ASTM E822-92(2015)
(Practice)Standard Practice for Determining Resistance of Solar Collector Covers to Hail by Impact With Propelled Ice Balls
Standard Practice for Determining Resistance of Solar Collector Covers to Hail by Impact With Propelled Ice Balls
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
2.1 In many geographic areas there is concern about the effect of falling hail upon solar collector covers. This practice may be used to determine the ability of flat-plate solar collector covers to withstand the impact forces of hailstones. In this practice, the ability of a solar collector cover plate to withstand hail impact is related to its tested ability to withstand impact from ice balls. The effects of the impact on the material are highly variable and dependent upon the material.
2.2 This practice describes a standard procedure for mounting the test specimen, conducting the impact test, and reporting the effects.
2.2.1 The procedures for mounting cover plate materials and collectors are provided to ensure that they are tested in a configuration that relates to their use in a solar collector.
2.2.2 The corner locations of the four impacts are chosen to represent vulnerable sites on the cover plate. Impacts near corner supports are more critical than impacts elsewhere. Only a single impact is specified at each of the impact locations. For test control purposes, multiple impacts in a single location are not permitted because a subcritical impact may still cause damage that would alter the response to subsequent impacts.
2.2.3 Resultant velocity is used to simulate the velocity that may be reached by hail accompanied by wind. The resultant velocity used in this practice is determined by vector addition of a 20 m/s (45 mph) horizontal velocity to the vertical terminal velocity.
2.2.4 Ice balls are used in this practice to simulate hailstones because natural hailstones are not readily available to use, and ice balls closely approximate hailstones. However, no direct relationship has been established between the effect of impact of ice balls and hailstones. Hailstones are highly variable in properties such as shape, density, and frangibility.2 These properties affect factors such as the kinetic energy delivered to the cover plate, the period during ...
SCOPE
1.1 This practice covers a procedure for determining the ability of cover plates for flat-plate solar collectors to withstand impact forces of falling hail. Propelled ice balls are used to simulate falling hailstones. This practice is not intended to apply to photovoltaic cells or arrays.
1.2 This practice defines two types of test specimens, describes methods for mounting specimens, specifies impact locations on each test specimen, provides an equation for determining the velocity of any size ice ball, provides a method for impacting the test specimens with ice balls, and specifies parameters that must be recorded and reported.
1.3 This practice does not establish pass or fail levels. The determination of acceptable or unacceptable levels of ice-ball impact resistance is beyond the scope of this practice.
1.4 The size of ice ball to be used in conducting this test is not specified in this practice. This practice can be used with various sizes of ice balls.
1.5 The categories of solar collector cover plate materials to which this practice may be applied cover the range of:
1.5.1 Brittle sheet, such as glass,
1.5.2 Semirigid sheet, such as plastic, and
1.5.3 Flexible membrane, such as plastic film.
1.6 Solar collector cover materials should be tested as:
1.6.1 Part of an assembled collector (Type 1 specimen), or
1.6.2 Mounted on a separate test frame cover plate holder (Type 2 specimen).
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E822 − 92 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Practice for
Determining Resistance of Solar Collector Covers to Hail by
Impact with Propelled Ice Balls
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E822; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
1.1 This practice covers a procedure for determining the
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
ability of cover plates for flat-plate solar collectors to withstand
1.9 This international standard was developed in accor-
impact forces of falling hail. Propelled ice balls are used to
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
simulate falling hailstones. This practice is not intended to
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
apply to photovoltaic cells or arrays.
