Standard Test Method for Evaluating Fenestration Components and Assemblies for Resistance to Impact Energies (Withdrawn 2015)

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
This test method is intended for determining the ability of a fenestration component, fenestration assembly, or impact protection system to resist specified impact energies.
The test apparatus, referenced herein, is capable of applying a variety of impacts to a specimen as the impactor head may be fabricated into a variety of shapes and from materials having different degrees of hardness. The user is able to simulate a specific type of impact and the impact energy with this apparatus.
There is a need to correlate the damage to fenestration assemblies from the impacts in question with the impacts delivered by the test apparatus in order for the test results to be properly interpreted. Due to the nature of the test apparatus, care must be taken when interpreting the results of a specific test to actual performance in the field. The impact energies involved in a pendulum impact cannot be directly transferred to impact energies applied by other devices, for example, projectiles; therefore, the performance of a specimen to the impacts applied by this test method are not directly transferable to performance in actual use. The application of impact energies to a specimen, as applied in this test method, however, does provide valuable information regarding the ability of the specimen to resist damage when impacted.  
Note 1—Use Test Method E 1886 for determining the performance of fenestration components subjected to impacts from windborne debris in a windstorm environment.  
When using this test method to compare the performance of products the same impact nose, impact device mass and impact speed must be applied to each product tested.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the evaluation of the resistance of fenestration components, fenestration assemblies, and impact protection systems to specified impact energies.
1.2 Window, glazed door, and skylight assemblies covered by this test method also include individual components, such as the glazing in-fill.
This standard does no purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
WITHDRAWN RATIONALE
This test method covers the evaluation of the resistance of fenestration components, fenestration assemblies, and impact protection systems to specified impact energies.
Formerly under the jurisdiction of Committee E06 on Performance of Buildings, this test method was withdrawn in July 2015 in accordance with section 10.6.3 of the Regulations Governing ASTM Technical Committees, which requires that standards shall be updated by the end of the eighth year since the last approval date.

