Abstract

Core INAP CS3 shall comprise the CAMEL phase 1, 2, and 3 (release 1999); ensuring a unique IN Network infrastructure for fixed network and mobile applications suitable for implementation in Europe. This shall contain the CAMEL Application Part (CAP) for specification for Phase 3 to support GSM The first release is has the following main topics: Multiple Point of Control, Enhanced CPH capabilities; Enhanced Charging; Number Portability,  IN Support for H.323 and SIP/SDP architecture SPAR Phase 1 requirements. CAMEL Phase 3 Release 1999.

Status
Published
Publication Date
31-Dec-2004
Current Stage
6060 - National Implementation/Publication (Adopted Project)
Start Date
01-Jan-2005
Due Date
01-Jan-2005
Completion Date
01-Jan-2005

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

English language (521 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is the Slovenian adoption of ETSI EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2 for Intelligent Network (IN) Intelligent Network Capability Set 3 (CS3). It specifies the Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP) protocol for the SCF-SSF interface, covering call control, service control, charging, and user interaction for fixed and mobile network applications. It is intended for telecom engineers, network operators, and implementers working with CAMEL and INAP-based systems.

What does SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 specify?

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 specifies the INAP CS3 protocol specification for the SCF-SSF interface. In practice, it defines how the Service Control Function (SCF) and the Service Switching Function (SSF) interact in an Intelligent Network, including CAMEL phase 1, 2, and 3 release 1999 capabilities.

The scope ties this interface to a unified IN network infrastructure for fixed and mobile applications. It also mentions support topics such as Multiple Point of Control, enhanced CPH capabilities, enhanced charging, number portability, and IN support for H.323 and SIP/SDP architecture.

The document is organized into 12 clauses:

ClauseWhat it covers
1Scope
2References
3Definitions and abbreviations
4Introduction
5Relationships
6CCF/SSF Model
7SCF Model
8FSM for SSF
9FSM for SCF
10FSM for USI
11Operation Procedures
12Parameter Descriptions

What are the key requirements of SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005?

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is mainly a behavioral specification. It tells implementers how call-control entities, service logic, state machines, and protocol procedures fit together so that SCF and SSF can exchange control and charging information consistently.

Network and call-control models

Clause 6 defines the CCF/SSF model and its main parts: Basic Call Manager (BCM), Feature Interaction Manager/Call Manager (FIM/CM), and IN-Switching Manager (IN-SM). This matters because implementers need a common internal model before they can map protocol events to switch behavior.

Clause 6 also defines the Call Control Function, Basic Call State Model (BCSM), detection points, and the mapping from cause to DP. In practice, this tells a switch where service logic may intervene during originating or terminating call handling.

Feature interaction and switching behavior

Clause 6.5 defines how DPs are handled, including event distribution and filtering, with rules for Single Point of Control (SPC) and Multiple Points of Control (MPC). That is important when several services may try to control the same call, because the switch must decide which service gets the event and when.

Clause 6.6 defines the IN-switching manager, connection view objects, and connection view state transitions. This gives the call-control side a structured way to represent legs, call segments, and associations during service execution.

SCF, SSF, and user interaction state machines

Clause 7 defines the SCF model, including the Service Logic Processing program Instance (SLPI) and groups of functional routines for management, communication, timers, data, asynchronous events, connections, specialized resources, and OAM. Clause 8 and Clause 9 then define finite state machines for SSF and SCF behavior. For implementers, these clauses show when the peer entity should be idle, waiting for instructions, monitoring, or handling temporary connections.

Clause 10 defines the FSM for USI. That is relevant where user interaction has to be coordinated between the SCF and the SSF during call handling.

Protocol procedures

Clause 11 defines the operation procedures used between SCF and SSF, including ActivateServiceFiltering, ApplyCharging, ApplyChargingReport, AssistRequestInstructions, CallGap, CallInformationReport, Connect, Continue, CreateCallSegmentAssociation, DisconnectLeg, EstablishTemporaryConnection, EventReportBCSM, InitialDP, RequestReportBCSMEvent, ReleaseCall, and StatusReport. The practical point is that each procedure is described from both sides, so implementers know who invokes it, how the normal exchange works, and how errors are handled.

What terms does SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 define?

