Standard Test Method for Evaluation of the Effect of Water Repellent Treatments on Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Hydraulic Cement Mortar Specimens

ABSTRACT
This test method details the standard procedure for evaluating the effect of water repellent treatments on the freeze-thaw resistance of hydraulic cement mortar specimens. This test method is designed to compare the effectiveness of water repellent treatments under conditions of freezing and thawing only, intended as a laboratory screening method for treatment selection and may not accurately reflect the performance of treated and untreated specimens in the field. This procedure requires the use of a balance, corrosion-resistant aluminum metal pan, weight per litre (gallon) cup, freezing chamber, forced draft oven, and stiff-nylon-bristled brush. Mortar specimens are treated with or immersed in a water repellent material, removed, and allowed to cure. After air drying, the treated specimens are weighed then subjected to various cycles of freezing and thawing. Periodic weighing and observations are made to determine weight loss and deleterious effects such as spalling and cracking.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers a procedure for determining the comparative effect of water repellent treatments on the freeze-thaw cycling of hydraulic cement mortar specimens.
1.2 This test method is designed to compare the effectiveness of water repellent treatments under conditions of freezing and thawing only. This test method is intended as a laboratory screening method for treatment selection and may not accurately reflect the performance of treated and untreated specimens in the field. This test method is not intended to duplicate field conditions.
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the standard. The values given in parentheses are for information only.
This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Jun-2007
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM D5860-95(2007) - Standard Test Method for Evaluation of the Effect of Water Repellent Treatments on Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Hydraulic Cement Mortar Specimens
English language
3 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: D5860 − 95 (Reapproved 2007)
Standard Test Method for
Evaluation of the Effect of Water Repellent Treatments on
Freeze-Thaw Resistance of Hydraulic Cement Mortar
Specimens
This standard is issued under the fixed designation D5860; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3. Terminology
1.1 This test method covers a procedure for determining the 3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
comparative effect of water repellent treatments on the freeze- 3.1.1 water repellent treatment, n—atransparentpenetrating
thaw cycling of hydraulic cement mortar specimens. sealer or surface-applied treatment formulated for the purpose
of protecting porous substrates by reducing the penetration of
1.2 This test method is designed to compare the effective-
liquid water.
ness of water repellent treatments under conditions of freezing
and thawing only. This test method is intended as a laboratory
4. Summary of Test Method
screening method for treatment selection and may not accu-
rately reflect the performance of treated and untreated speci- 4.1 Mortar specimens are treated with or immersed in a
mens in the field. This test method is not intended to duplicate
water repellent material, removed, and allowed to cure. After
field conditions. airdrying,thetreatedspecimensareweighedthensubjectedto
various cycles of freezing and thawing. Periodic weighing and
1.3 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as the
observationsaremadetodetermineweightlossanddeleterious
standard. The values given in parentheses are for information
effects such as spalling and cracking.
only.
1.4 This standard does not purport to address all of the
5. Apparatus
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
5.1 Balance, having a capacity of not less than 400 g and a
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
sensitivity of 0.1 g.
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
5.2 Corrosion-resistant Metal Pan, that is, aluminum, for
immersion of substrates.
2. Referenced Documents
5.3 Weight per Litre (Gallon) Cup.
2.1 ASTM Standards:
5.4 Freezing Chamber, capable of maintaining −19.26
C109/C109MTest Method for Compressive Strength of
1.4°C (−2.5 6 2.5°F).
Hydraulic Cement Mortars (Using 2-in. or [50-mm] Cube
Specimens) 5.5 Forced Draft Oven, capable of maintaining 110 6 5°C
(230 6 9°F).
D1193Specification for Reagent Water
D1475Test Method For Density of Liquid Coatings, Inks,
5.6 Stiff-nylon-bristled Brush.
and Related Products
E145 Specification for Gravity-Convection and Forced-
6. Test Materials
Ventilation Ovens
6.1 50-mm (2-in.) mortar cubes greater than 28-days old,
and prepared in accordance with procedures outlined in Test
1 Method C109/C109M, have been found suitable for this test
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee D01 on Paint
and Related Coatings, Materials, andApplications and is the direct responsibility of method. These cubes should be brushed with a wire brush or
Subcommittee D01.47 on Concrete, Stone and Masonry Treatments.
lightly sand blasted to remove form oil or release agent before
CurrenteditionapprovedJuly1,2007.PublishedJuly2007.Originallyapproved
using. Five test specimens will be used for each treatment, and
in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2002 as D5860-95(2002). DOI:
five untreated controls shall also be included for each test.All
10.1520/D5860-95R07.
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
cubes should come from the same lot of material.
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on NOTE 1—Preferably, rather than make each cube individually, a large
the ASTM website. cake can be made. 25-mm (1-in.) should be cut off each face of the cake
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
D5860 − 95 (2007)
to remove any residual form release oil. Cubes are cut from the cake to
7.6 Place five treated specimens for each treatment and five
measure 50 by 50 by 50 mm (2 by 2 by 2 in.) to be used as mortar
untreated specimens in a metal tray then add reagent water to
specimens.
the tray to a depth of 12.7 mm ( ⁄2 in.). Maintain at room
6.2 Water repellent treatments.
temperaturefor4 6 ⁄2handthenplacethetrayinthefreezing
chamber for 20 6 1 h. Before placing in the freezing chamber,
7. Procedure
measure the water level, and, if necessary, add water to
maintainthe12.7mm( ⁄2in.)depth.Reagentwaterusedinthis
7.1 Dry the required number of specimens in a forced draft
procedure shall be in accordance with Specification D1193.
oven, as specified in Specification E145, for 24 h at 110°C
(230°F) until 2 weighings
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.