General Information

Status
Withdrawn
Publication Date
30-Sep-2006
Withdrawal Date
01-Jul-2015
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E2025-99(2006) - Standard Test Method for Evaluating Fenestration Components and Assemblies for Resistance to Impact Energies (Withdrawn 2015)
English language
4 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: E2025 − 99 (Reapproved2006)
Standard Test Method for
Evaluating Fenestration Components and Assemblies for
Resistance to Impact Energies
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E2025; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision.Anumber in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 3.1.3 fenestration assembly, n—aglazedapertureinabuild-
ing composed of a group of parts or components that may
1.1 This test method covers the evaluation of the resistance
include glass or plastic panels or lites, opaque panels, framing,
of fenestration components, fenestration assemblies, and im-
mullions, muntins and dividers, screens and shading devices,
pact protection systems to specified impact energies.
for example, windows or glazed doors, or both.
1.2 Window, glazed door, and skylight assemblies covered
3.1.4 glazed panel, n—glazing installed in a framing sys-
bythistestmethodalsoincludeindividualcomponents,suchas
tem.
the glazing in-fill.
3.1.5 impact energy, n—impact energy is expressed as
1.3 This standard does no purport to address all of the
vertical drop height of the pendulum, times its weight, for a
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
particular impact event.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
3.1.6 impact energy (cumulative), n—the sum of impact
bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
energies from each of the respective impact events for the
entire applied impact sequence, derived from intentionally
2. Referenced Documents
impacting the test specimen more than once; the total impact
2.1 ASTM Standards: energyeitherappliedtomeetatestprotocolorobservedduring
E631Terminology of Building Constructions
an impact sequence and associated with a particular level of
E1886Test Method for Performance of Exterior Windows, damage.
Curtain Walls, Doors, and Impact Protective Systems
3.1.7 impact protection system, n—moveable (or perma-
Impacted by Missile(s) and Exposed to Cyclic Pressure
nent)constructionthatmaybeapplied,attachedorlockedover
Differentials
a fenestration assembly to protect the assembly from impact,
F476Test Methods for Security of Swinging Door Assem-
for example, shutters.
blies (Withdrawn 2011)
3.1.8 impact ram, n—the device that (when released) deliv-
3. Terminology ers the impact energy to the test specimen. The impact ram
includes the impact nose.
3.1 Definitions of Terms Specific to This Standard:
3.1.1 assembly support fixture, n—the assembly or structure 3.1.9 instrumented impact testing, n—additional apparatus
that supports the test specimen.
attached to the impact ram to provide for the load versus
deformation responses of fenestration components and assem-
3.1.2 component (fenestration), n—an individual product
blies under various impact conditions.
that combines with other components to make up a complete
fenestration assembly.
3.1.10 plastic glazing sheet material, n—an organic plastic
sheet specifically developed for glazing.
1 3.1.11 required impact energy, n—the potential energy level
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.51
specified for a single impact event to be applied in the test as
on Performance of Windows, Doors, Skylights and Curtain Walls.
required by the specifying authority.
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2006. Published October 2006. Originally
approved in 1999. Last previous edition approved in 1999 as E2025–99. DOI:
3.1.12 required impact sequence, n—the number of impact
10.1520/E2025-99R06.
events and the required impact energy for each event to be
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
applied to a specimen in the test and the order in which the
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on eventsaretobeappliedasrequiredbythespecifyingauthority.
the ASTM website.
3.1.13 required cumulative energy, n—thesumoftheimpact
The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
www.astm.org. energy times the number of each such impact events for the
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E2025 − 99 (2006)
entire required impact sequence to be applied to a specimen in specimen at impact. No slack in the supporting cables is
the test as required by the specifying authority. allowed when retracting the impact ram to the specified drop
height. The length of the cables in the suspension system
3.1.14 test specimen, n—the fenestration assembly, impact
defines the allowable drop height for that system. To prevent
protection system or glazing in-fill, which is subject to the
impactramwobble,itisnecessarytousetwopairsofcablesof
impact energies delivered by the impact ram.
sufficient separation that, hanging unrestrained, are parallel to
4. Summary of Test Method each other when viewed perpendicular to the long axis of the
impact ram.
4.1 This test method consists of installing a fenestration
6.1.4 Use a quick release mechanism that is capable of
component,fenestrationassembly,orimpactprotectionsystem
holding the impact ram and releasing it in uniform manner
in a wall assembly and impacting the test specimen.
withoutimpartinganyforwardmotionoracceleration.Provide
4.2 The impact is applied by an impact ram supported by a
a means to assure that the impact ram does not unintentionally
pendulum system and released from a specified height.
strikethespecimenaftertheinitialimpact,thatis,reboundand
strike the specimen again.
5. Significance and Use
6.1.5 The nose of the impact ram shall be of any material,
5.1 This test method is intended for determining the ability
shape,size,orsurfaceasspecifiedandwithintheweightlimits
of a fenestration component, fenestration assembly, or impact
for the impact device. Standardize the impact nose specified
protection system to resist specified impact energies.
and referenced for particular tests. Impact nose substitutions
5.2 The test apparatus, referenced herein, is capable of
shall meet the criteria of hardness, shape, and composition
applying a variety of impacts to a specimen as the impactor
specified for the impact nose by the test protocol. Adjust the
head may be fabricated into a variety of shapes and from
impactramlengthforthespecifiedimpactnosetocomplywith
materialshavingdifferentdegreesofhardness.Theuserisable
impact device system weight limits.
to simulate a specific type of impact and the impact energy
NOTE 2—Variations in impact nose specifications or composition may
with this apparatus.
affect test results.
5.3 There is a need to correlate the damage to fenestration
6.1.5.1 Unless otherwise specified, the impact nose shall be
assemblies from the impacts in question with the impacts
2.5 6 0.2 in. (63 mm 6 5 mm) in diameter and the radial
deliveredbythetestapparatusinorderforthetestresultstobe
tolerance shall be within 0.125 in. (3.2 mm).The nose shall be
properly interpreted. Due to the nature of the test apparatus,
made from cast epoxy-polyamide resin with a measured Shore
care must be taken when interpreting the results of a specific
A durometer hardness of 80 (6 5). No chips or surface
test to actual performance in the field. The impact energies
blemishes shall be present on the impact nose.
involvedinapendulumimpactcannotbedirectlytransferredto
impact energies applied by other devices, for example, projec- 6.2 An assembly support fixture shall supply the rigidity
tiles; therefore, the performance of a specimen to the impacts normally provided to an assembly in a building by the ceiling,
floor, and walls. The support fixture for the specimen shall
applied by this test method are not directly transferable to
performance in actual use. The application of impact energies consist of a vertical wall section constructed from nominal
steel or 2 × 4-in. wood studs, 16 in. (406 mm) on center, with
to a specimen, as applied in this test method, however, does
provide valuable information regarding the ability of the a rough opening of sufficient size to support the test specimen.
Installthespecimenintotheroughopeninginaccordancewith
specimen to resist damage when impacted.
the manufacturer specifications with clearances between the
NOTE 1—Use Test Method E1886 for determining the performance of
specimen and rough opening no greater than 0.75 in. (18 mm)
fenestration components subjected to impacts from windborne debris in a
on all sides of the specimen. Cover both sides of the vertical
windstorm environment.
wallsectionwith ⁄2in.(12.7mm)exteriorgradeplywood.The
5.4 When using this test method to compare the perfor-
assembly shall conform to the wall assembly described in Test
mance of products the same impact nose, impact device mass
Methods F476. The limiting deflection of the wall shall be
and impact speed must be applied to each product tested.
L/175 (based on the anticipated loads).
6. Apparatus
6.3 Standard Test Frame—To test glazed panels, design the
6.1 Impact Device—A variable mass moving carriage (im- standard test frame to support a rectangular specimen in a
pact ram), supported by a suspension system of four cables, vertical plane and expose it to impact energies. Construct the
shall be used to supply the specified level of impact energy. frame of 2-in. (50-mm) steel angles, at least ⁄4-in. (6.4-mm)
6.1.1 Theimpactdeviceshallbeapendulumsystemwithan thick, welded at all four corners to form a rigid assembly.
impact ram capable of delivering the specified horizontal Support the assembly is with a support fixture similar to that
impact energy. described in 6.2. Line that part of the test frame that comes in
6.1.2 The mass of the (movable) suspension system shall contact with the glazed panel with hardwood stripping. The
3 3
notexceed5%ofthemassoftheimpactram,includingimpact wood stripping in turn is to be covered with ⁄8 × ⁄4 in. (9.5 ×
ram
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.