ISO 21581:2010
(Main)Timber structures - Static and cyclic lateral load test methods for shear walls
Timber structures - Static and cyclic lateral load test methods for shear walls
ISO 21581:2010 specifies static and cyclic test methods as a basis for the derivation of lateral load resisting parameters which are required in the wind and seismic design of shear walls in timber buildings.
Structures en bois — Méthodes d'essai de charge latérale statique et cyclique sur murs de contreventement
General Information
Standards Content (Sample)
INTERNATIONAL ISO
STANDARD 21581
First edition
2010-06-15
Timber structures — Static and cyclic
lateral load test methods for shear walls
Structures en bois — Méthodes d'essai de charge latérale statique
et cyclique sur murs de contreventement
Reference number
ISO 21581:2010(E)
©
ISO 2010
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
PDF disclaimer
This PDF file may contain embedded typefaces. In accordance with Adobe's licensing policy, this file may be printed or viewed but
shall not be edited unless the typefaces which are embedded are licensed to and installed on the computer performing the editing. In
downloading this file, parties accept therein the responsibility of not infringing Adobe's licensing policy. The ISO Central Secretariat
accepts no liability in this area.
Adobe is a trademark of Adobe Systems Incorporated.
Details of the software products used to create this PDF file can be found in the General Info relative to the file; the PDF-creation
parameters were optimized for printing. Every care has been taken to ensure that the file is suitable for use by ISO member bodies. In
the unlikely event that a problem relating to it is found, please inform the Central Secretariat at the address given below.
COPYRIGHT PROTECTED DOCUMENT
© ISO 2010
All rights reserved. Unless otherwise specified, no part of this publication may be reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means,
electronic or mechanical, including photocopying and microfilm, without permission in writing from either ISO at the address below or
ISO's member body in the country of the requester.
ISO copyright office
Case postale 56 • CH-1211 Geneva 20
Tel. + 41 22 749 01 11
Fax + 41 22 749 09 47
E-mail copyright@iso.org
Web www.iso.org
Published in Switzerland
ii © ISO 2010 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 2 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
Contents Page
Foreword .iv
Introduction.v
1 Scope.1
2 Normative references.1
3 Symbols and units.1
4 Test specimens.2
4.1 Conditioning .2
4.2 Form and dimension .2
4.3 Sampling.2
5 Apparatus.2
5.1 General .2
5.2 Base of test frame and loading beam.4
5.3 Mounting of wall specimen.4
6 Test procedure.4
6.1 Static (monotonic) test.4
6.2 Cyclic test schedule .6
7 Test results .7
7.1 Hysteresis data .7
7.2 Envelope curves .7
7.3 Properties of wall specimen.7
8 Test report.8
Annex A (informative) Additional information .9
Bibliography.14
© ISO 2010 – All rights reserved iii
---------------------- Page: 3 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
Foreword
ISO (the International Organization for Standardization) is a worldwide federation of national standards bodies
(ISO member bodies). The work of preparing International Standards is normally carried out through ISO
technical committees. Each member body interested in a subject for which a technical committee has been
established has the right to be represented on that committee. International organizations, governmental and
non-governmental, in liaison with ISO, also take part in the work. ISO collaborates closely with the
International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC) on all matters of electrotechnical standardization.
International Standards are drafted in accordance with the rules given in the ISO/IEC Directives, Part 2.
The main task of technical committees is to prepare International Standards. Draft International Standards
adopted by the technical committees are circulated to the member bodies for voting. Publication as an
International Standard requires approval by at least 75 % of the member bodies casting a vote.
Attention is drawn to the possibility that some of the elements of this document may be the subject of patent
rights. ISO shall not be held responsible for identifying any or all such patent rights.
ISO 21581 was prepared by Technical Committee ISO/TC 165, Timber structures.
iv © ISO 2010 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 4 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
Introduction
Evaluation of the structural performance of shear walls intended to resist forces generated during wind and
seismic actions is based on static or reversed cyclic load testing in some regulatory jurisdictions. The objective
of this International Standard is to provide test methods appropriate for static and cyclic lateral loading as a
basis for determining the characteristics of shear walls for use in wind and seismic design. The cyclic
displacement schedule in ISO 16670, which was developed in consultation with a group of international
experts, was also used in this International Standard.
