ISO/IEC TS 10866:2024

Information technology — Cloud computing and distributed platforms — Framework and concepts for organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty

This document specifies concepts related to the intersection of digital sovereignty, organizational autonomy, and digital platform, and provides a framework enabling organizations to address these concepts. This document is applicable to all organizations and policy makers involved in organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty in cloud services and distributed platforms.

Technologies de l'information — Informatique en nuage et plates-formes distribuées — Cadre et concepts relatifs à l'autonomie organisationnelle et à la souveraineté numérique

General Information

• Status: Published
• Publication Date: 26-Nov-2024
• ICS: 35.210 - Cloud computing
• Technical Committee: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 38 - Cloud computing and distributed platforms
• Drafting Committee: ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 38 - Cloud computing and distributed platforms
• Current Stage: 6060 - International Standard published
• Start Date: 27-Nov-2024
• Due Date: 09-Jan-2026
• Completion Date: 27-Nov-2024

Overview

ISO/IEC TS 10866:2024 - Information technology - Cloud computing and distributed platforms - Framework and concepts for organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty provides a conceptual framework to help organizations and policy makers evaluate and manage the interplay between digital sovereignty and organizational autonomy in cloud services and distributed platforms. The Technical Specification defines terms, outlines a purpose-driven framework, and offers practical example scenarios to guide design, operations and conformance decisions across public, private and not‑for‑profit organizations.

Key topics

• Concepts and definitions: Clear terminology for organization, digital capability, digital service, digital platform, organizational autonomy and related terms (aligned with ISO/IEC vocabularies).
• Framework purpose and scope: How to assess effects of digital sovereignty requirements on organizational goals and platform configuration.
• Organizational objectives & digital capabilities: Mapping business and technical objectives to required cloud and distributed platform capabilities.
• Determining desired autonomy: Guidance to evaluate the degree of organizational autonomy needed (policy constraints, stakeholder requirements, resources).
• Application considerations: Practical factors such as data categorization and classification, resource requirements, design and operational controls, and conformance assessment.
• Example use cases: Worked scenarios in clause 6 including critical infrastructure under threat, recoverable critical data, global account management, global streaming content delivery, and trusted data sharing in a food services supply chain.

Applications and users

ISO/IEC TS 10866:2024 is intended for:

• Organizational leaders and decision makers (CIOs, CDOs, CISOs, compliance officers) who must balance control, resilience and innovation when adopting cloud services or distributed platforms.
• Digital platform architects and cloud service teams configuring platforms to meet autonomy and sovereignty requirements.
• Policy makers and regulators evaluating the implications of sovereignty policy on industry and public-sector organizations.
• Procurement, legal and risk teams assessing contractual and operational measures needed to ensure data availability, jurisdictional compliance and business continuity.

Practical uses include designing cloud/on‑edge deployments that align with national or organizational sovereignty objectives, performing impact assessments for proposed regulations, and specifying conformance criteria for vendor selection.

Related standards

• ISO/IEC 22123-1 (Cloud computing - Vocabulary)
• ISO/IEC 38500 (Governance of IT - Definitions, digital capability)
• ISO/IEC TS 5928 (Digital platform concepts)
• ISO/IEC 27000 (Information security management vocabulary)

ISO/IEC TS 10866:2024 helps bridge policy, architecture and operations by providing a concept-driven, example-rich framework to guide decisions about cloud architecture, data management, and organizational independence in an increasingly distributed digital landscape.

Standards Content (Sample)

