Standard Test Method for Odor or Flavor Transfer or Both from Rigid Polymeric Packaging

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is designed for use by a trained sensory panel experienced in using an intensity scale or rank ordering and familiar with the descriptive terminology and references associated with the packaging materials. Data analysis and interpretation should be conducted by a trained and experienced sensory professional. See Refs (3,4) for discussions on panelist screening and training.
This test method should be considered as a screening technique for suppliers and end-users to use in assessing the odor or flavor impact or both of rigid packaging. The application of this test method will result in a PPS or rank data. The determination for suitability of a package for a particular end-use should be based on a set of predetermined criteria including the PPS or rank score. Information obtained from the transfer tests can also be used to evaluate the origin of any transferred tastes or odors.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers a recommended procedure for examining odor or flavor properties or both of rigid polymeric packaging closures and fillable materials.
1.2 This test method can be used for single materials or coextruded materials that are foam molded, injection molded, blow molded, compression molded, or thermoformed polymers.
1.3 The focus of this test method is the evaluation of molded polymer in terms of the transfer of package-related odors, flavors, or both, to water and other model systems (bland food simulants). Rigid packaging forms vary considerably in type, size, and shape. Thus, customizing the exact procedure for dealing with the physical requirements for individual packages is the responsibility of the user.
1.4 This test method assumes testing of the materials at a one-time point; shelf-life testing is not included.
1.5 Refer to Test Method E 1870 for the evaluation of inherent odor of packaging material by confinement tests.
1.6 This test method provides sample preparation procedures and two methods of evaluation.
1.6.1 The package performance score method allows for the comparison of any molded polymer sample to another.
1.6.2 The ranking method allows for comparison of samples within the currently tested set only.
1.6.3 The preparation of samples is consistent regardless of the method of evaluation used.
1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
14-Apr-2008
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E2609-08 - Standard Test Method for Odor or Flavor Transfer or Both from Rigid Polymeric Packaging
English language
10 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E2609 − 08
StandardTest Method for
Odor or Flavor Transfer or Both from Rigid Polymeric
1
Packaging
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2609; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
1.1 This test method covers a recommended procedure for
examining odor or flavor properties or both of rigid polymeric
2. Referenced Documents
packaging closures and fillable materials.
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.2 This test method can be used for single materials or
D1292 Test Method for Odor in Water
coextruded materials that are foam molded, injection molded,
E253 Terminology Relating to Sensory Evaluation of Mate-
blow molded, compression molded, or thermoformed poly-
rials and Products
mers.
E460 Practice for Determining Effect of Packaging on Food
1.3 Thefocusofthistestmethodistheevaluationofmolded
and Beverage Products During Storage
polymer in terms of the transfer of package-related odors,
E619 Practice for Evaluating Foreign Odors in Paper Pack-
flavors, or both, to water and other model systems (bland food
aging
simulants). Rigid packaging forms vary considerably in type,
E1870 Test Method for Odor and Taste Transfer from
size, and shape. Thus, customizing the exact procedure for
Polymeric Packaging Film
dealing with the physical requirements for individual packages
is the responsibility of the user.
3. Terminology
1.4 This test method assumes testing of the materials at a
3.1 Definitions—For definitions of terms relating to sensory
one-time point; shelf-life testing is not included.
analysis, see Terminology E253.
1.5 Refer to Test Method E1870 for the evaluation of
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
inherent odor of packaging material by confinement tests.
3.2.1 blow molding, v—process of producing a hollow
polymeric part by introducing air into a parisen.
1.6 This test method provides sample preparation proce-
dures and two methods of evaluation.
3.2.2 compression molding, v—process of compressing
1.6.1 The package performance score method allows for the
polymer between two heated platens, using the heat and
comparison of any molded polymer sample to another.
pressure to produce a flat sample.
1.6.2 Therankingmethodallowsforcomparisonofsamples
3.2.3 coextruded packaging, n—two or more layers of resin
within the currently tested set only.
extruded simultaneously and these layers may be different
1.6.3 The preparation of samples is consistent regardless of
resins or the same resin.
the method of evaluation used.
3.2.4 direct contact, n—packaging material in physical con-
1.7 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
tact with test medium.
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
3.2.5 foam molding, v—process of producing rigid forms by
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
expanding foam in a closed mold using steam.
and are not considered standard.
3.2.6 injection molding, v—process of forcing molten poly-
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
mer into a mold.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
3.2.7 monolayer packaging, n—packaging consisting of a
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
single layer of material or resin.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction ofASTM Committee E18 on Sensory
2
Evaluation and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E18.05 on Sensory For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Applications--General. contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Current edition approved April 15, 2008. Published May 2008. DOI: 10.1520/ Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
E2609-08. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
E2609 − 08
3.2.8 package performance score (PPS), n— simple calcu- addition, qualitative descriptions are provided for each sample
lation that allows for the comparison of one rigid packaging and are typically listed in order of perceived intensity.
sample to another, as long as the same battery of tests is NOTE 1—The calculation of the PPS may only be used to compare
samples for which the same battery of tests has been performed (see
performed on each of the samples.
Appendix X2).
3.2.8.1 Discussion—The PPS is calculated by summing
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.