Supplementary information is given in Annex A to provide the rationale behind the cyclic displacement
schedule, recommendations for cases for which a modified schedule would be more appropriate and typical
test results obtained on a shear wall specimen by following this International Standard.
© ISO 2010 – All rights reserved v
---------------------- Page: 5 ----------------------
INTERNATIONAL STANDARD ISO 21581:2010(E)
Timber structures — Static and cyclic lateral load test methods
for shear walls
1 Scope
This International Standard specifies static and cyclic test methods as a basis for the derivation of lateral load
resisting parameters which are required in the wind and seismic design of shear walls in timber buildings. This
International Standard does not include criteria for parameters which are, at times, stipulated in national
standards or building codes. This International Standard can be used to determine those parameters under
the following conditions:
a) Method I: the boundary conditions are designed to produce mainly the shear response of the wall and
ensure that the full shear capacity of the wall is achieved;
b) Method II: the boundary conditions are designed to produce mainly the rocking (rigid body rotation of the
wall) or combined shear-rocking response of the wall reflecting the intended actual construction details of
joints connecting the wall to bottom and top boundaries.
This International Standard specifies procedures to ascertain the envelope curves (backbone or skeleton
curves) for shear walls subjected to a static or a cyclic displacement schedule.
2 Normative references
The following referenced documents are indispensable for the application of this document. For dated
references, only the edition cited applies. For undated references, the latest edition of the referenced
document (including any amendments) applies.
ISO 554, Standard atmospheres for conditioning and/or testing — Specifications
ISO 3131, Wood — Determination of density for physical and mechanical tests
3 Symbols and units
F Applied lateral load, in newtons
F Maximum lateral load, in newtons (for definition, see Figure 3)
max
F Applied vertical load, in newtons
v
H Height of wall specimen, in millimetres
K Displacement modulus, in newtons per millimetre
l Horizontal displacement of wall, in millimetres
l Ultimate horizontal displacement of wall, in millimetres (for definition, see Figure 3)
u
© ISO 2010 – All rights reserved 1
---------------------- Page: 6 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
4 Test specimens
4.1 Conditioning
The specimens shall be conditioned at the controlled environment of (20 ± 2) °C and (65 ± 5) % relative
humidity in accordance with ISO 554 as far as possible. The test laboratory shall normally be maintained at
the controlled environment, but when other conditions apply, they shall be reported.
The density of the wood members in the wall specimen shall be determined in accordance with ISO 3131.
4.2 Form and dimension
The dimensions (e.g. height and length), configuration (e.g. openings) and fabrication details (e.g. elapsed
time between the fabrication and test, tolerances, and conditioning details before and after fabrication) shall
be representative of the intended end use.
Where panels are used, the wall specimen shall consist of a single or multiple panels of the representative
dimensions.
Some wall configurations can have joints between wall units. Those joints should be considered for inclusion
in test specimens.
4.3 Sampling
Sampling shall provide for selection of representative test material on an objective and unbiased basis,
covering an appropriate range of physical and mechanical properties.
The number of replicates should be selected to achieve the specific objectives and desired reliability.
5 Apparatus
5.1 General
The test apparatus (Figure 1) shall be capable of producing the boundary conditions that are intended in
Methods I and II.
NOTE 1 For further information, see A.2.
The testing machine shall be capable of applying and continuously recording load and displacement to an
accuracy of ±1 % of the estimates of F and l or better.
max u
Where the lateral loads, F, are applied along with the vertical loads, F , the test apparatus shall be capable of
v
controlling the vertical loads and the lateral loads separately.
Where the lateral loads are applied along with the vertical loads, it is recommended that the frictional forces
be taken into consideration. Vertical load should not produce horizontal component.
In Method I, the full shear capacity of the wall specimen is achieved through application of sufficient vertical
loads and adequate vertical restraints (e.g. hold-down connectors) or tie-down rods (at both ends of the wall
specimen in the cyclic test).
Where hold-down connectors are used, they shall be attached in such a way that they are effective primarily in
resisting the up-lift forces, and the additional resistance that the wall gains due to hold-down connectors shall
be determined.