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
1.2 This practice defines two types of test specimens,
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
describes methods for mounting specimens, specifies impact
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
locations on each test specimen, provides an equation for
determining the velocity of any size ice ball, provides a method
2. Significance and Use
for impacting the test specimens with ice balls, and specifies
2.1 In many geographic areas there is concern about the
parameters that must be recorded and reported.
effect of falling hail upon solar collector covers. This practice
1.3 This practice does not establish pass or fail levels. The
may be used to determine the ability of flat-plate solar collector
determination of acceptable or unacceptable levels of ice-ball
covers to withstand the impact forces of hailstones. In this
impact resistance is beyond the scope of this practice.
practice, the ability of a solar collector cover plate to withstand
hail impact is related to its tested ability to withstand impact
1.4 The size of ice ball to be used in conducting this test is
from ice balls. The effects of the impact on the material are
not specified in this practice. This practice can be used with
highly variable and dependent upon the material.
various sizes of ice balls.
2.2 This practice describes a standard procedure for mount-
1.5 The categories of solar collector cover plate materials to
ing the test specimen, conducting the impact test, and reporting
which this practice may be applied cover the range of:
the effects.
1.5.1 Brittle sheet, such as glass,
2.2.1 The procedures for mounting cover plate materials
1.5.2 Semirigid sheet, such as plastic, and
and collectors are provided to ensure that they are tested in a
1.5.3 Flexible membrane, such as plastic film.
configuration that relates to their use in a solar collector.
1.6 Solar collector cover materials should be tested as:
2.2.2 The corner locations of the four impacts are chosen to
1.6.1 Part of an assembled collector (Type 1 specimen), or
represent vulnerable sites on the cover plate. Impacts near
1.6.2 Mounted on a separate test frame cover plate holder
corner supports are more critical than impacts elsewhere. Only
(Type 2 specimen).
a single impact is specified at each of the impact locations. For
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
test control purposes, multiple impacts in a single location are
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
not permitted because a subcritical impact may still cause
only.
damage that would alter the response to subsequent impacts.
2.2.3 Resultant velocity is used to simulate the velocity that
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the
may be reached by hail accompanied by wind. The resultant
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
velocity used in this practice is determined by vector addition
of a 20 m/s (45 mph) horizontal velocity to the vertical terminal
velocity.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E44 on Solar,
Geothermal and Other Alternative Energy Sources and is the direct responsibility of
2.2.4 Ice balls are used in this practice to simulate hailstones
Subcommittee E44.20 on Optical Materials for Solar Applications.
because natural hailstones are not readily available to use, and
Current edition approved March 1, 2015. Published April 2015. Originally
ice balls closely approximate hailstones. However, no direct
approved in 1981. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as E822 – 92 (2009).
DOI: 10.1520/E0822-92R15. relationship has been established between the effect of impact
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E822 − 92 (2015)
of ice balls and hailstones. Hailstones are highly variable in
properties such as shape, density, and frangibility. These
properties affect factors such as the kinetic energy delivered to
the cover plate, the period during which energy is delivered,
and the area over which the energy is distributed. Ice balls,
with a density, frangibility, and terminal velocity near the range
of hailstones, are the nearest hailstone approximation known at
this time. Perhaps the major difference between ice balls and
hailstones is that hailstones are much more variable than ice
balls. However, ice balls can be uniformly and repeatedly
manufactured to ensure a projectile with known properties.
2.2.5 A wide range of observable effects may be produced
by impacting the various types of cover plate materials. The
effects may vary from no effect to total destruction. Some
FIG. 1 Frame Dimensions and Location of Test Impact Points
changes in the cover material may be visible when there is no
apparent functional impairment of the cover plate material. All
NOTE 1—A launcher that has proven suitable uses a compressed air
effects of each impact must be described in the report so that an
supply, an accumulator tank, a large-diameter quick-opening valve and
estimate of their significance can be made.
interchangeable barrels to accommodate the sizes of ice balls to be used.