Technical
Specification
ISO/IEC TS 10866
First edition
Information technology — Cloud
2024-11
computing and distributed
platforms — Framework and
concepts for organizational
autonomy and digital sovereignty
Technologies de l'information — Informatique en nuage
et plates-formes distribuées — Cadre et concepts relatifs à
l'autonomie organisationnelle et à la souveraineté numérique
Reference number
© ISO/IEC 2024
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, or required in the context of its implementation, no part of this publication may
be reproduced or utilized otherwise in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, or posting on
the internet or an intranet, without prior written permission. Permission can be requested from either ISO at the address below
or ISO’s member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
CP 401 • Ch. de Blandonnet 8
CH-1214 Vernier, Geneva
Phone: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Website: www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
ii
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction .v
1 Scope . 1
2 Normative references . 1
3 Terms and definitions . 1
4 Organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty . 2
5 Framework . 4
5.1 Purpose .4
5.2 Organizational objectives and digital capabilities .4
5.3 Determining the desired degree of organizational autonomy .6
6 Application of the framework . 8
6.1 General .8
6.2 Example: Critical infrastructure under threat .8
6.2.1 General .8
6.2.2 Organizational context .8
6.2.3 Data categorization, classification and usage .9
6.2.4 Required resources .9
6.2.5 Design and operational considerations .9
6.2.6 Conformance .9
6.3 Example: Critical data are recoverable .9
6.3.1 General .9
6.3.2 Organizational context .9
6.3.3 Data categorization, classification and usage .10
6.3.4 Required resources .10
6.3.5 Design and operational considerations .10
6.3.6 Conformance .10
6.4 Example: Account management of a global digital platform .10
6.4.1 General .10
6.4.2 Organizational context .11
6.4.3 Data categorization, classification and usage .11
6.4.4 Required resources .11
6.4.5 Design and operational considerations .11
6.4.6 Conformance .11
6.5 Example: Global streaming platform content delivery . 12
6.5.1 General . 12
6.5.2 Organizational context . 12
6.5.3 Data categorization, classification and usage . 12
6.5.4 Required resources . 12
6.5.5 Design and operational considerations . 13
6.5.6 Conformance . 13
6.6 Example: Trusted data sharing within a food services supply chain . 13
6.6.1 General . 13
6.6.2 Organizational context .14
6.6.3 Data categorization, classification and usage .14
6.6.4 Required resources .14
6.6.5 Design and operational considerations .14
6.6.6 Conformance . 15
Bibliography .16

© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
iii
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) and IEC (the International Electrotechnical
Commission) form the specialized system for worldwide standardization. National bodies that are
members of ISO or IEC participate in the development of International Standards through technical
committees established by the respective organization to deal with particular fields of technical activity.
ISO and IEC technical committees collaborate in fields of mutual interest. Other international organizations,
governmental and non-governmental, in liaison with ISO and IEC, also take part in the work.
The procedures used to develop this document and those intended for its further maintenance are described
in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 1. In particular, the different approval criteria needed for the different types
of document should be noted. This document was drafted in accordance with the editorial rules of the ISO/
IEC Directives, Part 2 (see www.iso.org/directives or www.iec.ch/members_experts/refdocs).
ISO and IEC draw attention to the possibility that the implementation of this document may involve the
use of (a) patent(s). ISO and IEC take no position concerning the evidence, validity or applicability of any
claimed patent rights in respect thereof. As of the date of publication of this document, ISO and IEC had not
received notice of (a) patent(s) which may be required to implement this document. However, implementers
are cautioned that this may not represent the latest information, which may be obtained from the patent
database available at www.iso.org/patents and https://patents.iec.ch. ISO and IEC shall not be held
responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
Any trade name used in this document is information given for the convenience of users and does not
constitute an endorsement.
For an explanation of the voluntary nature of standards, the meaning of ISO specific terms and expressions
related to conformity assessment, as well as information about ISO's adherence to the World Trade
Organization (WTO) principles in the Technical Barriers to Trade (TBT) see www.iso.org/iso/foreword.html.
In the IEC, see www.iec.ch/understanding-standards.
This document was prepared by Joint Technical Committee ISO/IEC JTC 1, Information technology,
Subcommittee SC 38, Cloud computing and distributed platforms.
Any feedback or questions on this document should be directed to the user’s national standards
body. A complete listing of these bodies can be found at www.iso.org/members.html and
www.iec.ch/national-committees.

© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
iv
Introduction
Organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty are important, complex and evolving subject areas whose
implications have expanded in recent years, as organizations of all types address the challenges inherent to
supplying and procuring digital capabilities in evolving environments.
Government objectives and policies can often be addressed through public or private partnerships, as these
governments increasingly rely on industry to help address these goals to increase their prosperity while
maintaining an appropriate degree of control and independence.
Since the same issues of independence and freedom of action and choice also apply to organizations –
including private, public sector and not-for-profit – it is possible that such organizations will need to consider
their own independence to achieve their goals.
This document defines a framework for understanding and evaluating the implications of digital sovereignty
requirements and restrictions on the organization. It describes how the organization can configure its
digital platform to appropriately balance those requirements with its own need for organizational autonomy
to achieve its goals. The framework may be used by the organization itself, or by the policy makers and
regulators of a sovereign entity which desire to examine the consequences of proposed digital sovereignty
requirements and restrictions on organizations and industries.
The audience of this document includes:
a) Organizational leaders (e.g. Chief Information Officer, Chief Data Officer and Chief Compliance Officer),
business or technical decision makers and digital platform architects who configure the organization’s
digital platform to ensure it has the right balance of digital autonomy to support and enable the goals of
the organization to be achieved.
b) Policy makers and regulators who wish to understand the impact of digital sovereignty and autonomy
matters.
© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
v
Technical Specification ISO/IEC TS 10866:2024(en)
Information technology — Cloud computing and distributed
platforms — Framework and concepts for organizational
autonomy and digital sovereignty
1 Scope
This document specifies concepts related to the intersection of digital sovereignty, organizational autonomy,
and digital platform, and provides a framework enabling organizations to address these concepts.
This document is applicable to all organizations and policy makers involved in organizational autonomy and
digital sovereignty in cloud services and distributed platforms.
2 Normative references
The following documents are referred to in the text in such a way that some or all of their content constitutes
requirements of this document. For dated references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references,
the latest edition of the referenced document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO/IEC 22123-1, Information technology — Cloud computing — Part 1: Vocabulary
3 Terms and definitions
For the purposes of this document, the terms and definitions given in ISO/IEC 22123-1 and the following apply.
ISO and IEC maintain terminology databases for use in standardization at the following addresses:
— ISO Online browsing platform: available at https:// www .iso .org/ obp
— IEC Electropedia: available at https:// www .electropedia .org/
3.1
organization
person or group of people that has its own functions with responsibilities, authorities and relationships to
achieve its objectives
Note 1 to entry: The concept of organization includes, but is not limited to, sole-trader, company, corporation, firm,
enterprise, authority, partnership, charity or institution, or part or combination thereof, whether incorporated or not,
public or private.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 27000:2018, 3.50]
3.2
digital capability
information technology (3.5) for enabling or supporting a service, product or process of the organization (3.1)
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 38500:2024, 3.10]

© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
3.3
digital service
service offered by one party to another party by means of digital hardware or software technology, or both,
including communication over a network
Note 1 to entry: In the context of this document, a service comprises one or more digital capabilities such as a cloud
computing, edge computing, or some other distributed computing capability. Such a service will be subject to contract
and typically have defined qualities of service, terms, and conditions for use.
Note 2 to entry: Cloud service, edge service, network service, broadcast service, and mobile service are all types of
digital service. Not all types are discussed in this document.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC TS 5928:2023, 3.1.1]
3.4
digital platform
set of correlated and cohesive digital services (3.3)
Note 1 to entry: A digital platform as described in this document enables and assists other participant digital services
in conducting business with their customers, either by creating and facilitating a multi-sided market for those services,
or by enabling the technological creation and operation of those services, or both.
Note 2 to entry: “Distributed platform” is often used as a synonym to emphasize those elements of a digital service,
such as edge computing and mobile computing that go beyond the classical datacentres of cloud computing.
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC TS 5928:2023, 3.1.2]
3.5
information technology
IT
resources used to acquire, process, store and disseminate information or data
Note 1 to entry: Resources can include computer or communication equipment, sensors, software, cloud computing
and other software-based services
[SOURCE: ISO/IEC 38500:2024, 3.5]
3.6
organizational autonomy
ability of an organization to make decisions independently of external influences
Note 1 to entry: Organizational autonomy is limited by factors such as resources and stakeholder requirements.
4 Organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty
Organizational autonomy and digital sovereignty are important and complex subject areas which have
expanded in recent years, as organizations of all types address the challenges inherent to supplying and
procuring digital capabilities in an environment of globally available cloud services, rapid technology
innovation, and increasing cloud service customer (CSC) agility. Given many cloud services are offered
globally, the changing regulatory frameworks in multiple, overlapping and potentially contradictory
jurisdictions impact not only cloud service providers (CSPs) but also CSCs.
National sovereignty matters in general have been highlighted by events such as the Covid-19 pandemic,
global supply chain issues, security and defence, the movement of people and border control, and other
global issues, such as military conflicts and export restrictions.
Sovereignty matters can include:
— safety of citizens;
— conservation of national resources;
— national security;
© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
— prosperity and economic development;
— governance and accountability.
Some of these sovereignty concerns become digital sovereignty concerns for reasons including the following:
— public and private organizations are applying digital platform solutions to address these issues, which
elevates the importance and reliance on digital platforms;
— to grow their economy, governments realize they can leverage digital platform and services;
— security, privacy and resiliency are different in the digital world (as opposed to the analogue world);
— the reliance on foreign digital technology suppliers, who can be subject to third-party regulations, adds
complexity to solutions;
— some of the underlying digital platforms are supplied by a limited number of companies, including foreign
companies;
— governments are keen to encourage local innovation, and fear their local businesses being left behind or
overtaken in the market;
— policy interoperability is a prerequisite for cross-border data transfer and is subject to change as national
and global priorities change;
— each government and its organizations properly protects its own intellectual property rights (IPR) and
takes various measures to do so;
— deriving the maximum value of data requires systems of mutual trust for freely sharing the data across
borders.
While governments can potentially build their own customized technology solutions, this can create new
security and sovereignty concerns. Many of these issues can, for example, be addressed through public-
private partnerships, meaning that governments rely increasingly on private businesses and non-profit
organizations to help address these issues and increase their prosperity while maintaining an appropriate
degree of independence.
When it comes to the digital capabilities of organizations, the same concerns of independence and freedom
of an action or choice also apply to organizations – including private, public and not-for-profit. To address
these concerns, organizations can take into account the degree of independence (which is called “autonomy”
in this document to distinguish it from national sovereignty) necessary to achieve their goals.
This document addresses sovereignty matters that:
a) are imposed by governments;
b) affect organizations (including private, public and non-for-profit organizations); and
c) impact the digital platforms that organizations use to support and enable their goals.
This is shown as the intersection in Figure 1.

© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
Figure 1 — Digital sovereignty matters addressed by organizations
5 Framework
5.1 Purpose
The purpose of this framework is to enable organizations to identify and evaluate organizational autonomy
and digital sovereignty matters faced by organizations and balance the applicable digital capabilities to
achieve their objectives.
The framework helps organizations choose or create appropriate digital services, configure their digital
platform, and balance the requirements and restrictions of digital sovereignty with their own need for
organizational autonomy. Applying this framework can also help organizations to refine their objectives
and considerations when configuring or fine tuning the digital capabilities at their disposal to achieve this
balance.
Most organizations operate in multiple jurisdictions, since even a single location is often subject to both local
and federal administrations. Many organizations are cross-border, with customers, suppliers, or facilities
across multiple geographic or political boundaries.
Digital sovereignty requirements in any of these jurisdictions can influence the objectives of the organization
as well as the configuration of its digital platform. For example, some jurisdictions require data residency,
which can require different digital capabilities than in other jurisdictions. That can impact not only the
organization’s overall digital platform but also its overall objectives and therefore its organizational
autonomy.
Understanding these digital sovereignty requirements and restrictions while striking an appropriate
balance with organizational autonomy is a key outcome of using the framework in this document.
5.2 Organizational objectives and digital capabilities
Figure 2 shows the high-level approach of the framework. To utilize this framework, the organization
clarifies its objectives and the digital capabilities it requires to support and achieve these objectives. The
organization also ensures a balance between these objectives and the digital sovereignty requirements it
will encounter.
© ISO/IEC 2024 – All rights reserved
The framework utilizes an iterative approach, with the following steps as shown in Figure 2:
a) Determine organizational objectives and assess associated risks.
1) In this step, the organization outlines its objectives, while considering the associated risks for
achieving those objectives. Initially, this step will be organizationally focused (or a “business
outcome”), include an understanding of the organization’s risk appetite and have only a minor focus
on the information technology needed to achieve the objectives.
2) The first iteration of this step may be performed without insight into the digital capabilities
required to achieve these objectives, but later iterations will benefit from such insight.
b) Identify the digital assets and capabilities required to achieve objectives.
1) At this step, the broad organizational
...