  • Service Control Function (SCF) - the network function that hosts service logic and sends instructions to the SSF.
  • Service Switching Function (SSF) - the network function inside the switch that detects call events and applies SCF instructions.
  • Call Control Function (CCF) - the call-processing part of the switch model used in the protocol architecture.
  • Basic Call Manager (BCM) - the part of the CCF/SSF model that follows basic call behavior.
  • Basic Call State Model (BCSM) - the call-state model used to identify phases and detection points in a call.
  • Feature Interaction Manager/Call Manager (FIM/CM) - the model element that handles interactions between features and call processing.
  • IN-switching manager (IN-SM) - the model element that manages IN-related switching behavior and connection view state.
  • Service Logic Processing program Instance (SLPI) - an instance of service logic processing within the SCF model.

Who uses SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005?

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is used by telecom equipment vendors, network operators, and protocol implementers working on Intelligent Network and CAMEL systems. It is relevant for fixed-network and mobile-network integration, GSM service support, and INAP-based service control.

It is also used by test and quality teams that verify SCF-SSF interoperability, charging behavior, user interaction flows, and call-handling state transitions. Buyers and technical evaluators can use it to check whether an INAP implementation supports CS3 and the SCF-SSF procedures they need.

What does the SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 document contain?

The document contains detailed functional models, state machines, and protocol procedure descriptions rather than a short profile or checklist. Clause 6 and Clause 7 provide the architecture models for call control and service control.

Clause 8 to Clause 10 give finite state machines for SSF, SCF, and USI behavior, including state names, transition tables, and examples of connection-view configurations. Clause 11 is the largest procedural part and sets out many message exchanges with normal flow and error handling for both invoking and responding entities. Clause 12 lists parameter descriptions for the protocol elements used by those procedures, which is the part implementers use when encoding, decoding, testing, or validating protocol messages.

Buy Documents

Standard

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

English language (521 pages)
Preview
Preview
e-Library read for
×1 day

Get Certified

Connect with accredited certification bodies for this standard

ANCE

Mexican certification and testing association.

EMA Mexico Verified

Intertek Slovenia

Intertek testing, inspection, and certification services in Slovenia.

UKAS Slovenia Verified

LNE (Laboratoire National de Métrologie et d'Essais)

French national laboratory for metrology and testing.

COFRAC France Verified

Sponsored listings

Frequently Asked Questions

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is a standard published by the Slovenian Institute for Standardization (SIST). Its full title is "Intelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Capability Set 3 (CS3); Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Protocol specification; Part 2: SCF-SSF interface". This standard covers: Core INAP CS3 shall comprise the CAMEL phase 1, 2, and 3 (release 1999); ensuring a unique IN Network infrastructure for fixed network and mobile applications suitable for implementation in Europe. This shall contain the CAMEL Application Part (CAP) for specification for Phase 3 to support GSM The first release is has the following main topics: Multiple Point of Control, Enhanced CPH capabilities; Enhanced Charging; Number Portability, IN Support for H.323 and SIP/SDP architecture SPAR Phase 1 requirements. CAMEL Phase 3 Release 1999.

Core INAP CS3 shall comprise the CAMEL phase 1, 2, and 3 (release 1999); ensuring a unique IN Network infrastructure for fixed network and mobile applications suitable for implementation in Europe. This shall contain the CAMEL Application Part (CAP) for specification for Phase 3 to support GSM The first release is has the following main topics: Multiple Point of Control, Enhanced CPH capabilities; Enhanced Charging; Number Portability, IN Support for H.323 and SIP/SDP architecture SPAR Phase 1 requirements. CAMEL Phase 3 Release 1999.

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is classified under the following ICS (International Classification for Standards) categories: 33.040.40 - Data communication networks. The ICS classification helps identify the subject area and facilitates finding related standards.

SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005 is available in PDF format for immediate download after purchase. The document can be added to your cart and obtained through the secure checkout process. Digital delivery ensures instant access to the complete standard document.

