ASTM F1790/F1790M-15
(Test Method)Standard Test Method for Measuring Cut Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing with CPP Test Equipment
Standard Test Method for Measuring Cut Resistance of Materials Used in Protective Clothing with CPP Test Equipment
SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
5.1 This test method assesses the cut resistance of a material when exposed to a cutting edge under specified loads. Data obtained from this test method can be used to compare the cut resistance of different materials.
5.2 This test method only addresses that range of cutting hazards that are related to a cutting action by a smooth sharp edge across the surface of the material. It is not representative of any other cutting hazard to which the material may be subjected such as serrated edges, saw blades or motorized cutting tools. Nor is it representative of puncture, tear, or other modes of fabric failure.
SCOPE
1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the cut resistance of a material when mounted on a mandrel and subjected to a cutting edge under a specified load using the Cut Protection Performance (CPP) Tester.
1.1.1 This procedure is not valid for high-porosity materials which allow cutting edge contact with the mounting surface prior to cutting.
1.1.2 Test apparatus may have limitations in testing materials with a thickness greater than 3 mm or having a high frictional coefficient such as elastomers.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
General Information
Buy Standard
Standards Content (Sample)
NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation: F1790/F1790M − 15
Standard Test Method for
Measuring Cut Resistance of Materials Used in Protective
1
Clothing with CPP Test Equipment
ThisstandardisissuedunderthefixeddesignationF1790/F1790M;thenumberimmediatelyfollowingthedesignationindicatestheyear
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Cut resistance is an important property for protective clothing and equipment, and several standard
testing devices have been adopted across different industries to measure this property. A common
practiceincutresistancetestingistosubjectamaterialspecimentoatransverselymovingbladeunder
an applied load and measure the distance of blade travel required to cut through the specimen. This
test method calculates the load required to cut through different specimens at 25.4 mm [1 in.] blade
travel. This calculated load, defined as the calculated cutting load, can be used to compare the cut
resistance of materials.
The original F1790-97 test method defined a commercially-available apparatus known as the Cut
Protection Performance Tester (CPP). In an attempt to harmonize F1790/F1790M with ISO 13997
(another international testing standard for measuring cut resistance) and improve the test method, the
scope of the test method was changed in F1790-05 to allow the use of other cut testing equipment,
specificallytheTomodynamometer(TDM-100)andamodificationtotheCPParmcalledtheModified
CPP (mCPP). The revision addressed issues related to measurement of high frictional coefficient
materials like elastomers, specimen mounting, calculated cutting load determination, and other
procedures to harmonize with ISO 13997:1999. After further round-robin evaluation by the
subcommittee, it was demonstrated that the revisions to the test method result in a bias between the
original F1790-97 test method and the revised F1790-05 test method when using the CPP. F1790-05
wasnotwidelyadoptedinNorthAmericabecauseofthisbiasandlargeamountofdataandexperience
accumulated with F1790-97. F1790-97 continues to be the test method predominately practiced when
using the CPP device. To reduce confusion for end-users of F1790/F1790M and to allow for
differences between testing devices, the subcommittee has decided to limit the scope of F1790/
F1790M to include only the CPP device and created a separate test method for use of the TDM-100
(Test Method F2992/F2992M).
1. Scope 1.1.2 Test apparatus may have limitations in testing materi-
als with a thickness greater than 3 mm or having a high
1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the cut
frictional coefficient such as elastomers.
resistance of a material when mounted on a mandrel and
subjected to a cutting edge under a specified load using the Cut 1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units
Protection Performance (CPP) Tester. are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in
1.1.1 This procedure is not valid for high-porosity materials each system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each
which allow cutting edge contact with the mounting surface system shall be used independently of the other. Combining
prior to cutting. values from the two systems may result in non-conformance
with the standard.
1
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the
ThistestmethodisunderthejurisdictionofASTMCommitteeF23onPersonal
Protective Clothing and Equipment and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the
F23.20 on Physical.
responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appro-
Current edition approved Nov. 1, 2015. Published January 2016. Originally
priate safety and health practices and determine the applica-
approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 2014 as F1790/F1790M – 14.
