ASTM E1670-95a(2012)

Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Management of Operations and Maintenance

SIGNIFICANCE AND USE
Each Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) in this classification provides a means to estimate the level of serviceability of a building or facility for one topic of serviceability and to compare that level against the level of any other building or facility.
This classification can be used for comparing how well different buildings or facilities meet a particular requirement for serviceability. It is applicable despite differences such as location, structure, mechanical systems, age, and building shape.
This classification can be used to estimate the following:
Serviceability of an existing facility for uses other than its present use.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility that has been planned but not yet built.
Serviceability (potential) of a facility for which remodeling has been planned.
Use of this classification does not result in building evaluation or diagnosis. Building evaluation or diagnosis generally requires a special expertise in building engineering or technology and the use of instruments, tools, or measurements.
This classification applies only to facilities that are building constructions, or parts thereof. (While this classification may be useful in rating the serviceability of facilities that are not building constructions, such facilities are outside the scope of this classification.)
This classification is not intended for, and is not suitable for, use for regulatory purposes, nor for fire hazard assessment nor for fire risk assessment.
SCOPE
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the capability of an office facility to meet certain possible requirements for operations and maintenance.
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales, shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceability. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic, which occupants might require. The matching entry in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the requirement into a description of certain features of a facility which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely to meet that level of required serviceability.
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or diagnosing it.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings and outline specifications have been prepared.
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a serviceability score. That information is found in Practice E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
FIG. 1 Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance
FIG. 1Scale B.3.1 for Strategy and Program for Operations and Maintenance  (continued)
FIG. 2 Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff
FIG. 2Scale B.3.2 for Competences of In-house Staff  (continued)
FIG. 3 Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction
FIG. 3Scale B.3.3 for Occupant Satisfaction  (continued)
FIG. 4 Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption
FIG. 4Scale B.3.4 for Information on Unit Costs and Consumption (continued)

General Information

• Status: Historical
• Publication Date: 31-Mar-2012
• ICS: 35.260 - Office machines
• Technical Committee: E06 - Performance of Buildings
• Drafting Committee: E06.25 - Whole Buildings and Facilities

Relations

• Replaces: ASTM E1670-95a(2005) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Management of Operations and Maintenance
• Effective Date: 01-Apr-2012
• Replaced By: ASTM E1670-95a(2018) - Standard Classification for Serviceability of an Office Facility for Management of Operations and Maintenance
• Effective Date: 01-Mar-2018
• Referred By: ASTM E3035-15(2020) - Standard Classification for Facility Asset Component Tracking System (FACTS)
• Effective Date: 01-Apr-2012
• Referred By: ASTM E1765-16(2023) - Standard Practice for Applying Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP) to Multiattribute Decision Analysis of Investments Related to Projects, Products, and Processes
• Effective Date: 01-Apr-2012

Standards Content (Sample)

NOTICE: This standard has either been superseded and replaced by a new version or withdrawn.
Contact ASTM International (www.astm.org) for the latest information
Designation:E1670 −95a (Reapproved 2012) An American National Standard
Standard Classification for
Serviceability of an Office Facility for Management of
1,2
Operations and Maintenance
This standard is issued under the fixed designation E1670; the number immediately following the designation indicates the year of
original adoption or, in the case of revision, the year of last revision. A number in parentheses indicates the year of last reapproval. A
superscript epsilon (´) indicates an editorial change since the last revision or reapproval.
1. Scope 2. Referenced Documents
2.1 ASTM Standards:
1.1 This classification covers pairs of scales for classifying
E631 Terminology of Building Constructions
an aspect of the serviceability of an office facility, that is, the
E1334 Practice for Rating the Serviceability of a Building or
capability of an office facility to meet certain possible require-
Building-Related Facility (Withdrawn 2013)
ments for operations and maintenance.
E1679 Practice for Setting the Requirements for the Service-
1.2 Within that aspect of serviceability, each pair of scales,
ability of a Building or Building-Related Facility, and for
shown in Figs. 1-4, are for classifying one topic of serviceabil-
Determining What Serviceability is Provided or Proposed
ity. Each paragraph in an Occupant Requirement Scale (see
2.2 ISO Document:
Figs. 1-4) summarizes one level of serviceability on that topic,
ISO 6240 International Standard, Performance Standards in
which occupants might require. The matching entry in the
Building—Contents and Presentation
Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4) is a translation of the
3. Terminology
requirement into a description of certain features of a facility
which, taken in combination, indicate that the facility is likely
3.1 Definitions:
to meet that level of required serviceability.
3.1.1 facility—a physical setting used to serve a specific
purpose. E631
1.3 The entries in the Facility Rating Scale (see Figs. 1-4)
3.1.1.1 Discussion— A facility may be within a building, a
are indicative and not comprehensive. They are for quick
whole building, or a building with its site and surrounding
scanning and rating a facility and not for evaluating or
environment; or it may be a construction that is not a building.
diagnosing it.
The term encompasses both the physical object and its use.
1.4 This classification can be used to estimate the level of
3.1.2 facility serviceability—the capability of a facility to
serviceability of an existing facility. It can also be used to
perform the function(s) for which it is designed, used, or
estimate the serviceability of a facility that has been planned
required to be used. E631
but not yet built, such as one for which single-line drawings
3.1.2.1 Discussion—The scope of this performance is of the
and outline specifications have been prepared.
facility as a system, including its subsystems, components and
materials and their interactions, such as acoustical,
1.5 This classification indicates what would cause a facility
hydrothermal, air purity, and economic; and of the relative
to be rated at a certain level of serviceability but does not state
importance of each performance requirement.
how to conduct a serviceability rating nor how to assign a
3.1.3 offıce—a place, such as a room, suite, or building, in
serviceability score. That information is found in Practice
which business, clerical or professional activities are
E1334. The scales in this classification are complimentary to
conducted. E631
and compatible with Practice E1334. Each requires the other.
3.1.4 For standard definitions of additional terms applicable
to this classification, see Terminology E631.
This classification is under the jurisdiction of ASTM Committee E06 on
Performance of Buildings and is the direct responsibility of Subcommittee E06.25
on Whole Buildings and Facilities. For referenced ASTM standards, visit the ASTM website, www.astm.org, or
Current edition approved April 1, 2012. Published May 2012. Originally contact ASTM Customer Service at [e-mail]. For Annual Book of ASTM
approved in 1995. Last previous edition approved in 2005E1670 – 95a (2005). DOI: Standards volume information, refer to the standard’s Document Summary page on
10.1520/E1670-95AR12. the ASTM website.
2 4
Portions of this document are based on material originally prepared by the The last approved version of this historical standard is referenced on
International Centre for Facilities (ICF) and © 1993 by ICF and Minister of Public www.astm.org.
Works and Government Services Canada. Their cooperation in the development of Available from American National Standards Institute (ANSI), 25 W. 43rd St.,
this standard is acknowledged. 4th Floor, New
...