ASTM F1064-05
(Practice)Standard Practice for Sampling and Inspection of Complete and Incomplete Alpine Ski/Binding/Boot Systems in Rental Applications
Standard Practice for Sampling and Inspection of Complete and Incomplete Alpine Ski/Binding/Boot Systems in Rental Applications
SCOPE
1.1 This practice establishes a uniform method for the sampling and inspection of complete and incomplete Alpine ski/binding/boot systems used in rental operations. This practice is appropriate for use in rental applications in which all or part of the functional components of the system are supplied by the rental facility.
1.2 This practice should be followed by any facility that rents complete or incomplete Alpine ski/binding/boot systems to an end user.
Note 1—Refer to Practice F 1063 for equivalent procedures and tolerances for retail systems.
General Information
Relations
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:F1064–05
Standard Practice for
Sampling and Inspection of Complete and Incomplete
1
Alpine Ski/Binding/Boot Systems in Rental Applications
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F 1064; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (e) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Adhering to these guidelines may help to reduce the risk of injuries resulting from improper
mechanical functioning of releasable binding systems. However, skiing involves inherent and other
risks. Injury can result from simply falling down, impact with an object, or from many other actions.
Many injuries are unrelated to system function. Furthermore, even a properly functioning system
cannot protect the skier in all situations. Therefore, it is to be clearly understood that compliance with
these guidelines in no way guarantees that injury can be prevented.
1. Scope 3.1.1 Class I deviation—a minor deviation that does not
require corrective action, defined as 616 to 30 %, or two
1.1 This practice establishes a uniform method for the
horizontal rows up or down from the selected reference torque
sampling and inspection of complete and incomplete Alpine
value as determined on the binding manufacturer’s adjustment
ski/binding/boot systems used in rental operations. This prac-
chart. Class I deviations are used to determine the frequency of
tice is appropriate for use in rental applications in which all or
sampling. For a reference torque value of 8 Nm in twist and 29
partofthefunctionalcomponentsofthesystemaresuppliedby
Nm in forward lean (Skier Code A in Annex A2), a Class I
the rental facility.
deviation is a test result that is beyond the range of one row up
1.2 This practice should be followed by any facility that
and between one or two rows down on the adjustment chart.
rents complete or incomplete Alpine ski/binding/boot systems
3.1.2 Class II deviation—a minor deviation that prompts
to an end user.
inspectionoftheentireinventoryandcorrectiveaction,defined
NOTE 1—Refer to Practice F 1063 for equivalent procedures and
as 631 to 45 %, or three horizontal rows up or down from the
tolerances for retail systems.
selected reference torque value as determined on the binding
manufacturer’s adjustment chart. For a reference torque value
2. Referenced Documents
of 8 Nm in twist and 29 Nm in forward lean (Skier Code A in
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
AnnexA2), a Class II deviation is beyond the range of one row
F 939 Practice for Selection of Release Torque Values for
up or two rows down on the adjustment chart. For a reference
Alpine Ski Bindings
torque value of 11 Nm in twist and 40 Nm in forward lean
F 1063 Practice for Functional Inspections andAdjustments
(Skier Code B inAnnexA2), a Class II deviation is a test result
of Alpine Ski/Binding/Boot Systems
that is beyond the range of two rows up and between two and
three rows down on the adjustment chart.
3. Terminology
3.1.3 Class III deviation—a major deviation that prompts
3.1 Definitions:
corrective action and a review of all procedures, defined as
more than 645 %, or more than three horizontal rows up or
down from the selected reference torque value as determined
1
This practice is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F27 on Snow
on the binding manufacturer’s adjustment chart. The in-season
Skiing and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee F27.50 on Shop Procedures
sampling and inspection program is designed to render the
(Retail and Rental).
occurrence of a Class III deviation unlikely. For a reference
Current edition approved Oct. 1, 2005. Published November 2005. Originally
approved in 1989. Last previous edition approved in 2003 as F 1064 – 03.
torquevalueof8Nmintwistand29Nminforwardlean(Skier
2
For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Code A in Annex A2), and 11 Nm in twist and 40 Nm in
contact ASTM Customer Service at service@astm.org. For Annual Book of ASTM
forward lean (Skier Code B inAnnexA2), a Class III deviation
Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
the ASTM website. is not applicable.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959, United States.
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1064–05
3.1.4 clean versus lubricated tolerance—the accepted dif- 3.1.18 reference torque value—the nominal release torque
ference between clean and lubricated test result(s), defined as value derived from a document compatible with Practice F 939
not more than 20 % of the clean test, used whenever a such as Annex A3 or information supplied by the b
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.