Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area Network (HIPERLAN) Type 1; Conformance testing specification; Part 3: Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification

DE/BRAN-10-02B

Širokopasovna radijska dostopovna omrežja (BRAN) – Zelo zmogljivo radijsko lokalno omrežje (HIPERLAN), tip 1 – Specifikacija za preskušanje skladnosti – 3. del: Zgradba preskušalnega niza in namen preskušanja (TSS&TP) – Specifikacija

General Information

Status
Published
Publication Date
12-May-1998
Technical Committee
Current Stage
12 - Completion
Due Date
15-May-1998
Completion Date
13-May-1998
Mandate

Buy Standard

Standard
ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
English language
65 pages
sale 10% off
Preview
sale 10% off
Preview
e-Library read for
1 day

Standards Content (Sample)

SLOVENSKI STANDARD
SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
01-februar-2006
Širokopasovna radijska dostopovna omrežja (BRAN) – Zelo zmogljivo radijsko
lokalno omrežje (HIPERLAN), tip 1 – Specifikacija za preskušanje skladnosti – 3.
del: Zgradba preskušalnega niza in namen preskušanja (TSS&TP) – Specifikacija
Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN); HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area
Network (HIPERLAN) Type 1; Conformance testing specification; Part 3: Test Suite
Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification
Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z: ETS 300 836-3 Edition 1
ICS:
33.060.01 Radijske komunikacije na Radiocommunications in
splošno general
35.110 Omreževanje Networking
SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006 en
2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.

---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006

---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
EUROPEAN ETS 300 836-3
TELECOMMUNICATION May 1998
STANDARD
Source: BRAN Reference: DE/BRAN-10-02B
ICS: 33.020
Key words: HIPERLAN, LAN, radio, testing
Broadband Radio Access Networks (BRAN);
HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area Network (HIPERLAN)
Type 1;
Conformance testing specification;
Part 3: Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP)
specification
ETSI
European Telecommunications Standards Institute
ETSI Secretariat
Postal address: F-06921 Sophia Antipolis CEDEX - FRANCE
Office address: 650 Route des Lucioles - Sophia Antipolis - Valbonne - FRANCE
Internet: secretariat@etsi.fr - http://www.etsi.fr - http://www.etsi.org
Tel.: +33 4 92 94 42 00 - Fax: +33 4 93 65 47 16
Copyright Notification: No part may be reproduced except as authorized by written permission. The copyright and the
foregoing restriction extend to reproduction in all media.
© European Telecommunications Standards Institute 1998. All rights reserved.

---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 2
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
Whilst every care has been taken in the preparation and publication of this document, errors in content,
typographical or otherwise, may occur. If you have comments concerning its accuracy, please write to
"ETSI Editing and Committee Support Dept." at the address shown on the title page.

---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 3
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
Contents
Foreword .5
1 Scope .7
2 Normative references.7
3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations.7
3.1 Definitions .7
3.2 Symbols .7
3.3 Abbreviations .8
4 Test suite structure.9
5 Test purpose structure .10
5.1 TP naming convention .10
5.2 TP structure .10
6 Test purposes .12
6.1 TPs for MAC protocol .12
6.1.1 TPs for lookup function .12
6.1.2 TPs for routing information maintenance function and forwarding.14
6.1.2.1 TPs for routing information declaration and recording .14
6.1.2.1.1 Forwarder.14
6.1.2.1.2 Non forwarder .22
6.1.2.1.3 Forwarder and non-forwarder .24
6.1.2.2 TPs for multipoint relay determination .26
6.1.2.3 TPs for aliasing.27
6.1.2.4 TPs for forwarding .28
6.1.2.5 TPs for routing .28
6.1.3 TPs for power conservation function.31
6.1.3.1 TPs for individual-attention pattern declaration .31
6.1.3.2 TPs for individual-attention pattern recording.32
6.1.3.3 TPs for group-attendance pattern declaration.34
6.1.3.4 TPs for group-attendance pattern recording.34
6.1.4 TPs for user data transfer function.34
6.1.4.1 TPs for sanity check computation.34
6.1.4.2 TPs for user data encryption-decryption.35
6.1.4.3 TPs for HMQoS failure reporting .35
6.1.4.4 TPs for user data acceptance.36
6.1.4.5 TPs for user data delivery.36
6.1.5 TPs for HMPDU transfer function.36
6.1.5.1 TPs for expired HMPDU removal .36
6.1.5.2 TPs for HMPDU selection.37
6.1.5.3 TPs for HMPDU transmission .38
6.1.5.4 TPs for HMPDU reception.40
6.1.5.5 TPs for expired duplicate detection entry removal .41
6.1.6 TPs for structure and encoding of HMPDUs.42
6.2 TPs for CAC protocol.45
6.2.1 TPs for Elimination-Yield Non pre-emptive Priority Multiple Access (EY-
NPMA).45
6.2.1.1 TPs for prioritization phase.45
6.2.1.2 TPs for elimination phase.47
6.2.1.3 TPs for yield phase.48
6.2.1.4 TPs for transmission phase.50
6.2.1.5 TPs for conditions for commencing channel access .50
6.2.1.5.1 TPs for channel access in channel
free condition .50

