Standard Test Method for Resistance to Puncture of Cushioned Resilient Floor Coverings

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
4.1 Much of the cushioned resilient flooring in use today is in household kitchens. Kitchen flooring is frequently subjected to the hazard of dropped tableware and cutting knives, that can puncture the wear layer of cushioned resilient flooring. Food and soil that become embedded in these punctures often can not be removed by ordinary maintenance, resulting in unsightly marks. Moisture, grease, or oils that penetrate to the cushion layer can be wicked into the foam and cause permanent discoloration. Ultimately, the service life of the material is shortened.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the laboratory procedure for determining the resistance of cushioned resilient floor coverings to punctures from dropped pointed objects such as dinner forks.  
1.2 This test method employs a 35-g cylindrical dart with a flat, small-diameter tip that is dropped onto a specimen of flooring. The dart represents the weight of a typical fork and the tip produces a similar puncture to those which result from dropped forks.  
1.3 Flooring with thick wear layers may not puncture under even the most severe drop. Although data can be obtained by increasing the drop height or the weight of the dart, values of this magnitude have no practical application.  
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.  
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability and regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precaution statement see 8.2.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
30-Apr-2015
Drafting Committee
Current Stage
Ref Project

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F924-90(2015) - Standard Test Method for Resistance to Puncture of Cushioned Resilient Floor Coverings
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview
Standard
REDLINE ASTM F924-90(2015) - Standard Test Method for Resistance to Puncture of Cushioned Resilient Floor Coverings
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F924 − 90 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Test Method for
Resistance to Puncture of Cushioned Resilient Floor
1
Coverings
ThisstandardisissuedunderthefixeddesignationF924;thenumberimmediatelyfollowingthedesignationindicatestheyearoforiginal
adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.Asuperscript
epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2
1.1 This test method covers the laboratory procedure for 2.1 ASTM Standards:
determining the resistance of cushioned resilient floor cover- E171 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Flexible Barrier
ings to punctures from dropped pointed objects such as dinner Packaging
forks. F141 Terminology Relating to Resilient Floor Coverings
F410 Test Method for Wear Layer Thickness of Resilient
1.2 This test method employs a 35-g cylindrical dart with a
Floor Coverings by Optical Measurement
flat, small-diameter tip that is dropped onto a specimen of
flooring. The dart represents the weight of a typical fork and
3. Terminology
the tip produces a similar puncture to those which result from
3.1 Definitions:
dropped forks.
3.1.1 For definitions of other terms used in this test method,
1.3 Flooring with thick wear layers may not puncture under
refer to Terminology F141.
even the most severe drop. Although data can be obtained by
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
increasing the drop height or the weight of the dart, values of
3.2.1 puncture—a break in the wear layer of the specimen.
this magnitude have no practical application.
An indentation at the point of impact shall be considered a
puncture only if the wear layer is broken completely through at
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded
some point.
as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only
3.2.2 wicking—the presence of ink below the wear layer of
and are not considered standard.
the specimen in areas adjacent to a puncture. This can be seen
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the next to the actual cut, and appears either as spots on the pattern
layer or as a general discoloration.
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
4. Significance and Use
priate safety, health, and environmental practices and deter-
mine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use. 4.1 Much of the cushioned resilient flooring in use today is
in household kitchens. Kitchen flooring is frequently subjected
For specific precaution statement see 8.2.
1.6 This international standard was developed in accor- to the hazard of dropped tableware and cutting knives, that can
puncture the wear layer of cushioned resilient flooring. Food
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard-
and soil that become embedded in these punctures often can
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the
notberemovedbyordinarymaintenance,resultinginunsightly
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom-
marks. Moisture, grease, or oils that penetrate to the cushion
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
layer can be wicked into the foam and cause permanent
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
discoloration. Ultimately, the service life of the material is
shortened.
1
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeF06onResilient
Floor Coverings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F06.20 on Test
2
Methods. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
CurrenteditionapprovedMay1,2015.PublishedJuly2015.Originallyapproved contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
in 1985. Last previous edition approved in 2009 as F924 – 90 (2009). DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/F0924-90R15. the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F924 − 90 (2015)
1
5. Apparatus shall be a flat cap with a ⁄4 in. diameter opening in the center.
This hole should have smooth, rounded sides.
1
5.1 Dart Drop Assembly (Fig. 1), consisting of a ⁄2 in.
plywood platform tilted 20° from horizontal, and a vertical
5.2 Dart(Fig.2),consistingofa0.970 60.003(246 60.76
slotted tube at least 40 in. (1016 mm) long with an inside
mm) outside diameter hollow cylindrical aluminum body with
diameter of 1.05 6 0.05 in. (26.7 6 2 mm). The mouth of the
a 0.078 6 0.0005 in. (2.0 6 0.013 mm) diameter tip at one end
tube shall be approximately 2 in. (50.8 mm) above the center
and
...