DOI: 10.1520/F1790_F1790M-15. bility of regulatory limitations prior to use.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1790/F1790M − 15
1.4 This international standard was developed in accor- isolating the external environment from contamination by the
dance with internationally recognized principles on standard- wearer of the clothing.
ization established in the Decision on Principles for the 3.1.6.1 Discussion—Inthistestmethod,thepotentialhazard
Development of International Standards, Guides and Recom- is cutting.
mendations issued by the World Trade Organization Technical
3.1.7 calculated cutting load, n—in cut resistance testing,
Barriers to Trade (TBT) Committee.
the load required to cause a cutting edge to produce a cut
thro
...
This document is not an ASTM standard and is intended only to provide the user of an ASTM standard an indication of what changes have been made to the previous version. Because
it may not be technically possible to adequately depict all changes accurately, ASTM recommends that users consult prior editions as appropriate. In all cases only the current version
of the standard as published by ASTM is to be considered the official document.
Designation: F1790/F1790M − 14 F1790/F1790M − 15
Standard Test Method for
Measuring Cut Resistance of Materials Used in Protective
1
Clothing with CPP Test Equipment
This standard is issued under the fixed designation F1790/F1790M; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year
of original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval.
A superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
INTRODUCTION
Cut resistance is an important property for protective clothing and equipment, and several standard
testing devices have been adopted across different industries to measure this property. A common
practice in cut resistance testing is to subject a material specimen to a transversely moving blade under
an applied load and measure the distance of blade travel required to cut through the specimen. This
test method calculates the load required to cut through different specimens at 25.4 mm [1 in.] blade
travel. This calculated load, defined as a rating the calculated cutting load, can be used to compare the
cut resistance of materials.
The original F1790-97 test method defined a commercially-available apparatus known as the Cut
Protection Performance Tester (CPP). In an attempt to harmonize F1790/F1790M with ISO
1399613997 (another international testing standardsstandard for measuring cut resistance) and
improve the test method, the scope of the test method was changed in F1790-05 to allow the use of
other cut testing equipment, specifically the Tomodynamometer (TDM-100) and a modification to the
CPP arm called the Modified CPP (mCPP). The revision addressed issues related to measurement of
high frictional coefficient materials like elastomers, specimen mounting, rating calculated cutting load
calculation,determination, and other procedures to harmonize with ISO 13997:1999. After further
round-robin evaluation by the subcommittee, it was demonstrated that the revisions to the test method
result in a bias between the original F1790-97 test method and the revised F1790-05 test method when
using the CPP. F1790-05 was not widely adopted in North America because of this bias and large
amount of data and experience accumulated with F1790-97. F1790-97 continues to be the test method
predominately practiced when using the CPP device. To reduce confusion for end-users of
F1790/F1790M and to allow for differences between testing devices, the subcommittee has decided to
limit the scope of F1790/F1790M to include only the CPP device and createcreated a separate test
method for use of the TDM-100.TDM-100 (Test Method F2992/F2992M).
1. Scope
1.1 This test method covers the measurement of the cut resistance of a material when mounted on a mandrel and subjected to
a cutting edge under a specified load using the Cut Protection Performance (CPP) Tester.
1.1.1 This procedure is not valid for high-porosity materials which allow cutting edge contact with the mounting surface prior
to cutting.
1.1.2 Test apparatus may have limitations in testing materials with a thickness greater than 3 mm or having a high frictional
coefficient such as elastomers.
1.2 The values stated in either SI units or inch-pound units are to be regarded separately as standard. The values stated in each
system may not be exact equivalents; therefore, each system shall be used independently of the other. Combining values from the
two systems may result in non-conformance with the standard.
1.3 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility
of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory
limitations prior to use.
1
This test method is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee F23 on Personal Protective Clothing and Equipment and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee
F23.20 on Physical.
Current edition approved Jan. 1, 2014Nov. 1, 2015. Published February 2014January 2016. Originally approved in 1997. Last previous edition approved in 20052014 as
F1790 - 05.F1790/F1790M – 14. DOI: 10.1520/F1790_F1790M-14.10.1520/F1790_F1790M-15.
Copyright © ASTM International, 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959. United States
1
---------------------- Page: 1 ----------------------
F1790/F1790M − 15
2. Referenced Documents
2
2.1 ASTM Standards:
D123 Terminology Relating to Textiles
D1000 Test Methods for Pressure-Sen
...
Questions, Comments and Discussion
Ask us and Technical Secretary will try to provide an answer. You can facilitate discussion about the standard in here.