---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 4
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
6.2.1.5.2 TPs for channel access in the
synchronized channel condition . 51
6.2.1.5.3 TPs for channel access in the hidden
elimination condition. 53
6.2.1.6 TPs for EY-NPMA operating parameter settings . 54
6.2.2 TPs for channel permission function . 55
6.2.2.1 TPs for CP-HCPDU declaration. 55
6.2.2.2 TPs for CP-HCPDU recording . 56
6.2.3 TPs for user data transfer function . 57
6.2.4 TPs for HCPDU transfer function . 58
6.2.4.1 TPs for LBR-part checksum computation. 58
6.2.4.2 TPs for HBR-part checksum computation . 59
6.2.4.3 TPs for hashed address computation . 59
6.2.4.4 TPs for LBR-HBR HCPDU transmission . 59
6.2.4.5 TPs for HCPDU reception. 60
6.2.5 TPs for structure and encoding of HCPDUs. 61
7 Compliance. 64
8 Requirements for a comprehensive testing service . 64
History. 65

---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 5
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
Foreword
This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) has been produced by the ETSI Project Broadband
Radio Access Networks (BRAN) of the European Telecommunications Standards Institute (ETSI).
This ETS consists of 4 parts:
Part 1: "Radio type approval and Radio Frequency (RF) conformance test specification";
Part 2: "Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS) proforma specification";
Part 3: "Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes (TSS&TP) specification";
Part 4: "Abstract Test Suite (ATS) specification".
Transposition dates
Date of adoption of this ETS: 1 May 1998
Date of latest announcement of this ETS (doa): 31 August 1998
Date of latest publication of new National Standard
or endorsement of this ETS (dop/e): 28 February 1999
Date of withdrawal of any conflicting National Standard (dow): 28 February 1999

---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 6
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
Blank page

---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 7
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
1 Scope
This European Telecommunication Standard (ETS) specifies the Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes
(TSS&TP) for the Medium Access Control (MAC) and Channel Access Control (CAC) protocol parts of the
HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area Network (HIPERLAN), Type 1 functional specification as specified in
ETS 300 652 [1].
In this ETS, the term "HIPERLAN" is used to refer to HIPERLAN, Type 1.
2 Normative references
This ETS incorporates by dated and undated reference, provisions from other publications. These
normative references are cited at the appropriate places in the text and the publications are listed
hereafter. For dated references, subsequent amendments to or revisions of any of these publications
apply to this ETS only when incorporated in it by amendment or revision. For undated references the latest
edition of the publication referred to applies.
[1] ETS 300 652 (1996) and prA1 (1996): "Radio Equipment and Systems (RES);
HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area Network (HIPERLAN); Type 1; Functional
specification".
[2] ETS 300 836-2: "Radio Equipment and Systems (RES); HIgh PErformance
Radio Local Area Network (HIPERLAN) Type 1; Conformance testing
specification; Part 2: Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement (PICS)".
[3] ISO/IEC 9646-1 (1994): "Information technology - Open systems interconnection
- Conformance testing methodology and framework - Part 1: General concepts".
[4] ISO/IEC 9646-2 (1994): "Information Technology - OSI Conformance Testing
Methodology and Framework, Part 2: Abstract Test Suite Specification".
3 Definitions, symbols and abbreviations
3.1 Definitions
For the purposes of this ETS, the following definitions apply, in addition to those given in ETS 300 652 [1]:
abstract test method: See ISO/IEC 9646-1 [3].
abstract test suite: See ISO/IEC 9646-1 [3].
implementation under test: See ISO/IEC 9646-1 [3].
test purpose: See ISO/IEC 9646-1 [3].
3.2 Symbols
For the purposes of this ETS, the symbols defined in ETS 300 652 [1] apply.