Barrels should be made from materials with low thermal conductivity to
2.3 Data generated using this practice may be used: (1) to
reduce melting of the ice ball. Barrels should be sized such that the ice ball
evaluate impact resistance of a single material or collector, (2)
remains intact during loading and launching.
to compare the impact resistance of several materials or
3.2 Velocity Meter, for measuring the ice ball velocity with
collectors, (3) to provide a common basis for selection of cover
an accuracy of 62.0 %.
materials or collectors for use in various geographic areas, or
3.3 Test Base—A structurally rigid support for mounting a
(4) to evaluate changes in impact resistance due to environ-
complete solar collector panel (Type 1 specimen), or for
mental factors such as weather.
mounting a solar collector cover plate material (Type 2
2.4 This practice does not state the size(s) of ice ball(s) to be
specimen) set in the cover holder.
used in making the impact. Either the person requesting the test
3.4 Cover Holder—A rigid edging frame (see Fig. 1 and Fig.
or the person performing the test must determine ice ball size
2) designed to hold an approximately 860 by 1930-mm (34 by
to be used in the testing. Choice of ice ball size may relate to
76-in.) cover plate.
the intent of the testing.
2.4.1 If the testing is being performed to evaluate impact
NOTE 2—Hardwood, such as oak, birch, maple, or hickory, is manda-
resistance of a single material or collector, or several materials
tory if wood is used for the cover holder.
or collectors, it may be desirable to repeat the test using several NOTE 3—Corner straps, as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, have been found
useful to ensure the cover holder is rigid.
sizes of ice balls. In this manner the different effects of various
sizes of ice balls may be determined.
3.5 Molds, for casting spherical crack-free ice balls of
2.4.2 The size and frequency of hail varies significantly
appropriate diameter.
among various geographic areas. If testing is being performed
NOTE 4—Molds made from room-temperature vulcanizing rubber and
to evaluate materials or collectors intended for use in a specific
expanded polystyrene have been found suitable.
geographic area, the ice ball size should correspond to the level
3.6 Freezer—A device controlled at − 12 6 5°C (106 9°F)
of hail impact resistance required for that area. Information on
for making and storing ice balls.
hail size and frequency may be available from local historical
weather records or may be determined from the publications
4. Test Specimen
listed in Appendix X1.
4.1 Type 1—The test specimen shall consist of a complete
2.5 The hail impact resistance of materials may change as
glazing assembly or a complete solar collector panel with
the materials are exposed to various environmental factors.
necessary mounting brackets or fixtures.
This practice may be used to generate data to evaluate
degradation by comparison of hail impact resistance data
measured before and after exposure to such aging.
3. Apparatus
3.1 Launcher—A mechanism capable of propelling a se-
lected ice ball at the corresponding resultant velocity. The
aiming accuracy of the launcher must be sufficient to propel the
ice ball to strike the cover plate within 25 mm (61 in.) of the
specified impact points. See Fig. 1.
Gokhale, N. R., Hailstorms and Hailstone Growth, State University of New
York Press, Albany, NY, 1975. FIG. 2 Cover Holder, Empty (Section A-A of Fig. 1)
E822 − 92 (2015)
5. Mounting
5.1 Type 1—Position and support the test specimen on a
suitable test base using necessary mounting brackets or
fixtures, or both. Do not obstruct the specified impact points by
the mounting fixtures.
5.2 Type 2—Secure the test specimen in the cover holder, as
shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 5, and mount the cover holder (with
the cover), on a suitable test base. Provide sufficient clearance
on the side opposite the impact surface to permit unobstructed
deflection of the cover material.
5.2.1 Lay brittle sheet cover materials, approximately 860
NOTE 1—Slot corner as indicated to fit steel corner straps. Straps should
by 1930 mm (34 by 76 in.), on the elastomeric gasket (Type A
be flush with surface.
durometer rating 30 to 50) of one member of the cover holder.
FIG. 3 Slots for Corner Straps of Cover Holder
Put the shim in place. Lay the other member of the cover
holder on top. Tighten the bolts or C-clamp screws until the
elastomeric gaskets are compressed and the shim is firmly held,
as shown in Fig. 5. (Note 5). Mount the specimen firmly on the
test base for testing.
