analyzing the studies. Planning should include description of the scope of the test method which includes the description of the test equipment as well as the measurement range of samples it will be used for, rationales for the choice of samples, the amount of samples as well as rationales for the choice of methodology.  
4.1.2 Objective of ILS Studies—ILS studies (per E691-14) are not focused on the development of test methods but rather with gathering the information needed for a test method precision statement after the development stage has been successfully completed. The data obtained in the interlaboratory study may indicate however, that further effort is needed to improve the test method. Precision in this case is defined as the repeatability and reproducibility of a test method, commonly known as gage R&R. For interlaboratory studies, repeatability deals with the variation associated within one appraiser operating a single test system at one facility whereas reproducibility is concerned with variation between labs each with their own unique test system. It is important to understand that if an ILS is conducted in this manner, reproducibility between appraisers and test systems in the same lab are not assessed.  
4.1.3 Overview of the ILS Process—Essentially the ILS process consists of planning, executing, and analyzing studies that are meant to assess the precision of a tes...
SCOPE
1.1 This guide provides information to clarify the process of validating packaging test methods specific for an organization utilizing them as well as through inter-laboratory studies (ILS), addressing consensus standards with inter-laboratory studies (ILS) and methods specific to an organization.  
1.1.1 ILS discussion will focus on writing and interpretation of test method precision statements and on alternative approaches to analyzing and stating the results.  
1.2 This document provides guidance for defining and developing validations for both variable and attribute data applications.  
1.3 This guide provides limited statistical guidance; however, this document does not purport to give concrete sample sizes for all packaging types and test methods. Emphasis is on statistical techniques effectively contained in reference documents already developed by ASTM and other organizations.  
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety, health, and environmental practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.5 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Guide
    14 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
ASTM
ASTM D3475-17(Classification)
Standard Classification of Child-Resistant Packages

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
3.1 This classification scheme defines the type of motions, skills, or tools required for a particular type of child-resistant package and provides examples of current packaging within that type.  
3.2 Reference to a particular package in this classification is not intended in any manner to denote endorsement or approval of the package by ASTM.  
3.3 Packages have been included as examples based on manufacturers' claims of child-resistance. Child-resistant package functionality for any specific product type must be determined by the packager/manufacturer following the guidelines of the PPPA of 1970 and the most current version of the CFR Title 16 Part 1700 and Title 40 Part 157.2 The listing of a package in this classification is not an indication of whether or not it has been successfully tested in accordance with the aforementioned guidelines.  
3.4 Additions or deletions to the examples should be reported to Committee D10 on Packaging, for incorporation into this classification during the next revision.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers various types of child-resistant packages.  
1.2 The examples for each type of child-resistant packaging are not intended to be all-inclusive, but are included only as an aid in the understanding and comprehension of each type of classification.  
1.3 Listings are not to be considered endorsements or approval of the package by ASTM.  
1.4 This international standard was developed in accordance with internationally recognized principles on standardization established in the Decision on Principles for the Development of International Standards, Guides and Recommendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.

  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off
  • Standard
    5 pages
    English language
    sale 15% off