---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 8
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
3.3 Abbreviations
For the purposes of this ETS, the following abbreviations apply, in addition to those given in
ETS 300 652 [1]:
ATM Abstract Test Method
ATS Abstract Test Suite
CAC Channel Access Control
HIPERLAN HIgh PErformance Radio Local Area Network
IUT Implementation Under Test
MAC Medium Acces Control
MSAP MAC Service Access Point
PICS Protocol Implementation Conformance Statement
TP Test Purpose
TSS Test Suite Structure
TSS&TP Test Suite Structure and Test Purposes

---------------------- Page: 10 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 9
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
4 Test suite structure
The test suite structure is defined in table 1.
Table 1: Test suite structure
HIPERLAN MAC LK Lookup function LKP
Routing and Forwarding Forwarder
RF FWD
NFD Non-forwarder
Forwarder & Non-forwarder
FNF
MRD Multipoint relay determination
ALI Aliasing
Forwarding
FOR
ROU Routing
Power conservation Individual-attention pattern
PC IPD
function declaration
IPR Individual-attention pattern
recording
GPD Group-attendance pattern
declaration
GPR Group-attendance pattern
recording
DT User data transfer function SAN Sanity check computation
User data encryption-
EDN
decryption
QOS HMQoS failure reporting
User data acceptance
UDA
UDD User data delivery
HMPDU transfer function Expired HMPDU removal
HT EXP
SEL HMPDU selection
TRA HMPDU transmission
HMPDU reception
REC
REM Expired duplicate detection
entry removal
Structure & encoding of
SE VAR
HMPDUs
CAC EY Elimination-Yield Non PRI Prioritization phase
pre-emptive Priority ELE Elimination phase
Multiple Access YIE Yield phase
TRP Transmission phase
Conditions for commencing
CHA
channel access
OPS Operator parameter settings
Channel permission CP-HCPDU declaration
CH CPD
function CPR CP-HCPDU recording
DT User data transfer function. UDT
HCPDU transfer function LBR-part checksum
HT LBR
computation
HBR HBR-part checksum
computation
Hashed address computation
HDA
TRA LBR-HBR HCPDU
transmission
HCPDU reception
REC
SE Structure & encoding of VAR
HCPDUs

---------------------- Page: 11 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 10
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
5 Test purpose structure
5.1 TP naming convention
Individual TPs are numbered, starting at 1, within groups. These groups are organized according to the
fourth level of the TSS. Additional references are added to identify whether the TP relates to the MAC or
CAC and its group. See table 2.
Table 2: TP Identifier naming convention scheme
Identifier: __
= sublayer of protocol (second level of TSS): MAC or CAC
= group (fourth level of TSS): 3 letter field representing group
reference according to TSS
= sequential number: (1-99)
5.2 TP structure
Generally each TP has been written in a manner which is consistent with all other TPs. The intention of
this is to make the TPs more readable and checkable. A particular structure has been used and this is
illustrated in table 3. This table should be read in conjunction with any TP i.e. use a TP as an example to
fully understand the table. Due to the nature of the protocol some TPs may not fit exactly into this
structure.

---------------------- Page: 12 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 11
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
Table 3: Structure of a single TP for HIPERLAN
TP Part Text Example
Header tab see table 2
(bold) subclause subclause 0.0.0
tab
tab valid, invalid
PICS: PICS: MC 0
Ensure that the IUT
Stimulus
(normal) () (a forwarder),
(a non-forwarder) etc.
having generated a .,
after receiving a ., etc.
see below for PDU structure on receipt of.
or in order to.
transmits, generates, does not
Reaction
(indented) transmit, etc.
within the time T , etc.
hr
if the action is sending
see below for PDU structure
, etc.
HO-HMPDU, DT-HCPDU, etc.
PDU
containing a or with
structure
a) SA, ADA, etc.
encoded as or including
MSAP address of the IUT, etc.

or
NT-Status, etc.
b) with
equal to
T-Heard, etc.
and back to a) or b)
NOTE: Text in bold will not appear in TPs and text between <> is filled in for each TP and may
differ from one TP to the next.

