Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Manageability

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Each facility rating scale in this classification (see Figs. 1-8) provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such aslocation, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
This classification can be used to estimate the amount of variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities.
This classification can be used to estimate the following:
Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a remodeling has been planned.
Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology, and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales (see Figs. 1-8) for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for manageability.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales (see Figs. 1-8) are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the facility rating scale is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the needs of one or another type of occupant group, over time. The entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an office facility is performing.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in Figs. 1-8 are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.  
TABLE 1 Anticipated Remaining Service LifeA  CountBRemaining Useful Life at Least: Equal to 3 = Building envelope: seals, joints = 10 years or more  4 = Roofing and flashing = 15 years or more  5 = HVAC prime movers and main systems = 20 years or more  3 = HVAC secondary distrib., for example, small fans = 10 years or more  4 = HVAC controls = 10 years or more  3 = Elevators and escalators = 20 years or more  4 = Ceiling systems, including fixtures = 15 yea...

General Information

Status
Historical
Publication Date
31-Mar-2012
Current Stage
Ref Project

Relations

Buy Standard

Standard
ASTM E1701-95(2012) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Manageability
English language
15 pages
sale 15% off
Preview
sale 15% off
Preview

Standards Content (Sample)


NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E1701 −95 (Reapproved 2012) An American National Standard
Standard Classification for
1,2
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Manageability
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1701; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales (see Figs. 1-8)
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office
E1334 Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or
facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet
Building-Related Facility (Withdrawn 2013)
certain possible requirements for manageability.
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Service-
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
(see Figs. 1-8) are for classifying one topic of serviceability.
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
EachparagraphinanOccupantRequirementScalesummarizes
2.2 ISO Documents:
onelevelofserviceabilityonthattopic,whichoccupantsmight
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
require. The matching entry in the facility rating scale is a
Building—Contents and Presentation
translation of the requirement into a description of certain
ISO/DIS 7162 Draft International Standard, Performance
features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that
Standards in Building—Contents and Format of Standards
thefacilityislikelytomeetthatlevelofrequiredserviceability.
for Evaluation of Performance
ISO/DIS 7164 Draft International Standard, Performance
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-8)
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick Standards in Building—Definitions and Means of Expres-
sion for the Performance of a Whole Building
scanning, to estimate approximately, quickly, and
economically, how well an office facility is likely to meet the
3. Terminology
needs of one or another type of occupant group, over time.The
entries are not for measuring, knowing, or evaluating how an
3.1 Definitions:
office facility is performing.
3.1.1 facility, n—a physical setting used to serve a specific
purpose.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
3.1.1.1 Discussion—A facility may be within a building, or
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
a whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
and outline specifications have been prepared.
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability, but does not state
required to be used.
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components, and
E1334. The scales in Figs. 1-8 are complimentary to and
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical,
compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
importance of each performance requirement.
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
on Whole Buildings and Facilities. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved April 1, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005 as E1701 – 95 (2005). Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
DOI: 10.1520/E1701-95R12. the ASTM website.
2 4
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public www.astm.org.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
this standard is acknowledged. 4th Floor, New York, NY 10036, http://www.ansi.org.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
E1701−95 (2012)
FIG. 1 Scale B.2.1 for Reliability of External Supply
E1701−95 (2012)
FIG. 1 Scale B.2.1 for Reliability of External Supply (continued)
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in 4. Significance and Use
which business, clerical, or professional activities are con-
4.1 Each facility rating scale in this classification (see Figs.
ducted.
1-8) provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of
3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable a building or facility for one topic of serviceability, and to
to this classification, as well as those in 3.1.1 – 3.1.3, see compare that level against the level of any other building or
Terminology E631. facility.
E1701−95 (2012)
FIG. 2 Scale B.2.2 for Anticipated Remaining Service Life
4.2 This classification can be used for comparing how well 4.4.3 Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which a
different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement
remodeling has been planned.
for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such
4.5 Use of this classification does not result in building
aslocation, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building
evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis
shape.
generallyrequiresaspecialexpertiseinbuildingengineeringor
4.3 This classification can be used to estimate the amount of
technology,andtheuseofinstruments,tools,ormeasurements.
variance of serviceability from target or from requirement, for
a single office facility, or within a group of office facilities. 4.6 This classification applies only to facilities that are
building constructions, or parts there
...

Questions, Comments and Discussion

Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.