NOTE 5—If the cover plate material will be damaged by the procedure
specified herein, the bolts or C-clamp screws should be tightened
sufficiently to hold the specimen in the frame, but not tightened to the
extent that permanent deformations are made in the cover plate material.
5.2.2 Clamp semirigid sheet (plastic) cover materials in the
cover holder in the same manner as brittle sheet cover
materials.
5.2.3 Flexible Membrane:
5.2.3.1 Mount the material in accordance with the manufac-
turer’s recommendations on a suitable rigid subframe approxi-
mately 860 by 1930 mm (34 by 76 in.). Mount the subframe in
the cover holder in the same manner as described for brittle
FIG. 4 Detail of Corner Straps for Cover Holder
sheet in 5.2.1.
5.2.3.2 Alternatively, set flexible membrane cover materials
in the holder and place under biaxial tension (normal to length
4.2 Type 2—The test specimen shall consist of a section of
and width).
solar collector cover plate material mounted in the cover
holder. NOTE 6—This may be accomplished by cutting the films oversize,
NOTE 1—Bolts may be used in place of C-clamps if the bolt does not penetrate the test specimen (that is, for rigid sheet).
FIG. 5 Cover Holder, Loaded
E822 − 92 (2015)
notching the four corners to the dimensions of the holder frame, and
8.8 Aim the launcher at a target impact point (as shown in
draping the four flaps with suitable mass attached over the frame. The
Fig. 1) not previously impacted. Impact each impact point one
mass must be located to uniformly distribute the tension over the area of
time only.
the film. Experience has shown that a 0.13-mm (0.005-in.) film requires a
mass of approximately 9 kg/m (6 lb/linear foot) of perimeter. After
8.9 Position the velocity meter such that the ice ball velocity
tightening the clamps to prevent slippage during testing, the flaps and
will be measured between the launcher and the test specimen.
excess material may be trimmed away, and the clamped specimens
The ice ball should leave the velocity meter not more than 1.0
mounted as described in 5.2.1.
m (3.1 ft) in front of the impact location. Prepare the velocity
meter for the test.
6. Preconditioning
8.10 Remove from the freezer an ice ball of the size
6.1 Precondition Type 1 test specimen or the test material
determined in 8.3. Inspect the ice ball to ensure it is uncracked,
for the Type 2 test specimen at 23 6 2°C (73.4 6 4°F) and 50
uniform, and spherical. Measure and record the nominal
6 5 % relative humidity for not less than 24 h prior to testing.
diameter and mass of the ice ball. Report the mass measure-
7. Safety Considerations
ment to the nearest 0.1 g.
7.1 The operation of the described equipment may expose
8.11 Place the ice ball in the launcher.
the operator to risk of injury from the propelled or rebounded
8.12 Set the launcher controls to ensure that the ball will be
ice ball, fragments of the broken test specimen, and from the
propelled at the velocity determined in 8.4.
noise that may develop. Eye and ear protection should be
8.13 Caution: Personnel protective equipment may be re-
considered as the minimum protection for the operator.
quired during this operation, see 7.1. Launch the ice ball using
8. Procedure its corresponding resultant velocity. Measure and record the
velocity of the ice ball. Ice balls shall impact the test specimen
8.1 Using the ice ball mold(s), make sufficient quantities of
within 60 s of removal from the freezer.
ice balls of the size(s) anticipated for testing.
8.14 Inspect the ice ball impact location. If the actual impact
8.2 Precondition the Type
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: E822 − 92 (Reapproved 2009) E822 − 92 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Practice for
Determining Resistance of Solar Collector Covers to Hail by
Impact With Propelled Ice Balls
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E822; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
This standard has been approved for use by agencies of the U.S. Department of Defense.
1. Scope
1.1 This practice covers a procedure for determining the ability of cover plates for flat-plate solar collectors to withstand impact
forces of falling hail. Propelled ice balls are used to simulate falling hailstones. This practice is not intended to apply to
photovoltaic cells or arrays.
