ASTM E1663-01

Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office Information Technology

SCOPE
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for performance to support typical office equipment for information technology.  
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1 through 6, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.  
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1 through 6) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning to estimate approximately, quickly and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.  
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.  
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.

General Information

• Status: Historical
• Publication Date: 09-Oct-2001
• ICS: 35.260 - Office machines
• Technical Committee: E06 - Performance of Buildings
• Drafting Committee: E06.25 - Whole Buildings and Facilities

Relations

• Replaces: ASTM E1663-95a(1999) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office Information Technology
• Effective Date: 10-Oct-2001
• Replaced By: ASTM E1663-03 - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office Information Technology
• Effective Date: 01-Oct-2003
• Referred By: ASTM E1694-22 - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Special Facilities and Technologies
• Effective Date: 10-Oct-2001
• Referred By: ASTM E1765-16(2023) - Standard Practice for Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multiattribute Decision Analysis of Investments Related to Projects, Products, and Processes
• Effective Date: 10-Oct-2001

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superceded and replaced by a new version or discontinued.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information.
An American National Standard
Designation: E 1663 – 01
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Typical Office
1,2
Information Technology
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E 1663; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
1.1 This classification contains pairs of scales for classify- 2.1 ASTM Standards:
3
ing an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, E 631 Terminology of Building Constructions
the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible E 1334 Practice for Rating Serviceability of a Building or
3
requirements for performance to support typical office equip- Building-Related Facility
ment for information technology. E 1679 Practice for Setting Requirements for Serviceability
3
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, of a Building or Building-Related Facility
4
shown in Figs. 1-6, are for classifying one topic of serviceabil- 2.2 ISO Document:
ity. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
Figs. 1-6) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, Building—Contents and Presentation
which occupants might require. The matching entry in the
3. Terminology
Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6) is a translation of the
requirement into a description of certain features of a facility 3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely
to meet that level of required serviceability. purpose.
3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, a
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-6)
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
scanning to estimate approximately, quickly and economically,
how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or The term encompasses both the physical object and its use (see
Terminology E 631).
another type of occupant group over time. The entries are not
for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is 3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of required to be used.
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical, hydrother-
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
mal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative importance of
and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility each performance requirement (see Terminology E 631).
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a which business, clerical or professional activities are con-
ducted (see Terminology E 631).
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
E 1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to 3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable
to this classification, see Terminology E 631.
and compatible with Practice E 1334. Each requires the other.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 conduit capacity—a conduit is considered full when
the internal area occupied by cable has reached 50 of the
1
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
cross-sectional area of the conduit. Therefore, when additional
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
future capacity is required, it must be part of the original 50 %
on Whole Buildings and Facilities.
permissible area.
Current edition approved Oct. 10, 2001. Published March 2002. Originally
published as E 1663 – 95. Last previous edition E 1663 – 95a (1999).
2
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and r 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public
3
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 04.11.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of
4
Available fro
...