Standard Test Method for Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic

SCOPE
1.1 This test method is intended to provide a numerical rating system for classification of resilient floors during the various stages of their wear life in relation to their condition, as perceived by a knowledgeable user.  
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.  
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are regarded as standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for information only.

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
09-Nov-1998
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM F1037-87(1998) - Standard Test Method for Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-Service Exposure to Foot Traffic
English language
6 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F 1037 – 87 (Reapproved 1998)
Standard Test Method for
Visual Rating of Appearance of Resilient Floors After In-
Service Exposure to Foot Traffic
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1037; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 5. Apparatus
1.1 This test method is intended to provide a numerical 5.1 Buffıng Machine, residential, equipped with single or
rating system for classification of resilient floors during the double brush (pad), soft fiber polishing brushes, and lamb’s
various stages of their wear life in relation to their condition, as wool pads. When equipped with polishing brushes, the unit
perceived by a knowledgeable user. should deliver a nominal lineal velocity (loaded) of 1100 to
1.2 This standard does not purport to address all of the 1400 ft/min (each brush) and a Dwell ratio of 190 to 210 ft (17
safety problems, if any, associated with its use. It is the to 19 m ) per min at a pressure of 0.40 to 0.50 psi. When
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro- equipped with buffing pads, the unit shall deliver a nominal
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica- lineal velocity (loaded) of 1100 to 1400 lineal fpm (each pad)
2 2
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use. and a Dwell ratio of 500 to 550 ft (45 to 50 m ) per min at a
1.3 The values stated in inch-pound units are regarded as pressure of 0.15 to 0.20 psi (see note).
standard. The values given in parentheses are provided for 5.2 Scrub Brush, approximately 2½ by 7 in. (63 by 178
information only. mm) with nylon bristles approximately 1 ⁄4 in. (32 mm) long.
5.3 Cellulose Sponge, approximate dry dimension
2. Referenced Documents
8by4 ⁄4 by 1 in. (203 by 108 mm).
2.1 ASTM Standards:
6. Reagent
D 1436 Test Methods for Application of Emulsion Floor
Polishes to Substrates for Testing Purposes 6.1 Cleaning Solution, for approximately 3456 in. (22 464
cm ) area (six 24 by 24 (610 by 610 mm) panels), consisting of
3. Terminology
1 cup (240 mL) household ammonia, 1 gal U.S. (3.78 L)
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
lukewarm water, and ⁄2 cup (120 mL) liquid cleaner.
3.1.1 surface texture—surface imperfections such as deep
7. Sampling, Test Specimens, and Test Units
scratches, indents, or changes in embossing texture.
7.1 Specimen size can vary as desired. A typical size panel
4. Significance and Use
would be 24 by 24 in. (610 by 610 mm) and contain four
4.1 Ratings are developed by subjective, comparative,
12 by 12 in. (305 by 305 mm) similar or different panels to be
evaluation of exposed samples to original unexposed speci- tested. In addition, a companion specimen must be retained and
mens of those parameters experience has shown to be the most
stored in a location where its appearance will not be altered.
important in the consumers’ minds in evaluating the perfor- This specimen will be used for comparison purposes through-
mance of a walking surface. These parameters are a change in
out the test cycle. Each sample is to be cleaned in accordance
gloss, color, surface texture, alterations to pattern and re- with the washing procedure in 8.1. The waxing procedure shall
storability of appearance with normal maintenance procedures,
be followed on all resilient flooring samples designed to be
including the use of waxes, finishes, or buffing. Rating is done maintained with wax before each rating session. The original
by a panel of qualified observers under specified lighting
unexposed samples of these products shall be waxed also.
conditions in accordance with prescribed procedures. Those no-wax floors whose appearance, through exposure to
traffic, has deteriorated to an overall rating of “3” or more shall
be restored with either the waxing procedure (no samples
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F-6 on Resilient
receive double-waxing) (see 8.2) or the buffing procedure (see
Floor Coverings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F06.30 on Physical
8.3). The choice of restorative maintenance is determined by
Service Properties.
Current edition approved Jan. 30, 1987. Published March 1987.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol 15.04.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
F 1037 – 87 (1998)
the manufacturer’s recommended procedure. All cleaning and 8.3.4.1 Pads are to be washed in a mild detergent and cold
restorative maintenance procedures shall be performed on the water (2 heaping teaspoons (10.0 g) per gallon (3.8 L) of
entire sample. water), rinsed in cold water and air dried (do not “wring out”
7.2 Before evaluation, each sample shall be prepared using pads).
the procedure given in Section 8. This procedure is intended to
9. Observer Panel
remove all dirt and wax (if present).
9.1 The panel of observers shall consist of at least three
8. Procedure
people. One-third of the panel shall consist of a person(s)
8.1 Mix the cleaning solution and stir thoroughly.
technically trained in the composition and use of household
8.1.1 Soak brush in solution for 1 min.
cleaning products, such as a home economist or chemist.
8.1.2 Apply enough solution so that the panel is covered
One-third of the panel shall consist of a person(s) trained in the
with a thin coat of solution. Allow the solution to remain
technical characteristics and testing procedures used on resil-
undisturbed for 3 min.
ient flooring, such as an engineer or chemist. One-third of the
8.1.3 Dip brush in solution, then scrub the panel 30 times in
panel shall be a non-technically trained person(s) who regu-
each direction with enough pressure to slightly bend the
larly maintains resilient floors in a home. No panel member
bristles. Localized, abnormal stains such as chewing gum,
shall be color blind. The maintenance person shall not be
ground-out cigarettes, tar, or other spots considered abnormal
included in the observer panel. Members shall be carefully
in residential environment may be given special attention.
instructed on the scoring procedure and shall have had prior
Overall stains, discoloration, or soil that lodges in deep
experience of at least a complete rating of one sample before
embossments should not be given special treatment.
establishing a valid scored rating.
8.1.4 With the cellulose sponge wrung out in clear, luke-
9.2 Individual panel observers are provided with separate
warm water, remove the cleaning solution. Rinse sponge in
data sheets and are to separately rate gloss, color, surface
clear, lukewarm water, wring sponge out lightly, then go over
texture, pattern change and restorative effects of maintenance.
the panel to rewet the surface. Rinse out sponge again in clear
They may do their rating simultaneously, but should not
water. Wring out tightly and remove as much rinse water as
discuss or compare ratings. If any sample requires restorative
possible.
maintenance, all panels are returned to the exposure site only
8.1.5 Allow surface to air dry for 1 h.
after restorative maintenance is complete and ratings for
8.2 Finish Procedure—After washing, apply to each indi-
restorative maintenance are made. Scoring is in accordance
vidual sample to receive finish a wax or finish in the following
with 11.1.
manner. Use a fresh supply of an acrylic floor finish or an
equivalent material appropriate for the specific type of floor.
10. Sample Arrangements and Lighting Conditions
Apply the wax in accordance with Method B of Test Methods
4 10.1 Samples are to be washed, waxed where appropriate
D 1436.
(See Section 8 and Fig. 1) and assembled with the viewing
8.3 Buffıng Procedure—Followi
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.