1.2 This practice defines two types of test specimens, describes methods for mounting specimens, specifies impact locations on
each test specimen, provides an equation for determining the velocity of any size ice ball, provides a method for impacting the
test specimens with ice balls, and specifies parameters that must be recorded and reported.
1.3 This practice does not establish pass or fail levels. The determination of acceptable or unacceptable levels of ice-ball impact
resistance is beyond the scope of this practice.
1.4 The size of ice ball to be used in conducting this test is not specified in this practice. This practice can be used with various
sizes of ice balls.
1.5 The categories of solar collector cover plate materials to which this practice may be applied cover the range of:
1.5.1 Brittle sheet, such as glass,
1.5.2 Semirigid sheet, such as plastic, and
1.5.3 Flexible membrane, such as plastic film.
1.6 Solar collector cover materials should be tested as:
1.6.1 Part of an assembled collector (Type 1 specimen), or
1.6.2 Mounted on a separate test frame cover plate holder (Type 2 specimen).
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
2. Significance and Use
2.1 In many geographic areas there is concern about the effect of falling hail upon solar collector covers. This practice may be
used to determine the ability of flat-plate solar collector covers to withstand the impact forces of hailstones. In this practice, the
ability of a solar collector cover plate to withstand hail impact is related to its tested ability to withstand impact from ice balls.
The effects of the impact on the material are highly variable and dependent upon the material.
2.2 This practice describes a standard procedure for mounting the test specimen, conducting the impact test, and reporting the
effects.
2.2.1 The procedures for mounting cover plate materials and collectors are provided to ensure that they are tested in a
configuration that relates to their use in a solar collector.
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E44 on Solar, Geothermal and Other Alternative Energy Sources and is the direct responsibility of
Subcommittee E44.05 on Solar Heating and Cooling Systems and Materials.
Current edition approved April 1, 2009March 1, 2015. Published June 2009April 2015. Originally approved in 1981. Last previous edition approved in 20032009 as
E822–92(2003).E822–92(2009). DOI: 10.1520/E0822-92R09.10.1520/E0822-92R15.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E822 − 92 (2015)
2.2.2 The corner locations of the four impacts are chosen to represent vulnerable sites on the cover plate. Impacts near corner
supports are more critical than impacts elsewhere. Only a single impact is specified at each of the impact locations. For test control
purposes, multiple impacts in a single location are not permitted because a subcritical impact may still cause damage that would
alter the response to subsequent impacts.
2.2.3 Resultant velocity is used to simulate the velocity that may be reached by hail accompanied by wind. The resultant
velocity used in this practice is determined by vector addition of a 20 m/s (45 mph) horizontal velocity to the vertical terminal
velocity.
2.2.4 Ice balls are used in this practice to simulate hailstones because natural hailstones are not readily available to use, and ice
balls closely approximate hailstones. However, no direct relationship has been established between the effect of impact of ice balls
and hailstones. Hailstones are highly variable in properties such as shape, density, and frangibility. These properties affect factors
such as the kinetic energy delivered to the cover plate, the period during which energy is delivered, and the area over which the
energy is distributed. Ice balls, with a density, frangibility, and terminal velocity near the range of hailstones, are the nearest
hailstone approximation known at this time. Perhaps the major difference between ice balls and hailstones is that hailstones are
much more variable than ice balls. However, ice balls can be uniformly and repeatedly manufactured to ensure a projectile with
known properties.
2.2.5 A wide range of observable effects may be produced by impacting the various types of cover plate materials. The effects
may vary from no effect to total destruction. Some changes in the cover material may be visible when there is no apparent
functional impairment of the cover plate material. All effects of each impact must be described in the report so that an estimate
of their significance can be made.