Method I is intended to result in shear failure in the wall specimen. It is therefore recommended that, if so
desired, the end members be designed in such a way as to avoid crushing and buckling failures. It is also
recommended that hold-down connectors be used at the top of the wall if separation of horizontal and vertical
members is not desired. Where tie-down rods are used, the frictional forces should be taken into account.
2 © ISO 2010 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 7 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
In Method II, the wall specimen shall be tested with representative boundary conditions (e.g. anchorage, hold-
down connector details) and the vertical (compressive or tensile) loads that are expected in actual
construction.
NOTE 2 Method II can result in failure in the wall or in anchorage or vertical restraints (hold-down connectors).
Measuring point A should be as close to the top of the wall as practicable.
a) Example with end restraints b) Example with tie-down rods
c) Example with combined compressive load d) Example with combined tensile load
Key
a distance between points A and B
1 lateral restraint
b distance between points C and D
2 wall specimen
F lateral load
3 anchor bolt
F applied vertical load
4 horizontal restraint
v
H height of wall
5 base beam
6 vertical restraint
7 loading beam
8 roller
9 tie-down rod
Figure 1 — Examples of test apparatus
© ISO 2010 – All rights reserved 3
---------------------- Page: 8 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
5.2 Base of test frame and loading beam
The base of the test frame shall provide a level foundation for the test specimen and shall be relatively stiff,
such that its deflections are negligible. A rigid datum (independent of the test frame) shall be provided for the
measurement of the deformation of the wall specimen.
The loading beam, if applicable, shall be firmly attached to the top of the wall specimen to ensure uniform
distribution of lateral load. The actuator that is attached to the loading beam to apply the lateral load shall be
installed in such a way that does not restrain up-lift. In all cases, the stiffness and the mass of the loading
beam shall be determined. The cross-sectional dimensions and position of the beam shall allow the free
movement of the panels during the test, unless otherwise specified by the test objectives.
A rigid or flexible loading beam may be used depending on the intended end use. In Method I, a rigid loading
beam shall be used. In Method II, stiffness of loading beam may be chosen according to the intended actual
construction.
5.3 Mounting of wall specimen
The wall specimen shall be connected to the base of the test frame with anchor bolts or other connectors
according to the actual end use in structures.
In Method I, anchor bolts and vertical restraints (hold-down connectors) shall be designed in such a way as to
allow the wall to fail in shear.
Lateral restraints shall be provided through the loading beam such that the top of the wall specimen deflects
only in the plane of the wall.
6 Test procedure
6.1 Static (monotonic) test
The lateral load, F, shall be applied as shown in Figure 1. The load shall be applied at a constant rate of
movement related to the displacement at gauge A. For loading and unloading up to 0,4 F (estimated), the
max
rate of loading shall be (0,000 8H ± 0,000 2H) mm per min (H: height of wall) . For loading above 0,4 F
max
(estimated), the rate of loading shall be selected to achieve ultimate displacement between 5 min and 30 min.
The procedure for the application of the lateral load is shown in Figure 2.
The displacements of the wall specimen shall be monitored at points A, B, C and D (see Figure 1). The
deformations, l , shall be taken as the displacement at A minus the displacement at B. The displacements at
rel
C and D shall be reported separately.
The mean value (where applicable) of the ultimate displacement l of the static tests will be determined by
u
following the definition of l in Figure 3.
u
NOTE Static (monotonic) test procedure is adopted from EN 594.
4 © ISO 2010 – All rights reserved
---------------------- Page: 9 ----------------------
ISO 21581:2010(E)
Key Key
X time, in seconds X deformation, in millimetres
F
F
Y Y
F
F
max,est max,est
a
Stabilizing load cycle.
b
Stiffness load cycle.
c
Strength test.
a) Lateral load versus time
b) Typical lateral load versus deformation
Figure 2 — Static tests procedure
X displacement, l
Y load, F
1 F (case a, case b)
max
2 displacement at failure
3 F (case c)
max
a
l (case a), displacement at failure.
u
b
l (case b), displacement for 0,8 F .
u max
c
l (case c), displacement = H/15.
u
Definition of ultimate displacement: l correspond
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.