This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: F924 − 90 (Reapproved 2009) F924 − 90 (Reapproved 2015)
Standard Test Method for
Resistance to Puncture of Cushioned Resilient Floor
1
Coverings
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F924; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of original
adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A superscript
epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the laboratory procedure for determining the resistance of cushioned resilient floor coverings to
punctures from dropped pointed objects such as dinner forks.
1.2 This test method employs a 35-g cylindrical dart with a flat, small-diameter tip that is dropped onto a specimen of flooring.
The dart represents the weight of a typical fork and the tip produces a similar puncture to those which result from dropped forks.
1.3 Flooring with thick wear layers may not puncture under even the most severe drop. Although data can be obtained by
increasing the drop height or the weight of the dart, values of this magnitude have no practical application.
1.4 The values stated in inch-pound units are to be regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are mathematical
conversions to SI units that are provided for information only and are not considered standard.
1.5 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of whoever uses this standard to consult and establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability and
regulatory limitations prior to use. For specific precaution statement see 8.2.
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
E171 Practice for Conditioning and Testing Flexible Barrier Packaging
F141 Terminology Relating to Resilient Floor Coverings
F410 Test Method for Wear Layer Thickness of Resilient Floor Coverings by Optical Measurement
3. Terminology
3.1 Definitions:
3.1.1 For definitions of other terms used in this test method, refer to Terminology F141.
3.2 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.2.1 puncture—a break in the wear layer of the specimen. An indentation at the point of impact shall be considered a puncture
only if the wear layer is broken completely through at some point.
3.2.2 wicking—the presence of ink below the wear layer of the specimen in areas adjacent to a puncture. This can be seen next
to the actual cut, and appears either as spots on the pattern layer or as a general discoloration.
4. Significance and Use
4.1 Much of the cushioned resilient flooring in use today is in household kitchens. Kitchen flooring is frequently subjected to
the hazard of dropped tableware and cutting knives, that can puncture the wear layer of cushioned resilient flooring. Food and soil
that become embedded in these punctures often can not be removed by ordinary maintenance, resulting in unsightly marks.
Moisture, grease, or oils that penetrate to the cushion layer can be wicked into the foam and cause permanent discoloration.
Ultimately, the service life of the material is shortened.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F06 on Resilient Floor Coverings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F06.30 on Test Methods
- Performance.
Current edition approved May 1, 2009May 1, 2015. Published July 2009July 2015. Originally approved in 1985. Last previous edition approved in 20042009 as F924
– 90 (2004).(2009). DOI: 10.1520/F0924-90R09.10.1520/F0924-90R15.
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM Standards
volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on the ASTM website.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F924 − 90 (2015)
5. Apparatus
1
5.1 Dart Drop Assembly (Fig. 1), consisting of a ⁄2 in. plywood platform tilted 20° from horizontal, and a vertical slotted tube
at least 40 in. (1016 mm) long with an inside diameter of 1.05 6 0.05 in. (26.7 6 2 mm). The mouth of the tube shall be
approximately 2 in. (50.8 mm) above the center of the platform. The tube shall be marked in 1 in. or less graduations showing the
1
height above the surface of a mounted specimen positioned on the platform. At the top of the tube shall be a flat ca
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.