2.3 Data generated using this practice may be used: (1) to evaluate impact resistance of a single material or collector, (2) to
compare the impact resistance of several materials or collectors, (3) to provide a common basis for selection of cover materials
or collectors for use in various geographic areas, or (4) to evaluate changes in impact resistance due to environmental factors such
as weather.
2.4 This practice does not state the size(s) of ice ball(s) to be used in making the impact. Either the person requesting the test
or the person performing the test must determine ice ball size to be used in the testing. Choice of ice ball size may relate to the
intent of the testing.
2.4.1 If the testing is being performed to evaluate impact resistance of a single material or collector, or several materials or
collectors, it may be desirable to repeat the test using several sizes of ice balls. In this manner the different effects of various sizes
of ice balls may be determined.
2.4.2 The size and frequency of hail varies significantly among various geographic areas. If testing is being performed to
evaluate materials or collectors intended for use in a specific geographic area, the ice ball size should correspond to the level of
hail impact resistance required for that area. Information on hail size and frequency may be available from local historical weather
records or may be determined from the publications listed in Appendix X1.
2.5 The hail impact resistance of materials may change as the materials are exposed to various environmental factors. This
practice may be used to generate data to evaluate degradation by comparison of hail impact resistance data measured before and
after exposure to such aging.
3. Apparatus
3.1 Launcher—A mechanism capable of propelling a selected ice ball at the corresponding resultant velocity. The aiming
accuracy of the launcher must be sufficient to propel the ice ball to strike the cover plate within 25 mm (61 in.) ofthe of the
specified impact points. See Fig. 1.
NOTE 1—A launcher that has proven suitable uses a compressed air supply, an accumulator tank, a large-diameter quick-opening valve and
interchangeable barrels to accommodate the sizes of ice balls to be used. Barrels should be made from materials with low thermal conductivity to reduce
melting of the ice ball. Barrels should be sized such that the ice ball remains intact during loading and launching.
3.2 Velocity Meter, for measuring the ice ball velocity with an accuracy of 62.0 %.
3.3 Test Base—A structurally rigid support for mounting a complete solar collector panel (Type 1 specimen), or for mounting
a solar collector cover plate material (Type 2 specimen) set in the cover holder.
3.4 Cover Holder—A rigid edging frame (see Fig. 1 and Fig. 2) designed to hold an approximately 860 by 1930-mm (34 by
76-in.) cover plate.
NOTE 2—Hardwood, such as oak, birch, maple, or hickory, is mandatory if wood is used for the cover holder.
NOTE 3—Corner straps, as shown in Fig. 3 and Fig. 4, have been found useful to ensure the cover holder is rigid.
3.5 Molds, for casting spherical crack-free ice balls of appropriate diameter.
NOTE 4—Molds made from room-temperature vulcanizing rubber and expanded polystyrene have been found suitable.
Gokhale, N. R., Hailstorms and Hailstone Growth, State University of New York Press, Albany, NY, 1975.
E822 − 92 (2015)
FIG. 1 Frame Dimensions and Location of Test Impact Points
FIG. 2 Cover Holder, Empty (Section A-A of Fig. 1)
NOTE 1—Slot corner as indicated to fit steel corner straps. Straps should be flush with surface.
FIG. 3 Slots for Corner Straps of Cover Holder
3.6 Freezer—A device controlled at − 12 6 5°C (106 9°F) for making and storing ice balls.
4. Test Specimen
4.1 Type 1—The test specimen shall consist of a complete glazing assembly or a complete solar collector panel with necessary
mounting brackets or fixtures.
4.2 Type 2—The test specimen shall consist of a section of solar collector cover plate material mounted in the cover holder.
5. Mounting
5.1 Type 1—Position and support the test specimen on a suitable test base using necessary mounting brackets or fixtures, or both.
Do not obstruct the specified impact points by the mounting fixtures.
5.2 Type 2—Secure the test specimen in the cover holder, as shown in Fig. 2 and Fig. 5, and mount the cover holder (with the
cover), on a suitable test base. Provide sufficient clearance on the side opposite the impact surface to permit unobstructed deflection
of the cover material.