---------------------- Page: 13 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 12
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
6 Test purposes
6.1 TPs for MAC protocol
NOTE: In this clause the expression "(for the IUT)" is used to indicate that a DT-HMPDU
received by the IUT contains a destination MAC Service Access Point (MSAP) address
identifying the IUTs HMS user.
6.1.1 TPs for lookup function
MAC_LKP_1 subclause 6.2.1 valid PICS: MC 6
Ensure that the IUT, on receipt of a HM-LOOKUP request primitive:
- generates a HC-UNITDATA request primitive containing an LR-HMPDU, with:
- HIPERLAN identifier parameter set to Any_HIPERLAN;
- destination address parameter set to All_Neighbours.
MAC_LKP_2 subclauses 6.2.1, 6.2.3 valid PICS: MC 6
Ensure that the IUT, having generated an LR-HMPDU, on receipt of one and only one LC-HMPDU, before
expiry of timer t :
C
- issues a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive containing HIPERLAN information with HIPERLAN
name and HIPERLAN identifier as contained in the received LC-HMPDU.
MAC_LKP_3 subclauses 6.2.1, 6.2.3 valid PICS: MC 6
Ensure that the IUT, having generated an LR-HMPDU, on receipt of exactly two LC-HMPDUs, each
containing different HIPERLAN name and HIPERLAN identifier, before expiry of timer t :
C
- issues a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive containing HIPERLAN information with HIPERLAN
names and HIPERLAN identifiers as contained in the received LC-HMPDUs.
MAC_LKP_4 subclause 6.2.1 valid PICS: MC 6
Ensure that the IUT, having generated an LR-HMPDU, on receipt of no LC-HMPDUs, before expiry of
timer t :
C
- issues a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive containing HIPERLAN information with no
HIPERLAN names and HIPERLAN identifiers.
MAC_LKP_5 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l or an LC-HMPDU during
LR
a period of l , on receipt of an LC-HMPDU:
LC
- ignores the LC-HMPDU and does not issue a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive.
MAC_LKP_6 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN
information as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- cancels the transmission of the previously generated LC-HMPDU.

---------------------- Page: 14 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 13
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
MAC_LKP_7 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN
information as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- does not issue a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive.
MAC_LKP_8 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN name
and different HIPERLAN identifier as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- proceeds with the transmission of the previously generated LC-HMPDU.
MAC_LKP_9 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN name
and different HIPERLAN identifier as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- does not issue a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive.
MAC_LKP_10 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN identifier
and different HIPERLAN name as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- proceeds with the transmission of the previously generated LC-HMPDU.
MAC_LKP_11 subclause 6.2.3 inopportune
Ensure that the IUT, not having generated an LR-HMPDU during a period of l , and having generated but
LR
not yet transmitted an LC-HMPDU, on receipt of an LC-HMPDU containing the same HIPERLAN identifier
and different HIPERLAN name as in the previously generated LC-HMPDU:
- does not issue a HM-LOOKUP confirm service primitive.
MAC_LKP_12 subclause 6.2.2 valid
Ensure that the IUT, on receipt of an LR-HMPDU:
- generates a HC-UNITDATA request primitive containing an LC-HMPDU, with HIPERLAN name and
HIPERLAN identifier of the local HM-entitys HIPERLAN, with:
- HIPERLAN identifier parameter set to Any_HIPERLAN;
- destination address parameter set to All_Neighbours.
MAC_LKP_13 subclause 6.2.2 valid
Ensure that the IUT, having received an LR-HMPDU and having generated an LC-HMPDU in response,
on receipt of a second LR-HMPDU prior to the transmission of the response to the first:
- ignores this second LR-HMPDU and does not generate an LC-HMPDU in response.