Standards Content (Sample)


2003-01.Slovenski inštitut za standardizacijo. Razmnoževanje celote ali delov tega standarda ni dovoljeno.Inteligentno omrežje (IN) – Tretji nabor zmožnosti inteligentnega omrežja (CS3) – Aplikacijski protokol inteligentnega omrežja (INAP) – Specifikacija protokola – 2. del: Vmesnik SCF-SSFIntelligent Network (IN); Intelligent Network Capability Set 3 (CS3); Intelligent Network Application Protocol (INAP); Protocol specification; Part 2: SCF-SSF interface33.040.40Podatkovna komunikacijska omrežjaData communication networksICS:Ta slovenski standard je istoveten z:EN 301 931-2 Version 1.1.2SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005en01-januar-2005SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005SLOVENSKI
STANDARD
ETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)EuropeanStandard(Telecommunicationsseries)IntelligentNetwork(IN);IntelligentNetworkCapabilitySet3(CS3);IntelligentNetworkApplicationProtocol(INAP);Protocolspecification;Part2:SCF-SSFinterfaceSIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)2ReferenceDEN/SPAN-03063/1-2KeywordsCS3,CTM,IN,INAP,protocol,UPTETSI650RoutedesLuciolesF-06921SophiaAntipolisCedex-FRANCETel.:+33492944200Fax:+33493654716SiretN°34862356200017-NAF742CAssociationàbutnonlucratifenregistréeàlaSous-PréfecturedeGrasse(06)N°7803/88ImportantnoticeIndividualcopiesofthepresentdocumentcanbedownloadedfrom:http://www.etsi.orgThepresentdocumentmaybemadeavailableinmorethanoneelectronicversionorinprint.Inanycaseofexistingorperceiveddifferenceincontentsbetweensuchversions,thereferenceversionisthePortableDocumentFormat(PDF).Incaseofdispute,thereferenceshallbetheprintingonETSIprintersofthePDFversionkeptonaspecificnetworkdrivewithinETSISecretariat.Usersofthepresentdocumentshouldbeawarethatthedocumentmaybesubjecttorevisionorchangeofstatus.InformationonthecurrentstatusofthisandotherETSIdocumentsisavailableathttp://www.etsi.org/tb/status/Ifyoufinderrorsinthepresentdocument,sendyourcommentto:editor@etsi.frCopyrightNotificationNopartmaybereproducedexceptasauthorizedbywrittenpermission.Thecopyrightandtheforegoingrestrictionextendtoreproductioninallmedia.©EuropeanTelecommunicationsStandardsInstitute2001.Allrightsreserved.SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)3ContentsIntellectualPropertyRights.20Foreword.201Scope.212References.213Definitionsandabbreviations.213.1Definitions.213.2Abbreviations.214Introduction.215Relationships.215.1SSF-CCFrelationship.215.2SSF-SCFrelationship.226CCF/SSFModel.226.1CCF/SSFFunctionalModelComponents.246.1.1BasicCallManager(BCM).256.1.2FeatureInteractionManager/CallManager(FIM/CM).256.1.3IN-SwitchingManager(IN-SM).256.1.4CCF/SSFModelcomponentsrelationships.266.1.4.1RelationshipbetweenSCFandIN-SM.266.1.4.2RelationshipbetweenIN-SMandFIM/CM.266.1.4.3RelationshipbetweenFIM/CMandBCM.266.1.4.4RelationshipbetweenFIM/CMandnon-INFM.266.1.5TypicalSequenceofModelActions.276.2CallControlFunction.286.2.1BasicCallControllerProcess.296.2.1.1Overview.296.2.1.2CreationanddeletionsofBCSMinstances.296.2.2SignallingTerminations.306.2.2.1Overview.306.2.2.2AbstractSignallingPrimitives.316.2.2.3SignallingTerminations.336.2.2.4SignallingConfigurations.336.2.3FSMforCallControlSignallingTermination.336.2.3.1Overview.336.2.3.2FSMstates.336.2.3.2.1Idle.336.2.3.2.2RequestedPath.346.2.3.2.3ProgressedPath.346.2.3.