E822 − 92 (2015)
FIG. 4 Detail of Corner Straps for Cover Holder
5.2.1 Lay brittle sheet cover materials, approximately 860 by 1930 mm (34 by 76 in.), on the elastomeric gasket (Type A
durometer rating 30 to 50) of one member of the cover holder. Put the shim in place. Lay the other member of the cover holder
on top. Tighten the bolts or C-clamp screws until the elastomeric gaskets are compressed and the shim is firmly held, as shown
in Fig. 5. (Note 5). Mount the specimen firmly on the test base for testing.
NOTE 5—If the cover plate material will be damaged by the procedure specified herein, the bolts or C-clamp screws should be tightened sufficiently
to hold the specimen in the frame, but not tightened to the extent that permanent deformations are made in the cover plate material.
5.2.2 Clamp semirigid sheet (plastic) cover materials in the cover holder in the same manner as brittle sheet cover materials.
5.2.3 Flexible Membrane:
5.2.3.1 Mount the material in accordance with the manufacturer’s recommendations on a suitable rigid subframe approximately
860 by 1930 mm (34 by 76 in.). Mount the subframe in the cover holder in the same manner as described for brittle sheet in 5.2.1.
5.2.3.2 Alternatively, set flexible membrane cover materials in the holder and place under biaxial tension (normal to length and
width).
NOTE 6—This may be accomplished by cutting the films oversize, notching the four corners to the dimensions of the holder frame, and draping the
four flaps with suitable mass attached over the frame. The mass must be located to uniformly distribute the tension over the area of the film. Experience
has shown that a 0.13-mm (0.005-in.) film requires a mass of approximately 9 kg/m (6 lb/linear foot) of perimeter. After tightening the clamps to prevent
slippage during testing, the flaps and excess material may be trimmed away, and the clamped specimens mounted as described in 5.2.1.
6. Preconditioning
6.1 Precondition Type 1 test specimen or the test material for the Type 2 test specimen at 23 6 2°C (73.4 6 4°F) and 50 6
5 % relative humidity for not less than 24 h prior to testing.
7. Safety Considerations
7.1 The operation of the described equipment may expose the operator to risk of injury from the propelled or rebounded ice ball,
fragments of the broken test specimen, and from the noise that may develop. Eye and ear protection should be considered as the
minimum protection for the operator.
8. Procedure
8.1 Using the ice ball mold(s), make sufficient quantities of ice balls of the size(s) anticipated for testing.
8.2 Precondition the Type 1 test specimen or the material for the Type 2 test specimen as described in 6.1.
8.3 Determine the ice ball size to be used in the test.
NOTE 7—The size of the ice ball shall be determined by the sponsor of the test or the testing facility personnel.
8.4 Calculate the resultant velocity corresponding to the ice ball diameter. Determine the resultant velocity as follows:
2 2
V 5= V 1V (1)
r t w
where:
V = 20 m/s or 66 ft/s (45 mph), and
w
V =
14.04 =d cm or 73.4 =d in.
t
E822 − 92 (2015)
NOTE 1—Bolts may be used in place of C-clamps if the bolt does not penetrate the test specimen (that is, for rigid sheet).
FIG. 5 Cover Holder, Loaded
where:
V = resultant velocity of ice ball,
r
V = terminal velocity of ice ball,
t
V = wind velocity of 20 m/s (66 ft/s), and
w
d = ice ball diameter.
8.5 Mount the test specimen as described in Section 5.
8.6 Mark the four target impact points shown in Fig. 1 on the cover plate material. Each impact point is located in a corner 150
mm (6 in.) from both supporting edges.
NOTE 8—Care should be taken to ensure that the marking does not react with the cover material or influence test results.
8.7 Position the launcher as necessary to ensure that the path of the propelled ice ball at impact will be essentially perpendicular
(90 6
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.