---------------------- Page: 15 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 14
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
6.1.2 TPs for routing information maintenance function and forwarding
In all the TPs in this subclause the various information bases concerned with each TP should contain no
entries at the start of the test, unless otherwise indicated in the TP. (Where the initial state of the
information bases is directly related to the objective of a TP, the initial state is explicitly stated in the TP.)
6.1.2.1 TPs for routing information declaration and recording
NOTE: In these TPs the tester should wait up to 95 % of t or t when an HO-HMPDU or
HO TC
TC-HMPDU is expected.
6.1.2.1.1 Forwarder
MAC_FWD_1 subclause 6.5.4.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), periodically:
- transmits to the reserved HCSAP address All_Neighbours at least one HO-HMPDU containing zero
or more {NA, NS} pairs, and with the RTI field encoded as R-Forwarder.
MAC_FWD_2 subclause 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), periodically:
- transmits to the reserved HCSAP address All_Neighbours at least one TC-HMPDU containing zero
or more {MSN, SMA} pairs.
MAC_FWD_3 subclause 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), periodically:
- transmits TC-HMPDUs with OA set to the HCSAP of the IUT and with a holding time of I and the
TC
transmission condition where C is set to the HIPERLAN identifier of the IUTs HIPERLAN and
hid
C is set to All_Neighbours.
next
MAC_FWD_4 subclause 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), periodically:
- transmits TC-HMPDUs with the transmission condition where C is set p and C is set to
Pri TC Dist
n .
MHD
NOTE 1: This TP is untestable.
MAC_FWD_5 subclauses 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), having not received any HO-HMPDUs for a period exceeding t :
HO
- periodically transmits a single TC-HMPDU not containing any {MSN,SMA} pairs.
MAC_FWD_6 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU not containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT, and where there exists no entry in the local neighbour information
base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and no entry in the local source
Nbour
multipoint relay information base with S equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU:
SMR
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym, and transmits, one or
more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field equal to the
Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.

---------------------- Page: 16 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 15
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
MAC_FWD_7 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT and NS equal to N_Asym, and where there exists no entry in the
local neighbour information base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and N
Nbour Status
equal to N_Asym and no entry in the local source multipoint relay information base with S equal to the
SMR
source address of the HO-HMPDU:
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing a {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym or N_MultiRelay, and
transmits, one or more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field
equal to the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.
MAC_FWD_8 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT and NS equal to N_Sym, and where there exists no entry in the
local neighbour information base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and no entry
Nbour
in the local source multipoint relay information base with S equal to the source address of the
SMR
HO-HMPDU:
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing a {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym or N_MultiRelay, and
transmits, one or more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field
equal to the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.
MAC_FWD_9 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT and NS equal to N_MultiRelay, and where there exists no entry in
the local neighbour information base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU:
Nbour
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym or N_MultiRelay, and
transmits, one or more TC-HMPDUs, with at least one containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA
field equal to the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and the MSN field equal to the value
of the MSN field in the received HO-HMPDU.
MAC_FWD_10 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU not containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT, and where there exists an entry in the local neighbour information
base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and N equal to N_Asym and no
Nbour Status
entry in the local source multipoint relay information base with S equal to the source address of the
SMR
HO-HMPDU:
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing a {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Asym, and transmits, one or
more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field equal to the
Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.
MAC_FWD_11 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT and NS equal to N_Asym, and where there exists an entry in the
local neighbour information base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and N
Nbour Status
equal to N_Asym and no entry in the local source multipoint relay information base with S equal to the
SMR
source address of the HO-HMPDU:
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym or N_MultiRelay, and
transmits, one or more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field
equal to the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.

---------------------- Page: 17 ----------------------

SIST ETS 300 836-3 E1:2006
Page 16
ETS 300 836-3: May 1998
MAC_FWD_12 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equal to the MSAP address of the IUT and NS equal to N_Sym, and where there exists an entry in the
local neighbour information base with N equal to the source address of the HO-HMPDU and N
Nbour Status
equal to N_Asym and no entry in the local source multipoint relay information base with S equal to the
SMR
source address of the HO-HMPDU:
- transmits, one or more HO-HMPDUs, with at least one containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA equal to
the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU and NS equal to N_Sym or N_MultiRelay, and
transmits, one or more TC-HMPDUs, with none containing an {MSN, SMA} pair with the SMA field
equal to the Source Address of the received HO-HMPDU.
MAC_FWD_13 subclauses 6.5.5.1, 6.5.4.1, 6.5.6.1 valid PICS: R1
Ensure that the IUT (a forwarder), after receiving an HO-HMPDU containing an {NA, NS} pair with NA
equ
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.