2.4AcknowledgedPath.356.2.3.2.5ConfirmedPath.356.2.3.3Examplemapping.366.2.4SignallingInterworking.366.2.4.1GeneralObjectives.366.3FunctionalInterfacebetweentheCCFandtheSSF.376.4Basiccallmanager(BCM).386.4.1BCSMModel.386.4.2BCSMdescription.396.4.2.1OriginatingBCSM.416.4.2.1.1O_Null.426.4.2.1.2Authorize_Origination_Attempt.426.4.2.1.3Collect_Information.436.4.2.1.4Analyse_Information.456.4.2.1.5SelectRoute.466.4.2.1.6Authorize_Call_Setup.47SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)46.4.2.1.7Send_Call.486.4.2.1.8O_Alerting.496.4.2.1.9O_Active.506.4.2.1.10O_Suspended.516.4.2.1.11O_Exception.526.4.2.2TerminatingBCSM.536.4.2.2.1T_Null.546.4.2.2.2Authorize_Termination_Attempt.556.4.2.2.3SelectFacility.556.4.2.2.4PresentCall.566.4.2.2.5T_Alerting.576.4.2.2.6T_Active.586.4.2.2.7T_Suspended.596.4.2.2.8T_Exception.596.4.3BCSMResumePointsandBCSMTransitionsintheINCS-3CallModel.616.4.3.1OriginatingBCSM:DetailedSetofO_BCSMTransitions.616.4.3.2TerminatingBCSM:DetailedSetofT_BCSMTransitions.656.4.4BCSMindicationsfortheCS-3CallModel.686.4.4.1User-O_BCSMAccessSignallingIndications(Category1).686.4.4.2T_BCSM-UserAccessSignallingIndications(Category2).706.4.4.3IntraLocalExchangeBCSMIndications(Category3).716.4.5MappingfromCausetoDP.756.4.5.1O_BCSM:MappingTablefromCausetoDP.756.4.5.2T_BCSM:MappingTablefromCausetoDP.786.4.6BCSMDetectionPoint.806.4.7DPCriteria.826.5Featureinteractionsmanager(FIM)/callmanager(CM).906.5.1DPHandling.916.5.1.1FIMmechanisms.926.5.1.1.1Servicelogicinstanceinteractionsconsiderations.936.5.1.2DPandEventDistributionandFiltering.966.5.1.2.1GeneralRules.976.5.1.2.2SinglePointofControl(SPC)Rules.976.5.1.2.3MultiplePointsofControl(MPC)Rules.986.5.1.3TDPandEDPProcessingScenariosforSinglePointofControl.1006.5.1.4ImplicitEDPDisarmingRules.1016.6IN-switchingmanager(IN-SM).1036.6.1IN-switchingstatemodel(IN-SSM).1036.6.2TheConnectionViewModel.1076.6.2.1ConnectionViewObjects.1086.6.2.1.1CallSegmentAssociationObject.1086.6.2.1.2CallSegmentObject.1096.6.2.1.3LegObject.1096.6.2.1.4ConnectionPointObject.1106.6.2.2RelationshipofBCSMtoConnectionViewCSStates.1106.6.3ConnectionViewStateTransitions.1116.6.3.1Introduction.1116.6.3.2SSME-Control.1116.6.3.2.1Introduction.1116.6.3.2.2TransitiontableforSSME-Control.1116.6.3.3CallSegmentAssociationConnectionView(CSACV)Transitions.1126.6.3.3.1Introduction.1126.6.3.3.2FunctionalProceduresforCallSegmentAssociation(CSA).1126.6.3.3.3TransitiondiagramforCallSegmentAssociation(CSA).1136.6.3.3.4TransitiontableforCallSegmentAssociation(CSA).1136.6.3.4CallSegmentConnectionView(CSCV)Transitions.1156.6.3.4.1Introduction.1156.6.3.4.2FunctionalProceduresforCallSegment(CS).1176.6.3.4.3CallSegmentConnectionView(CSCV)StateDescription.1266.6.3.5ExamplesofCVConfigurations,CompositeTransitions.1486.6.3.5.1ExamplesofCompositeTransitionsfromthe"Originating_Setup"CSCVstate.1486.6.3.5.2ExamplesofCompositeTransitionsfromthe"Stable_2_Party"CSCVstate.149SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)56.6.3.5.3ExamplesofCompositeTransitionsfromthe"Stable_Multi_Passive_Party"CSCVstateprovidedtheCShasonly2pendinglegs.1506.6.3.6OverviewofTransitionsofDPEventstotheCSCVstates.1516.7Out-ChannelCall-RelatedUserInteraction(OCCRUI).1596.7.1DescriptionoftheOCCRUIattheCCF/SSF"CallModel"level.1596.7.1.1Firstcase:theUSIinformationisconsideredasa"notificationpreviouslyrequestedbytheSCF".1596.7.1.2Secondcase:theUSIinformationisanadditionalandoptionalinformation.1606.7.1.3Synthesis.1607SCFModel.1617.1Introduction.1617.2SCFModelComponents.1617.2.1ServiceLogicProcessingprogramInstance(SLPI).1627.2.2FunctionalRoutineCategories.1627.2.2.1SLPImanagementfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.2SLPIcommunicationfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.3Timermanagementfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.4Datamanagementinterfacefunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.5Asynchronouseventhandlingfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.6Connectionmanagementfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.7Specializedresourcemanagementfunctionalroutines.1627.2.2.8OAMfunctionalroutines.1638FSMforSSF.1638.1SSFmanagementfinitestatemodel(SSMEFSM).1658.2INSSFswitchingstatemodel(IN-SSM)FSM.1668.2.1FiniteStateModelforCallSegmentAssociation(CSA).1708.2.1.1Statea:Idle.1718.2.1.2Stateb:Active.1728.2.2FiniteStateModelforCallSegment.1758.2.2.1Statea:Idle.1808.2.2.2Statec:WaitingForInstructions.1818.2.2.3Stated:WaitingForEndOfUserInteraction(WFI).1828.2.2.4Statee:WaitingForEndOfTemporaryConnection(WFI).1838.2.2.5Statef:Monitoring.1848.2.2.6Stateh:WaitingForEndOfUserInteraction(Monitoring).1858.2.2.7Statei:WaitingForEndOfTemporaryConnection(Monitoring).1868.3AssistingSSFFSM.1878.3.1Stateaa:Idle.1888.3.2Stateab:WaitingForInstructions.1888.3.3Stateac:WaitingForEndOfUserInteraction.1898.4Handed-offSSFFSM.1908.4.1Stateha:Idle.1918.4.2Statehb:WaitingForInstructions.1918.4.3Statehc:WaitingForEndOfUserInteraction.1929FSMforSCF.1939.1RelationshipbetweentheSLPandtheinterSCFcallstatemodel.1939.2TheSCFFSMstructure.1939.3PartialSCFManagementEntity(SCME)StateTransitionDiagram.1949.3.1TheStatusReportFSM.1949.3.1.1StateM1:"StatusReportIidle".1959.3.1.2StateM2:"WaitingforSSFResourceStatusReport".1959.3.2TheServiceFilteringFSM.1959.3.2.1StateM3:"Servicefilteringidle".1969.3.2.2StateM4:"WaitingforSSFservicefilteringresponse".1969.3.3TheActivityTestFSM.1969.3.3.1StateM5:"Activitytestidle".1969.3.3.2StateM6:"Waitingforactivitytestresponse".1979.3.4TheManageTriggerDataFSM.1979.3.4.1StateM7:"ManageTriggerDataidle".1979.3.4.2StateM8:"WaitingforManageTriggerDataresponse".1979.3.5TheResourceControlObject.198SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)69.4SSF/SRFRelatedStates(SCSM-SSF/SRF).1989.4.1FiniteStateModelforSSF/SRFinterface.2009.4.1.1StateS1:"Idle".2009.4.1.2StateS2:"PreparingSSF/SRFInstructions".2019.4.1.2.1StateS2.1:"AssistRequestIdle".2029.4.1.2.2StateS2.2:"WaitingforAssistRequest".2029.4.2FiniteStateModelforCSA.2039.4.2.1StateI1:"SSFControlIdle".2049.4.2.2StateI2:"PreparingSSFInstructions".2049.4.3FiniteStateModelforCallSegment.2069.4.3.1StateC1:"CSControlIdle".2089.4.3.2StateC2:"PreparingCSInstructions".2089.4.3.2.1StateC2.1:"PreparingCSInstructions".2109.4.3.2.2StateC2.2:"WaitingforNotificationorRequest".2129.4.3.2.3StateC2.3:"Queuing".2149.4.3.3StateC3:"SuspendedandUserInteraction".2169.4.3.3.1StateC3.1:"DetermineMode".2179.4.3.3.2StateC3.2:"UserInteraction".2189.4.3.3.3StateC3.3:"EstablishingTemporaryConnection".2219.4.3.4StateC4:"NotSuspendedandUserInteraction".2239.4.3.4.1StateC4.1:"DetermineModeMonitoring".2249.4.3.4.2StateC4.2:"UserInteractionMonitoring".2259.4.3.4.3StateC4.3:"EstablishingTemporaryConnectionMonitoring".2279.4.4FiniteStateModelforAssistingSSF.2289.4.4.1StateA1:"AssistingSSFIdle".2309.4.4.2StateA2:"PreparingSSFInstructions".2309.4.4.3StateA3:"UserInteraction".2319.4.5FiniteStateModelforHanded-offSSF.2329.4.5.1StateH1:"Handed-offSSFIdle".2339.4.5.2StateH2:"PreparingSSFInstructions".2339.4.5.3StateH3:"UserInteraction".23410FSMforUSI.23510.1USIFSMforSSF.23510.2USIFSMforSCF.23611OperationProcedures.23711.1ActivateServiceFilteringprocedure.23711.1.1Generaldescription.23711.1.1.1Parameters.23711.1.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.23711.1.1.1.2ResultParameters.23811.1.2Invokingentity(SCF).23811.1.2.1Normalprocedure.23811.1.2.2Errorhandling.23911.1.3Respondingentity(SSF).23911.1.3.1Normalprocedure.23911.1.3.2Errorhandling.24011.2ActivityTestprocedure.24011.2.1Generaldescription.24011.2.1.1Parameters.24111.2.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.24111.2.1.1.2ResultParameters.24111.2.2Invokingentity(SCF).24111.2.2.1Normalprocedure.24111.2.2.2Errorhandling.24111.2.3Respondingentity(SSF).24111.2.3.1Normalprocedure.24111.2.3.2Errorhandling.24111.2.4Invokingentity(SSF).24211.2.4.1Normalprocedure.24211.2.4.2Errorhandling.242SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)711.2.5Respondingentity(SCF).24211.2.5.1Normalprocedure.24211.2.5.2Errorhandling.24211.3ApplyChargingprocedure.24211.3.1Generaldescription.24211.3.1.1Parameters.24311.3.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.24311.3.2Invokingentity(SCF).24311.3.2.1Normalprocedure.24311.3.2.2Errorhandling.24411.3.3Respondingentity(SSF).24411.3.3.1Normalprocedure.24411.3.3.2Errorhandling.24511.4ApplyChargingReportprocedure.24511.4.1Generaldescription.24511.4.1.1Parameters.24611.4.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.24611.4.2Invokingentity(SSF).24611.4.2.1Normalprocedure.24611.4.2.2Errorhandling.24811.4.3Respondingentity(SCF).24811.4.3.1Normalprocedure.24811.4.3.2Errorhandling.24811.5AssistRequestInstructionsprocedure.24811.5.1Generaldescription.24811.5.1.1Parameters.24911.5.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.24911.5.2Invokingentity(SSF).24911.5.2.1Normalprocedure.24911.5.2.2Errorhandling.24911.5.3Respondingentity(SCF).24911.5.3.1Normalprocedure.24911.5.3.2Errorhandling.25011.6CallGapprocedure.25011.6.1Generaldescription.25011.6.1.1Parameters.25011.6.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.25011.6.2Invokingentity(SCF).25111.6.2.1Normalprocedure.25111.6.2.2Errorhandling.25111.6.3Respondingentity(SSF).25111.6.3.1Normalprocedure.25111.6.3.2Errorhandling.25311.7CallInformationReportprocedure.25311.7.1Generaldescription.25311.7.1.1Parameters.25311.7.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.25311.7.2Invokingentity(SSF).25411.7.2.1Normalprocedure.25411.7.2.2Errorhandling.25411.7.3Respondingentity(SCF).25511.7.3.1Normalprocedure.25511.7.3.2Errorhandling.25511.8CallInformationRequestprocedure.25511.8.1Generaldescription.25511.8.1.1Parameters.25511.8.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.25511.8.2Invokingentity(SCF).25611.8.2.1Normalprocedure.25611.8.2.2Errorhandling.25611.8.3Respondingentity(SSF).25611.8.3.1Normalprocedure.256SIST EN 301 931-2 V1.1.2:2005

ETSIETSIEN301931-2V1.1.2(2001-09)811.8.3.2Errorhandling.25611.9Cancelprocedure.25711.9.1Generaldescription.25711.9.1.1Parameters.25711.9.1.1.1ArgumentParameters.
...